Conversation 386-001

On December 5, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon, Charles W. Colson, H. R. ("Bob") Haldeman, White House operator, Stephen B. Bull, Ronald L. Ziegler, Manolo Sanchez, John B. Connally, and unknown person(s) met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building at an unknown time between 2:00 pm and 6:20 pm. The Old Executive Office Building taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 386-001 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 386-1

Date: December 5, 1972
Time: Unknown between 2:00 pm and 6:20 pm
Location: Executive Office Building

The President met with Charles W. Colson and H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman.

[This recording began while the meeting was in progress]

       Vietnam negotiations
            -Breakdown
                 -Press relations
                        -Ronald L. Ziegler
                              -John B. Connally
                              -Richard A. Moore
                              -Connally
                 -Henry A. Kissinger’s recommendations
                        -The President’s possible television [TV] appearance
                              -Blame
                                    -North Vietnam
                                          -US, South Vietnam
                              -US military action
                                    -Pace
                                    -Civilians
                                    -The President’s message to Kissinger
                                          -North Vietnam
                                    -Duration
                                          -Settlement agreement
                                                 -Prisoners of war [POWs]
                              -The President’s previous TV appearances
                                    -Troop withdrawals
                                    -US military action
                                          -Cambodia
                                          -Bombing, mining
                              -Purpose
                              -Duration
                                    -Outline
                                               -2-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                         (rev. July-08)

                                                                 Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                               -Kissinger’s schedule
                               -Record
                               -Necessity
                                     -North Vietnam, South Vietnam
                                     -Public relations [PR]
                                           -North Vietnam
                                           -George S. McGovernites
                                                  -South Vietnam
                                           -Possible domestic problem
                                                  -North Vietnam, McGovernites
                                                        -Blame on US
                                                               -Effect
                                                                     -Hardhats
                                                                     -1972 election
                                                                     -George H. Gallup polls
                                                                           -Reinhardt [sp?] [first
                                                                            name unknown]
                                                                           -Joseph L. Tauro
                                           -Settlement agreement
                                                  -Cease-fire
                                                        -Communist violations
                                                                -Louis P. Harris poll

The President talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 2:00 pm and
2:56 pm.

[See Conversation No. 34-23]

[Conversation No. 386-1A]

[End of telephone conversation]

       1972 election
            -Vietnam negotiations
                   -Kissinger’s press conference, October 26, 1972
                         -Reaction
                                -Tone
                         -Polls
                                -[Opinion Research Corporation] [ORC]
                                -Albert E. Sindlinger
                                             -3-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                                 Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                        -Watergate
             -McGovern
                 -Tax reform
                 -Unemployment
                       -Columbia Broadcasting System [CBS] profile
                       -Whites
                            -Blacks
                                 -Integration
                       -McGovern’s speech on the economy
                            -Colson’s conversation with Haldeman
                                 -Timing

       Vietnam negotiations
            -Breakdown
                 -Kissinger’s recommendations
                        -The President’s possible TV appearance
                             -The President’s view
                             -Colson and Haldeman’s views

The President talked with Stephen B. Bull between 2:56 pm and 2:57 pm.

[See Conversation No. 34-24]

[Conversation No. 386-1B]

[End of telephone conversation]

       The President’s schedule
            -Reception for California administration officials
                  -The President’s possible statement
                         -Robert H. Finch’s recommendation
                              -California Republicans
                                    -Talent
                                    -TV poll
                                    -Possible meeting in San Clemente
                                          -Timing

The President talked with the White House operator at 2:58 pm.

[See Conversation No. 34-25]
                                              -4-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                          (rev. July-08)

                                                              Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

[Conversation No. 386-1C]

[End of telephone conversation]

       The President’s schedule
            -Reception for California administration officials
                  -Dinner
                         -Blair House
                         -Seating arrangements
                               -The President’s experience as Congressman
                  -Medals
                         -Presentation
                         -Gold
                               -Value
                         -Leonard K. Firestone
                         -Taft Schreiber
                         -Silver
                         -Gold
                               -Inscription
                  -Finch
                         -Letter
                  -Dinner
                  -Camp David
                  -Californians
                         -The President’s role
                               -Hand-shaking, greetings
                               -Seating
                               -Clothing
                                     -Black tie
                               -The President’s possible remarks
                                     -Vietnam War
                               -Departure

Ronald L. Ziegler entered at 3:00 pm.

       Vietnam negotiations
            -Breakdown
                 -Kissinger’s recommendations
                        -Instruction for Ziegler, Haldeman, Colson
                                               -5-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                              Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                              -Consultation
                                   -Location
                                   -Reading

Ziegler left at an unknown time before 3:10 pm.

       Second term reorganization
            -North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]
                  -Donald H. Rumsfeld
                        -Departure
                              -Timing
                  -Peter G. Peterson
                        -Departure
                              -Trip to Europe
                              -Rejection of ambassadorship-at-large
                              -Trip to Europe
                                    -Common Market
                                    -Japan
                                    -Brazil

       The President’s schedule
            -Reception for California administration officials
                  -Finch’s recommendation
                         -Blair House
                               -Dinner
                  -Medals presentation
                  -Tribute to Finch
                         -John D. Ehrlichman, George P. Shultz, Rumsfeld, Peter M. Flanigan
                               -Reception
                                     -Cocktails
                  -Purpose
                  -Dinner
                         -Entertainment
                               -Jonathan Winters
                               -[Foster Brooks]
                         -Clothing
                               -Black tie
                         -Entertainment
                               -Medals presentation
                               -Brooks
                                       -6-

            NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                 (rev. July-08)

                                                          Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                       -Winters

Second term reorganization
     -Rumsfeld
           -NATO
     -Peterson
           -Trip
                 -Study
                 -Ambassadorship-at-large
                       -Cabinet rank
                       -Shultz’s recommendation
                 -Special representative
                 -Plane
                       -David M. Kennedy
                       -Japan
                       -Gas
                             -Cost

The President’s schedule
     -Reception for California administration officials
           -Finch
                  -Conversation with Haldeman
                         -Camp David
           -Timing
           -Hand-shaking
           -Remarks
           -Speeches
           -Entertainment
           -Medals presentation
           -White House staff
           -California Republicans
                  -Possible meeting in San Clemente
                         -Timing
                  -Ronald W. Reagan, Finch
                  -Politics

Second term reorganization
     -Finch and Rumsfeld
           -Compared to “Hamlet”
     -Rumsfeld
                                             -7-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                             Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                  -NATO

Ziegler entered at an unknown time after 3:00 pm.

       Haldeman’s schdedule
            -Ziegler
            -Connally
            -Meeting with the President
                  -Timing

Haldeman left at 3:10 pm.

       Vietnam negotiations
            -Breakdown
                 -Kissinger’s recommendations
                        -The President’s possible TV appearance
                             -The President’s previous TV appearances
                                   -Cambodia
                                   -The President’s May 8, 1972 decision
                             -Enemy trickery
                             -US military action
                                   -Duration
                                          -POWs
                             -PR
                                   -US
                                          -North Vietnam, press relations
                                   -Possible domestic problem
                                          -North Vietnam
                                          -McGovernites
                                          -Press relations
                                          -Washington, DC
                                          -Pressure on Kissinger
                                          -North Vietnam
                             -US bombing of North Vietnam
                                   -B-52s
                             -PR
                                   -Administration supporters
                                   -Administration opponents
                                   -Kissinger’s possible statement
                                          -Tone
                           -8-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                     (rev. July-08)

                                             Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                   -Public expectations
                   -Washington, DC
                         -Compared to Wall Street
                   -Morale
                   -North Vietnam
                   -The President’s trips to the People’s Republic of China
                    [PRC] and the Soviet Union
                   -Kissinger’s resignation
             -Haldeman’s and the President’s view
             -Ziegler’s view
                   -“Dramatic” effect
                   -US military action
                         -Pace
                                -Statements
                         -18th and 19th Parallels
                   -Previous statements
                         -Kissinger’s “peace is at hand” statement, October
                           26, 1972
                         -The President’s address, “Look to the Future,”
                           November 2, 1972
                                -Settlement agreement
                                       -Signing
                                              -Timing
                                                   -US troops remaining in
                                                    South Vietnam
                                                   -Draft
                                                   -Casualties
-Kissinger’s possible statement
      -North Vietnam’s intransigence
      -Settlement agreement
             -South Vietnam
      -Recess
      -North Vietnam’s intransigence
      -POWs
      -US bombing of North Vietnam
-Kissinger’s recommendation
      -The President’s possible TV appearance
             -PR
                   -“Peace is at hand”
-Kissinger’s possible statement
                                      -9-

           NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                (rev. July-08)

                                                        Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                 -TV
                 -US military action
                        -Duration
                               -POWs
           -Kissinger’s message
                 -North Vietnam-South Vietnam relations
                        -Vietnamization
           -US bombing of North Vietnam
                 -Haiphong, Hanoi
           -North Vietnam
                 -Settlement agreement
                        -“Peace is at hand”
           -Kissinger’s possible statement
                 -Duration
                 -Le Duc Tho
                 -North Vietnamese intransigence
                        -Settlement agreement
                               -Signing
                 -POWs
                 -Questions
           -Kissinger’s recommendations
                 -The President’s possible TV appearance
                        -PR
                               -Public interest in Christmas shopping, POWs
                        -“Peace is at hand”
                               -North Vietnam’s reversion

Press relations
      -Ziegler’s announcement
             -Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD]
             -Peterson’s departure
                   -Leak
                         -Shultz

Vietnam negotiations
     -Breakdown
          -Kissinger’s possible statement
                 -Tone
                 -Previous statements
                       -Timing of signing of settlement agreement [November 2, 1972
                              -10-

     NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                         (rev. July-08)

                                               Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                   statement]
                         -Compared to “peace is at hand”
           -POWs
                  -PR
                         -POW wives
                               -North Vietnam
                               -1972 campaign
                               -Honor
     -Kissinger’s recommendations
           -Assessing blame
     -Honor
           -Statement
                  -US military action
     -Statement
           -Necessity
-North Vietnam’s possible position
     -Kissinger’s credibility
           -“Peace is at hand”
           -Settlement agreement
     -North Vietnam’s possible subversion of South Vietnam
           -The President’s message to South Vietnam
                  -Settlement agreement
                         -Congressional relations
                               -End of war
     -Kissinger’s credibility
           -Kissinger’s relationship with the President
     -Pressure on South Vietnam
     -Delays
           -Congressional relations
                  -1972 election
                         -The President’s victory margin
-Breakdown
     -Kissinger’s recommendations
           -The President’s possible TV appearance
                  -Necessity
                  -Timing
                         -Christmas
                         -1972 election
                  -Tone
                  -Strategy
                                              -11-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                                 Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                  -US bombing of North Vietnam
                        -Hanoi
                        -PR
                              -B-52 loss [November 22, 1972]
                                    -Effect
                              -Kissinger’s view
                  -Kissinger’s possible statement
                        -Points

Manolo Sanchez entered at an unknown time after 3:10 pm.

       The President’s schedule
            -Camp David
            -Reception for California administration officials
                  -Blair House
                         -Clothing
                               -Suit
                                     -Zosimo T. Monson

Sanchez left and Connally and Haldeman entered at 3:30 pm.

       Connally’s schedule
            -Jetstar

       Press relations
             -Ziegler’s press conference
                    -Second term reorganization
                         -Eugene T. Roussides’s and Charls E. Walker’s departures
                    -The President’s schedule
                         -Meeting with Walker
                               -The President’s conversation with Shultz
                               -Camp David
                               -Ziegler’s conversation with Shultz
                         -Camp David
                               -Return
                    -Second term reorganization
                         -Peterson’s departure
                               -Statement
                                      -Shultz
                                             -12-

                    NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                               Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

Ziegler left at 3:35 pm.

