President Nixon met with Ron Ziegler, John Dean, and Henry Kissinger to discuss the ongoing Watergate investigation and the administration's public relations strategy. Key topics included how to respond to press inquiries about executive privilege, the Segretti case, and the administration's cooperation with investigators. Nixon and Ziegler strategized on managing press conferences and limiting the disclosure of FBI raw files to avoid further complications.
On March 14, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon, Ronald L. Ziegler, White House operator, John W. Dean, III, Manolo Sanchez, and Henry A. Kissinger met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 4:25 pm to 5:40 pm. The Old Executive Office Building taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 419-034 of the White House Tapes.
Nixon Library Finding Aid
Conversation No. 419-34
Date: March 14, 1973
Time: 4:25 pm - 5:40 pm
Location: Executive Office Building
The President met with Ronald L. Ziegler.
Ziegler's press conference
-Executive privilege
-John W. Dean, III
-Watergate
-Administration cooperation with investigators
-John N. Mitchell
-Dean
-Richard A. Moore
-Further questions on Watergate
-Executive privilege
-Emphasis on cooperation
-Restrictions on raw files disclosure
The President talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 4:25 pm and
4:34 pm.
-45-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
[Conversation No. 419-34A]
[See Conversation No. 37-107]
[End of telephone conversation]
Watergate
-Donald H. Segretti case
-Ziegler's statements
-White House involvement
The President talked with John W. Dean, III at an unknown time between 4:25 pm and 4:34 pm.
[Conversation No. 419-34B]
[See Conversation No. 37-108]
Show the rest of the log (483 more lines)
[End of telephone conversation]
Watergate
-Segretti case
-White House involvement
-Dwight L. Chapin's involvement
-Questions to Ziegler
-Political sabotage and espionage
-White House involvement
-Chapin-Segretti link
-Confirmation
-L[ouis] Patrick Gray, III's testimony
-Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI] interviews
-Herbert W. Kalmbach
-Ziegler's remarks
-Use of FBI raw files
-American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU] guidelines
-Public release
-John Chancellor’s file
-Destruction
-Lyndon B. Johnson, J. Edgar Hoover
-46-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman
-William E. Timmons
-Wife
-Validity
-President’s file
-Ziegler’s file
-President's reply at press conference
-Dean's report
-White House involvement
-Ervin Committee investigation
-Guidelines
-Hearsay prohibition
-Press questions
-President's reaction to reports on Segretti
-Dean investigation
-Chapin involvement
The President talked with Dean between 4:34 pm and 4:36 pm.
[Conversation No. 419-34C]
[See Conversation No. 37-109]
[End of telephone conversation]
Watergate
-President's press conference
-Raw files disclosure
-Answer
-Dean's investigation
-Problems
-Further comments
-Segretti case
-Investigation
-Segretti's actions
-Chapin
-Hiring of Segretti
-Contacts of Segretti, Mitchell, and Kalmbach
-47-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
Wounded Knee incident
-Patrick J. Buchanan
-President’s response
-Justice Department investigation
-Indians' actions
-Buchanan
-Radicals
-President’s response
Shield laws
-President’s position
-Mitchell's policy
-Ziegler
-[First name unknown] Dixon’s testimony
-Justice Department
-Support for guidelines
-Legislation
-Questions about First Amendment
-Federal compared to state courts
-Restatement
-Conflict of rights
-Rights of reporters
-First Amendment
-Protection from crime
-President’s conversation with reporter
-Press coverage
-Ziegler’s attendance at joint meeting of press organizations [?]
-Definition of a reporter
-Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union [TASS] [?]
-Columbia Broadcasting System [CBS]
-Dangers of law
-Emotional rhetoric
-Legislation
-First Amendment
-Passage
-Abuse of protection
-Congress
-48-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Discrediting of press
-State court decisions
-Bransburg [?] decision
-Federal remedy
-Meetings with American Bar Association [ABA]
-First Amendment
-Freedom of the press
-Qualifier
-End of contract
Congressional relations
-Executive privilege
-President’s letter [statement]
-Responsibility
-Fiscal side
-Political side
-Power of presidency
-Criticism
-Use by President
-Frequency
-Records
-Cooperation with Congress
-Dan Rather
-Briefing
-Dean [?]
