Conversation 321-003

TapeTape 321StartWednesday, February 9, 1972 at 12:16 PMEndWednesday, February 9, 1972 at 1:05 PMTape start time00:03:59Tape end time00:49:21ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President);  Haldeman, H. R. ("Bob");  Ziegler, Ronald L.Recording deviceOld Executive Office Building

On February 9, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon, H. R. ("Bob") Haldeman, and Ronald L. Ziegler met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 12:16 pm to 1:05 pm. The Old Executive Office Building taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 321-003 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 321-3

Date: February 9, 1972
Time: 12:16 pm - 1:05 pm
Location: Executive Office Building

The President met with H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman and Ronald L. Ziegler.

     Press relations
           -Manolo Sanchez

     Democrats
         -Foreign policy report, February 9, 1972
               -Associated Press [AP]
         -Presidential candidates
               -Criticism
                     -Vietnam
                           -Enemies
                                -Prolonging war
                           -Compared to 1968
         -President’s instructions to Ziegler
               -Candidates
                     -Edmund S. Muskie
                -1968 bombing halt
                -1966
                      -Non-Presidential election year
                      -Lack of negotiations
           -Ngo Dinh Diem
                -President’s earlier criticisms
                -Effect of criticism on war
                      -1972 election

National policy
     -Network commentary
     -William P. Rogers’s call
           -Bomb shelters
     -Nixon administration
           -Foreign policy report
                -Columbia Broadcasting System [CBS]
                -Dan Rather
                      -Innovation
                      -Generosity of peace terms
                            -History of warfare
                      -Marvin L. Kalb
                            -Possible quotes
                            -Nixon’s critics
                      -Nixon’s critics
                            -Henry A. Kissinger
                                  -George S. McGovern
                                  -Communists
                            -Haldeman’s comments on Today show, February 7, 1972
           -National Broadcasting Company [NBC]’s views
                -Peter Hackess
           -American Broadcasting Company [ABC]’s views
                -People’s Republic of China [PRC]
                -Moscow
                -Paris
                -Critics
                -Debate
           -Kissinger
                -McGovern
                      -Plan to end the Vietnam war
                            -Communism
                      -Saigon
                      -Patriotism

Press Room
      -Gerald L. Warren
           -Vietnam
                 -Press reaction to text of foreign policy report radio address

Vietnam
     -President’s instructions
           -Muskie
                -McGovern
                -Hubert H. Humphrey
                -Edward M. Kennedy
                      -Possible attacks form the left
                -1968
           -Television line
                -Length
                -Highlights
                      -Possible cuts
                -Leroy Henderson
                -Cameras
                -Technicians
                -Teleprompter
                      -The President’s experience

Foreign policy report
     -Alexander M. Haig, Jr.
     -Kissinger
           -Press coverage
     -Ziegler’s role
     -John A. Scali [?]

H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman’s statement on Today show
     -President’s reaction
           -Patrick J. Buchanan
           -The left
           -Hugh Scott
           -Kennedy
     -Ziegler’s views
     -Buchanan
           -Meeting with Ziegler
                 -Developing the President’s response

President’s schedule
     -Camp David
           -PRC
                 -Readings
     -Florida visit
           -John B. Connally
           -John D. Ehrlichman
           -Domestic issues
                 -Timing
                 -PRC
                 -Connally
                 -Ehrlichman
                 -Rogers
                       -Location
                 -Connally
                       -Focus on domestic issues
                           -Adele (Langston) Rogers
                -George P. Shultz
     -Camp David
           -PRC
           -Rogers
     -Florida

White House staff
     -President’s defense
     -Press
     -Vietnam
           -Cambodia and Laos
                 -Unknown person
     -Ziegler’s previous conversations
           -Comparison with Lyndon B. Johnson administration
           -Comparison with John F. Kennedy administration
                 -Not being able to work together
                      -Compared to current Administration
                            -Support for Haldeman [?]
                 -Domestic issues

Nicholas and Alexandra
     -Kissinger
           -Grigori Y. Rasputin
     -Historical movies
           -Production costs

