Conversation 293-009

TapeTape 293StartWednesday, November 17, 1971 at 2:53 PMEndWednesday, November 17, 1971 at 4:00 PMTape start time00:18:10Tape end time01:14:23ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President);  Haldeman, H. R. ("Bob");  [Unknown person(s)];  Kehrli, Bruce J.;  White House operator;  Hughes, James D. ("Don")Recording deviceOld Executive Office Building

On November 17, 1971, President Richard M. Nixon, H. R. ("Bob") Haldeman, unknown person(s), Bruce J. Kehrli, White House operator, and James D. ("Don") Hughes met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 2:53 pm to 4:00 pm. The Old Executive Office Building taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 293-009 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 293-9

Date: November 17, 1971
Time: 2:53 pm - 4:00 pm
Location: Executive Office Building

The President met with H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman.

     John D. Ehrlichman
          -Previous conversation with the President

     Henry A. Kissinger
         -Schedule

     Alexander M. Haig, Jr.
          -Schedule

     Ehrlichman

     Pending legislation
          -Tax Bill
               -Charles H. Percy
               -Amendment
                      -Ronald W. Reagan and Nelson A. Rockefeller
                      -Percy
                      -Effect
                           -House Resolution [HR] 1
                      -The President's previous conversation with Ehrlichman
               -The President's signature
               -Possible veto

                 -Wilbur D. Mills
                 -Congressional responsibility
                 -Balanced budget
                 -Staff meeting
                       -John B. Connally
                 -Financing political campaigns
                       -Effect
                       -Tax check-off provision
                             -Hubert H. Humphrey
                             -Effect
                                  -Parties
                                  -Vietnam War
                       -Status
                       -Possible veto
                             -Eighteen year old vote

     The President's schedule
          -The President's forthcoming speech to American Federation of Labor-Congress of
               Industrial Organizations [AFL-CIO] convention
               -Raymond K. Price, Jr.

Haldeman talked with an unknown person at an unknown time between 2:53 pm and 3:10 pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9A]

     The President's review of a speech

[End of telephone conversation]

     The President's schedule
          -The President's forthcoming AFL-CIO speech
               -Prepared text
               -Ehrlichman

Bruce J. Kehrli entered at 3:10 pm.

                 -Instructions
                       -Ronald L. Ziegler

Kehrli left at 3:11 pm.

          -National Association of Manufacturers [NAM] Dinner
               -Republicans

     NAM Dinner
        -Edmund S. Muskie
        -Edward M. Kennedy
        -Henry M. (“Scoop”) Jackson

     The President's schedule
          -Florida
                -Manolo Sanchez
                      -Conversation with Military Aides office
                -Haldeman's conversation with Maj. Gen. James D. Hughes
                      -Helicopters
                      -Sanchez
                      -Ziegler
                      -Schedule Office

*****************************************************************

BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1
[Personal Returnable]
[Duration: 47s ]

END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1

*****************************************************************

Haldeman talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 3:11 pm and 4:00
pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9B]

[See Conversation No. 14-156]

[End of telephone conversation]

     The President's schedule

An unknown man entered at an unknown time after 3:11 pm.

     The President's speech

The unknown man left at an unknown time before 4:00 pm.

     The President's forthcoming speech to AFL-CIO convention
          -Content
               -The President's previous radio broadcast on dignity of work
               -Ehrlichman's views
                      -Previous speech

Haldeman talked with Hughes at an unknown time between 3:11 pm and 4:00 pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9C]

[See Conversation No. 14-157]

[End of telephone conversation]

     The President's schedule
          -Trip to Florida
                -Haldeman's previous conversation with Hughes
                      -Helicopters
                      -Sanchez

     Congress

     Pending legislation
          -Tax Bill
               -Percy's amendment
                      -Richard B. Ogilvie
          -John B. Anderson
          -Donald H. Rumsfeld
          -Ogilvie

     Polls
             -An initiative
             -Robert Teeter
             -John N. Mitchell

             -Teeter
             -Opinion Research Center [ORC]

Haldeman talked with an unknown person at an unknown time between 3:11 pm and 4:00 pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9D]

     Polls
             -Figures

[End of telephone conversation]

