Conversation 323-023

Transcript (AI-Generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

That's the end of this tape.

Thank you.

Tonight I want to talk to you about one of the most difficult issues of our time, the issue of busing.

Across the nation, in the north, east, west and south, state, cities and local school districts have been torn apart in debate over this issue.

My own position is well known.

I am opposed to busing for the purpose of achieving racial balance in our public schools.

I have spoken out against busing scores of times over the years.

I believe most Americans wanting black share that view.

But what we need now is not just speaking out against floor busting, but action to stop it.

Above all, we need to stop it in the right way, in a way that will provide a better education for every child in America, in a desegregated school system.

The reason action is so urgent is because of a number of recent decisions in the lower federal courts.

Those courts have gone too far, in some cases beyond the requirements laid down by the Supreme Court, in ordering massive busing,

to achieve racial balance.

The decisions are left in their wake.

Confusion and contradiction of the law.

Anger, fear, turmoil of all communities.

And worst of all, agonized concern among hundreds of thousands of parents for the education and safety of their children who have been forced by court order to be bused miles away from their neighborhood schools.

What is the answer?

There are many who believe that a constitutional amendment is the only way to deal with this problem.

The constitutional amendment proposal deserves a thorough consideration by the Congress on its merits.

But as an answer to the immediate problem we face of stopping more busing now, the constitutional amendment approach has a fatal flaw.

It takes too long.

A constitutional amendment would take between a year and 18 months at the very least to become effective.

This means that hundreds of thousands of schoolchildren will be ordered to the courts to be bussed away from their neighborhood schools in the next school year with no hope for rigor.

What we need is action now, not two or three or four years from now.

There is only one effective way to deal with the problem now.

That is for the Congress to enact it.

That is why I am sending a special message to the Congress tomorrow urging immediate consideration and action on two nations.

First, I shall propose legislation that would call an immediate halt to all new busing orders by federal Congress, a moratorium on new busing.

Next, I shall propose a companion issue, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1972.

This act would require that every state or local county grant equal educational opportunities to every person, regardless of race, government, or national origin.

For the first time, the cherished American ideal of equality and educational opportunity would be affirmed in the law of the land by the elected representatives of the people in Congress.

The cherished American ideal of equality and educational opportunity would be affirmed in the law of the land by the elected representatives of the people in Congress.

The act would further establish an educational bill of rights, an educational bill of rights for Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, Indians, and others who start their education under language handicaps, to make certain that they too will have equal opportunity.

The act, I propose, would concentrate federal school aid funds on the areas of greatest educational need.

That means directing over two and a half billion dollars in the next year mainly towards improving the education of children,

from poor families.

This proposal deals directly with the problem that has been too often overlooked.

We all know that within the central cities of our nation there are schools so inferior that it is hypocrisy even to suggest that the poor children who go there are getting a decent education, let alone an education comparable to that of children who go to school in the suburbs.

Even the most extreme proponents of busing admit that it would be here

before programs could be set up and financed, which would bus the majority of these children out of these central city areas to better schools and suburbs.

That means that putting primary emphasis on more busing, rather than on better education, inevitably will lead a lost generation of poor children in the central cities to a bigger education.

It is time for us to make a national commitment to see that the schools in the central cities are upgraded,

so that the children who go there will have just as good a chance to get quality education as do the children who go to the schools in the suburbs.

What I am proposing is that at the same time we stop more bustling, we move forward to guarantee that the children currently attending the poorest schools in our cities and rural districts be provided with education equal to that of good schools in their communities.

Taken together, the two elements of my proposal

The moratorium on new buses and the Equal Educational Opportunity Center would focus our efforts where they really belong, on better education for all of our children, rather than on more buses for some of our children.

In addition, I am directing all agencies and departments of the federal government at every level to carry out the spirit as well as the letter of this message in all of their actions.

by directing the Justice Department to intervene in selected cases where the lower courts have gone beyond the Supreme Court's requirements in order to trust them.

These are the highlights of the new approach I propose.