Kissinger
     -Podium

Liberals
     -Relationship with the President

Press conferences
      -Question
      -Ziegler’s briefing
      -Frequency
            -Presidential reaction
      -Public view
      -AP story
      -Johnson
      -Policy areas
            -Comparisons
      -Unknown woman
            -Prospects for frequent press conferences
            -Previous conversation with Haldeman
      -Supposed issue
            -Need for frequent press conferences
            -Administration “non-issue”
            -Credibility
     -Haldeman
           -Unknown woman
                 -James B. (“Scotty”) Reston
     -Upcoming press conference
           -Style
           -PRC
           -Timing
     -Briefing
           -Off the record
           -Ziegler’s views
                 -Kissinger’s backgrounder
                 -Hawaii
                       -Upcoming Presidential press conference
                            -Timing

President’s instructions to Haldeman
      -Kissinger
      -Muskie
      -Humphrey
      -Reston’s influence
            -Reston’s column
            -Kissinger

PRC trip
    -Possible press attendees
          -Stanley Karnow
    -Charles B. Rangel
    -Peregrine Worsthorne
    -PRC
    -Press list
          -Jews
                -Numbers
          -Blacks
                -Numbers
    -White House staff
          -Possible questions
          -Gen. Brent G. Scowcroft
          -Vernon G. Coffey, Jr.
                -Military assistant
          -Secret Service
                -Assistance
          -Black reporter, [Forename unknown] Simmons
                -Style admired by the President
    -Press
          -Air Force One
          -Nationwide selection
          -NBC
                -Black reporter
          -CBS
          -Networks
                       -Ability to choose reporters
           -Military aide
                 -Coffey
           -Secret Service
                 -Blacks
                       -Detail
                       -Zosimo T. Monzon

     News story
         -Buchanan
               -Handling
               -Story style

     President’s schedule
           -Buchanan

Ziegler left at 12:50 pm.

     News story
         -Possible reaction
               -Foreign policy report radio address
               -“Year of the Breakthrough”
         -Kissinger
               -Shock
               -Statement, February 8, 1972
         -Constitutional definition
               -Patriotism
               -Treason
                     -Haldeman’s comments
         -Kissinger

     Veterans groups
          -Meeting with Henry C. Cashen, II
          -Medal of Honor
          -National convention
          -Herbert R. (“Chief”) Rainwater
                -Telegram

     President’s speech
          -Congress
                -Length of time

     Vietnam
          -Critics of President’s policy
                -Foreign policy radio address

     World report
         -Length
         -Possible impact
     Foreign policy report radio address

******************************************************************************

[Previous PRMPA Personal Returnable (G) withdrawal reviewed under deed of gift 10/09/2019.
[Personal Returnable]
[321-003-w002]
[Duration: 3m 17s]

       F. Donald Nixon
              -Jack N. Anderson
              -George S. McGovern
              -Aristotle Socrates Onassis [?]
              -H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman’s assessment
              -Family matter

       Herbert W. Kalmbach
              -The President’s lawyer
                      -Finances
              -Jeb Stuart Magruder [?]