     Polls
             -Results
             -United Nations [UN] vote on the People's Republic of China [PRC]
             -Troop withdrawal announcement
             -Timing
                   -Gallup
             -The President's forthcoming speech to AFL-CIO convention
             -Timing
                   -Gallup
             -Size of sample
             -Accuracy
                   -White House
                   -Gallup
                   -Harris
             -Timing
                   -Troop withdrawal announcement
                   -Soviet summit announcement
                   -Press conference
                   -Announcement of the President's Supreme Court nominees
                   -William F. (“Billy”) Graham
                   -Compared with Laos invasion period
                   -PRC
                   -Phase II
             -Results
                   -National economy
                   -The West
                         -Recognition of the PRC
                              -Compared to other areas
                         -Ronald W. Reagan

Haldeman talked with an unknown person at an unknown time between 3:11 pm and 4:00 pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9E]

     Polls
             -Gallup
                  -Results
                       -The West

[End of telephone conversation]

     Polls
             -Results
                  -The West
                       -The South

Haldeman talked with an unknown person at an unknown time between 3:11 pm and 4:00 pm.

[Conversation No. 293-9F]

     Polls
             -Results

[End of telephone conversation]

     Polls
             -Results
                  -Timing

*****************************************************************

BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 4
[Personal Returnable]
[Duration: 2m 2s ]

END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 4

*****************************************************************

    Polls
            -Results
                 -National economy
                 -The West
                 -National economy
                 -The Presidency
                 -The President's forthcoming foreign trips
                       -Mao Tse-tung
                 -State visits
                 -Vietnam
            -Questions
                 -National economy

    National economy
         -The President's forthcoming speech to AFL-CIO convention
         -The President's program
         -Cambodia
         -Vietnam
         -Wage increases
         -Vietnam casualties

    Kissinger
         -Schedule

*****************************************************************

BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 5
[Personal Returnable]
[Duration: 3m 58s ]