-Television [TV]
-Alger Hiss case
-President’s experience
-FBI assistance
-Harry S Truman's Executive Order of non-cooperation with Congress
-Government departments
-Information sharing
-Comparison with current administration
-Nature of espionage
Watergate
-Ziegler's talk with James C. Haggerty
-Executive privilege
-49-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-International Telephone and Telegraph [ITT] case
-Army-McCarthy hearings
-Ziegler’s childhood memory
-Henry A. Kissinger [?]
-Dan Rather [?]
-As national issue
-Hearings on TV
-Testimony
-Mitchell, Maurice H. Stans, Chapin, Dean
-Segretti
-Subpoenas
-Executive privilege
-Mitchell
-Stans
-Joseph R. McCarthy hearings
-Mitchell, Stans and Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.
-Hiss case
-Press stories and reactions
-Impact on establishment
-Press conference
-Questions
-Dean
-Gray
-Segretti case
-Dean's investigation
-White House staff
-Chapin
-Impact on White House staff
-Ziegler
-Confrontations with press
-Ervin hearings
-Guidelines for conduct
-Hearsay
-Gray
-Hearings
-John V. Tunney
-California
-Edward M. (“Ted”) Kennedy
-50-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Difficulties
Press conference questions
-North Vietnam
-Infiltration
-George P. Shultz’s Europe trip
-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics [USSR]
-Paris
-International finance
-Press conference
-Soviet Jews
-Leonid I. Brezhnev [?]
-Pakistan
-US arms sale
-Announcement
-Protest
-Vietnam agreement
-North Vietnam’s infiltration
-PRC, USSR
-John T. Downey
-Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]
-Release from PRC
Press conferences
-Balance
-Frequency
-Subjects
-Troop withdrawal
-Congress, domestic issues
-Vietnam settlement
-TV coverage
-Announcement before Congress
-Response
-Benefits
Amnesty
-Frequency
-Staggered pattern
-Control
-51-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Role as event for publicity
-Compared to Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy
-Kennedy
-Events for publicity
-Staggered patterns
-Press coverage
-Live, day time
-Value
-Amount of play
-Radio
-Evening
-Format
-East Room
-Press Room
-East Room as setting
-Preparation
-Amount of time
-Worthiness
-Use of President’s energy
-Value of press conferences
-Types of questions
-Participatory
Rural Environmental Assistance Program [REAP]
-Paper
-Distribution
Manolo Sanchez entered at an unknown time after 4:36 pm.
Henry A. Kissinger
-Presence at meeting
-Secretary
Sanchez left at an unknown time before 5:29 pm.
REAP
-Bud Linewall [?]
-Office of Kenneth W. Clawson
-52-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Column
-Congressional Record
-United Press International [UPI]
-Expansion of story
-Unnamed woman
-Number of acres [?]
-Wealth
-Washington Post
Press coverage
-Handling
-Honest reporting
-Pressure
-Fairness
-Spiro T. Agnew’s speech
-Administration’s effectiveness
-Overtness
-Repressiveness
-Control by administration
-Skillfulness
-Hardness
-William S. Paley
-Credit
-Respect
-President’s response to a question
-Tone
-Power of Presidency
-Clarity
-Quality
-Networks
-Use of prime time
-Concerns
-Control by administration
Press conference
-Vesco case
-Handling
-John D. Ehrlichman
-53-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Stans
-Contributions
-President’s comments
Sanchez entered at an unknown time after 4:36 pm.
Kissinger
-Location
-Presence at meeting
-Timing
Sanchez left at an unknown time before 5:29 pm.
Henry A. Kissinger entered at 5:29 pm.
Anatoliy F. Dobrynin
Ziegler left at 5:30 pm.
Pakistan
-Announcement
-US aid
Watergate
-Samuel J. Ervin, Jr’s statement
-Constitutional requirements
-Separation of powers
-President’s aides
-Questioning
-Segretti case [?]
-President’s press conference
-Dean’s investigation
-Responses to questions
-Clear position
-Standards
-Cooperation
-54-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-FBI investigation
-Interrogations
-Unnamed woman’s [Judy Hoback ?] request
-Private interview
-Presence of lawyers
-Handling of press questions
-Posture
-Seniority
-FBI interview of secretary
-Question for Committee to Re-elect the President [CRP]
-Follow up about accountability
-Danger
-Distortion, hearsay information
-Final statement
-Ervin Committee
-Segretti
-Administration’s disapproval
-Chapin
-Letters [?]