Let me now go to the heart of the problem in practice.

I'm going to tell you why I feel that busing for the purpose of achieving racial balance in our schools is wrong, and why the great majority of Americans are running in wanting to bring it to an end.

The purpose of such busing

is to help to end segregation.

But experience in case after case has shown that busing is a bad means to a good end.

The frank recognition of that fact does not reduce our commitment to desegregation.

It simply tells us that we have to come up with a better means to that good end.

The great majority of Americans, black and white, feel strongly that the busing of school children away from their own neighborhoods for the purpose of achieving racial balance is wrong.

But the great majority of black and white also are determined that the process of desegregation must go forward under the goal of genuinely equal educational opportunities achieved.

The question then is, how can we end segregation in a way that does not result in more busing?

One emotional undercurrent that has done much to make this issue so difficult is the feeling that some people have that to oppose busing is to be anti-black.

This is dangerous nonsense.

There is no...

This is dangerous nonsense.

There is no escaping the fact that some people oppose busing because of racial prejudice.

But to go on from this to conclude that anti-busing

is simply a code word for prejudice, is a vicious lie on millions of concerned parents who oppose busing, not because they are against desegregation, but because they are for better education for their children.

They want their children educated in their own neighborhoods.

Many have invested their life savings in a home in a neighborhood they chose because it had good schools.

They do not want their children bused across the city to an inferior school just to meet some social planner's concerns.

what is considered to be the correct racial balance, or what is called progressive social policy.

There are right reasons for opposing busing, and there are wrong reasons.

And most people, including large and increasing numbers of blacks, oppose it for reasons that have little or nothing to do with race.

It would compound an injustice to persist in nasty busing, simply because some people oppose it for the wrong reasons.

There is another element to consider, the most important of all.

That is the human element, which I see reflected in thousands of letters I receive in my mail from worried parents all over the country to the north, east, west and south.

Let me give you some examples.

I believe it is wrong when an eight-year-old child who was once able to walk to a neighborhood school is now forced to travel two hours a day in a bus.

I believe it is wrong when a working mother is suddenly faced with three different bus schedules for her children, and that makes it impossible for her to continue to work.

I believe it is wrong when parents are burdened with new worries about their children's safety on the road and in neighborhoods far from home.

I believe it is wrong when a child in a poor neighborhood is denied the extra personal attention and financial support in his school that we know can make all the difference.

All these individual human wrongs add up to a deeply felt and growing frustration.

These are wrongs that can and must be separated.

That is the purpose of the legislation I am sending to Congress tomorrow.

I submit these proposals to the Congress, and I commend them to all of you listening to me tonight, mindful of the profound importance and the special complexity of the issues they address.

The key is action, and action now.

The Congress has the key.

If you agree with the goals I have described tonight, to stop more of us in doubt, and provide equality of opportunity for all of our children, I urge you to let your congressmen and senators know your views, so that the Congress will act properly to deal with this problem.

Let me close with a personal note.

This is a deeply emotional and divisive issue.

I have done my best to undertake to weigh and respect the reflecting and

To strike a balance which is thoughtful and just.

To search for actions that will best serve all of our nation's children.

I realize the program I recommended will not satisfy the extremists on the one side who oppose busing for the wrong reasons.

And I realize that my program will not satisfy the extreme social planners on the other side who insist on more busing at the cost of better education.

But while what I have said tonight will not appeal to either extreme, I believe I have expressed the views of the majority of Americans.

I believe that the majority of Americans of all races want more busing stopped and better education stopped.

Let us recognize that the issue of busing divides many Americans.

But let us also recognize that the commitment to equal opportunity in education unites Americans.

The proposals I have submitted to Congress will allow us to turn away from what divides us and to turn toward what unites us.

The way we handle this difficult issue is a supreme test of the character, the responsibility, and the decency of the American people.

Let us handle it in a way we can be proud of, by uniting behind a program which will make it possible for all the children in this great and good country to receive a better education

and thereby enjoy a better life, to receive a better education, and thereby enjoy a better life.