Conversation 551-002

Transcript (AI-Generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

Rydyn ni wedi cael hynny wedi llwyddo, ac mae pawb wedi cymryd hynny i fyny.

Rydyn ni eisiau rhywun sy'n gallu gwneud hynny.

Rydyn ni wedi gwneud hynny.

Felly, roeddwn i wedi cael ychydig o adnoddau ar y pad yma.

Roeddwn i'n dod i'w gael.

Roeddwn i wedi cael.

ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu, ychwanegu

ac mae rhywun arall wedi gwneud hynny.

Mae wedi gwneud hynny.

Mae'r bobl gwleidyddol yma'n bwysig am yr amrywiaeth.

Dwi ddim yn meddwl.

Dwi'n meddwl eich bod chi'n rhoi'r pethau y mae'n cael ei siarad amdanyn nhw.

Os ydych chi'n bwysicaf, beth yw'r broblem?

A'r pethau y mae'n cael ei ddweud?

Mae'r rhain wedi'u rhannu.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl y byddwn i'n meddwl.

Mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hynny.

Gallwch chi wneud hynny.

Roedd hi'n gweithio i fyny.

Mae hi'n gweithio i fyny.

Wel, os ydw i'n gallu gwneud rhywfaint o'r hyn sydd wedi'i wneud, bydd hi'n dod i fyny.

Bydd hi'n dod i fyny.

Mae ganddo'r holl bwyd o'r llaw a'r amgylcheddau cymdeithasol.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddatganfod pethau.

Mae'n rha

Mae llawer o'r eraill yn gwneud hynny.

Ie.

Felly, ie, un o'r ffyrdd bach, lle roedden ni'n siarad am Florida diwethaf, Roaster,

Mae'n dweud nad yw hynny'n wir.

Mae hynny'n dweud nad yw hynny'n wir.

Mae'n dweud nad yw hynny'n wir.

Yr hyn y mae hi'n ei wneud, pan fydd hi'n rhedeg hynny, yw bod hi'n dweud, wel, mae gen i blynyddoedd eraill ar gyfer y wythnos.

Os byddwn i'n ei angenu yno, mi fyddwn i'n rhaid mynd, ac rwy'n gwneud hynny.

Mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg, mae

Dwi'n meddwl bod hynny'n rhaid i mi ddweud.

Rydw i'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n gallu gwneud hynny'n dda.

Mae'n dda, mae'n dda.

Mae'n dda.

ond dydw i ddim yn gweithio'n dda gyda Ros a John Scali.

Roeddwn i'n argymell y bydden nhw eisiau mynd allan i'r Cynon ac ystyried yng Nghymru drwy'r wythnos.

Fe wnaethon nhw fynd allan i'r Nghymru drwy'r wythnos, ac nid oedd rhaid i unrhyw un ohonyn nhw fynd allan i'r Iowa a'r California.

Oherwydd nid oedd rhywbeth, nid oedd unrhyw gynllun gweithredu yn cael ei wneud.

Rwy'n meddwl, roeddwn i ddim yn siŵr o'r ffordd y byddech chi'n ei ddweud diolch.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roeddwn i'n meddwl, roedd

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud wrthym.

Mae hi wedi dod i lawr am amser ac mae hi wedi dod i lawr pan oedd hi'n hoffi.

Rwy'n gwybod, os oes hi'n mynd i lawr, mae hi bob amser yn gwneud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddod i lawr i roi newydd rhwg mewn fy mharffurfa yma.

Mae rhywbeth fel hynny.

Ond os ydw i'n ei angen, byddaf yn dweud na, does dim rhaid i mi ddod o gwmpas.

Efallai yw hynny'n anghywir.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud na, does dim rhaid i mi wneud hynny.

Ac yna mae hi'n dod i lawr yno, yn dweud bod yn ei angen, ac yna mae hi'n... Mae'n debyg bod

Rydyn ni ddim yn gallu cael unrhyw un ymlaen yn yr ofn, sydd ddim yn eu hunain.

Rydyn nhw'n rhaid mynd i lawr a gwneud hynny gyda'r gofynion.

Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhaid i'r gofynion.

Rydw i ddim yn gallu cael unrhyw un ymlaen yn y gofynion.

Rydyn ni'n gallu gwneud yn y gofynion.

R

Ond nid oedd hynny'n rhywbeth i'w wneud.

Roedd Rose yn gwybod beth roedd hi'n ei wneud.

Ie.

Wel, gadewch i mi ddysgu hynny.

Dwi wedi gwneud hynny.

ddim yn bwysig.

Yn ein broblem yma, rydyn ni wedi cofio am re-organisio'r fferm.

Wel, fe siaradwyd â George a dweud, beth allwn i ddweud y byddwn yn gweithredu?

Oherwydd dyna'r holl bwysigrwydd i mi fod yn gweithredu.

Felly mae'n edrych ar hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddrys rhywbeth o'r llinell bwysig, oherwydd mae wedi bod yn cyd-destunol, wedi bod yn cyd-destunol ar hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddechrau.

Felly yna, a dyna sut rydw i wedi cyflawni'r esenwad, 72 esenwad y byddwn ni'n gwneud.

Felly rydyn ni wedi cael 3 mlynedd yn gyfan o ddewisiadau, a dyna lle mae'r bobl yn gwneud hynny'n gyflawni'r esenwad.

Mae'n rhaid i ni wneud hynny.

Mae'n 10.30.

Ie.

Mae'n rhaid i fi ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i fi ddweud hynny.