North Vietnam
-Forces in Cambodia
-Withdrawal
-US aid request
-President's press conference
-Explicit statement aid
-Prisoners of war [POWs]
-Agreement on ending war and restoring peace in Vietnam
-Article 20
-Cambodia and Laos
-Cease-fire compliance
-Compared withdrawal
Sudan
-Message
-Terrorism
-President’s statement
-55-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
USSR
-Shultz's meeting with Brezhnev
-Soviet Jews
-Press coverage
-Mission
-Authorization
-President's response at press conference
-Hard line
-Most-favored-nation [MFN] status
-Foreign policy
-Shultz’s discussion with Brezhnev
-USSR’s initiative
US-USSR trade relations
-Soviet Jews
-Press coverage
-Congress
-Kissinger's meeting with Henry M. (“Scoop”) Jackson
-Decency
-Potential as Defense Secretary
Vietnam
-Cease-fire
-North Vietnam strategy
-Tests
-US withdrawal
-Communications
Sanchez entered at an unknown time after 5:30 pm.
President’s schedule
-Telephone call [?]
Sanchez left at an unknown time before 5:40 pm.
Vietnam
-Cease-fire
-North Vietnam strategy
-56-
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
Conversation No. 419-34 (cont’d)
-Economic aid
-US negotiations with PRC, USSR
Kissinger's conversation with Dobrynin
-US-USSR relations
-Soviet military aid to North Vietnam
-Answers to US challenges
-Civilian goods
-Tanks
United Nations [UN]
-Kurt Waldheim
-Offices for Vietcong [VC] or Vietminh
-Recall of John A. Scali from post
President’s statement
-Aid [?]
Kissinger left at 5:40 pm.
Transcript (AI-generated)
This transcript was made by an AI model listening to the recording (gemini-3.8-flash) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Speaker names are the model's inference from the voices and the participant list. Words and names can still be wrong — verify against the audio and the finding aid before citing.
NixonWell, I think you have to emphasize, Ron, that what happened yesterday, that you can't have this, you can't have this
NixonYou can have a representative stand up there, raise his hand and swear, and tell all the facts, whatever he knows, he can testify, but you can't do it in this form. That is an interrogation.
NixonJust as you would question a felon, that's what Gray's being, like he had done something wrong.
ZieglerWell, the questioning of executive privilege-
NixonI see, but the point you want to bury in the first paragraph is one, the willingness to cooperate, and that is not changed, that is, but we are
Nixonwilling to answer questions [crosstalk] under oath, and all the rest, but on the other hand-
ZieglerSubmitting written questions [crosstalk] backed by a sworn
NixonAnd, do you know whether or not, uh, there've have been any other instances where raw files of the FBI have been turned over to any congressional-
NixonYou call the FBI if Pat Gray's not home, find out, they are going to have their ass in high roller here. I'm fired up about that, girl, I mean that. I mean, you tell them.
ZieglerThe, uh, on the Segretti investigation, the Washington Post piece-
NixonWe, we took that on in October, 18th of October, Ron.
Zieglerdirected it. Now, that was filed in October, and it got blew up, and the focus went onto other areas. The focus came back to the Segretti-Chapin thing
Zieglerthis week after the Gray hearing, where he released the FBI
Unknownhear what's said about [unintelligible]
ZieglerRight. So, then they asked me about that and I said, well, having carefully listened to the question, [unintelligible], and I said, "I have nothing else to add to what I said previously on the subject. I stand on every statement that I made in the morning on this subject."
ZieglerThen, I said, "I am, uh, we're concerned about the use of raw and unevaluated files." And supported Gray's, the position Gray had taken,
Zieglerthe position where they set up some guidelines as to how the files, the FBI files, are used in a, in an executive session. Judiciary Committee, they are not public, and that they, you know, they're going through a searching checkpoint so that the file doesn't get into the hands of the committee in general, or, released publicly,
Nixonreleased publicly, with false information about an individual that has never been checked out.
ZieglerYes, sir. That, uh, brings people into a, into a problem who are seconds, flatly in accurate. That's, uh, right, Bob?
NixonWell, somebody knows that they actually did want to turn in on a candidate. The other candidate's turned in.
Nixon[unintelligible] I know what was the other guy's name?