       Connally’s schedule

       The President’s schedule
            -Meeting with Shultz

       US-Soviet Union Gas Deal
           -Kissinger
                  -US-Soviet Union Summit, 1973
           -Involvement
                  -Commerce and State Departments
                  -White House
           -Connally’s responsibility
                  -Shultz
                  -Anatoliy F. Dobrynin
                         -Conversation with Kissinger
                               -The President’s conversation with Kissinger
                                     -Florida
                  -Politics
                         -Kissinger
                  -Economics
                         -Shultz
                               -Costs
                                     -Loan guarantees
                  -White House
                  -The President’s conversations with Kissinger, Shultz
                  -Connally’s conversation with Kissinger
                         -Kissinger’s return from Paris
                  -Dobrynin
           -Announcement
                  -Timing
                         -US-Soviet Union summit, 1973
                               -May or June
                               -Arms control
                  -Dobrynin
                  -Soviet Union trade minister [Nikolai S. Patolichev]
                         -Possible meeting with Connally
                         -Pipeline companies
                               -Connally’s role
                                             -13-

                  NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                       (rev. July-08)

                                                              Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                  -Connally’s possible trip to Soviet Union
                  -Connally’s responsibility
                  -The President’s view
            -Armand Hammer
                  -The President’s schedule
                  -Capital
                  -Credit
                  -Investments
                        -El Paso Company
            -US interests
            -Export-Import [Ex-Im] Bank
            -Joint East-West Bank
                  -Loans
                        -US underwriting
            -Involvement
                  -Secretary of Commerce
                  -White House
                        -Kissinger
                              -Politics
                        -Flanigan

An unknown person entered at an unknown time after 3:35 pm.

       Refreshments

The unknown person left at an unknown time before 6:20 pm.

            -Ex-Im Bank
                  -Gas prices
                  -Gamal Abdel Nasser
                        -Relations with US
                  -Diplomatic relations
            -Peterson
                  -Successor
                        -Harry S. Dent
                              -South Carolina
                              -Loyalty
            -Algeria
            -Iraq
                  -Connally’s possible trip to
                                     -14-

           NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                               (rev. July-08)

                                                      Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

     -Saudi Arabia
          -Hammer
                -[Faisal, King of Saudi Arabia] Malik Faisal ibn Abd al-Aziz-al-Saud
                      -Possible message from the President
                            -Haldeman
                            -Kissinger
                -Concessions
          -Iran
                -[Shah of Iran] Mohammed Reza Pahlavi
          -Algeria
          -President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Committee [PFIAB]
          -Hammer
                -Concessions
          -The President’s experience as Vice President
                -World trip
                      -Donald McI. Kendall
          -Timing
                -January 1973
     -Connally’s contacts
          -[David] Kenneth Rush
          -Shultz
          -William J. Casey
                -Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs
                -Relationship

Second term reorganization
     -State Department
           -Casey
                 -Conversation with Ehrlichman
     -William P. Clements, Jr.
           -Conversation with Connally
                 -Oil deal lawsuit
                       -Argentinians
           -Senate Armed Services Committee
     -H. Ross Perot
           -Vietnam War
                 -Cease-fire
                       -POWs, missing in action [MIAs]
                             -Records
                 -Commission
                                      -15-

           NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                (rev. July-08)

                                                         Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                       -MIAs
                           -International organization
                       -POWs and families

Vietnam negotiations
     -Breakdown
          -Kissinger’s recommendations
                 -The President’s possible TV appearance
                      -Connally’s view
                            -Details of October 1972 agreement
                            -Kissinger’s messages
                            -PR
                                   -Cease-fire
                            -Translation excuse
                            -Alternative
                      -Ziegler’s view
                            -Previous statements
                                   -“Peace is at hand”
                                          -Compared to timing of signing of settlement
                                           agreement [November 2, 1972 statement]
                      -US bombing of North Vietnam
                            -Pace
                                   -Effect
                      -Ziegler’s view
                            -Draft
                            -Casualties
                            -Timing
                      -Connally’s view
                            -Recess
                            -North Vietnamese intransigence
                      -South Vietnam
                            -The President’s meeting with Nguyen Phu Duc
                                   -Settlement agreement
                                          -Changes
                                                -North Vietnam
                                          -Withdrawal of North Vietnamese troops from
                                           South Vietnam
                                          -Congressional relations
                                                -US aid to South Vietnam
                                                       -Cut off
                     -16-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                (rev. July-08)

                                      Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                         -POWs
                         -Cease-fire
                         -South Vietnam’s self-determination
                         -North Vietnamese troops in South Vietnam
                         -Cease-fire
            -North Vietnam
                  -Congressional relations
                         -Cut off of US aid
       -North Vietnamese intransigence
            -October 8, 1972 agreement
                  -Thieu
                         -US presence in South Vietnam
                  -Compared to October 26, 1972 agreement
                         -Changes
                         -Congressional relations
                               -Cut off of US aid
            -US bombing of North Vietnam
                  -Christmas
                  -Announcement
                  -B-52s
                  -Civilian casualties
            -Status of negotiations
                  -October 1972
                  -Settlement agreement
                         -Coalition government
                               -Communists
                         -North Vietnamese troops in South Vietnam
            -Kissinger’s possible statement
                  -Tone
                         -October 26, 1972 agreement
                               -“Peace is at hand”
            -Instructions to Haldeman for message to Kissinger
                  -October 26, 1972 agreement
                         -Congressional relations
                               -US funds for US military action and
                                 military and economic aid to South
                                 Vietnam
                                       -Settlement agreement
                  -South Vietnam
                  -Impasse
                      -17-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                (rev. July-08)

                                        Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                         -Consultations
                   -Resumption of talks
             -Kissinger
                   -Emotions
                   -Resignation
                         -The President’s trips to the PRC and the
                           Soviet Union
                         -Timing
             -Instructions to Haldeman for message to Kissinger
                   -Kissinger’s efforts
                   -Consultations
                   -Resumption of talks
                   -US military action
                         -Pace
                   -Kissinger’s possible statement
                         -Length
                               -Ziegler’s view
                         -Tone
                         -Translation excuse
                         -North Vietnamese troops in South Vietnam
                         -Coalition government
                               -National Council of National
                                 Reconciliation and Concord [NCRC]
                                        -Thieu’s veto
                         -US bombing of North Vietnam
                               -Pace
                                        -“Hawks”
                               -Duration
                                        -POWs
                                             -McGovern
                                                    -R. Sargetn Shriver
                                             -Connally’s TV speech,
                                               October 20, 1972
       -PR
             -Peace with honor
                   -McGovern
             -Details
                   -Christmas
             -Economy
                   -Retail sales
                     -18-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                (rev. July-08)

                                      Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

             -Alexander M. Haig, Jr.
             -Kissinger’s messages
                    -Kissinger’s outlook
                          -Kissinger’s possible statement
       -Instructions to Haldeman for message to Kissinger
             -Initiative
             -Recess
                    -Consultations
             -Return to Washington, DC
       -PR
             -Delays
             -Translation
                    -“Organization”
             -Administration opponents
             -Administration supporters
             -US bombing of North Vietnam
                    -Duration
                          -POWs
             -The President’s previous statements
                    -Cambodia
                          -Supplies
                    -The President’s May 8, 1972 decision
                          -US bombing and mining of North Vietnam
       -Instructions to Haldeman for message to Kissinger
             -Kissinger’s possible statement
                    -Tone
             -The President’s meeting with Connally
             -North Vietnamese intransigence
                    -October 26, 1972 agreement
                          -Congressional relations
                                -Funds
             -Haldeman’s conversations with others
                    -Connally
                    -“Hawks”
             -Congressional relations
                    -Funds
             -Consultations
       -The President’s May 8, 1972 decision
             -Kissinger’s trip to the Soviet Union
                    -Kissinger’s return
                              -19-

     NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                         (rev. July-08)

                                               Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                                -Kissinger’s meeting with Connally
                           -North Vietnam
                           -US-Soviet Union summit
                                -Cancellation
                                      -Speech
                      -US bombing of North Vietnam
                           -US-Soviet Union summit
-Breakdown
     -North Vietnamese intransigence
           -Cut off of arms to North Vietnam and South Vietnam
                 -US-Soviet Union and US-PRC relations
                        -Mutual and Balanced Force Reductions [MBFR]
                               -Europe
                        -Dobrynin
                        -Paris
     -Kissinger’s recommendations
           -The President’ possible TV appearance
                 -Kissinger’s morale
                 -North Vietnam
                        -Blame
                 -US military action
                 -Resumption of talks
                        -Terms
                               -October 8, 1972 agreement
                 -PR
                 -Congressional relations
                        -Funds
                               -Continuation of war
-US-North Vietnam bilateral deal
     -POWs
           -Cessation of US mining and bombing of North Vietnam
           -Cut off of US military and economic aid to South Vietnam
                 -Thieu
     -Congressional relations
           -Cut off of US military and economic aid to South Vietnam
                 -Vietnamization
                 -Responsibility
                 -Thieu
-Haldeman’s message to Kissinger
     -Timing
                                          -20-

                 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                     (rev. July-08)

                                                           Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                 -The President’s possible TV appearance

      1972 election

*****************************************************************
[Begin segment reviewed under deed of gift]

      Democratic National Committee [DNC]
          -New chairman
                 -Robert S. Strauss
                       -Possible actions
                       -Traits
          -George S. McGovern supporters
                 -Hubert H. Humphrey
                 -Attitudes

      Politics
             -Democrats and Republicans
                 -Connally’s view
                        -Third party
                        -Liberals, conservatives
                 -Connally as candidate
                        -Ability to win
                              -California
                        -Edmund G. (“Pat”) Brown nomination
                        -Ronald Reagan nomination
                        -John V. Tunney
                 -Third party
                        -American National Party
                        -American Independent Party
                        -Koch [?] [first name unknown]
                        -Ken Moore [?]
                        -Public reaction
                              -Vietnam war
                 -Leadership
                        -Elections
                        -Connally’s proposals
                        -Money [?]
                        -Nelson A. Rockefeller
                                           -21-

                 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                      (rev. July-08)

                                                            Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                             -New York
                 -1972 election
                       -1968 election
                       -John N. Mitchell
                       -Florida
                       -Texas
                       -Georgia
                       -Texas
                             -Blacks
                 -Voting habits
                 -Registration
                 -Party selection

[End segment reviewed under deed of gift]
*****************************************************************

      Connally
           -Presidency
                 -Public opinion
                       -William Benton
                             -Lyndon B. Johnson’s home
                             -Connecticut
                             -Conversation with Connally
                                   -Possible meeting in New York
                       -H(uey) Paul Simon
                             -Dallas
                             -Conversation with Connally
                       -Responsible liberals
                             -Democratic Party
                       -1972 election
                             -California
                       -Charles D. (“Tex”) Thornton
                             -Conversation with Connally
                                   -Litton Industries
                                         -Roy L. Ash
                                         -William Proxmire
                                         -Debt
                                         -California
                                               -Asa V. Call, Sizemore [first name unknown]
                                           -22-

                 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                      (rev. July-08)

                                                         Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                 -Kissinger’s view
                       -Agnew
                       -Ehrlichman, Dent
                 -Republican Party

*****************************************************************
[Begin segment reviewed under deed of gift]

      Politics
             -Third party
             -Republican Party
                   -Strength
                         -Compared to Democratic Party
                   -Liberals
                         -Charles McC. Mathias, Jr.
                         -Charles H. Percy
             -Democratic Party
                   -Presidential nominations
                   -Liberals
                   -Strauss
                         -Blacks
                   -Attitudes
             -Republican Presidential nominees
                   -Rockefeller
                   -Reagan
                   -Percy
                   -Mathias
                   -William E. Brock, III
                   -Rockefeller
             -Third party
                   -Compared to Republican Party
                         -New Majority
                         -Name change
                         -Characteristics
                         -Structure
                         -Haldeman’s view