END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 5

*****************************************************************

     The President's schedule
          -Speech

Haldeman left at 4:00 pm.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

I was just talking to the girl.
And I thought, what's up?
And I called him.
This was Kissinger, apparently.
He had called.
He's gone until tomorrow morning.
And Hager's there.
Everyone had.
I didn't call him.
Yeah, I watched somebody else.
Hager's in his office.
He doesn't speak to me.
No, I didn't.
Hager's, you know, I don't know who he is.
Now this is the problem with everything that's going on in this country.
The allies are breaking the rock bottom.
We're talking about the Percy Scrooge Amendment and the tax bill that was provided.
I don't know if I'm taking that into account.
I don't know if I'm taking that into account.
I don't know if I'm taking that into account.
I don't know if I'm taking that into account.
I don't know if I'm taking that into account.
They take care of Illinois, but the Rockefeller don't buy it.
I just talked to Eric, and I worked it out, and the point is that he said Percy had paid for some car, and he realized it was sort of irresponsible, but it was a cost to the institution.
They didn't amend it to HR1, which was the effective data.
I said, well, help me if you want to do the general election.
Well, I was getting a bill that I personally may not get, that I may not pass for someone.
But in a tax bill, it was hard on him to do.
His amendment was passed in a tax bill.
I will have to sign it.
I've got to sign the tax bill now.
So he did.
They're getting to the point.
He may not be able to sign the tax bill.
I know.
I know.
They aren't yet to the point where he's on the Congress.
I know that.
But the point that we have to have in mind is that all of the talk about necessity to get up to the economy, we may have to sign it, and then the responsibility of the economy is the responsibility of the economy.
So you see my point?
Yeah.
It would be quite a responsibility to accomplish that.
In fact, we're hoping that they're doing a terrible thing.
Well, that's that.
I'm going to do it.
I'm going to sign it.
I'm going to do it.
I'm going to do it.
I'm going to do it.
Discussing in the staff meetings without first you're always on one comment and then you say, you know what I mean?
Discussing that they don't really know.
They don't know the politics of it.
They don't discuss it.
They're just discussing it.
I understand the amendments are terrible, but I think you ought to get a comment as well.
That one.
That one too.
and spending what you're having in terms of the presidential race.
It's more in our advantage than it is under their advantage.
Most people won't understand that.
And it comes up as an enormous challenge.
If we've got other ways, if they've got to pay for their staff and everything else, we don't have to do that.
Revening is fine, but the thing to worry about is this check on it.
So the individual can check off on his tax return being like a dollar of his taxes allocated to the party of his choice.
No, allocated to party funds.
It can't go to the party of his choice.
They would prorate the things between the two major parties evenly and some stuff to the Lander parties that would end up, they think, with something like $20 million for each party, which the Democratic Party would have to issue to solve the Democrats' financial problem.
It would also get them well on their $9 million deficit, which is what's going to be a problem for one of their lines of credit.
I very much don't want that.
Maybe we're talking about the means of killing that or other means of killing him on the basis of procedure.
It's a very bad thing when you look at the taxpayer, to look at his tax return and decide what he doesn't want the money spent for, which is in effect what you're doing, letting him check off, you know, spend a certain amount for one thing, then the next thing they say, I want to check off 20% because I don't believe in the law.
I don't want to get into that.
If something like that were passed, where come I?
I didn't veto it.
It was funny.
I'm not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I was not afraid of it.
I always got a damn good job
put it together and kind of just kind of, you know, just lay it up in the wind, you know.
I couldn't be finished with it now.
I wanted to go with the story.
I told him to get a, I want it more bland than this, though, and to get a rough draft.
I think it would be great.
That's what they'll expect is that you come in and read that line.
Your idea is sensational.
If it is, provide it to me.
I can even blow it out.
Get time enough to think, well, get a quick period on it, put everything over.
Just being there, saying some things that aren't in there, and saying it, and not too damn long.
That's right.
Talk long.
You really don't, because all you want to make is your point.
Be received and get out.
All the other crap is in there at least to speak to anyone, so...
And that's how I got all the way here.
You can include in future speeches the idea of a patient at war, or an awardee at war, and the idea of the exact equivalent of that as a person at war.
I always said, I always had a lousy idea for what the public
or an NAM that is correct.
Well, I think the NAM would reach as high as American labor is, and it doesn't.
So the bad idea is to do that.
It's a good idea to do that.
Except it might be a damn good idea for that must be the NAM.
The same procedure is about to settle.
We're going to have to determine who's Jordan Seligman.
It's cool if I didn't change something here.
The military age called and said, Manolo, we're down on seven.
I said, no.
They made no decision about whether we were going or not.
I didn't know.
You see, if it gets out that far, Bob, they're down there.
They're going to piss all over the place.
What's going on with Manolo?