ZieglerWait. I bet they'd go crazy [unintelligible]
— 2 min 9 s with no transcribed speech —
Zieglerwell, uh, uh, uh, the Secretary, uh, the Great House, uh, we've set up for the, uh, this many more of their, uh, their hearings by partisan way, that we will rule out hearsay, that we will rule out closed-door sessions, and we'll rule out charges of anything as long as they apply for those rules,
Zieglerthey want to conduct it, they'll call another man. Non-partisan, hearsay, innocent people slandered, it will be the
ZieglerThat's another shot across the bow, and what I mean is that, that no that no innocent person could ever- ever be named without hearsay. It's the hearsay that we want to rule out. If we enforce that rule, hearsay would be hearsay, whether it be a lawyer and all other, but it's hearsay which could be a bad word. A lot of good in that, I think the shot across the bow.
ZieglerThe matter would be, they want to be in the position of Dean, for example, and say, well, that's they're liable to get into it. Okay, well, hell, I don't care [unintelligible] who the hell, you know, I, whatever they got in there. Then the question would be whether or not you'd say, Well, Dean conducted the investigation, is that what you did?
NixonOr do you want me not to say Well, I uh this thing. I have never said that. [laughter] Okay. You think that's pressed for it, well ask questions, you see, I mean, if somebody should bring that in, would he have any reason to
ZieglerBecause they say, I had to report on the matter as that and why he was checking whether or not anybody in the White House staff was involved in such activity, direct or indirect, such activity.
NixonI know. Now having said that, huh, then you get a second question. As to whether or not you are aware, or whether or not the Dean investigation showed that
NixonChapin did, indeed, hire Segretti. Who he hired.
ZieglerWhat they mean is, that they have never, formally, turned over raw files to a committee. Now, informally, they have taken files up and shown them to Eastland, when he, for example, was conducting a judge. They've done that. Yeah.
ZieglerYeah, that's right. They take the- but they couldn't turn the files informally. But what they did
ZieglerAnd so, in other words, we've been, the statement, very forthright in terms of forward of information than has applied to any other [unintelligible]. I think maybe you should listen to that Joe, Joe who's later on.
ZieglerWhat I get at is this, I want to say, would always refer to raw files never to raw raw raw files to a committee. They know this. We've got neither of them on basis of, totally secure [unintelligible]
NixonNever been, never, they regularly went through all raw files. They walked
Nixonin their office, and took everything. [unintelligible] Exactly.
NixonAll that question, Ziegler, you could say uh just say, "Gentlemen, I have never commented on it, and it's simply a nonsense."
ZieglerMaybe I could just stay off the thing completely, though. Uh-huh. Well, I don't know, I mean. If I say that they have this afternoon, maybe they'll comment on it anyway. Maybe I just better stay out, so they won't have
Nixontell me now, where did the money come from, and all of that. Hell, no. All of that that's their big star.
ZieglerI think it's better to stay, I'm not gonna comment on that matter, because it's [unintelligible] All right, just stay off it. I think I'll just draw a line there.
NixonCourse they could've said, could say, and not to Dean, you can say, "I'm not gonna have anything further to say about whatever it was we discussed, over here, and at the committee. I will tell you that I I heard about this [unintelligible] private
Nixonprivate investigator, or study. Now, did that make news for people who paid him? Did Congress follow along so they won't pay for other activities? All right. And directly, that takes Care of this, because the second you have to go into definition of what it is, Yeah, it's not trying.
ZieglerI just think I'll stay, stay out of it. I think I'd better stay out of it. Let them say that, "Ron, is under investigation." So, that's that's all.
ZieglerThe whole thing is so goddamned foolish. You know, the activities, on crap totally separate from the Watergate. They got sabotage, and they got all In fact, the, what they think about is much worse than what has happened.
Zieglercontact Kalmbach who [unintelligible] We even said that about four or five weeks
Nixonago. Well, but there's nothing, I'm not questioning the truth of it, Ron, I'm only talking about
Nixontactics. It's a killer. If they get into the tactics, Ron, you can't, it's all caught up in that. As long as you I understand that. As long as you respond only to the The best way is to fall into their
ZieglerNo, I'm, I don't say, I'm not gonna, I'm not, just had to, like it, and, I, like that you know that it hadn't, but
Zieglerbearing in mind the matter that it has, has been raised by, as you know, both parties, and, it will be up to your criteria, then to be seriously reports on the, on the, on the 70s. I said they're crafty. Yeah. I didn't think they'd run through all those names, because that report had leads,
Zieglerreports on it, Well, they can't. Why didn't they take the raw file?
