Conversation 374-020

Transcript (AI-Generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

He's kind of right-of-way with this sign.

This sign shows one day impact on the defense.

But he has shown some very significant changes in the underlying data.

For example, you're reading a negotiating settlement with the amount of $109,354.

In this poll, it turns around a complete baseline of $239,500.

on the government being too negative to look at, too radical to look at.

That's up to 66%.

Make so many mistakes and reflect on these judgments.

That's up to 61% to 66%.

In analyzing the economy, our positive rating has gone up.

I don't have all the basic data.

How could that be with the negative average?

I don't know.

Maybe I...

When he said the 7th and 14th League would have a negotiation with the Russians and the Chinese, now, as people look at this in terms of the finance side of the negotiations with the Russians and the Chinese, I had this idea of how we had him go out to Paris.

And he said, go ahead and hang yourself for a couple of days.

And I'm out of heaven.

But then, and we kind of worked this out together.

He said, then someone from a very high level has to say, and this is basically what we wanted to do, that we now had to ban this election.

The clearest possible choice.

We thought the choice was clear before, but it's even more clear now than it was.

President Nixon is ending the world war.

He's bringing home the real world.

He's going to give a free subcommittee, the non-capitalists, you know, the co-partners, free elections.

What a tragedy it would be if the American people would have shoes, whatever.

The man who would throw away 10 years of blood, sweat and tears.

He said right there, put all that down.

I said, well, that's the speech for somebody to make.

It really is.

We kind of worked with him.

He said, in the game, what was the plan?

In the game, we decided to do what was necessary for perhaps a year to ensure that the election machine didn't place itself behind.

To ensure that there aren't re-elections.

To ensure that the ceasefire didn't happen.

How about that?

Roger said this.

Brunches would be great.

If you have too many eggs, you could do this too.

But you wait until the magazine is out.

Then you say, let's put it all in this thing.

If we do, then we ought to buy television, right?

This is it, because maybe buy television, right?

Because you see, what all the other artists say, or you could buy television for comedy.

But the point is that all the other arguments are, could we have done this four years ago?

You can argue that's sort of equivalent to the history of that, but people don't like that.

And the rest is all part of the argument, but I think if you really put this thing into

proper context, what this is, is a decision by the emergency department, whether they want to implement it, or do you have some skillful innovation in question?

You know, two and a half may have already been supported, we didn't some of these days.

Or do you want just to let someone who was already sick, and then you want to let them just surrender to the bank?

Right.

When you laid our field up, it was for the emergency person, and the department seemed to have got an issue with us.

You have to make that time period when we had a lot of... Sir, you told us that we're outside your officer.