I told him, you know, here you go.
I ain't told that I'm going to talk to him.
I told him he used to get down with that person.
He said he might be going down.
He said he was going to.
But not for sure.
That's why I told Don.
That's why I called him.
Schedule office doesn't know.
I thought there was a screw-up.
I thought we made it quite clear to him.
I can go down, prepare everything, all that sort of thing.
All right.
All right.
All right.
Got a call from here.
Yeah.
Got it.
This is the one that I wanted.
one labor organization from under Congress, you know, in the period before the election.
I'm not arguing for doing this, but it's a second argument.
I'm arguing for doing this instead of one of the...
I say for a lesser... Yeah.
All right, thank you.
Well... We still have some...
Do you want any of this first page stuff?
That's about right in the laundry list, man.
I don't want any of the first page.
Party on Labor does not have a law on it.
It's true.
Let's take all that out.
We have a different lead engine.
We started off by a pair of them.
Yeah, we started off with a knife.
They probably had this in their first draft.
This is the kind of stuff that... ...
Places that are say, let me say, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
making the writing better than it was due to the time of the attempt.
And so I had to wipe out any work that should have ever been done.
I suppose it's just about the kind of craft that's good.
They would expect, you know, press will write.
Yeah.
It's big enough.
It's big enough.
The first page, of course, is, again, on a little letter.
Right.
What I have in mind is really, I need something else to that.
Back to the dignity of where the radio is going to get to that day.
For writing, not for personal use.
I'm not going to go
to as far, I won't plan to go as far as Irving suggests.
That's a technique I've never used and do not use.
This idea that you pick a forum, first that you pick a forum and go in and tell them what they want to hear wrong.
But it's just as bad to pick a forum and go in and say, well, I'm a brave son of a bitch because I can come in and tell them, y'all see, that's what John wanted to do.
That's a typical
you know, reaction of political scientists, you know, right?
That proves you're very brave, you know what I mean?
Like, it's like what they tried to write into that thing with the D-E-R, you know?
Hello?
Yeah.
Thank you.
Hello?
Don?
Something apparently went astray on our operation here, because Dave's office is still in Manolo.
He used to go down and set up a funk tonight.
And we know we weren't supposed to be saying anything to anybody.
Well, they currently set up some wheels in motion because they at least ordered Manolo up on a 7 o'clock plane, which of course there shouldn't be one up to begin with.
And we don't know if they gave it to anybody.
Get out of here, guys.
I think a
Everything turned off, just on there is no trip.
Just on the trip is canceled.
But leave the helicopters down.
I thought I would surprise him because he clearly understood what we were doing.
Well, I suppose he told me that just three years ago.
What it is, there's probably some sergeant in his office, when they order the helicopters down, they put other things in them.
They're great, they're great, but they don't realize that sometimes we want them.
Yeah, true.
That's it, I'll find out who did that, I'll kill him.
I don't want to see us both here on the ship.
The public needs to fight harder to turn the rules on.
Maybe we ought to go together.
If we Democrats kill someone, they're supposed to get close, I know this, Bob.
So we must be having some leadership.
Jesus Christ, it's awful, isn't it?
I don't think they'll ever get it.
I personally think that a person will regret making the needle.
The needle, because both of you have the needle.
And frankly, if it does get in, if it does get in, I have a thought.
I wonder if we don't really have to face up to people who we probably can't see.
Maybe trying to get them out there is probably the end of it.
Anderson.
Against.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
We have to pull over the tubes so that we get our own, you know, basis of comparison.
How's that mission going to go?
They haven't just done one recently, we'll have all the numbers and they've got Teeter now that's doing it.
It's going to be our fault.
It's going to be our fault.
It's going to be Mitchell's fault.
So what's happening with old people?
We've given up on old people.
Oh no, we'll still use him to do the phone thing.
Teeter himself is going to be the committees.
That's something my courage was.
Well, I mean, who does this?
Who does this?
Teeter pulled himself.
I don't, I think he does, but I think he orders it from a phone organization.
I don't think he has a permanent staff position.
Most of those guys down at ORC, they're only a few, but that's how they do it.
They're trying to stack these children
4364, I'm 4937 now.
There's the road.
Oh, it's a 5.
435-011.
Now it's 49-37-13.
No lights on right here.
The last one.
No lights on right here.
This is 54-37-49-37-14.
That is, it seems to be quite consistent with the kind of things of aberration that you have in periods of events to the undecided.
The undecided goes up.
So that's what happened in Cali in the middle.
change in understanding.
They've increased within us as I've been talking to them.
Disapproval.
Disapproval is what I imagine has appeared.
Appeared as one of the disprovals I've seen, but not as toxic as it's existed.
It's been dropped.
Disapproval is, you know, we have the, you see, I'm certain that's something useful for us to, you know,
Well, so that we can have benchmarks now, you know what I mean?
And so we're starting that.
You know, the fact that we did approve the QM, and now we've come up with the proof of announcement, too.
You know, we're going to evaluate those students, get a reading on what's been affected with the QM, and what's been affected with the control.
