Nixon White House Tapes — Conversation 039-120 Date: Wednesday, June 6, 1973 at 4:56 PM Participants: Nixon, Richard M. (President); Ford, Gerald R. Recording device: White House Telephone Source: https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/039-120 This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite it as authoritative. [0:00] Hi, Mr. President. [0:02] I understand you're tied up down there. [0:04] Apparently the policy was going to come down and they said they couldn't come today. [0:08] Well, we had a tough blow on this damn minimum wage thing and we lost the substitute and so we're now going through the process on about 20-some amendments to try and clean it up. [0:21] We aren't very optimistic, but we're going to make the effort. [0:26] You think it's something, all right. [0:27] Well, then you go to conference, huh? [0:29] Yeah, I think there will be a fairly substantial vote against the bill, and my recommendation would be that if the bill comes to your desk the way it is, that you ought to veto it. [0:42] Okay. [0:44] What's Pete Brennan's view? [0:45] Of course, he's pro-labor, but why, it's just a bad bill, huh? [0:52] Well, if we don't get the, honest to goodness, youth differential in there... [0:57] then I think you've got to veto it. [1:01] If they were to take the youth differential with all this other extra coverage and the wage, why, you might have a problem. [1:10] But if they knock out the youth differential or keep it out of the committee bill, then I think you've got a good, legitimate reason to veto it because it doesn't coincide with your recommendations. [1:22] That'll be a hairy thing with Brennan, I'm afraid. [1:25] Well, we'll do our best. [1:26] Oh, he's—we're having a cabinet meeting tomorrow, and I'll try to— Say, are you having a cabinet meeting after our bipartisan meeting? [1:34] Oh, the bipartisan has shifted to Tuesday, Larry—I mean, Sherry. [1:39] Oh, the bipartisan— Yeah, so you can pass that. [1:42] We were going to have it tomorrow, but we've had—I decided that I wanted to wrap it up with—so that I could take Vietnam [1:52] and the Brezhnev Summit all in one meeting, so Tuesday is a better day for it. [1:59] That bipartisan meeting is Tuesday, not— Yeah, you probably should have a call by now, but we are changing it from tomorrow, Thursday, until Tuesday at the same time. [2:11] Scott is here with me, and— He may not have the word, but— How about you and me coming down to that cabinet meeting? [2:19] Great. [2:20] I'd like to do that. [2:21] Yeah. [2:21] Great. [2:22] You're invited. [2:23] All right. [2:23] What time is it? [2:24] 10 o'clock. [2:25] 10 o'clock. [2:26] Yeah, that's a good idea. [2:27] It'll be Mel's first one. [2:28] Good. [2:29] Good. [2:29] Well, I think you and I would like to come if we could. [2:32] You're invited. [2:33] All right. [2:33] You're invited. [2:34] Great. [2:35] You tell Hugh, yeah. [2:37] All right. [2:37] Hugh just said he'd like to speak with you. [2:39] Sure. [2:39] OK. [2:40] Wait just a second. [2:41] Pardon? [2:42] Wait a second. [2:43] How'd you do with our friend Klosky? [2:45] Well, I got a copy of his speech, and I was just going over it hurriedly. [2:51] It, frankly, is what I discussed with you. [2:56] He doesn't make any affirmative recommendation. [2:59] He doesn't say he's going to introduce a resolution. [3:03] He talks about the need for study, and he gets into some other details. [3:07] But my judgment is we still ought to ignore it. [3:12] I agree. [3:13] I agree. [3:14] I'll see that you get a copy. [3:15] No, don't bother. [3:17] Don't bother. [3:18] All right. [3:19] I just told Jerry we'd like for you and him to attend the cabinet meeting tomorrow. [3:27] We're putting the bipartisans of Tuesday so that I can wrap the Soviet summit in the one meeting. [3:34] But we have an 830 meeting, I believe, with you, sir. [3:37] That is off. [3:39] We put that off to Tuesday. [3:42] All right. [3:42] But you're both to attend on cabinet meeting, if you like, you and Jerry. [3:46] I think it'd be a good idea. [3:48] It'd be an interesting, you know, it's a little different thing to do. [3:50] Why, John Connolly's here. [3:52] This idea doesn't come from me. [3:53] It comes from him. [3:55] It comes from me. [3:56] We were just ready to sound it out, and that was if you have an economic package coming up, and it's one that you think is a strong one, whether you'd consider addressing a joint session with Congress. [4:08] It goes right to the people line. [4:09] The difficulty with it is that it isn't that strong. [4:13] Yes. [4:13] I'm going to see John Connolly tonight. [4:14] He's going out—you know, I'm going to see him at 6 o'clock. [4:18] I'll talk to him about it. [4:22] It doesn't have the stuff in it that we really need for that sort of thing. [4:27] You know what I mean? [4:28] I don't want to go to that joint session on us. [4:30] We've really got something that's a thing. [4:32] Yes, sir. [4:34] But I'll talk to John about it. [4:36] Because it appalls me, you know, to read one of your economists in U.S. News that there's no consumer hurting anyone in the country. [4:44] And that's absolute crap because... We know that. [4:47] We know that. [4:48] Sure, sure, sure, sure. [4:49] We know that. [4:49] Particularly the food prices going up 50% in about six months. [4:52] What we need is some movement, some strong counteraction to this freeze because they plan to put on the debt limitation. [5:01] A freeze running as long as the debt limitation, five months. [5:06] Oh, my. [5:06] All those freeze. [5:08] And... [5:08] On labor, too? [5:11] Well, we believe it's going to be on wages and prices. [5:14] Well, I'll tell you, that would break it off. [5:16] It would ruin the economy, of course, and it would have... Lopp has met the day with the labor and management group, and labor is strenuously opposed to a freeze. [5:30] That's interesting. [5:30] And management, a little less strenuously, but also... [5:34] So that's interesting, too, isn't it? [5:35] Yes, sir. [5:36] I just mention it because of what you do, if you can anticipate doing that, you take a play with it. [5:43] I know. [5:44] That's what we've been thinking about. [5:46] You can't do it. [5:47] Well, you did a fine job yesterday, I must say. [5:49] Well, thank you, sir. [5:50] It was a good shot across the bow. [5:52] Thank you. [5:52] And Mike is being very supportive now on the fact that I said this morning to the Senators that I wish all Senators in both parties would do what they could to restore confidence in the country by... [6:03] Speaking of the strength of the country and the fact that we continue our commitments and that we are strong and unimpaired. [6:11] That's right. [6:11] And Mike's given some support on that. [6:14] Good, good, good. [6:16] Good. [6:16] So we'll be there tomorrow. [6:19] Yeah, at the cabinet meeting. [6:20] Yeah. [6:20] Right. [6:21] Good. [6:21] Thank you very much.