NixonNo, because he owns a crash tool, and home, and I Maybe you could watch the crowd, they're wrong. Okay.
NixonWell, these guys will really, But on the other, the other issue, Well, I am not gonna get This plays into their For you to comment, this plays into their hand. Now, the other thing is in regard to that,
Zieglerthe whole issue of shield law is really around.
NixonWhat did you say [unintelligible] I don't give a damn about a shield or no shield.
ZieglerI could only say to this the Attorney General ventured a statement of policy on that that he put a policy through where the Justice Department
NixonYou state your belief should not be, we shouldn't
ZieglerSo, you have stated that later on that the federal shield law really would not be [unintelligible]
NixonWe don't particularly oppose codifying that [unintelligible] guidelines, because there's no need to do it because they're working. And we have serious questions about whether it is, whether it's supported by the First Amendment, particularly as it applies to state courts because we are, those issues are not right, you know.
ZieglerMaybe I could state that. The sixth, testified on this and today I stand by those words and what I thought, what was, what was a point I figured you might have, I might even say this to, they're going call on me for the right of reporters to the freedom of the press,
Nixonright of people to be protected against crime. What's the right of people to justice?
ZieglerThree principles that really ought to be discussed in the media
NixonYeah. The basic six point for the right of reporters to freedom of the press, the right of people to protection against crime, and the right to justice.
Nixonto see its information. I believe in free press for the right of people to freedom from crime and to protection against crime and those are the rights for justice. And that is his, and I, I think I will over the weekend, Ron, and write a little statement that you can always point to, because they're going to keep hammering on this.
ZieglerListen, you know what, I heard Ron Nessen say if you don't have a shield law they're going to get a lot of jackasses passed in others, called them, 'Who's a reporter?' You call a reporter that would, would push girl or whoever it happened to be, you know.
ZieglerIt scares the hell out of them because of what they're doing now. I told them to keep briefed, because what the press is doing is on a wave of emotion,
Ziegleron a wave of misunderstanding, on a wave of expanded rhetoric, not only from the standpoint of freedom of the press, but from the standpoint of how the media have acted toward this administration,
Zieglerterms of the rhetoric, you might legislate away the First Amendment. I said, you have no chance for absolute shield. None. You'll legislate, modify a shield law and,
Zieglerit is conceivable, which it won't be, in next four, six years that once you cross the barrier, legislate away the First Amendment in that, they get into steps to take for the Congress getting in it where the press, the right of the people to a free press will be impeded,
Zieglerand they stopped. And they haven't come back on that since.
NixonI, and also tell them, I'm not, saying that there is not a problem with the state court. [unintelligible] That where the problem is, it's not the federal. It is in the
ZieglerThat's where the problem is. In the states.
NixonSince the Branzburg decision, many state courts have gone a little far down that road. If they finally take their problem, that's been a court problem, they know that.
ZieglerNow they don't, they're looking for federal remedies.
NixonWhat they should do is assume state [unintelligible]
ZieglerI argue strongly that if you begin to legislate the First Amendment guarantee, that's a guarantee for the press. Anything you do that's qualified will add to it little at all.
ZieglerWe've drawn the line far, far harder on the Watergate situation, much harder. The questions come, [unintelligible] that's also the question this evening and the question [unintelligible]
NixonOn, on one side, they force the President [unintelligible] more power [unintelligible] have the power [unintelligible]
ZieglerI make it perfectly clear in all of these briefings that this administration has used less executive privilege, I will make that safe assertion,
NixonWell they don't, I don't know the FBI part. But the Department of Justice, and everybody the Department of Justice has had, the, with the White House, will cooperate with, in every way we can. They'll furnish any and each person, they'll furnish both the, they'll furnish the information and so forth and so on. We have absolutely, uh, we have been uh, totally
ZieglerI think we'll probably get diverted by that. I mean, if he leaked it for that
NixonWell, that's going to take right into the four months, you know, for the Gray hearings. It'll take quite a while for Gray to get through with this. The only thing I can think, if they didn't, go ahead and ask a question about Dean, Gray
NixonAll right, I don't think tomorrow, that he's going to get into [unintelligible] that would be the best. Make that a whole change of script tonight.