******************************************************************************

     Unknown person
         -Tenure
         -John N. Mitchell

Haldeman left at 1:05 pm.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

Well, uh, I wanted to get a big, uh, on the, on the, on all the calls and jackals and, uh, of all you people know, which is, uh, when you knock them off balance, there's a certain point that's right, and I believe that he started off, I think, with a mix of both Congress and the nation-based foreign policy about the world.
Yeah, I suppose, sure.
If I could interrupt you there, don't ever, don't let Muskie get away with this crap that I've ever done.
I didn't raise my damn voice.
I went all around the country and after the damn bombing halt, you know, I supported him.
And in 66, as we say, I was not a candidate and there were no negotiations.
And there was no presidential elections.
And there were no presidential elections.
There were no negotiations.
And I was a critic, and I have said so of that.
I was a critic, and you also said the president, for example, criticized the murder of Deanna.
And that is the truth.
Oh, so that's good.
That just goes on to say in the National Broadcast Assessment, it's one of those in the present city that's not a question of making a decision or sincerity, but it's going to be criticized as good.
Of course, but if you call me,
I would hope that anyone seeking to question
going to the election.
You know, that statement is so carefully drawn, it's a hard one to twist.
Here's an interesting network commentary, because you guys had had to go on and talk about it.
Denny Rogers called, I don't know, Allen.
I know Bill, he probably made his bombshell.
I'm seeking to get us on the wrap-up.
Rather...
He's saying that your administration has innovated in this field of a foreign policy report.
The idea of a foreign policy report is an innovation of the administration.
Yeah, but he's making the point that this is a new thing that you brought in.
Then he noted the comment on the most generous offer in the history of warfare and asked Martin Kauffman what the most important goals were.
Kauffman said, well, that was a very interesting statement, that what he found of real interest was the partial rollback of Nixon's criticism of the critics of his policy.
Then he noted that Kissinger had settled on governing consistently held views which would result in turning to Vietnam over the communists.
But he had no doubts that Senator Spader existed.
And noted, rather, Nixon said he didn't question the sincerity or patriotism of his critics, so some effort has been adopted in keeping the loyalty of the critics.
At no time concluded, rather, did Nixon or Kissinger disavow all of the statement, but they did put it in context, emphasizing they questioned the wisdom, not the patriotism of the critics.
And that comes out, I think, just exactly what we were going for.
NBC, Peter Hines, he just picked up the most generous piece of the proposal.
Thank you.
That's all.
Said he doesn't criticize those who disagree with the presidential candidates, have a higher responsibility to have their statements.
And this is a breakthrough year.
ABC said Nixon said his foreign affairs policies brought us closer to peace.
We've stopped reacting to yesterday's habits of being in an argument, wrongs, opportunities.
Cited as a trend in Moscow, there isn't necessarily a stable peace.
Also had a word for his critics, and then they had a
the tape replay of the paper-free debate.
That's the law.
So I think we could go on better.
I think Henry Hemming basically said the same thing.
Henry mentioned how it was a good point.
He said McGovern is an honest man, and McGovern believes that we should turn our words around.
The lead of Kissinger, the West Basin's national security office, said the day that Senator George McDonough appeared if he wanted to accept the confidence of his government to sign on and interfere in the war.
They said that if any president could get a hold of him, they could.
The governor seems to believe that the urgency of ending the war is so great that he wouldn't be willing to take this step.
Well, I think it was a, I think it was a good move a few rounds.
Absolutely.
And I had Jerry, a freshman, watch the press.
They were listening to it and waiting for the text and kind of going around it.
Some of the guys who had left,
We've got to keep the issue up.
We've got to keep the issue up.
It must be at all.
It must be at all.
It's good to get across the point, too, that I said this in 1968.
We have said it, but you know, it doesn't play.
When I say it, they use the website.
Now we'll see, too, what we get there.
I don't know why, because it worked well before, and I just did that.
Just that part of it.
That part was not another damn thing.
And so we've got it.
We have selected, in other words, another damn good action for the team.
Yeah.
I think what we considered .
That's right.
Normally, it should be shorter than that.
