Conversation 406-006

Transcript (AI-Generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

I'll leave it down there.

Don't take any blame on me.

Oh

I'm waiting for you to read the book.

Let me ask you, suggest one other thing.

You should not overwork.

How about having them?

Let some others fight it separately.

Herman Kahn.

Herman Kahn should fight it.

That you can't, right?

Or you both can't.

You're pissing him straight.

That's right.

Now, with Hank, maybe he has some thought on it.

One thing I want to be very sure of is the client thing.

You know, not a small pool.

Nothing.

We cannot have you running around the world with a person.

Right.

But, you know what I mean, that, uh, and, uh, refusing to admit that maybe they had been in there, refusing even to concede, maybe, maybe, present, you know, some character occurred, you know what I'm saying.

Uh, maybe Bill Hurst will write it, maybe Buchanan can write it for us.

Must not come out of the White House staff.

You know, I didn't want to knock it.

But it is something that one of our staffers could write.

You kind of have that special ability, I think, to get somebody else to pick it up and then pick it up.

What if you just have, you can't even check the seed or the martell or the telegraph?

What if any of the telegraphs had action?

If they didn't, they'd send out those two.

The first two are very good, because they deal with inauguration.

And that should be done very fast, Bob, because you have that kind of thing on those two bits of your own store again.

The first two, I've read them both.

They're excellent.

And if they go to Thursday,

I think another thing is that, you know, I've been trying to make the point, and I will, in the election, that all other people don't act like winners, so it's very important, which is why I had this point again, in campaigns going around, you know, the not-that-church, or maybe the kind of loose-balling that was said by Dolly Parton in this campaign.

And I keep...

all the grating he had to do on people, I think that's very important, very important.

Because in other words, rather than it should be not a bitter anger, but a joyous anger, that's not what it's going to be.

That's the point I would say.

Let's have a little fun with it now.

What do you think about the idea of an article about it?

Take care out in the park tonight.

I still want you.

That's what's .

So what I'm getting here to is the idea that .

I think he underestimates the weakness of their philosophical difference and also their basic personality.

Coming to the point, though, it gets to the crit iron, it gets to the target, it gets to all the rest.

Whether our decision there probably isn't right.

All the ground is dead.

If you wrap around with the structure and all the rest of it, there's no particular fallout.

What do you feel?

It's not insidious like it is.

I don't make a big thing out of it.

This year I just can't make a big deal out of it.

I don't think they can find it.

And they could argue that they have, you know, they know one's own.

The average democratic party.

Yeah.

And he's off room.

Talk about the other day.

He never does a thing about it.

He's done a lot.

And I think we should play it that way.

I am not going to press him.

I think Colson should.

Colson's going to be on the outside.

We're not going to close him down.

We're not going to do anything.

One of us is going to go.

We're not going to do a show.

He's going to host a meeting.

And I'm not going to raise him.

I'm not going to raise him for this thing.

I don't mean you can't raise him.

It's a little discouraging.

If it is...

but I'm pretty high in this room at all.