Nixon White House Tapes — Conversation 046-041 Date: Monday, May 14, 1973 at 9:01 PM Participants: Nixon, Richard M. (President); Ziegler, Ronald L. Recording device: White House Telephone Source: https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/046-041 This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite it as authoritative. [0:01] Yes, sir. [0:01] Nothing further from the committee. [0:03] They've still taken their dog in the manger attitude. [0:06] Yes, sir. [0:06] I've talked to Herb Klein, and he's moving on the Gallagher thing, and very tough. [0:11] Now, look, we've got to understand that it's not to our interest, really, to have Irvin and Baker, who are both pusillanimous assholes, you know, repudiate this thing. [0:23] Tomorrow at [0:24] However, when you go on for your briefing at 10.30, forget this goddamn thing we're going to do tomorrow with the leaders. [0:30] You go out there at 10.30 with a camera, right? [0:33] You understand? [0:34] Yes, sir. [0:34] And, Ron, take down what I've told you. [0:36] You've got it down. [0:37] Yes, sir. [0:38] That means that the committee will have indicted itself. [0:40] This committee has indicted itself. [0:42] Tomorrow is the time to start the attack on the committee. [0:46] Okay. [0:46] Yes, sir. [0:47] You understand? [0:48] Because they will not have acted. [0:50] You understand? [0:50] They will not have acted by the time you go on, Ron. [0:52] That's right. [0:53] They never will have acted. [0:54] That'll force them to act later in the day. [0:58] I would say this committee, don't put it in any nice terms, but I put it very tough. [1:04] They have, by their favor, to allow this story for two days. [1:09] That time will be two days. [1:10] You understand? [1:11] You understand? [1:12] Yes. [1:12] Two days. [1:13] They have allowed it. [1:14] allowed it to lie there without repudiating it, without doing it. [1:19] First, they have indicted themselves for irresponsibility. [1:22] Second, we demand an apology from the committee and a retraction. [1:26] Third, we demand an immediate investigation to the committee staff who was responsible and a discharge of that person. [1:32] Have you got all that or not? [1:34] I'm just writing it down, sir. [1:36] I'm just sorry to do that, but we've got to do this. [1:38] Then don't let Len get you off of this. [1:41] I don't think he will want you to. [1:42] He won't, no. [1:44] Because basically, we've got to hit that. [1:46] Now, there may be a half-assed statement by Irvin, you know, tonight or late tonight or so forth. [1:51] They haven't found him yet, though, have they? [1:53] No, he's issued a, as you refer to it, a half-assed statement. [1:56] What did he say? [1:57] Well, just that he didn't have any information that would support that story. [2:02] But what we need is a formal statement. [2:04] All right. [2:04] No, we want to demand a formal retraction by the full committee. [2:09] That's right. [2:10] Because the Santa Ana Register says that they stand by their story. [2:16] Well, that just supports it more. [2:18] All right. [2:18] Now, a formal retraction for the full committee is required. [2:22] You lay it right out there and fight Irvin and fight the rest. [2:25] I agree. [2:26] All right. [2:26] Okay. [2:27] Good. [2:27] Yes.