This one.
Normally, we ought to shoot her under .
This probably ran through under two minutes.
Yes.
So much.
Well, I don't know.
They may chop off the latch.
Exactly 11 minutes.
So it's a page and a minute.
So we went a little over two minutes.
Yeah.
I don't guess it was the whole thing, but they cut across the wide area.
And they cut the last side, so.
About 45 neighbors and so forth.
Don't try to send a war on them.
But nevertheless, they cut it straight.
But I really think that that's what they did.
You know, they were shoveling out the bicep on there all that time.
You see anything of that?
They would see.
They would see what they do.
They would see what they do.
They have good film.
But who was it?
Lee Roy Anderson.
He's a good friend.
Good guy, I know.
They were very good, very comfortable to work with.
You know, I just thought about what a hell of a difference it was to work in a theater with five cameras in there and 14 technicians.
So this is the way to do it.
Always was pretending to have another camera.
You have another group.
If you're going to use a teleprompter, you cannot.
You just cannot use the teleprompter.
Yeah, Henry was not good.
He was probably so wound up in his own stuff he didn't realize he didn't know what was going to be the lead.
But Henry worried about it.
Oh, sure, he worried about it.
It came off well.
But I'm sorry.
His foreign policy report will get a bigger flood because of this.
They'll do the same thing.
I'm confident Ron is much better.
to get out of the way this way, and not to have you do it.
You don't have to make a statement.
That's why this gallery, that people are wrong.
Why did you walk out there?
I mean, you're trying to apologize, right?
And then that opens it up with any questions you want about them, and yeah.
And, well, here it says, reach out a hundred miles.
Tomorrow, I don't think we just answer anything on faith.
It's just one of the companies.
What about the other?
I stated what I stated about the mission.
Nothing to do with that.
Nothing to do with that.
Do you think we've already heard back from you?
You might have heard.
They may, some fellow may be in the field, I guess.
With a question, Mr. President, will you repeat the bottom of the statement?
If that question comes, I think, in fact, you should say, well, Zipper is already talking about not getting my views on the situation yesterday, period, and let it drop in traffic.
Now, the only thing...
If the cannon has an error, if that comes, you'd love to say yes, but...
That would be the worst goddamn thing you could have happen.
I think he wrote that without being aware of this.
Oh, I know that.
I know that.
But I wouldn't even settle that.
You see, I wouldn't have that.
I thought, well, could it get me up?
But that tears your goddamn history.
It tears the ass.
First, I don't accept it, but it does.
There are a lot of people who may grieve them all.
What's the matter with him?
He's a son of a bitch.
He runs tail as soon as he's in such a...
Left-wingers and communists take off, so you've got to... Well, then there are the other people like Scott who have refused to repudiate it.
Or if you get the other...
If you get the question, I doubt you would have liked it.
You see, that's... That was put out of perspective once it were... And I gave you my views yesterday.
Yeah.
And I expressed my views.
That's putting it out of perspective.
Why don't you get... You can get a vote if you can and say that I'm not going to go into a little crap.
Yeah.
And if you develop the answer, we could continue, if I could, by leaving the camp table for a call.
You can say that I'm going to camp table for taking my sign, my reading on the channel.
That'll throw them off on the question on the model.
And what I think we ought to do is turn the tables on Florida.
and that I would say that the president will be going to Florida Thursday night and that it will be primarily devoted to domestic issues, winding up domestic issues prior to going to China.
Secretary Conley will be going, John Irvin will be going,
Is that good?
Yes, and I wouldn't say Secretary Rodney's just going.
He ain't.
I think he is.
That's fine.
That's fine.
But I meant he's going to stay in a hotel.
I wouldn't.
Yeah, he's going to.
Just say Secretary Connolly's going.
Now, Rogers will appear on the manifest later, but don't say today.
You don't mean to announce that he's going.
Right.
No, I mean, he's going to.
You just say he's going, and he's going to be meeting there with Secretary Connolly and John Riddle.
Yeah, but you ought to take Schultz on.
Actually, no.
I mean, we'll focus on domestic, but I see nothing wrong with the fact that he's going to the campaign, the president's going to the campaign.
Well, that's good.
That's right.
He's going to Florida with McConnell and the Secretary of Commerce.
He's going to Florida to work on domestic values.
He's going to China.
And if he doesn't, I mean, we'll also be studying.
And he will also be involved in the race.