      Congress
           -William E. Timmons
                                     -23-

           NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                (rev. July-08)

                                                   Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

     -Gerald R. Ford
     -1972 election
          -Ford
     -Democratic members compared to Republican
          -Number
          -Usefulness to Republicans
     -George H. Mahon

Republican Party
     -Traits
     -Assistance to the President
     -Haldeman’s view
            -Control
     -John C. Stennis
     -Russell B. Long
     -J. Strom Thurmond
     -Harry F. Byrd, Jr.
     -James O. Eastland
     -John L. McClellan
     -Seniority in Congress
            -Attrition
            -Mathias
            -Mahon
     -The President’s supporters
     -Presidential nominees for 1976 election
            -Rockefeller
            -Reagan
            -Traits
            -Chances for success
            -Future elections
     -Connally as candidate
            -Duration of office
            -California primary
            -Strategy
     -Dwight D. Eisenhower campaign
     -Connally as candidate
            -Chances for success
            -Democratic Party nomination
                   -Compared to Republican Party
            -Support in California
                                            -24-

                 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                    (rev. July-08)

                                                         Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

                      -Radicals
                      -Moderates
                      -Firestone
                      -Republican primary
                -Republican primaries
                      -New Hampshire
                      -Colorado
                -Spiro T. Agnew
                -Reagan

[End segment reviewed under deed of gift]
*****************************************************************

      Second term reorganization
           -Winton M. (“Red”) Blount
           -Peterson
                 -NATO
                 -Economics
           -NATO
                 -Rumsfeld
                       -Frederic V. Malek
           -Peterson
                 -Paper
                       -Cabinet rank
                       -Washington, DC
                       -Ambassador at large
                       -Europe, Japan
                       -Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]
                       -NATO
                       -Japan
                       -Shultz
                       -Commerce Department
                       -European Economic Community [EEC]
                             -Report
                                   -Spring 1973
                                   -US relations
                                         -Recommendations
                 -Departure
                       -Kissinger
                                             -25-

                  NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                         Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

            -State Department
                   -Rush
                   -William J. Casey
                   -William J. Porter
            -Ambassadorships
                   -Walter H. Annenberg
                   -Chad
                   -West Germany
                         -Martin J. Hillenbrand
                   -John A. Volpe
                         -Italy
                         -Loyalty
            -Justice Department
                   -Richard G. Kleindienst
                         -Announcement
                         -Loyalty
            -Edward L. Morgan
            -Schedule C
            -Kleindienst
            -John N. (“Jack”) Irwin, II
            -Justice Department
                   -John N. Mitchell
                   -Judges
                         -US
                         -Supreme Court
            -Irwin
            -Supreme Court
                   -South
                   -Age
                   -South
                   -Age
                         -Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

      Connally

*****************************************************************
[Begin segment reviewed under deed of gift]

      Politics
                               -26-

      NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                          (rev. July-08)

                                                  Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

-Connally as candidate
     -Change in party
     -Grass roots movement
     -Timing
     -Strategy
           -Change in party
     -Republican Party
           -High-level delegation
     -Strategy
           -Democratic Party
                  -Presidential nomination
           -Momentum
           -Past tactics
                  -Success
           -Timing
     -DNC
     -Independents
     -Democratic Party
           -Republican nomination
           -Connally’s departure
           -Independents
     -Strauss
     -Independents
     -Coalition
     -Third party
     -Liberals
           -Robert M. LaFollette
     -Republican Party
           -Voting habits
           -Political orientation
                  -Polls
           -La Follette
                  -Minnesota Farmer Labor party
     -West Virginia
     -Republican Independent Coalition
           -The President’s supporters
           -Public reaction
           -Senate
           -Chances for success
     -Republican Party
                               -27-

      NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                          (rev. July-08)

                                                 Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

            -Eisenhower
            -The President’s experience
            -Need for change
      -Republican Independent Party
            -Youth
      -Republican demographics
            -Compared to Democrats
      -Voting habits
-Democrats
      -Compared to Republicans
      -Definition
      -James O. Eastland
      -Bella S. Abzug
      -Compared to Republicans
            -Reagan
            -Jacob K. Javits
-Third party
      -New name
      -Independents
      -Conservatives
      -Coalition
      -Name
      -Republicans
            -Independents
      -Anne L. Armstrong [?]
      -Inclusiveness
      -Future
-Connally as candidate
      -Motivations
      -Democrats
      -Republicans
-Spiro T. Agnew
      -Competition with Connally
      -The President’s view
      -Democratic Party
      -The President’s conversation with Edward Bolland [?]
      -Traits
      -Vice Presidential experience
      -Connally-Agnew contest
            -Need to avoid
                                            -28-

                  NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                            Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

           -California Republicans
           -Rockefeller
                 -Nominee
           -Agnew
                 -Motivations

[End segment reviewed under deed of gift]
*****************************************************************

      Presidency
            -The President’s schedule
                 -Trips to Florida
                 -Agnew
                 -Shultz
                       -Economic expertise
                 -Foreign policy
                       -Kissinger
                 -Cronies
                 -Secret Service
                 -Staff relations
                       -Cronies
                              -Charles G. (“Bebe”) Rebozo, Robert H. Abplanalp
                       -Lunches, dinners, social contact
                       -Secret Service
                              -Social contact
                       -Franklin D. Roosevelt
                       -Dwight D. Eisenhower
                              -Sherman Adams
                              -W. Alton (“Pete”) Jones
                              -Charles S. Jones
                              -Compared to the President
                                    -Haldeman, Ehrlichman

*****************************************************************
[Begin segment reviewed under deed of gift]

      Politics
             -George C. Wallace [?]
                                 -29-

      NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                           (rev. July-08)

                                            Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

-Republicans
      -Youth
      -Organization
-Connally as candidate
-Democrats and Republicans
      -Voting
-1976 Presidential nominee
      -Rockefeller
            -Compared to Agnew
            -Vulnerabilities
      -Reagan
            -Chances for success
      -Melvin R. Laird
            -Traits
            -Polls
-Robert J. Dole [?]
-Telephone calls
-1962 gubernatorial race
      -California
-Republican Party
-Connally as candidate
      -Rationale
      -Alternatives
      -Chances for success
            -Liberal intellectuals
      -Support from Republicans
            -1932 election
                   -Herbert C. Hoover
                   -Franklin D. Roosevelt
      -Connally’s view
            -Support
            -George W. Romney
                   -Liberal
            -George S. McGovern
                   -New voters
            -Third party
-Lyndon B. Johnson
-George H. W. Bush
-Roosevelt
      -Senate
                                              -30-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                        (rev. July-08)

                                                                 Conversation No. 386-1 (cont’d)

[End segment reviewed under deed of gift]
*****************************************************************

       Connally’s career
            -Per-hour salary

Connally and Haldeman left at 6:20 pm.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

