Conversation 022-002

TapeTape 22StartThursday, March 23, 1972 at 10:20 AMEndThursday, March 23, 1972 at 1:31 PMTape start time00:02:08Tape end time00:03:41ParticipantsHaldeman, H. R. ("Bob");  White House operator;  Nixon, Richard M. (President);  Safire, William L.Recording deviceWhite House Telephone

On March 23, 1972, H. R. ("Bob") Haldeman, White House operator, President Richard M. Nixon, and William L. Safire talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 10:20 am and 1:31 pm. The White House Telephone taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 022-002 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 22-2

Date: March 23, 1972
Time: Unknown between 10:20 am and 1:31 pm
Location: White House Telephone

H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman talked with the White House operator.

[See Conversation No. 325-10B]

     Request for call to William L. Safire

Haldeman conferred with the President at an unknown time between 10:20 am and 1:31 pm.

     Forthcoming Pay Board statement by the President, March 23, 1972
          -Spoken
          -Written

[End of conferral]

Haldeman talked with Safire.

[See Conversation No. 325-10C]

     The President’s Pay Board statement for television
          -Safire draft of a paragraph
                -Criticism of George Meany
                      -Wage increase to longshoremen
                            -Inequity
                      -Meany’s walkout

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

Do you want that in your spoken one or in the released one?
In the spoken one?
It's in the written one.
Bill?
Yes, Bob.
The President asked if you could put a one-paragraph thing in the, whip one up for the spoken statement, the TV statement, making the point that, zinging Meany on the point that he objects to the fact that the board wouldn't approve a 20% increase for the longshoremen.
Right.
And while millions of Americans are limited to 5%, to allow 20% to one specific group is wrong.
Mm-hmm.
I mean, hit him on the point that he was, you know, that he walked out because one special interest group didn't get an exorbitant pay raise.
Okay, that means there's a little more room in the statement?
No, he says he'll cut something else out.
Goddamn.
Okay, I'll write a good paragraph on that.
Okay.