And I would say he'll be continuing his studies.
He's taking his China folks along.
But he's also going to be meeting with the Secretary of Commerce and hearing on the focus of the question.
Yeah, so it shows we care a lot about him.
But the Rogers thing, then just the Secretary and Mrs. Rogers will be going home.
Yeah.
What did you say the President learned that they were planning to take a vacation over the weekend for the 55th?
Which is exactly what they're doing.
That's right.
We're not going to be getting off with his wife because she isn't going to be coming.
We're all going to be missing 4 o'clock.
I don't mention 4 o'clock that she's at the Rockets.
No, I'm going to call you.
I'll mention that on the plane.
I think the Conley.
I'll do the rest of it.
The Conley early.
Right.
We'll focus on you.
I can't take it.
I don't have to announce it.
Well, don't get the...
I mean, the people that come around our house, right?
Jump ship.
I tell you, we can do that every little bit.
Especially because they don't get many
You mean people in the staff or in the conference?
All the press.
Well, the press we know.
But I'm surprised the staff didn't get anything to it.
I'm surprised the staff didn't get anything to it.
That's terrible.
That's terrible.
That's terrible.
because none of them are bright enough to handle it properly.
I have great respect for them.
I'm sure the camp building, I lost all the rest, including me.
We didn't have many, many partners who should have pulled the trigger and went and banged all these assholes.
And I remember, I just can't remember.
It's a great part of that.
In all appearances.
And it's really cool.
is that they don't know the whole thing.
And they should go on a flight, right?
But they don't.
Because they care.
They want something to come out right, and they're worried, and so they raise these stupid questions about, you know, something.
So when he's thought about this or that, like the priming thing over there, you didn't think about what it would do domestically, for Christ's sake.
That's what was...
My word is that one of the reasons they didn't expand is because of the raising of loyalty issues and the traitor issues.
It's for...
When they come up with words more, you know, damn holiday, you know, don't you want to listen to them, and that kind of thing.
There's an ability to be able to say, no, that's not why it's bad.
It's not a fact.
I wouldn't understand that.
I wouldn't listen to them.
I've talked to some of these guys.
I've talked to some of these guys.
I mean, they, it was, I'm sure one of the reasons that they did not make much progress in a lot of the investigations was because there was this tremendous jealousy, which you have now brought to the table.
You know, it's pretty dull, but that guy that plays Henry Kissinger with the beard was great.
That was a lot of people.
That was a lot of people.
That guy that plays Henry Kissinger with the beard was great.
That was a lot of people.
I saw it, I liked it, because I liked the start of the movies, but it wasn't up to where it should have been.
If you look at the money they spent on production, it was a talent boost.
They kind of did this in the story.
Did it get into the interesting part of that story?
Did it bring up the capability of the kid?
Did it bring up the separates they had elevated in the movie?
There's no symbolism, I said.
There's no symbolism.
Well, you know, I don't know.
They've got an attack on this front or that front or the other front.
Don't you agree?
Yes, sir.
We're always out there.
We're always welcome at the end of the day.
But I love to stick it to the lips.
I just love to stick it to them.
I guess I escalated that, too.
That was what I heard the other day.
But that worked perfectly.
The whole idea now, why don't you have more press conferences?
All right, I said fine.
We're having a lot of questions.
What about me?
but I don't get into a discussion anymore.
I'm not going to get into a discussion there.
I'm not going to do it.
I might decide to have one a year.
I really, really don't.
Screw them.
They're out to drop us, and I know it, and I'll use them when I want to.
You said that.
You said that today.
I'll have press conferences on it.
That's a good answer.
They do come after the question.
Well, what about the agency that was during the press conference?
However, they come in, what we're having right now, what do you think?
I'm always finding around us, we've got a little kid right now, what do you think?
And then, we have another one.
I know one of them asked me about it, about a hundred kilowatts.
I said, I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm checking it like that.
I'm supposed to be doing it.
They asked me in the briefing, well, don't you go and talk to the president after we ask for a procession?
I said, no, I won't.
Just stand right up.
Is this guilt that they don't control, that they can't say anything at all, and therefore you say, yes, sir, have one?
It's not an actual issue.