Why don't you poll this weekend?
They prefer weekends.
It doesn't make too much difference anymore.
They used to prefer weekends, but now they don't care.
Gallop takes too long.
It's somewhat better because they can get in.
They can go on all day instead of having to do this.
Why don't you pull?
Why don't you pull?
I can't get a question.
I have to do it over the week.
Well, I'm going to go over the weekend.
We'd like to get it to Southern, you know, wherever we are.
Why don't you pull Friday and Saturday?
We can do that.
Yeah, we can.
Yeah, I don't know if we can get a report before Monday.
That's fine.
You'd have it Monday rather than Wednesday.
We can get it Monday anyway.
If we pull Saturday and Sunday, they'll have a report for us Monday night.
I don't know.
Saturday.
What I'm getting at is that we're going to do this.
VFL and so forth.
Let's get a little feel of that too.
Or whatever.
Maybe Saturday, Sunday 30th.
Saturday's all right.
Nothing's going to happen.
Maybe you're correct.
Maybe it's Saturday, Sunday 30th.
They just have a pattern.
So we're going to go Saturday, Sunday 30th.
I would like to check back on Gallup on this one.
Don't ask any other questions.
I don't want to go into the questions here and all that.
But I think all these tribes and so forth that are regional, that they do regional.
I don't see everything right now.
The thing that I was thinking of, if we do enough, we've got to get to 1,500 people.
It's just one of our standards.
But very fast ones, we use, you know, 600 or 800, most of them 1,500.
And those, then, we can't get a good regional break.
And they do 1,500 over two days, yes, if they know how to do it.
All right?
Well, let me say this.
We know our polls aren't totally honest.
And they may be wrong, but they're on account.
We know that we don't poll for purposes of proving that they're not intentional.
Correct.
And as a matter of fact, except when we loaded the question at that point, we had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
We had never run off here.
So my father, he had a headline that says it makes approval drops by one-sixth.
Then it says that I have to do it.
And then it says that the current level of 49 is on a par.
He doesn't make a big thing out of it, but it says it's on a par with the average rating the president's held through this year.
And then it points out that the state has to do it.
Well, it was quite out of the state before the approval was done.
Well, uh, his other one was taken, as you said, on the 19th, right, of October 8th, 2011, in France.
I think what we have done since then, I don't know, so it's on.
In fact, this revision, it's very important to say more of that, because it's very popular, you know, and it's quite popular, for example, and press conference at the same time.
We had the Supreme Court try and find a coalition.
That came the next week.
We had also a major to this point in the Billy Graham case.
He was a good part of the country.
Plenty of nickelbacks, you know, over the counter.
If you look at what
It was in that guy's mind at the time of the cold, March 29th, looking mainly at what was staggering to the exact states.
Well, that's the point that I'm making.
You might have pulled a week earlier and gotten the same level around.
Yeah, probably would.
And you might have pulled, you may have pulled a week later and find that the light is off.
You know what I mean?
You get to do an extra day to take this place, correct?
So much the same as the whole business that kind of allowed us to go the whole, it wasn't a passion matter.
It wasn't quite what we were all talking about.
We were all talking about TV, stories, and that kind of stuff.
And we all kind of looked at each other and said, well, if there was anything that certainly doesn't demonstrate that to you, maybe it didn't move you.
We're all in this theory that events and
change polls, not announcements.
In fact, we were a little higher than what we wanted to get before.
It was not significant to see my point of view.
I don't think we've really been much.
I mean, we've gone through China, yes.
We've gone through phase two.
We've made an announcement about phase two.
But I don't think those were events.
I don't think it was deaths.
a little bit of business in the area.
But of course, now you've got also the uncertainty in the economy.
There's been all the talk about the stock market, the market going down, and the uncertainty line.
Now, on the other hand, the West is very, very, it would not be as effective on that.
But I suggested one thing, according to what you were doing, is to take this more related to the last
In other words, to see whether the West was more affected by that than the East.
We know that more than the East.
Certainly we know the Southwest.
Out there, there really isn't.
There isn't enough in there to have the West
be that far different from the rest of the country?
Have we had any in the end of the year now?
Or do we think we have?
There's a hell of a lot of right-wingers in the South, too.
There's a lot of left-wingers in the West, too.
Maybe there might be a correlation there.
They don't.
They don't.
You reckon maybe...
He may be reflecting a greater concern there than what we have here.
But to have a situation in the last three days, basically a mystery to these California out here, a world of disapproval, is not only a theme, but something that we have to really be concerned about.
Right?
Yeah.
Go ahead.
to this approval was, I don't know, 145 or something like that.
It was the same rate.
It was a, I don't know what it was, I don't know.
It was, yeah.
It was a lot, you know, 42 approval going, it went up to 51% approval in a way.
I don't know.
It was 45-47.
Yeah.
Disappointed.
Approval was 45, disapproval 47.
And you had a very, very small one this time.
That's right.
You only had 7% on your side.
Right.
OK. Then it went to 52, 39.
Approval.
59 to 39.
49 on this side.
43.
16 on this side.