I think Ron is.
I think Ron.
I think you should get to Ron.
Ron.
Ron.
Ron.
I think you should get to Ron immediately and say, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
And the only other one I can think of is .
I don't think this is kind of .
I think it is wrong, basically.
Ron will see.
And as I say, we're not concerned about the police or the press.
I'm not concerned about the press.
Right, you said it would be bad either way.
It's not going to be very good.
What we're really talking about is the country.
And what the hell I say?
No.
And really what I want to say, what the hell do I say?
I just go on.
And put the blame on them.
That's really what it is.
It's a question of who is to blame when the negotiators break it down.
Kissinger is asking that I go on national television to put the blame on the minority and the needs, because they will be putting the blame on us, and also to take the blame off of some of them, those who have been harmed.
Up to that point, so be it.
Then he's asking that I go on for the purpose of saying, what then do we do now?
He said, what we do now is that we should continue our military action on a step-by-step basis.
He suggested that.
That's very strong.
I know, I know.
My point is, there ain't nothing to step up.
It's a weak reason, because I know what the hell we have to do.
There isn't a hell of a lot more we can do without Frank and Jake and El Cedric.
Alright, fine.
So, the main thing there is to do that.
I told that to the guy with that message.
He didn't do it.
He's not talking about it.
Tell them we're going to do it.
But we aren't just setting it up.
Then he goes on.
Then he next says that we should go on and say that we will continue our military actions until we get an agreement.
What kind of an agreement are we insisting upon?
He says, no, we can't.
We tried to get a political agreement.
An agreement for our prisoners.
Until we get our prisoners back, until we have achieved this, then who remains in jail?
Well, that's right.
That's an agreement.
He doesn't need it.
That's what I meant by agreement.
Until we get an agreement to get our prisoners back and return responsible, that's what I meant by agreement.
You know what I mean?
That is what we say, our goal.
See, me and Tanya have made these speeches where we say, either I've announced the troop reduction, or I've announced we're going to go home, or we're going to go to Cambodia, or I've announced we're going to stand firm, or we're going to do some other thing, or we're going to bomb a mine at this time.
What in the name of God am I telling the American people?
We're going to do something lovely going on.
He says, we're all in confidence.
10 to 15 minutes should get us out of line.
It takes 30 minutes.
Quit it.
Jesus Christ, it takes 30 minutes to get through that.
And if you've ever heard that, we come in and jump in and say, let me take five minutes.
I can't imagine.
He doesn't know.
We all do.
But I think what this involves is really setting the record straight.
It doesn't want to help with an argument.
It doesn't want to help with a subject.
The question is, and here's the other thing, whether the people need to have abysmal, you know, whether we need to rally support.
Let us assume the words, let us assume.
I don't think the need is there that much yet.
Now, if that's true, then his case may have some merit.
But you've got to question his premise.
First of all, didn't he face a major domestic problem when I was arguing with him?
Absolutely no evidence.
I don't think we face a domestic problem.
A major domestic problem, I would say.
The question he's saying, we face a major domestic problem.
Yes, not now, but if the parks break down, if the dark get in the middle of it.
Does that create a major government problem?
No.
I don't think it does.
They don't believe this all along, John.
They're making promises.
And all of it was relative to that.
The paradise plan.
Yes.
And the last three weeks, the 9th, the 4th, the 11th, and the 10th, they've still been missing on all this kind of therapy and not missing any of this on the whole time.
They're not even convinced of it.
How do we go about that?
How do we go about it?
I'm not really expecting, I still think people don't believe, but I don't think they expect your settlement either.
I think they don't respect the order of the law.
I don't think they're counting on a immediate settlement.
I think they think it's going to be tough on them.
I think they're going to be good.
Actually, we're pretty well out of it anyway, but what we're figuring before now is we're going to have this extra on the end of the evening to get a settlement.
That's going to be good.
I think they're going to keep it.
They're going to buy those receipts.
But I think they're going to take a lot out of it early.
I think we've got this to take over.
Do you remember this famous story?
Do you remember the famous briefing?
Do you remember about the report right afterwards?
Because of the uncertainty, we dropped it.
Whether that pole was accurate, we raised questions about it.
And actually, we came right back up and said, okay, if it's anything, then we've got to stop it.
I think we did.
I think you can see a jar of people who were dead loose from their entire certainty again, even though it was supposedly in the right direction from the high side.
I mean, it's an amazing thing to realize.
that he never made an effective issue on the tax reform or on employment.
That's right.
He never made an effective issue on employment.
And they could have smeared that around.
We were all so worried about him on account.
But we said in the figures if anybody had told us that we would have 5.5 on employment, we gave them an election day and not have the economic issue running against us, we said we were out of here.
We're not taking money.
That's because they're not 5.5% on board.
I agree.
I agree.
I agree.
I agree.
It was amazing that you could not see.
You couldn't.
You couldn't.
You couldn't.
the moment I heard Henry's suggestion that I should go over to Caroline's sister party and say that I'm going to work with you on the United Nations.
Now, you both have a strong feeling, medium strong, or what?
Strong.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, Steve, it would serve my interest much better if I could do this thing earlier.
Are they going to gather not until 7.30?
No.
Alright, thank you very much.
How are we getting along?
Good to see you everyone.
Bye.
Yeah, now... Bye.
And you're to be the contact of this thing.
So you're to be the host of this interview.
Bye.
You know how to do that, don't you?
Okay.
I mean, let me tell you, this thing is kind of interesting.
You're being rather royal in that.
But...
Uh, you've written to me recently, but, uh, I don't know.
I don't know.
I haven't just given you an idea of the total problem.
I can conclude by saying I care very much about my native state, and my message to you tonight is this.
Look at the great talent available to develop our new programs.
Without what it costs to take an intelligent role, who are the strongest candidates presented to government?
I'll track some of your members to hire the best talent available.
And then I would ask the hostess here to convene this group again at San Clemente at some point in the next three months and share the information and data so that you can move together to strengthen those other parties in California.
Not that is the other.
It's mine.
Why?
I'm not even sure about that.
But that was unbelievable.
Well, what he wants you to eat.
Yeah.
You should have said you were coming to the meeting.
He just, that's why I was waiting over here.
He said, he's making a pitch, he's trying to get you to stay at the president.
I said, Bobby, that was all.
I said, that's all.
Well, then he says, well, what he should do then is there will be four tables with men and people will put an extra chair at each table.
Oh, shit.
No, no, no.
I said, Bobby, just do that.
He said, well, he used to like to do that.
I said, yeah, he used to be a congressman, too.
But could you imagine that?
So then he said, he said, how about he doesn't want to say for the presentation of the medals to the honorees.
And I said, well, you don't want him to say for the presentation of the medals to the honorees.
It would be embarrassing for the honorees.
They're giving each of us, which is awesome, each of us is being honored.
They're giving a $200 gold medallion.
Who's putting this on?
And they gave each of the other guests a silver replica of the gold medal.
And the gold medallion says, you know, the Californians in the mix of cap and the mix of satin.
Well, Bob has got to screw loose then, because I barely had that goddamn medallion.
He's a letterer, actually.
He also had his folder there, and he had nine pieces of gold.
And it's, you know, one of his books that he gave at the stadium.
But what he's pleading with is that you come later to the dinner.
So that, I mean, that's what he's talking about.
Well, that's what I'm doing, and I think you can come better for the temptation.
Yeah, I do.
I think that's another way to put off my dinner late at 30, but I mean, it's always got a damn topic in mind.
I can't go over there and be involved in a fundraising thing.
I can't be involved in three months from now deciding who will be.
But I've told California to do what I've said, and this is what the plan always goes.
I thought, listen, I didn't even know this was happening.
As you know, this is sort of this wonderful, well-meaning sport.
I'm pretty sure they're not going to write it.
Yeah, they don't even write it.
So I finally got into it.
The Californians are never there on time, either, is my recollection.
You can't, you shouldn't go to work there.
What I've suggested to Bob is that as soon as they're all there, you should come over.
You should do it.
Let each one of them shake hands with Bob.
Walk around.
Walk around.
You won't ever see them greet each other.
And as you finish greeting them, they should move into the dining room.
He's very obsessed with this, and it maybe is a nicer way.
They go in, sit down at their tables, and then you come into the dining room.
Don't sit down.
There's no chair for you.
You are not in black time.
For God's sake, don't wear black time.
It's a good part of the dinner.
And then you say, you know, I've got to go.
And don't want to be anonymous.
I'm going to leave.
All right.
I want you and he and you and he and Chuck to go out and talk a little bit in this next room, and then come back and tell you about the rest of the whole thing.
I'll be glad to let you read the papers quickly, and then come back.
You go in and read the two pieces of paper, and you can see the two pieces of paper.
Yes, sir.
Go read those in the next room.
You stay here and pass it.
I don't want you to stay here.
No, I understand.
Fine.
Fine.
Good.
And then, Bob, as soon as you've finished, Bob, I want Bob to check with you to talk about it.
Yes, sir.
And what do you think about it?
Oh, boy.
I have to get Rumsfeld NATO, which is a terrible mistake, to send a part-time man to NATO again.
and that we're going to remove it.
We're going to leave in eight months.
We work meters and hours on that, so we're going to send him a whole trip.
When he's around, he'll be able to see us.
He'll be able to visit us.
That's right.
If they can have it, it'll be useful.
I know.
It'll be useful.
I just can't take it.
But here, see?
It is so bad.
I agree with you about the movement.
But I've got to have a graceful way to go out and take this job.
And I'm just going to go over and study our relations with the common market and with Japan and possibly Brazil.
If you want to come back.
I know we're doing a little crazy.
Yeah.
But everybody can learn.
Mr. Bob, can I, what is Japan?
What does he mean?
What the hell would it mean for me to sit down at each table and see this?
I'm not going to present a medallion to me.
It's when I will not accept it.
You understand that, don't you?
They must not do it.
I don't accept that.
It would be very embarrassing.
I think the other thing he's done, which he told me he hadn't done, is he's an absolutely incredible guy.
He is, and to pay tribute to him, he has asked Colson, not Colson, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
to drop by the cocktail at the reception.
I think that's why he doesn't want you to come at the reception.
He wants their company to sort of pay their tribute to Bob, and that they are supposed to lead.
And then, for God's sake, it's a party for him.
We're in third California.
It's clearly a party for him.
That we're all being used as shells for the drugs.
And I don't mind if you just tell us that you know he's on the Air Force strolling strength playing with a cocktail.
And then he's got dinner.
He's got Jonathan Litters.
Oh, I heard of him.
And some other big name entertainer.
His name I've never heard of.
You probably told them I'm going to be there.
No, I'm not.
No, he says he doesn't, you know, he, that's one thing.
He said he is, he should not wear a black tie.
He should not be part of the dinner.
He should not stay for the entertainment.
I said, he's talking.
He said, does he want to stay for the presentation?
I said, no.
And he said that,
I said, he said, I've been entertained.
I said, would you want to stay for the entertainment?
He says, oh, no, you shouldn't be there for that.
One guy does the drunk act, and the other guy does the takeoff.
I don't know.
I'll leave it all to you.
I can do it.
And I can remember it all the time.
You can do that?
Yeah.
You can do that.
Sorry.
I'm going to go buy it.
It's unusual, and you see we're trying to, we're trying to cross-spell it.
I'll show you where we're going.
We're trying to cross-spell the name.
And, uh, we just want people to know that is the decent thing to do.
And also, it will serve you just for the purpose.
You'll come back and they'll help you with some study and get more about this.
You know what I mean?
Yeah, I agree.
Well, to Schultz, to his great credit, did not recommend that.
I said, he's a special representative.
I also told him he could not have a plane like Kennedy had.
I said, you can have a plane to take to Japan, but it has to come back.
And then he's got a client.
So that's what we're going to do with that.
or I can kind of imagine what the answer would be.
I'm sure he saw it.
He didn't have to tell me because he'd make a deal.
The question that is made later, and I told Bob, I said, Bob, this is September 6, 30.
The president's got a weekend date.
Are you sure?
I think what you better do is wait till they're all there and then go over, do that handshake and run and then make your green remarks while they're standing up.
I said, tell me how the rest of this goes.
Is there going to be speech making?
Are you going to call on the honorees to make speeches to borrow opinions on the same thing?
I said, well, then what happens?
We'll have entertainment and a presentation.
And he said, then I'll probably say a few words.
And then all of us in the White House staff will leave.
And then they'll put the whole thing together.
That's the one thing that we'll put together.
And he said, well, then I'll go, you know, work out how to put this together.
And I said, well, Bob, who's going to stay in there and do that here?
And he said, no task.
And I said, yeah, copy this.
Copy this.
Don't you think it would be a very bad grace for me to mention anything about putting something together?
Yes, sir.
Absolutely.
You just talked about the importance of California and the great work these people have done and the value that they can accomplish anything or something like that.
That's all you need to say.
Let's put something together.
Got some folks out to come to St. Clementi.
Two or three folks to report their role.
That's trying to get us through a place.
And I was supposed to be right in the middle of the ring and finish mine.