People are not going to be concerned about whether you have press conferences.
That's right.
It's an issue for them if the people are not.
You know, if you go out and ask John Doe, I don't think one out of a hundred thousand would say, well, why doesn't he have more press conferences?
Do you think so?
No.
They see me all the time.
They try and shift it to the national issue by equating press conferences with credibility.
That doesn't equate.
Credibility could.
We don't have that problem, but it could be a national issue.
Critics tend to tie the two together.
Well, credibility.
In fact, you have two press briefings a day.
They know you're coming to see me before the damn briefings, and it will be back to you in the notes.
That's super.
They'll be the officials responsible for attracting you to the policy areas.
But what if they ask you, oh, one thing, you may ask, what about all the people who were oppressed?
What if they were?
Well, then they'll say, why do you do this show?
Yeah, well, that's a good question.
Well, the reason.
that she said that they know damn well.
She built it up very strongly and she did rest in fact this morning.
I didn't realize that's what she was going to do after her arrest.
Her point, her argument from my point of view was that somebody in a position that I am in should not be totally unknown to the American people because this is a chance for the people to see the personal and what is fine.
That's the posture she put it.
The answer is it was a long-standing question.
Well, I'm going to just drag them off of that.
I intend to be very short on tomorrow.
I'm going to give them the China bit.
Very shortly.
Must be ready to get ready to hit their shots.
It might be a good idea to keep the story.
I don't know.
Yeah.
Go get it early.
I want you to be assured about your funding.
I do think, though, that you've got to rely again on just the research you've done.
I mean, you must.
And I guess maybe you have something to help it.
that, you know, it's simply a compulsion to see the rest of the life.
And the point is that, Henry, you've got to realize that it ought to get you, and that you have borrowed it to you, us, them, and then you, which is, or you told him this from up around every, where was he talking?
I don't know, what'd he say?
He agreed, he talked to him about it,
He said that the rest of the day sliced everybody up by entering.
And said entering had avoided you terribly.
Was I right?
So I don't think our caregivers have the most proof of that.
The rest of the influence is still there.
The only place the influence is is in the Senate, so to speak.
I want you to grab everybody over there
.
.
.
.
.
It's already Gentile going.
Everybody with a foreskin.
Huh?
Really, I'm curious.
I have no feelings about it.
But it does look as if we didn't have so much to do in order to have, as far as you reported, in order to do it.
Now, I understand the reason I raised this question.
Now, the Chinese are called the Jews of Asia.
And that's a compliment.
Did you realize that, I looked over at the press list, and it showed that there was proof that no one had spent it.
Did you realize that out of your 82, there's 49 in Jews?
And it's the survival of all aspects of life.
Huh?
Blast.
I think I said, well, why'd you hire somebody?
I think what you ought to say is because of so many Jews, it wasn't real important.
There's not black on that list?
We're going to catch that.
We're going to catch all of this.
It's our fault.
We're not taking any of this back.
Yeah, we are, because you're wrong.
It's over there.
I'm out there now.
That's right.
But I hope I'm asking a question somewhere so that, you know, we can get back or something to one of these press forums or something, because I think... You can just say that the President's trauma was very...
He will get it right.
I just want to be sure to get it back.
We've got one.
Black one.
So coffee is your ranking A. Yeah.
So it's not an A.
It's a military system.
It's a terrorist organization.
It's not a rank.
It's not a very A.
It's kind of a copy.
Black one.
No, it's much different.
Yeah.
Well, I want him to go.
He's better than the pilots.
He's the best of the bunch.
For me, I don't mind any of them, but he has a manner that I like.
Well, let's put it that way.
That can be changed in order.
The point is that we put blacks.
We have blacks there in their regular positions.
We're not showcasing blacks.
We're going to hire a black.
You'll be sure something's wrong.
So if that question is raised, I would force one of the black people to come up with one.
And you say, as far as the press?
The press, we have no control.
They took their own.
And the news media in this nation, that's actually our heart of mind.
The fact that we made a nationwide selection like this, all they ever... Well, they could have taken that.
There's an NBC of a black reporter.
Nice guy, I just think.
Well, do you remember Matthews, though, who left NBC one of the days?
Well, they could have sent him, couldn't they?
Sure.
CBS.