It doesn't stop.
It's not as high as it was, you know, four points lower than it was, but the approval is also four points lower.
Yeah.
It's not 45, 46, 45 percent.
It's not as high as it was, but the approval is also four points lower than it was, but the approval is also four points lower.
The August, yeah, early October line, the west end, which is about like the rest of the country, all right?
About 30 bucks, yeah.
The south is, well, the south always is, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know, the, you know,
I don't know.
Give me the regional one.
Yeah.
Start with the unit first.
The last one I was taking is the unit first.
Yeah.
All right.
I went from 51 up to 56, back to 52.
Actually, it sounds like I'm ahead of the list again.
Right?
45, 52, 41.
The rest is 47, 52, 50, so it's ahead of where it was.
47, 52, 53.
46, 54, 53, so it's ahead of where it was.
All of your weakness versus unity.
So you're at the same as where you were in Jim, 49.
The total count you did, like, 49, 54, 49.
What was it you did?
What was it?
49.
49.
Yeah.
Versus Jim, you gained four points in the East, three points in the Midwest, one point in the South, but you lost four points in the West.
That's right.
East is, the national average is 49.
East is above 1.50.
The Midwest is above 1.50.
The South is above 1.52.
But then, of course, again, it's in the West.
Invest.
I still believe in the economic side.
I think it could work.
But I would have said that I believe that you're doing the hammering of the peak in the United States of California right that weekend.
Why would that bother the West more than the Middle East?
Because I think the West may be a hell of a lot stronger.
That's why I say, check that over.
What traditionally has been, you know, very hard on that subject.
Let's put it this way.
The economy didn't change that much in the Middle East.
The economy hasn't been growing over a period of time.
It doesn't change dramatically.
It never has.
It just grows over a period of time.
There's been a good upward on the economy because of the things going on and all that.
I agree about the good and saw that it really changed and that's a good thing to do.
As well as anybody else.
Relatively better.
Just because of what we've been doing.
You can't argue with visibility.
On your own.
You've got to get all the traffic prepared.
heavy news, low visibility, and, of course, I'm probably one of the core workers of every American country.
It's very, very popular.
Yeah, but not in the...
Stirring them up, you know what I'm saying?
But I'll say that they're reassuring, they're solidifying.
Presidency.
If you want to talk about that, it's a challenge.
Yeah.
It's not the announcement that, you know, we were in the office of the announcement of the Russian president.
I think, you know, we're in a very good time.
That gives you some accretion among intelligent people.
You know, the church themselves, I mean, we're in Mexico.
Is it because they are men?
Yeah.
The church themselves are very well-managed people.
What the other Crips have, particularly when you're on high confidence, they're going to have a lot of attention to it.
Trying to be on board, they'll take more attention than any of the other Crips.
I don't know how much you're going to get away with, but we've got a lot here.
Not really, they're going to buy it.
If you aren't going to get a bunch away, you'll probably get something else, but maybe K says that it's just diplomatic stuff, and, you know, it's going to be you.
I mean, maybe not sometimes.
We're always going to the China wall.
It's going to be you.
Thank you very much.
I don't think I would get it.
I don't think I would borrow it, but it would prove it as a real amount of time.
I don't think you have much relevant stuff on that.
I mean, we have a few.
We can see whether there's a shift, which would give you an effect of the phase two.
Don't ask in terms of you think phase two is going to work.
No, no.
No questions like that.
Just leave our train questions.
Which is, do you approve of this?
Whatever it is.
Not that I have any economy.
We always get a negative answer.
Well, if we still get negative, then it's a question of how.
Yeah.
I wonder how it would possibly go.
Look, if we've got several different questions we can ask him, then we don't have to do anything.
No, but I mean, if we've got background, then we can take one of those so that we get one for comparison.
I think people really feel like we have the time.
I've got a family that can't go in there and just kick my ass.
I don't know what I'll say about home.
I'm not sure if you'd want to move up to someplace.
Would you like to have a mother?
I think building, getting, taking them out of the petty people, in the sense that they're standing with the country,
In other words, lifting and elevating them, I think you're one of two things.
Cambodia and then what you've got to do now.
This idea of elevating them out of their headiness.
Say, well, I've come to this country to live with this country.
Also, now I've come to this country to live with this country.
So you kind of understand what I'm saying.
But it's got to give a little.
Instead of promising, we're concerned about the working camp.
But you've got to be concerned about the other people too.
It's the best for everyone.
I know it's specific to the restraints, weight increases.
I mean, we'll go all out with it.
Everybody's got to do something.
But we'll go all out with it tomorrow.
We'll go all out tomorrow.
The whole playback of the prosperity of 68 based on boys being killed.
The sacrifice of Damien.
That's it.
We're asking for you in the industry.
I mean, this country comes in by participation of a lot of people at that time.
It came by pouring a lot of money into the war that was killing a lot of Americans.
I don't feel we want to get him in there.
I'm trying to crack it up a little.
That'd be the last date that a president appears before the NFL is mentioned.