Trying to be like a hole in the head.
I mean, it's just the politics of it.
It's a proper kind of little talk that shows who is in the right way when it matters.
It doesn't matter now.
I have a feeling that neither one is going to make it.
Neither one is going to make it.
They've both been this amazing.
They've both lost their balls.
There's no brain on them for very long.
They have a life quality of both of them, actually.
They have a life quality of them.
Not the pitch, the piece, the gun calls, or the grump stuff.
Grump stuff, instead of busting his ass over there, the nail over there, and farting around about something he hasn't done in forever, and won't learn.
Pretty awful.
Go ahead.
I want you to have a meeting.
Do you want to talk to Ron?
Do you want me to talk to Ron?
You go ahead and do Conway.
And give him stuff.
And then we'll be done.
I mean, you've got to go with him about 15 minutes.
Whenever you're ready.
I mean, it takes your time, though.
You know, we've got all the time in the world.
Right.
3.30.
All right.
So that won't trap you.
wrong, because I know it's a cure.
It's a precedent.
And I have to react to it.
And as a precedent, I have to think that I'm always trying to keep going.
In my view, there's a fatal weakness, and there's a precedent.
And the purpose is that I'm explaining how the relationship is fatal, and then educating nothing that's important at all.
Actually, when they talk about, in both of them, when we talk about May 8th, in each of those cases, how they're grounded, I think everybody said, well, we've got a hell of a problem, and now we're going to do something.
Now we say, in effect, well, this is where this negotiation's going on and on and on.
They're reaching one another out there.
The enemy has misled us.
We've been tricked.
It's one of those circumstances my fellow Americans.
And I've got to ask, what do you do?
and we were, of course,
the difficulty of that, the difficulty of, well, that's obviously the, that's obviously the way that we've reacted, so if you're looking at the finish line, well, we've got, you understand, two jurors, two judges with each other.
And then we'll see, the real issue is, what is the best way to handle it?
The American public has to be in a responsible position.
And as a matter of fact, you say it, but I'm going to interrupt this and go along here.
And Henry says that we have a huge dimensional problem.
The size of that dimensional problem is, will certainly be to a great extent affected by how we do this.
The size of the dimensional problem at the moment is not nearly that great.
The people don't respect much of this thing.
The second thing, the wars and the...
It'll be hot around the town up here.
It'll be very hot on Henry.
And that's when we go ahead.
I think what we've got to do is we have to think about the impact on America.
We've got to get the impact on Hawaii.
We've got to get the impact.
That's right.
But you see, the impact on Hawaii, we're going to have another way, because that's something we've told you quite a bit.
And also, they won't be told by what we do.
Now, what we're going to do with this event, I think, is we'll be done with it.
I mean, probably, because we're going to be able to see either the Jews or the Americans.
But if it really is more of the same, then it's not something that should be announced.
Because it's not dramatic to do.
We're not moving them.
We've already bombed.
So as soon as you see what I mean, we can, when Henry is there, we can talk about real stuff about the military after this.
We can say what we're fighting for.
Also, without an argument, we can talk about what we're up against at this point.
We've got to rally our supporters.
We've got to also reach, you know, every president, you know, we've got to also rally our supporters.
And rallying our kids, I don't know, I don't know, I don't know.
Go on.
Here I go.
The second point that we put in is that, what is it you really want from our people here?
And the third point is that, based on those two things, how do you understand that?
When the president goes out, the pros and cons of this going on, he rallies the border, but he rallies it to the west, and pushing, obviously, the career of the opposition.
Just as he does it when the question is put, how heavy he comes out of it, how strong he comes out of it, what does the public really expect of that, that this is the end?
I think Kennedy is supposed to be able to use the announcement that we didn't make as causing a great big crowd in May.
He's not just good at that.
He also, he gives them so strong a ground, and that's why he talks about the line and all that stuff, which is bullshit.
I'm sorry.
I don't know what the hell.
We did China, we did Russia, we got .
We're a job that's different.
Resignation is thinking in a polarity of automatic terms that basically induces the management issue.
And that's not the negative of it.
When you see the resignation crack, you step down.
It's the only person involved.
So I think the degree is in this module .
But having said all that, what do you think?
Well, I wouldn't say that.
I wouldn't come up with what you said.
That's what I think.
That's what I think, but I think you need to know that Baldwin has come to the same conclusion that I have.
I wrote down an example before, before, when you said something, you know, there's a minor short action.
I wrote down the first reaction of a speech by a musician about it.
Thanks for still following the game, Senator.
They don't even think about it anymore, but if you were behind them, they would remember.
That's what Henry said, but we moved up from the 18th to the 19th parallel.
Nobody gives a shit.
Nobody even knows what about that parallels are.
That's the two tracks of criticals.
The third thing I would say is that in the course of the negotiation, there are only two statements that stand out.
And both of those statements have to be correlated in the proper way that you should put them on.
First of all, we have the expectation of pieces at hand.
That's one statement that we have to keep in mind.
That is our vision.
Right on.
Right?
There's another statement that we have to keep in mind.
That is, the President has said, I will sign this agreement when it's right before him.
And I will suggest that if it went, of course, I didn't say it could.
three days before the election, said I am completely confident that we will still have an agreement.
But I also said I will not sign it one day before.
I completely carried this out.
In other words, these two statements, expectations, the other side, I will sign one day before.
I think we must be going to sign one day before because I think
processing the public attitudes in this country that we support.
We have 24,000 troops in there.
And as we do today, we've got to react bravely.
We've got to react more positively to the presence of the United States outside of the United States of America before it's run.
And we should not be getting involved so bravely.
You mean because of the S.O.P.
accrues?
Well, because...
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
That's a new or something?
It's a new.
And not being drafted?
That's right.
That's right.
Yeah.
And they're okay with it.
So you have the two facts.
We have two facts.
The first is, of course, what did the S.O.P.
do wrong?
On the one hand, another is the S.O.P.
rising as a piece of land and entering into an agreement just to pay that S.O.P.
off.
But entering into an agreement is not right.
It seems to me that if the talks grow, we would be better off not to apply for it if possible.
But had Henry come back and say, it would be difficult for us to say this, but the North Vietnamese are a tragedy.
In this continuation of negotiation, we stand ready to negotiate with the North Vietnamese, to work out an agreement that is right.
The South Vietnamese, of course, have had some difficulties with this agreement, but the South Vietnamese are wonderful people.
Holden is, in other words, your client is Henry.
Instead of going through the dramatic encroachment of saying, I break off the talk and go back to the president of the court.
That's the problem.
What you say, if he could work this out, the talk should be successful.
Or however it should be done.
It comes back to the police.
It does not breathe with giving an articulation.
You know, a lot of things.
He suddenly comes back and he says, I don't believe the structures of something that we're going to break.
Don't repost anything that we've never played.
Let's judge them.
Because the more people you've heard about in these transactions, the more involved you are in the last one you usually stand around and negotiate.
Now, then, we have an interest in the person involved, and we're going to negotiate with them, but we can't get this to go back quickly.
And then, all of a sudden, they go to the bottom, and they destroy their narrative.
Right?
Great.
And then, they may break the reset.
They may come back, though she just broke my confidence.
I said no, no, none of us will.
But from a public standpoint, we can stand very strongly, I think, on the fact that the president's instructions are in sign.
I agree with that.
Yeah, right.
Well, let's come to this, Ron.
What do you think, though, about Henry's point?
Do you think I should go on acting without him?
Yes, sir.
I know you did, but say it again.
Yes, he brought a nation on television.
Whatever you say, I think that dramatic gesture from Trump could possibly mean that the American people would see this in great anticipation.
Now, they'll say, oh, no, no, no, no.
Here we go again.
The goddamn war is going on.
The end of the consciousness of the guy out there who supports the fact, you know, really, in his mind, we're not going to be safe if we didn't talk to the president.
We're doing the right thing.
If we had confidence in the president, it's going to take a long time, and we know that.
But we could handle this kiss and debriefings and me responding to a kiss and debriefing, but not a TV camera system.
That would do it in a lower case case.
So he doesn't have Jen to show up, but the temptation to show up.
What has he done before?
He's got to walk out and say, I don't know.
So Jen, on the present status, has been...
At this point, we should not say what they want.
Right, of course, the weak didn't matter.
The bottom line.
What is the bottom line then?
The bottom line is, well, we're going to step up the bottom.
We're going to step up military action, as he says, and continue them until we get our prisoners down.
So we bought the whole war from the goddamn business.
It's terrible.
We can't do it.
As the outlaw said in the second message, you know, we can't be settled here.
I know it's up to you now, so we're going to have to settle it.
So, the utilization is in the middle, center, right, upper, lower, center, left, upper, right.
You read the suggestion.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
Just to make good
They've been defeated in the past.
See, I think in our first hand, if they break these laws, if Hillary comes back, you know, I think Hillary's free.
Ten minutes.
They've been very free.
Ten minutes.
And I think we're going to do it right.
Well, I don't think, no matter how long, and so forth, he walks out for ten minutes, and he walks out, and he doesn't get into a lot of, you know, until the traffic lights up, and all of a sudden he walks out.
He's a gentleman.
Of course, he's in a very good position, and he's standing right in front of me.
I had instruction from the president who saw me in the program, and I was right.
Don't talk too much right now.
In other words, we make our case, and what does that make there?
And he can even, why then?
Let me ask you this.
Why is Henry so obsessed with Martin Luther and his new metrics?
Me doing this thing?
What's your analysis of that?
Well, I think, I think that, that they're wrong.
Oh, you're right, that was wrong.
He's here.
Well, I think Henry, you know, being as close as he is to the convention, living with this educated, facing all of them, being in the center, dealing with the forces and the pressure against him, living with this decent agency, I think he's going to be able to sustain.
It was.
It was.
These batteries reverted back.
That's right.
So I think that's probably .
No surprise, those data.
Peterson, of course, put it out in his office.
I don't .
Wall Street's gone.
You and he had a conversation.
That's it.
That's it.
And he even heard it.
One of the two people who did it.
Yeah.
Either he or George.
He or George did it.
The two of them.
Sorry.
Everybody's taking some clients.
We've got to keep it out of state.
I don't know what he's going to do.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
It's fine.
And I don't care about that.
I don't care.
You can see it.
You know, I probably just went back to the one thing.
All of this cuts through it all.
It's robbery.
You know what I mean?
It's like all this stuff.
You know what I mean?
It sends us to heaven into the consciousness.
Right.
It re-raises the worry.
The sign of right is a stronger shape than the face of the man.
That's the dollar.
Yeah.
And if things are not, we're not losing anything.
So it seems to me that that is what we're concerned about.
Yeah, or we can say we're going to continue to negotiate because our president's major concern is .
That's the only .
Well, let's go.
Throw the field up your watch and start racing hell again.
I don't blame them for the bad thing.
Can't hold it, can't hold it.
When you're talking, can't hold it.
We've done it before.
What they've been directed.
My point is, we've got an animal that we get today.
And we just have to say today, we're having a hell of a time with these people.
We can say, look, it is close, but we're just trying to get them out of line.
And that's why Henry's thing, you see, I think is almost totally obsessed with the idea of explaining
who was to blame for breaking off the negotiations, for the negotiations failing?
Am I correct or not?
Is that what it is?
Well, I think there's a portion of it, but it seems to me that Henry, Henry is driven to end it.
Sure, so am I. Yeah, of course.
But Henry is driven to end it.
End it.
In what would appear to be okay.
But you have to place your interest in him in a way that's right.
In terms of the question of honor, because that is going to be a dominant question.
Well, Henry would change that.
He'd change our speech to say we will have peace with honor.
And I ask you, my fellow Americans, to stand by me, with me, until we have a result in the war, until we have a standing.
There's no reason to do this.
That's the question.
Rallying is not the code for us.
Nobody's asking.
Nobody's asking.
Even when this announcement comes out, I mean, there's a lot of people aren't going to give it away.
There's a lot of people who are saying, well, you know.
You know, I just had a great one question.
You have to wonder, you know,
He is so eager to protect his own people and the peace of the United States that he'll do anything to get it.
And he may, he may do it without it.
So it's hard to get me, I'm sure, as I told you, to have some sort of a separate side on it so that they know that I have a side on it.
And by God, if we didn't, if they didn't settle the Congress and get us the hell out of the war, which is true, it would be amazing to have an integrated peace in the United States.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
My point is that this is going to happen.
This is going to happen.
That was not the purpose of any saga.
You know, everything you do for one side, they hurt you a lot.
The message is, again, this is a melody of over and over.
This is a thing that's been through the Oriental Lines since those days.
They may be picturing...
They may not even have to go to that extreme, because they know we need them.
Right now, they have to go back to the 61% mandate.
You're going to go ahead with that.