The choice was up to the networks and the rest.
And it's...
This is a...
They won't ask a question.
There are some that have been around.
Thank God that we've got some.
And to take them to another trade, that's good.
And he'll be a marriage.
All the time.
All the time.
And it's a bit like the Secret Service thing.
They do have...
of their Secret Service group, there's a couple of very good blacks that he killed, and that'd be around to show the color of money.
Munson, unfortunately, was a Filipino.
Well, anyway, you'll tell, who can it be?
You'll probably be relieved.
But I think that,
I think we should give a very short strip to the story.
It's done now as far as we're concerned.
And as we can see, but my, I'll check with you again at 4 o'clock, 3 o'clock, 3.30.
We'll see whether, Bob, you've got any other questions.
But you get any other reactions on that.
I think it was a good one.
I think it was a good one.
With this in it, too, it gave the radio talk a call because there was a bunch of good guys.
It wasn't bad, but it was good.
But it didn't have anything that someone was going to use.
It was a good, well, except that historic piece on her and John.
Here are the breakthroughs, right?
Yeah.
That is good.
There he is.
There he is.
You'll need to wait a little bit.
I'm worried about this whole thing.
When he put out the statement yesterday, that's why he looked at that question.
I'm sure it's good.
It was good because he said
It's the same word that we don't question the failure to do.
What you would have said too, if you don't care.
Absolutely.
It was only the weapon point that your case is.
Definitely.
They had a string of hollow out and they picked up the technical definition of treason and they called it a traitor.
It actually is.
Constitutional determination used in the state to provide aid to the country.
And I said aid to the country.
And it isn't technical.
No.
The clear point is no.
No.
No, it isn't technical.
If I remembered that, it was the Constitution.
They let me use it.
No.
No.
No.
If I had used it, it wouldn't have been in play.
Thank you.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Take this subject to see how they're involved in Congress.
You can't go over and solve it, you know what I mean?
So, yeah, then they've got a line.
Don't pick, don't give them the whole thing, don't mess it up.
You have to just give them the basis to take the question.
That's the very first position, the way we say it.
We do have questions on the critics of our media non-policy.
The president covered this lately in his radio speech.
I think he understood it.
I think it's good.
I think it's very important.
I think it's very important.
I think it's very important.
In fact, this has carried me to never a reply.
But God is always on that world of fortune.
I always like to advise people to be wise to their beliefs.
In other words, it never, it doesn't advise them on how.
It really doesn't.
It never has something, and it never will.
It just isn't the kind of thing, unless you suck them on in some way.
I'm going to get off.
I'm going to get off.
We can talk a little bit about what we're going to do.
And you can see how broad that amount is.
I'm ready to turn around.
I'm supposed to.
This is a great time to run.
Correct.
Get it over with.
Another time.
I can't believe it.
I'm too goddamn excited about it.
I'm a perfect brother.
I'm upset.
I'm upset for these damn matters.
Why?
I'm so upset.
Indeed, I failed.
I'm not that yet.
He had never done it.
He did.
We don't think he did.
He never went.
He never talked to anybody here.
Right.
Onassis.
I don't know Onassis.
I don't know.
I don't think he could nail anything.
But the scary thing, and that's why you should pick moment, is that you're never really sure.
That's the joy of the learning.
Yeah.
Well, it's scary to question, Bob, how this could have been done.
That is utter dynamite.
I mean, sure, that's better than I would have ever snapped off.
That's better than I would have ever made this world up.
That bubble would be there.
I think we've got to be as tough as we have to be in order to get to end up where we've got to end up.
If we can't live there and start gently, we can end up living in the wild and so much of that.
But the better way to do it, be sure we can do it and be sure we're settled for the better.
I think it's not a debatable issue.
We're sorry.
But it's not a debatable issue.
But I mean it.
I think you can say that it's not a debatable issue.
It's not easy.
The problem is you've got to be able to say you have not ever talked to the president about it.
And do you know what about the family matter?
You've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got to be able to say you've got
You see, that's his drill.
He uses it.
I don't understand what all this is.
I guess, on this day, I should try to make it done.
I could.
It would be the best way I could say it here tonight.
And all these things overlap just as much as the individual themselves.
Just take a breath.