ZieglerWell, I resolved Friday this far. I stepped up and said, "Look, that's a matter—" Well, I said, "I've already I've covered that and I have endeavors about it so forth and, ah, the only question I have been asked is Did Dean conduct an investigation?"
ZieglerAnd I have said, "Well, would you just say yes?" and I nodded.
NixonWhy not say, "Gentlemen, I just said to that, ah, that you've asked me scoopfuls of questions on this, but while it's evident right now that there are more questions on this,
Nixonall I can say on, ah, on it, and all they were responding that you shoot, and they'll get frustrated by that.
NixonBecause if if you get into You make a mistake if you just tease them up with questions, you know. They can, they can ask you so many, you know.
ZieglerWhy not just say, "Dean, Dean responded to questions regarding Watergate, but when you stop to consider the whole wiretap thing, it was a totally different, ah,
Ziegleroperation that went far beyond, and for that reason, all that was said
NixonThe Ervin Senate, tell him Ervin, tell him there's naturally [unintelligible] [whispering]
NixonI was asking today of whether the question to be asked about Gray, does this mean you intend to, they'll bring all of them in the White House [unintelligible]
ZieglerThey asked him about, they said, "Well, the question would be what, would it ever include John Dean?" I said, "Well, whatever the Senate may do, the question is, will he come up, and will you cooperate with a congressional committee?" We have never said that we would not provide information
Ziegler[unintelligible] And they asked, "Has he got subpoenas?" [unintelligible] I said, "Yes. Have other staff members?" I said, "They have. Now, that's not to say they came to testify, but I've said that we've always been willing to cooperate.
NixonNext man after Chapin. You bet after [unintelligible] that that's a different story. Then we run across this, you know, this question [unintelligible]
ZieglerThey stumbled on a story in the New York Times.
NixonThat Segretti, in other words, [unintelligible] the whole child situation. Watch him.
ZieglerNow let's drive away, and I have uh John going into the background on this thing, to let them squarely know why, they're not going to be able to talk about it,
Zieglerwhy, why try to be good friend to these people, because that's not, you know, what it's all about. That's your projection.
NixonYeah. And, listen, this bothered you [unintelligible]
NixonThe surprising thing is, Ron, the [unintelligible] on the whole issue. [unintelligible] yesterday. The President made that statement. You've answered by saying nothing more to be added. And, uh, you're position has been made clear.
NixonNow that is a new response in a news conference. I mean, they want more than to be answered. But wait a minute. You
ZieglerUh, well you see, there's another point. They think that we're talking through who appeared [unintelligible]
ZieglerYeah, it's something that we haven't answered.
Nixon[unintelligible] that the President of the United States should not be asked. But they are questions in the Senate committee
Nixonthat they like to be answered, that the FBI has been questioned about, and something that's been handled and commented on already by by their men. It's already been answered and investigated by the proper committee. But those are questions that should be handled by the Committee for the Re-Election. Not by the President and not his staff.
NixonI think that should—that should provide the answer to all of them.
ZieglerTell them, "Gentlemen, no. There's been a lot of questions you may have asked, and they've been covered. Of course, you have,
Ziegleryou are well impressed with that. And, of course, you want to
NixonWith regard to the Cambodia thing, that's not, uh, there's not very [unintelligible]
ZieglerWell, the people have been, you know, officially and privately they said that I think that that would happen and everybody's had that. But we've never clarified our stand point.
ZieglerA second point: With regard to a- with regard to, uh, [unintelligible] in the event that [unintelligible]
NixonThey don't have all that much for Cambodia because they come out from very far [unintelligible]. Why did they say no [unintelligible] Cambodia today?
NixonI suppose that they are worried to, ah, mark, maybe they've got that question.
NixonWhy don't you just say that the article with respect to Cambodia was not, uh, was not accurate. The fact is [unintelligible] says the article [unintelligible] the Cease-Fire [unintelligible] the Cease-Fire. I will just say that we agree with that point.