Because they don't know.
They don't know.
They don't know.
They don't have any money.
And we'll be ready to get rid of any more of them, because we're going to have to do it for our own reasons.
They don't know.
They don't know.
They think we're going to have to put this around.
Without a doubt, I'm sorry.
I just don't think that we're going to be able to do it.
That's my point.
The wrong time of the year.
It was just before Christmas, right after the election.
And here we go on, and the somber, well, we failed, I'm sorry, and grin and bear it, too.
I can't go to judgment today.
One, two, three, four, five, six,
I still believe it.
It's still in the mind.
I don't think they've ever done much doing that.
B-52 went down.
I don't know if there was a B-52 on the B-0.
That's a weird one.
It was just another student.
I mean, I don't know what the hell it is.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Yes, I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I have to.
I'm going to start to go down where you don't know.
I'm going to break them over here, and I'll dress over here.
And I also have my hand up there, and I'm going to serve them here.
I'm going to put them over the house that I have to be in right now.
At the same time, I'm going to put them over there, and then back, so I'll do it right here.
And I'm ready to go.
Come in.
Come in, John.
Well, I just hope we weren't hurting you too much, John.
That was her.
If I had thought of it, I mean, I could have sent the checks off.
At least for my purpose and not yours.
I want to see, that's what I like, I want to see Walker.
Well, I talked to Schultz about it, I want to see Walker, and I need Walker, but I can't get him on the right time.
So I'm going to thank him for his work and all that.
I forgot that I've got to say goodbye to Charlie Walker.
I want to say goodbye to him.
I'll be there in two days.
I've definitely got a, don't say it, but I'm planning to come back and take a probably 30 to 90.
And you see what I mean?
But my point is just keep it.
Just say you'll be there tomorrow.
And whether it's going to be the next day or the next year.
Did you discuss the papers?
Here's the papers.
Right.
You can come to me and say it's okay.
I worked it out with Schultz.
Whatever he wrote, it's okay.
You can, uh, you can write it down.
Schultz, Schultz, I'm sure, worked out a careful, did a careful lesson, shall we?
It's you, Austin.
Hmm.
Uh, Mr. Perry.
You're Austin, sir.
I'm here.
Mr. Perry.
No, sir.
No, sir.
I've been working on it since the very beginning.
Well, I'm sure you've noticed now.
I want you to know I haven't talked to Joe since morning.
What did he ask me?
Oh, shit.
What now?
Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry
And Schultz understands that you are going to be the man that will bring it to the end.
So I'd like you, if you would, John, to think of yourself as being the government representative.
And you just definitely can.
I've heard everybody believe that you can.
I would.
I know I did.
And you seem to bring it to the end.
No, I don't.
As far as I know, Jimmy Cole,
He said he was going to talk to the doctor.
He has talked to the doctor.
And that's the last I've heard of him.
And he's talked to the doctor.
And he knows the signal.
And that's what I thought.
And I thought about it.
Yes, and he has talked to the doctor.
And he knows that situation.
So we work through it.
We do that.
And sometimes, a lot of times, we don't know.
And the one that I would particularly like to hear is generally on the political side.
So, this part of the bottom line is how much it's going to cost us in the way of government.
Otherwise, I think you have got to be the man, and that's much better than kidding white house people or terrible people.
I don't know if you see what I mean about it.
This thing is so hot.
So I'd like to use this to deal with your line, personal, representative, in terms of working this thing out.
I quote him, quote Paul.
And they basically want to have .
Well, I told Henry that one step back from Paris, there's no recession anymore.
And that didn't work out.
It wasn't necessarily out of his vision.
And then suddenly, he goes, well, let's take some time to do this.
And then I think all of a sudden, he was in contact with Capri, right?
I would like to have it worked out so that you could have a deal with this.
to the Moscow summit.
If that's not too late.
No, no, I don't think it's too late at all.
You see, I'd like to, we're going to have a new arms controller by the time we finish.
You see, that kind of thing would be very helpful to bring in most of his, most of his lines of work.
So another thing,
But I don't want you to know that you ought to deal with it.
That's a problem you're bringing up at all.
That it's necessary for this policy to be carried out in the next few years.
And I don't know if you've ever seen it.
Well, I have no plans to see it.
I mean, normally I would see these pipeline companies.
But in the meantime, I'm going to try to put myself in the pipeline companies.
Right, right.
Well, I'd like to get up there, but I haven't been trying to prove it.
I'm delegating this to you.
I've heard a lot about it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The question is, it's a long load.
It's a long load.
I think that basically doesn't have that kind of capitalism.
It doesn't have a kind of trade.
It doesn't have a kind of sport.
It just doesn't have the type of technical skill.
But it's got a small part.
It's got a 20-inch width.
It'll pass us.
That's all we'll know, because they've got a 20-inch.
So if we put the five together, he'll wind up with the five percent of what's right.
No, you're not wrong about that.
Oh, it'll be a lot of fun.
I think we will, as a matter of fact, .
And we're going to do some controlling with a joint bank.
The United States undertakes...
You want to run ahead, but you're so quick to imagine that you've got a Russian guy in the world market.
So this may form a big problem, but again, the use of this kind of arrangement, you really can't fit it in your secondary conference.
Because he, that is the government, and the other thing is, and the other thing, Bob, this is one thing, the White House cannot touch it.
The chemistry can only touch it, and it affects the world tonight.
The planet can't touch it.
If you look up, there's a ball in the center of the hemisphere, and it says, you know, coffee, tea, or water, and now it's called for in the United States of America.
Thank you.
This is a stand-up.
Yeah, yeah.
.22 on that period.
Remember what I told you that I liked it in the fall?
Just so many of those names were in other countries.
Well, here's the Iraqis.
They shot in there.
Hammer won't be able to sell you rings this weekend.
He's got work to do.
He's ministered.
Don't be bashful about this.
Be sure that you let Bob know that God has written a proper message.
But I mean, I want something, because you see, the Queen feels right close to me, I think.
In the Southeast, you're close to me.
Some of them I understand.
One of them, some may not, but you know what I mean.
Well, it happened to be having you go.
Well, Harold wants me to go, obviously, because he's trying to get in a session with the sergeant.
I'm not sure I want to tell my case.
I didn't have to tell my case to him.
Again, my relations with the sergeant, what I'd rather do is go by myself, go with him.
Well, he's not the only guy.
Well, if there's no URN, it's basically John.
If there's no URN, you could just, actually, live on.
I love it when you say it in person.
I love it when you say it in person.
Yeah, well, that's all I know.
I don't know if you could call us that.
You could call us a number.
We've done that with our calls.
But I can go just about anything by myself.
And I need to take all three in the next couple of weeks.
All right.
And I really ought to go by myself, because I know Henry won't.
He ought to go by himself.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
He won't.
I don't like it.
I didn't want to travel, so this represents a bad company.
I think you've got to, you've got to fight to the city.
It's very big.
That's what it is.
You should go only if it's in your league.
I feel very strongly in that.
You can always try to cover that language.
And then you can say, now, if you go see your son, you say, now, you're good.
And you're talking about that.
And you don't say, now, the President asked me to take some information about how long you're going on your arm.
What is your relationship to this and that?
And you're not sure about how bad your shoes are.
And listen, from my busy eyes, you all work out the changes that you have to make.
I don't think that's a better thing.
Right after the first year, I mean, I mean, I need to go back here.
And I was so afraid.
I mean, I was wrong.
I mean, I got to go back there.
I'm going to go back there.
I'm going to go back there.
I'm going to go back there.
You already know Russian as well.
Officers stay very close to German gentlemen.
The other one.
The other one.
quite important for the OSHA's case is that it's going to have a responsibility to strengthen the economic side of the state in the care of the chief senator.
And in this case, we are trying to guide them.
So we're going to underline them in this report, but I'm just wondering if you're going to underline them again.
No, I'm sure we're going to actually serve them well.
You like that?
Yes, sir.
I'm sure.
What did he tell you at the right of the day?
He said he was going to put his nose under his neck and keep it there for three months and everything else before we started putting his body in.
Thank you.
I don't know.
.
.
.
.
.
The main thing is, the main thing about the product is that it's not just a report.
It's a media report.
It's a media report.
It's a media report.
It's a media report.
It's a media report.
Thank you.
Yeah, it took me a long time to get a job, to put a truck down.
The first thing that you want is a nice truck that comes on the road with you.
Right.
Get it all the way.
Sure as you've got to.
I think that what is envisioned at the present time is actually an international body of responsibility.
Uh, Harold, the American man, he's probably the best.
He really had it.
He said, he said, you know, that, that, that, oh, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that,
Yes, sir.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I'm afraid, I think, I first thought, this happened, the other one, I was arguing with my doctor, he said, well, I'm not going to tell you, because I had a sticker on it, I didn't even, I just had to read it and say it, look at it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
rather than having
Pray about him this week.
Come back to me.
It's a lot.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
It's a great thing to know.
and all that kind of thing.
And I didn't want to hold back, I didn't want to do a good job.
And I'm very, very, very patient about it.
And I'm just getting started.
That was my first step.
Yeah.
And it was going on.
And it hit me, and it hit me, and it hit me.
And it was very, very, very, very, very, very, very, not a lot of people made it, but it hit me hard.
.
.
.
.
.
That's basically my opinion.
Why do you don't think that can go on?
Well, at least we know how to take a stay.
I don't know how to take a stay here, but we're going to all be free.
We're all going to be free.
That's the reason.
That's the reason.
We're going to be free.
We're going to be free.
We're going to be free.
We're going to be free.
Sure, they have to be.
You know what?
One hour or more, they have to be doing what they're doing.
One hour, they can get on this train.
Well, I tell you what, I think we don't know that.
Except I think it's true.
There's nothing to say about that.
First, I don't know about you, but I told you about this.
I said, I don't know about you.
I said, I don't know about you.
I said, I don't know about you.
They're not.
They're not.
I said to the man in credit, that if, if it appears that we've got the kind of agreement that we now are talking about with the law firm, that this has to be a success, and then we will not go on, then I will have an authority from the Congress to cut the mercy.
.
.
.
.
And that's what this matter is.
This matter is not being resolved.
This matter is going on.
Ninety-five, ninety-seven, eighty-eight, ninety-seven, ninety-nine, thirty-five, ninety-eight, ninety-nine, ninety-eight, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine, ninety-nine.
And in the past, we've seen things that are not, that they're best based on the beginning, the body, on top of your body.
And I'm going to tell you.
Now, on the other hand, you have to do the same thing for the lower body.
And I will tell you, I'm going to tell you, I'm going to tell you, I'm going to tell you, I'm going to tell you,
Okay.
They are much better in the sense that they, that they, everybody knows that having a mind is a bad thing to do.
And that is not a good thing, not a good thing.
Now, I have to say, when they are saved, when they are going back in the name of the Holy Spirit,
I said, oh, we're not even going to read it.
It's a little bad stuff, but we're going to do it.
We're going to do it.
We're going to do it.
We're going to do it.
We're going to do it.
In fact, the way it goes along, you know, the way it's not happening, you know, the way it's not happening, you know, the way it's not happening,
You can do that.
So, the only thing I would do, I was just a little too much to talk.
I was just really looking to be good on the side of it.
I was just a white man.
I heard about it.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
I was a black man.
Well, I think the point is, the very, very clear point is
That's my issue.
But I don't know… I don't want to reach you now.
Yes, but your consciousness…
Yeah.
Yeah.
But in the right of the rest, the opposite of the rest, I told them, I said, if you want to see what I'm going to have right now, I'm going to get it.
I'm going to get it.
I'm going to get it.
I'm going to get it.
I'm going to get it.
that it's my belief now that if you, as an artist, I mean, having your name on there, on the board, on any of these, that I will be getting a bump from a doctor.
.
.
.
.
And I think that's what I want to do.
I think that's what I want to do.
I think that's what I want to do.
I think it all has to do with avoiding a dramatic break-off of the situation by us.
What we should do is put in there a K-square equation that has to happen this time, and each side will go back to conservation, and we should go on whenever we think we can.
In other words, your idea is, you may be able to get a better one.
Yeah, better than that one.
And, uh, but I've tried everything I can.
I mean, I've been studying for a long time.
I've been studying for a long time.
I've been studying for a long time.
I've been studying for a long time.
I've been studying for a long time.
.
.
.
.
.
Why?
uh they can't be very much as well
And, uh, then we were told that, uh, one week ago, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh,
I'm very sorry.
I'm very sorry.
Just let me tell you right there, I may not know this, but I'm just telling you right now.
And actually, that's all of our information.
We can't, we can't get the fuck out of here right now.
So, you see, the other fuck, whatever he's talking about, he's read the bottom line.
What he is saying, that's what I will explain.
They were the ones who ran him off, not us.
They were the, they were the bad guys, the bad, bad guys.
Thank you.
um is
... ... ... ... ...
Therefore, I am ordered to step up, you know, our bombing of the north.
You know, I'm a leader, but that's going to be, that's going to help with a lot of things that were already done.
And if it isn't enough, all I want to do is move on.
And it's going to help with, you know, the experience of death, you know.
