Nixon White House Tapes — Conversation 514-004 Date: Tuesday, June 8, 1971 at 7:55 AM Participants: Nixon, Richard M. (President); Ehrlichman, John D.; Kissinger, Henry A. Recording device: Oval Office Source: https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/514-004 This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite it as authoritative. [0:00] I want to tell you that I'd like to look at that housing bank for editing purposes. [0:20] I think it could be improved by cutting. [0:22] All right. [0:22] Did you read it all? [0:23] Oh, yes. [0:23] Yes, I did. [0:23] And it's in one line right over the gutter. [0:25] It's cut now. [0:26] I guess maybe that's my problem. [0:26] We cut it about in half from when it started out. [0:27] The difficulty I have with the job is that it [0:30] I just don't like all that crap about morality. [0:46] And I don't like the title. [0:49] There's one title in there, complexities. [0:51] I don't like that. [0:52] I mean, you can't ever admit that there's such a thing. [0:53] Well, let me get it back to you. [0:54] Well, you understand, the substance will abide. [0:55] The only one thing that I have some concern about is why we couldn't be a little bit more precise in interpreting those two things. [1:02] To me, it seemed to me that the, and it may be that you're trying to, we're trying to bend over too far and make you these, or the liberal slime there. [1:20] And the clear implication of those cases is that that was the, [1:33] in the case of people at large voting in a referendum. [1:42] That doesn't come true at all. [1:44] And the way that paragraph is written, it's got us along and all that. [1:49] It got us along. [1:50] We can sharpen that up. [1:50] Well, I think it should be sharpened up. [1:54] And read the case. [1:55] Because that doesn't actually give you the basis for doing the other one. [2:02] I think that the goddamn people want it. [2:13] They want to live in a neighborhood of higher-priced homes that they have a right to. [2:25] Absolutely. [2:25] Absolutely. [2:25] This does not make that clear. [2:27] It has in the economic narration and all the rest. [2:32] I think it's there, the detention, but can we get through approximately 80, I think it's 22, 20, 20 to 5,000 words. [2:43] It's pretty much lost. [2:44] Well, we'll try and cut, say, cut 25 to 30 percent of it as a target and see what we can do. [2:57] That's quite small. [3:00] Yeah. [3:00] When we started, we cut pretty hard and [3:02] You know, when you live with a draft, then you figure, gee, this is bare bones at this point. [3:09] But we can do better. [3:15] Well, right. [3:17] It's ready to draft. [3:19] Yes. [3:19] All right, Joe. [3:20] I know. [3:20] All right. [3:21] So we were working on a draft. [3:23] Oh. [3:24] Yeah, I'd cut some more. [3:25] All right. [3:25] Just a second. [3:25] Would you want to do some cutting or want me to take another look at it? [3:27] Well, I'll get it back to you. [3:28] And then I can spend some time on it today. [3:31] No, no. [3:32] Well, let me arrange to get it back to you. [3:46] Well, I understand that I was supposed to be in the night. [4:10] Yeah, what I was talking about, on this assignment to the presentation of Laos, did we have anybody there that was trying to take up our side, or was there any preparation? [4:41] I understand what I mean. [4:51] They talked, they asked about the disclosure on laws and so forth and so on. [5:02] As a matter of fact, we disclosed the whole goddamn thing. [5:05] Because I was in a case, it was in San Juan, it calls upon the administration to disclose what we're doing. [5:11] We disclosed it. [5:12] It seems to me that when we've got somebody that can take the offensive open thing for us, what's been done on that? [5:23] I mean, who'd you talk to, Colson or who, McGregor? [5:35] I don't know what to say. [5:36] That's just a terrible thing. [5:40] They always dominate those, don't they? [5:41] The other thing, did you get that final casualty figure in him? [5:43] It is 19. [5:47] And that's your time. [5:51] Now, I want you to pass that, if you would, immediately to Scalia and tell him to develop a plan as to how we can get a maximum impact on that. [5:59] But they should say the president again proved right, you know, the president catched us in the holes. [6:02] What did you say they were? [6:03] This was pretty good. [6:06] It gets down to five and a half years. [6:09] Because we might as well crow online, don't you? [6:30] This is the first time it's been below 20, isn't it? [6:31] Good. [6:31] Thank you a lot. [6:31] Yeah, yeah. [6:31] Yeah, yeah, we've heard about you. [6:35] Yeah, yeah. [6:35] Yeah. [6:35] Why don't we just say that I'd like for him to go a later time. [6:40] He won't fit in on something we're doing with the Russians or something.