NixonIn other words, finally we break all the plans for ceasefire. Uh, oh, I have, uh, a small flyer on. We, according to this, there's an implication that we did send word to the government of Lon Nol and therefore, caused this terror before I made my speech, and we would have liked to have made that [unintelligible]
ZieglerWell, that's what, that's what's the, and I have to be careful about not saying it before you got there or where that happened.
Nixonuh, Shultz indicated that he discussed the Ruhr, under some question.
NixonYou know this on story that I, uh, that on the way to the 300,000 [unintelligible] If that wasn't mentioned I don't know whether the Treasury guys ever did that or not.
NixonWell, Goddamn it, people should know who he is. Of course they don't, I don't, but that one day the other fellow cannot do this. Why the hell didn't Hannigan [unintelligible] tell, well not that he's the responsible guy over there, you can't say that Jackson, it's not Jackson, really no Jackson,
NixonI wouldn't take a very hard line [unintelligible] I won't have to. I wouldn't take a very hard line, damn it, on that one. Central Telephone Company [unintelligible]
ZieglerThe other prompt here is, that they'll want me to add, did Shultz do that?
NixonRight. And say, did he do it? It can't hurt if I give him a [unintelligible] so that he did do it, and you've got to look to that too. Well yes, what shall I say, shall I say have we discussed this thing, whether, I will only indicate that any, any writer about that
Nixonthat uh, we all have felt that uh, that it would be totally beyond [unintelligible] regards for you, never let they know how few and uh, they were
Nixonsay, a rhino would have, would have slammed down the door [unintelligible] and take the stand that we took. We haven't had [unintelligible] electronically getting some while another market, we not.
NixonI wouldn't say, I wouldn't say, I wouldn't say on, these are ever done, but 40,000 to, that is their advice. That is the fact.
NixonThey could readily impact into possible, it's possible. And I have to say something else, that in also in terms of Peter's relationship that the about fully and hopefully that foreign public there checker that.
NixonI say, I'm Jewish, what did you do with him? You know I'm kind of getting this call life right now. I didn't scruple [unintelligible] that thing to be aggressive maybe [unintelligible]
NixonWell, they want to push the issue, go forward with it, they did it with 42, we'll carry it to sixty.
ZieglerUh, the other point I had [unintelligible] I don't know if they think that it's taxation [unintelligible] Yeah.
NixonAll right, but they had won't play it quite, quite the ball. [unintelligible] I know they're trying, but that would never make it [unintelligible] they'll never make, they'll never, never make it.
NixonAnd fact is, the best they can do is use, uh, to what? In detail, it can be if they were to use, that's what I said that day, they have use [unintelligible]
ZieglerNow the other point is, uh, on the ceasefire
Ziegleron, on that issue itself. Uh, is it possible that we review
NixonBased on your conversation, rather than to make any communication [unintelligible] they can do so far, but don't say that they call [unintelligible] I don't think that's quite so.
ZieglerAnd Steve Rogers came up with an idea [unintelligible]
NixonNow let's hope so. And hope he does tell me [unintelligible] Yeah.
NixonYou, uh, check with that, they say they've [unintelligible] communicate to Moscow.
NixonGo ahead. I don't think it would do a damn for the beginning because if they're still, uh, setting back to us. Very sympathetic though, it's not, they're not asking for options if it's costly, which is they want. Come on, damn. But then again, if they're saying it's, damn business,
037-105 4:09 PM · 18 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Ronald L. Ziegler talked on the telephone from 4:09 pm to 4:10 pm.
419-032 4:09 PM · 17 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Ronald L. Ziegler met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 4:09 pm to 4:10 pm.
037-106 4:10 PM · 1 min — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 4:10 pm and 4:25 pm.
037-107 4:10 PM · 11 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 4:10 pm and 4:25 pm.
419-033 4:10 PM · 14 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and unknown person(s) met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building at an unknown time between 4:10 pm and 4:25 pm.
037-108 4:25 PM · 39 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and John W. Dean, III talked on the telephone from 4:25 pm to 4:26 pm.
037-109 4:34 PM · 2 min — President Richard M. Nixon, John W. Dean, III, and Ronald L. Ziegler talked on the telephone from 4:34 pm to 4:36 pm.
419-035 5:40 PM · 16 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Manolo Sanchez met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building at 5:40 pm.
Conversation 419-034, March 14, 1973. White House Tapes, Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, National Archives. Audio and AI transcript via Easy Nixon, https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/419-034 (accessed November 4, 2026).