And second, he says, we will continue to do this until we get it done.
For Christ's sake, that's what we're going to do.
Uh-oh.
Uh-oh.
We put forward that.
That's what the hell they were looking for.
They were afraid of us.
We were not.
We were not.
You agree?
I agree.
Well, I do don't think the opportunity to do this is good.
I think that, you know, it's going to get to the point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point where it's going to get to that point
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, it's very helpful if there's a problem that I have.
But, uh... And it's a problem.
It's a problem.
I don't know that we're going to have to do that.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
It's a problem that we're going to have to deal with.
.
.
.
.
Sir, you had to say that that's what the American people had to do.
Sir, you know, I mean, that's bad.
I mean, what's your opinion about it?
Well, oh, yeah.
You know, I mean, you said you think of it that way sometimes.
You know, I mean, you said you think of it that way sometimes.
You know, I mean, you said you think of it that way sometimes.
I mean, you said you think of it that way sometimes.
or like seven persons alike, because what we are being today.
So I say, each of us, each of us, one of our dogs is playing right this time.
That's the difference between us.
And we try to be good at it sometimes.
We all try to work out what we are doing.
All right, that will be it for now.
I asked
because we've been praying for a while.
People are not going to be too worried because we've been praying for a while.
They will be, God damn it.
People are going to be praying for a while.
They will be praying for a while.
People are going to be praying for a while.
Let me come to this.
Let me go.
And he said, we're always going to ask, we've always done it like that.
I don't personally ask.
I've got to admit, first, you're right, before you go to the rally, you're not going to probably find it.
Second, I suppose, on that day in Congress, the first thing I said was,
Now you're going to rally us for Camp Ocean?
and then the base cut off with the bomb.
You can rally this for May.
You can stand in line to bomb and mine, but then, you know, it's worse than if it had an effect.
And you can't rally them simply by going off and explaining how much money they need to pay.
See, that's the thing.
This is totally fatal.
I don't want him to assume that he can bust a ball and then come back here assuming that he's got these big guns ready to fire.
And he doesn't.
He's got to know that.
And I just forgot to say, we believe that we'll be in sync.
We believe in the other hand, that we're free.
And I'm hoping that we'll be a part of that.
It's been a long time, and I'm sure that time after time, it will, it will.
It's been a long time.
It's been a long time.
It's been a long time.
It's been a long time.
It's been a long time.
But the way to do that is to do the concrete, but not to those married people, but ahead of time, and that's a good point.
Let me ask you a question.
Now, what do you get in the end?
Well, I can quote other people, but I don't know who you're talking about.
don't don't i agree don't don't i would say that i think it would be a cool thought i think
And I'll say that I think, I think that that is, this is a possibility, probably a possibility.
If you do that with me, I'll come to you, you know, that is, that is a, I think if you say that you have a name, and you have a job, and you have a name, and you have a job, what are you going to do?
I think that way I'll do it.
I think you might have said it, but nobody else is going to do it.
And so what you're saying is that there's a lot of people out there, a lot of people just say that that's a thorough consideration to the jurisdiction.
Yeah.
And it's not an accurate discussion, it's only a call.
Remember, that's hard on people.
Very close.
Hard on people.
They think it's a grave mistake.
I vote that way.
We know your heart.
It's good.
And that the, the, that I, that I hear that you speak, that, that you believe that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that,
I don't need to be a third-order, huh?
You have a place in my brain now, don't you?
You have a place in my brain now, don't you?
Please, God, let me be a second-order so that you may recall every time I leave.
Let me have been always a cleaner, huh?
Let me come back.
Now, we will cancel the conference.
But I was in a fine state, so we canceled the conference.
So instead of doing that, we stopped.
We thought about that.
And in fact, we did not.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You can say whatever you want.
You can say it in Chinese.
You and I, you and I, we both have a very different life here.
Instead of us talking just about it, we can talk about it more directly what we feel.
That's all that we have to talk about.
That's the whole point.
You shut off.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You shut off my bathroom.
You're teaching me that for the first day of the fall, I'm teaching you that.
You know, we're talking about the fall of the leader.
I would say the last year of the fall, we might have been getting desperate.
You know, we were hurting.
We were struggling for that day.
We were struggling for that day.
The point is, Bob, that you've got to be able to get him off the track of breaking off the building.
It's the idea that I've got to go on the end of the road.
Now, I want to get to this other question.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
If that gun is set ready to be fired, and therefore he can shoot me down the floor with the back of an RTA-made, five-inch, three-page, well, I've got to go home.
I hear about a break-up in the building.
I hear from the back, I hear about the desert.
All right.
I don't think there's any problem.
That's the reason, that's the reason why my book is wrong.
Which one?
Which one?
Yeah, I'll tell you.
.
.
.
.
.
Ātmā kāyat, ātmā kāyat, ātmā kāyat, ātmā kāyat.
You see, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very,
Alright.
Thank you.
Okay.
Okay.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Well, I don't know.
You can't do anything on your own.
You've got to be a force at the core, and then other forces to operate.
You've got to be smart.
I don't want to, I don't want to have it, it would not be that much of an issue now, but they've all been very important to us.
Thank you.
Thank you.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I don't know what to say.
I don't know what to say.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
But I don't have any kind of faith in it.
But, you know, actually, I could dwell on that.
I could, one, I could feel it.
But that's not what I'm saying.
So that is the best I can do.
Bill was there a couple of years ago.
Bill was the one who put this together.
And that was the first place we could do it.
That was the first place we could do it.
Bill was there a couple of years ago.
Bill was there a couple of years ago.
Bill was there a couple of years ago.
And it's a long thing to do.
Y'all have to do something.
I'm very glad you came by, because when you come directly, you know the way to find us.
And I hope you come to town, and you can write down the story of what I was wondering.
And that's it.
And if you want to write it down, go for it.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah, Republican, Republican, Republican, Republican.
That's all I want to see.
.
.
.
.
.
I mean, I don't think I'm going to be there.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Before you turn it down like this, it's crazy.
And twice you will have the other man turn it down twice as easy now.
That's funny.
I knew you were going for a hand, but I thought I needed a different hand.
You know what I mean?
I thought I needed a guy like Brown.
That Brown sort of thing.
You know what I mean?
Uh, or we nominate a writer and get them to check that, like, uh, like Frank, or Tony, or somebody else, like, all the way down to the 49ers, because, uh, they're all people.
So what we do, John, is we let them, uh, we let them, of course, go off and have a little bit of a situation.
And, uh,
I have liked my wife, and I have liked my children, you know, either part of the United States or either of the other.
I don't know how you do it, but they change the name when it comes to the American Union Party.
The National American Party, the American National Party, whatever it may be.
That's what we want to see, the American Party.
uh... uh... uh... uh...
But anyway, how do you put the people into it?
If you have no place to fall down, I just tell you about a conch.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I didn't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't want to talk about anything further.
I don't know how to do it.
I just don't think that's what we have.
I don't have the courage.
I don't believe that they could do it.
I'm not sure that the American people would understand.
The American people have some interesting thoughts about war.
I don't know.
I think they would do this.
Maybe it's a bit of a worry to you a little bit.
But I don't mind doing it.
Democrats and Republicans.
I'm sure that they've managed to do it.
And he's the president of the big election.
That's so objective at all.
But I'm not sure he did it, although I would probably call it a picture.
I don't know.
I just don't know what's so objective.
But I can tell you that I'm not going to believe it.
Ultimately, you know, the idea is to pray for the leaders themselves, to pray for themselves, to pray for themselves.
And I don't know if I'm supposed to tell them.
I'm supposed to tell them how to tell them.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
I was in the second century.
um um
.
.
.
And then I followed him.
And, uh, he said, he said, I'm not going to follow him.
Matter of fact, what is it?
He said, follow this doctor.
I said, I'm not going to follow this doctor.
He said, I'm not going to follow this doctor.
He said, I'm not going to follow this doctor.
He said, I'm not going to follow this doctor.
He said, I'm not going to follow this doctor.
But if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man, if I was a man,
.
.
.
.
.
All right.
What have you got, Texas, by the day of coming?
Nothing.
Nothing.
I mean, it would be close.
I mean, that's the law.
It's not the law.
It's not the law.
It's not the law.
You know, it's a little out of the air.
It's right off the air.
You're a fly.
You're a fly.
I like to do it.
I like to do it.
I like to do it.
And I told him, you've got to get to the Republican Party.
And I said, you should know, Mr. President, I'm not going to tell you.
I don't know.
I didn't think you were going to tell me.
I didn't think you were going to tell me.
I was told you were going to tell me.
I didn't know.
I didn't know.
I didn't know.
Now, I think what's going to happen is all the old people are going to leave.
Don't talk about that.
Don't talk about that.
That ain't going to be interesting.
And they didn't understand that.
I mean, both of them.
Both of them.
But some of them did.
And how do you get them to tell me that I didn't do it?
They did not ask me.
Because I didn't get the registration to be done.
But if the person's always been like, oh, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I don't know what to do with them.
I'm cold and I don't know what to do with them.
I don't know what to do with them.
Thank you all.
And I will hope you'll get it.
I will, of course, on every night.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
.
.
.
.
Those are the people who are responsible for this matter.
They're not by the government.
They're the base for it.
I commit that.
I have to get to California.
I have to get to California.
I have to get to California right now.
I have to get to California right now.
I'm not going to do it.
I'm going to do it.
I'm not going to do it.
I'm not going to do it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I don't know
But how could I?
But now I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
.
.
.
Nor is it democratic.
There is a great voice out there.
You know, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia, there's Julia,
They cannot do it because of their pride in the black, and their pride in the so-called poor, and the right, and their pride in the unrighteous.
They're my wrong and their right, and their right is not my right.
And also their pride over that issue.
We've got to come to terms with that issue.
They've got to be able to work with it.
That was never heard of.
.
.
.
.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have made a lot of money today.
He could not have
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You can't start a third one.
You're gonna have another one.
It's too bad.
That's the worst of the rock-and-roll songs.
You really gotta follow the hook, buddy.
You can't start a third one.
You can't start a third one.
You can't start a third one.
You can't start a third one.
You can't start a third one.
You can't start a third one.
And if you can't get, and if you have a proposal by the majority, and it's not a great time, and it's not a good time, then what you've got to do is, if you think, if you're a Republican, if you're a Democrat, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican, if you're a Republican,
They can't drop the word republic.
They can't drop the word republic.
I don't think they can.
I don't think they can.
I don't think they can.
I don't think they can.
I don't think they can.
Well, one of the other things that John made a point of was that there are a lot of people that are just deep down convinced that they've all died for what they've done all their lives.
What do you do?
What do you do?
What do you do?
What do you do?
What do you do?
What do you do?
What do you do?
Without God, we can't even believe it.
It doesn't matter who he is.
I don't know what I'm actually talking about.
The last time I talked to you, I didn't believe you.
The problem with that is you don't expect the structure to come out.
You expect the structure to come out.
And you've got to lay something out in order to do something, too.
Now, you can't do it alone.
And that gets to the point you were telling me, that don't do it alone.
It doesn't take forever.
We talked about trying to do it in a complex way.
We talked about that.
But here is what we're doing.
And what we're saying is not going to work.
We're going to do it in a complex way.
We're going to do it in a complex way.
We're going to do it in a complex way.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
If you have a small fee, it's not a big deal for the money.
I didn't want to have to go there.
I got to take it out pretty much.
But, you know, that's the problem.
When I thought about it, it was important.
When I thought about it, it was important.
When I thought about it, it was important.
When I thought about it, it was important.
When I thought about it,
And what do I do?
I need to submit.
And they said, well, you can't do it.
What do I have to do?
What do I have to do?
What do I have to do?
What do I have to do?
What do I have to do?
And when the Buddha is gone, he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja, and he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja, and he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja, and he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja, and he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja, and he's got to go back and pray to the Mahārāja,
It's about a watch.
because we don't have the experience of the kind of life we have had.
But my point is, if you think that, to me, that everything is important, if you look at me, if you look at me, I'm only going to talk.
I'm only going to talk to you because I'm always going to be on your mind.
That's the part of me.
On other occasions, I'm going to be with you.
So, I'm going to talk to you.
I'm going to talk to you.
I'm going to talk to you.
I'm going to talk to you.
But we have to live in the past.
And I think we all know that.
And we've got to do that.
And we've got to realize that we just can't do that.
We just can't do that.
We've got to fight it.
Fight it out.
We've got to work on it.
And I think that's what we've got to do.
uh... uh... uh... uh... uh... uh...
But once I got on that one, I knew that if I can't do my job, I'm going to have to go to the police.
Right now, I feel like I'm going to have to go to the police.
I can't.
I can't.
I can't.
I can't.
I can't.
I can't.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Because I can't say that I've had a lot of people, and those who've had it before, they're not welcome.
So, you know, there's something else.
But it's always been in my head, you know.
Well, that's what she did.
That's what she did.
uh but it's not very good
How do you make the deal that you've got to be able to buy that way?
You've got to make the deal that you don't do that.
Well, if you do that, then you're the right, then you're the number two member of the majority.
That's right.
And then three is older.
.
.
.
.
.
.
uh... uh...
Yeah, I think that's right.
I think that's right.
It's one way to start.
That's one way to start it out.
Thank you.
That's what you're supposed to do.
They can tell.
They can tell.
They might do it, but I think it's much better if you do it.
You agree?
You agree?
And I didn't want to be there.
I didn't want to be there.
I didn't want to be there.
I didn't want to be there.
I didn't want to be there.
.
.
.
.
.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right, that's good.
That's very nice.
That's very nice.
That's very nice.
Maybe not that long.
Maybe not that long, but...
But in the time that I was in, I'm going to be in the party.
You're not going to be in the party.
You're going to be in the election.
That's what I'm sure of.
Now, I've flown markets at such a time.
They're not going to make it.
They're not going to make it.
And they're going to make it.
They're not going to make it.
But I'm not sure I'm going to be in the party.
They're going to make it.
They're going to make it.
They're going to make it.
You don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say, you don't want to say.
You've got to do it.
If you're ever going to go off to Mexico, and I'm going to make you, and I'll give you that message, but I'm going to show you how to do that.
I'm going to show you how to do it.
I'm going to teach you how to do it.
I'm going to teach you how to do it.
I'm going to teach you how to do it.
I'm going to teach you how to do it.
.
.
.
You are interested in the situation with Eisenhower.
With the exception that Eisenhower is going to have to depart.
I don't think that you can get the Democratic Party.
If you could, you'd win.
You'd get along with the Democratic Party, but I don't think you can.
Because if you go to the Prime Minister with the Democratic Party, you've got to face it.
Let's, let's interview with the telephone, the timer, and the dennerner itself.
That's like ditching the state before they can serve you in your ears.
I'm a dennerner, you know.
That's a, that's a, that's a goddamn letter, huh?
It's full of duck whiners, rambles, uh, a lot of things.
Basically, you're, you're right about that.
You're right about that.
Even though you've got a new conference coming up, huh?
You've got a, a, a, a, a,
I did not get Donald Trump against the Democratic Party.
On the other hand, you get Republicans, and the Republicans, I mean, the Republican Party, and the Republican Party, you can win.
Because what you would get from this thing now would be the moderate Republicans, the Democrats, the Democrats, and the Democrats themselves.
You get all of those, the leaders now, you get all of those.
They have to get it and sell it to the Democrats.
You get that spot.
That's the same time.
You get the right piece of the problem.
You get that piece of the problem.
You get that piece of the problem.
You're running out of time.
You're running out of time.
I can't tell you.
I can't tell you.
I'm getting out of the way now.
I have to then pick up what my wife got from the restaurant, and then, you know, come down there and tell me what to do with it.
And then, and then, and then, you know.
But then I'll have to get there and tell you what to do with it.
That's what it is now.
That's, that's, that's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
That's what it is now.
And all those faces that you've been touching over the last 99 years, what's happening to you?
No question.
I know those faces.
You know those faces.
And I've said it like how well I've been saying it.
I've said it like how well I've been saying it.
I've said it like how well I've been saying it.
How well I've been saying it.
How well I've been saying it.
How well I've been saying it.
The thing is, the thing is, the thing is, the thing is, the thing is,
Yeah, that's correct.
All right.
.
.
.
.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Here's the thing.
We've always been talking about the table and the economic, uh...
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
It would be a bad for the lives of all of your men and women.
And if you had those, you could be.
And if I had those, you could be.
And if I had those, you could be.
And if I had those, you could be.
And if I had those, you could be.
And if I had those, you could be.
But what I have done for people, and I think it's personal, is I have been working on this whole business of security, and I'll be saying that again and again and again and again.
And I'm hearing a lot of complaints, and I don't get it, for a period of time.
They report back to me in the spring, where I have been fighting with them, and I've been studying the situation with regard to the United States, and the relationship with New York, and the United States.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Well, that was it.
.
.
.
.
.
We're not.
I don't know how long this is going to last.
I don't know how long this is going to last.
I don't know how long this is going to last.
By the way, the question is not the answer.
It's the reason.
The question is not the answer.
The question is not the answer.
The question is not the answer.
Okay.
We're going right down.
And frankly, they can't get close.
um um
I just didn't think I was going to run away.
I didn't think I was going to run away.
I didn't think I was going to run away.
I didn't think I was going to run away.
I didn't think I was going to run away.
I didn't think I was going to run away.
That's all.
That's all.
And, uh, it wasn't that bad, pretty well.
One of the parts was, uh, uh, you know, uh, you know, uh, uh, you know, uh, you know, uh, uh,
I wonder if the kingdom is part of it.
God is not the Lord, He is not the earth.
Basically, why can't there be a way to radically change the world?
And that's why you don't stop at the end of the tunnel.
See, the point is, the problem right now is not the church, but I talk to people about it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yeah.
Yeah.
.
.
.
.
Well, I think he's right there.
I think, uh, I don't know if I can speak to him.
I think he's right.
I don't know if I can speak to him.
I don't know if I can speak to him.
I don't know if I can speak to him.
We've done things right up to now, and I just always have been doing things that I don't have thought of doing.
All right.
Thank you very much.
So my view is that if you decide to die, you have to find out how to die.
Why not?
Why not?
This is not what you should be looking for.
What you're looking for is, you know, what you're going to look at is, what you're going to look at is, what you're going to look at is, what you're going to look at is, what you're going to look at is,
If you become independent, you're playing in the right place in the right place.
.
.
.
.
.
Now, what we're going to do after that, we're going to do anything after that.
We're just going to wait.
We've got to wait.
That's the first thing we're going to do.
Or we're going to do something like that.
We're going to do something like that.
We're going to do something like that.
I don't think so.
I'm not sure.
I'm not sure.
I'm not sure.
What?
They're going to cry.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
They want to kill him.
I don't know.
That's only with the whip.
Love, love, faith, love.
Beautiful, beautiful.
Well, if we could do like that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
If we could do that, we could do a lot.
Yeah, yeah, people like you.
Some of them say God is bold.
Some of them don't like Jesus.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
It's about 4,000 .
I thought the liberals were a little lower than that.
I don't think that's true.
That's right.
No, that's true.
They're on board with it.
They're on board with it.
They're on board with it.
I don't know.
.
.
.
.
I don't think we've done much in the past.
I don't think we've done much in the past.
I don't think we've done much in the past.
You don't necessarily have to say I'm a Republican or anything like that.
You have to add something to it.
It's really just a possibility, but it's not.
The other thing is, when he's a Republican, although he's the president of the U.S., he's talking about his national identity as a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
He's a Republican.
Well, we're going to be out there, and we're going to be out there.
We're going to be out there.
We're going to be out there.
We're going to be out there.
We're going to be out there.
And I'm curious what the Republicans say if the president is going to be the president of the Republican Party.
And I don't know if the Republicans are going to be the president of the Republican Party.
Thank you.
So, uh, probably going to go back to college.
Probably going to go back to college.
22.
That's about two years now.
So, it's a, and they wrote it for you?
Yeah.
That's great.
And that's why you did it.
Thank you.
.
.
.
I mean, I know what I've done.
I know what I've done.
I know it's never been God's plan, but it is.
I have, I have, I have, I have done a lot of things, but I know it's never been God's plan.
I've, uh, I've done a lot of things, but I know it's never been God's plan.
I've done things, uh, I've done, uh, I don't know what I'm talking about, you know, because I know that it's never been God's plan.
But it's not that I don't like it.
Yeah.
The word coalition, I would like to make it my cut.
The idea of coalition means you've got to get it on, you've got to call it.
You've got to say to the Republicans, they're going to have a party.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Well, that's a bet.
Well, what is it that's a bet?
What is it that's a bet?
How would I define it?
You've got the guy in the chair.
The guy in the chair.
Well, that's what you're getting at.
That's not a bet.
That's a bet.
That's a bet.
That's a bet.
That's a bet.
Well, I think it's the public.
All right.
So we can take a look at that.
We can take a look at that.
We can take a look at what a Democrat is.
When you get right down to it, in fact, you can take a look at what a Democrat looks like.
And they'll ask you if you're a Democrat.
So they took it.
They took it already.
So what do you do?
You create a thing.
.
.
.
.
.
Yes, and I would say that I think it's a very good thing.
I think it's a very good thing.
I think it's a very good thing.
I think it's a very good thing.
I think it's a very good thing.
I think it's a very good thing.
You know what I mean?
So I thought it would be independent of being related to its conservative side.
It was not independent.
Yeah, but that doesn't come back to COVID.
Exactly.
I don't know.
I don't know why I didn't do it.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
All right.
I don't know.
I don't know.
All right.
I don't know what's wrong with that.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
We just want to follow up on what Bob told us.
We want to, we want to follow what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit, and what he said at the summit,
I think in her case, what he thought,
Take a heart of what it has to do with us.
It has to do with us.
It has to do with us.
You want to talk about it, right?
You want to talk about it, right?
I think that, I think, I think if they don't say it's right, you want to say it's wrong.
I mean, I would say that they would have, I mean, if I, if I, if I, if I, if I, if I,
I don't want that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I don't know.
I worked on it.
But it wasn't funny.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
It was out of the question.
And I said to them, I said to John, I said to him, I said to him, I said to him, I said to him, I said to him,
Thank you.
The job is good, but it's not going to work.
The job is good.
.
.
.
.
.
Thank you.
Thank you.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
Takk.
... ... ... ... ...
I thought I would have a job with that.
But that's pretty tough.
It's a better place to make money.
How about it?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
Det er det vi kan ta av.
Det er det vi kan ta av.
Det er det vi kan ta av.
Det er det vi kan ta av.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
I figured I'd send him off and throw him over there, and at about three o'clock in the afternoon, I dropped him, and I went to him.
He had to leave the car over there.
What was he doing in the car over there?
I mean, you know, he was in the car every time.
What?
He was in the car.
I said, I know what he was doing in the car.
What is the reason?
I said, I don't know.
I said, I don't know.
... ... ... ...
... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
And I come up like that, and I say that, and I just follow my staff relations, so it's better than I do, because I come from my people, I've got my own, and I'm good at everything.
I can't do something on my own.
Everybody else here has done it.
But you would say that's worse, but that's why I'm on the bed of the dead.
Now, I'm among the people who have done it, but I'm not going to do it.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
But if Rockefellers wasn't down today, it would be exciting.
I just wonder if Rockefellers are doing the same thing.
Maybe that's what I don't know.
I don't know.
But if Rockefellers, when I tell you the thing about them, I'll tell you what.
It's good that Rockefellers are doing the same thing.
Den er i dag.
Den er i dag.
Den er i dag.
Den er i dag.
Den er i dag.
... ... ... ... ...
Ja.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ...
Faktum, du har, du har, du har, du har, du har, du har.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
Takk.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ...
En vi kan nga tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle tåle
... ... ... ...
... ... ...
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
Haftet jo.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
God bless you.
... ... ... ... ... ...
Nā, nā, nā.
Nā, nā, nā.
Nā, nā.
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...
Ja, ja, ja.
Ja, ja, ja.
... ... ... ... ...
You know, he's an obstetrician.
He's an obstetrician.
I just told him to stop, and he had a lovely reaction, but it's not how hard it is.
I said, well, it's good.
I said, well, it's good.
I said, well, it's good.
I said, well, it's good.
I said, well, it's good.
Hva er det du har hatt i dag?
Hva er det du har hatt?
Hva er det du har hatt i dag?
Ænda berita.
Ænda berita.
... ... ... ... ...
Nei, eit kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart, kvart,
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
Herre, herre.
... ... ... ... ...
Ha, ha, ha!