Mae rhywun sydd wedi rhoi'r llyfr i ni neu rhywbeth, mae hynny'n ddiddorol.

Wel, efallai efallai rhywbeth arall.

Fe wna i ddilyn ymlaen ar y conglwyddo.

Mae'n debyg.

Y ffordd rwy'n mynd i'w wneud, os nad ydych chi'n cael hynny, yw byddwn i'n aros i'r papur yma heddiw, a byddwn i'n mynd i'r papur yma heddiw, a byddwn i'n mynd i'r papur yma heddiw, a byddwn i'n mynd i'r papur yma heddiw, a byddwn i'n mynd i'r papur yma heddiw.

Diolch yn fawr.

ac mae Regan yn debyg yn bwysau Finch hefyd wrth gwrs, mae'n siarad â Regan am hynny.

Neu, dwi ddim yn gwybod unrhyw atebion.

Roeddwn i'n benderfynu rhywbeth, beth ydych chi'n ei wneud?

Roeddwn i'n meddwl y byddech chi'n ei wneud yn y farchnad yn ôl, ond dwi ddim yn gwneud hynny.

Rydw i eisiau... Rydw i eisiau... Rydw i eisiau... Rydw i eisiau... Rydw i eisiau... Rydw i eisiau...

Ac roedd yn dweud eu bod nhw'n gwisgo'r peth hwn i fynd ymlaen ac maen nhw'n cael mwy o gynhyrchu i fynd allan.

Felly, roedd yn dweud eu bod yn ceisio gwneud hynny.

Mae'r holl hynny yw eu bod yn ceisio gwisgo'r llyfrau.

Maen nhw'n meddwl y maen nhw'n gwneud rhywbeth ddefnyddiol.

Maen nhw'n credu y maen nhw'n mynd i fod yn ddefnyddiol i chi.

Mae hynny'n gwirioneddol.

Mae'n rhaid i chi.

Yn amlwg, pan nad ydyn nhw'n cael eu cymryd i ffwrdd â hynny.

Yn amlwg, nid yw Buckley yn hynny.

Nid yw Mahoney yn hynny.

Rwy'n siŵr y gallai rhai ohonyn nhw ei wneud.

A byddan nhw'n cael rhai o'r eraill yn cael eu cymryd i ffwrdd?

Wel, byddan nhw'n cael rhai o'r digwyddiadau dynol.

Ie.

Ychydig o amser.

Roedd John yn bwysig am Mahoney yn dod i ffwrdd â'r tro, ac roedd Elliot yn siarad â Mahoney ac roedd wedi cael ei siarad â nhw.

Nid oedd yn bwysig o gwmpas.

Rwy'n meddwl bod hi hefyd wedi siarad â Jim Buckley.

Roedd yn dweud, dyw hwnnw ddim yn mynd i'r sefyllfa hwn ac mae'n ffocilio ei hun.

Wrth gwrs, dyw hwnnw ddim wedi gwneud hynny.

Wel, mae'n debyg ei bod yn mynd i ddynu'r llinell ar ei hun.

Mae hynny'n dda.

Ond mae'n anhygoel sut lawer o ddynion sydd wedi cael.

Dwi ddim yn disgwyl.

Dwi ddim yn gwybod.

Mae'r cyfle i... Yw hynny'n... Yw hynny'n anghywir.

Yw hynny'n anghywir.

Mae'r Cymdeithas Rhifon yn cymryd i chi fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i

Rwy'n meddwl mai'r ffordd y mae'n cael ei chwarae yw'r ffordd y mae'n cael ei chwarae.

Ac mae'n rhaid i ni edrych ar hynny.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n mynd i gael cyfle dros hynny.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n mynd i g

Hwyl.

Rydyn ni wedi mynd ymlaen i weithio ar y tref.

Rydyn ni wedi mynd â nhw ac rwy'n meddwl ein bod ni wedi cael hynny'n dda iawn.

Rydw i'n cofio'r cyfrifoedd a'r ymwybyddiaeth ac ati.

Roedd hynny'n dda iawn i ni.

Roedd y Prif Weinidog wedi'i ddweud yn gyflym.

Roedden ni wedi cael bwyd â nhw.

Roedd yna llawer o ffyrdd yn y bar.

Nid oes unrhyw ffordd i gael eich cymryd cymryd.

Mae hynny'n amlwg.

Mae hynny'n cymryd cymryd.

Mae hynny'n amlwg.

Yn ystod y diwrnod yma,

ac rwy'n gobeithio y byddaf yn llynu'r adnoddau.

ac felly rydyn ni'n mynd ymlaen gyda'r ychydig bach o gwasanaeth bach yn yno nad ydyn nhw'n mynd i fynd i'w llwyddo drwy'r tŷ.

Mae'n dal i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i

Mae'n ymwneud â'r cyfnod yma.

Diolch yn fawr.

Mae'n bwysig iawn.

Mae'r cymdeithas wedi cael ei gyflawni.

Yn amlwg, yr hyn rydych chi'n ei ddweud yw, mewn gwirionedd, nad yw'r Llywodraeth yn gwneud unrhyw beth arall.

Mae'n rhaid i'r swan ddewis beth yw wedi cael ei wneud.

Yn fawr, mae'n rhaid i'r swan ddewis beth yw wedi cael ei wneud.

Mae'n rhaid i'r swan ddewis beth yw wedi cael ei wneud.

Ac felly, os yw'r cas yn mynd i'r penod, ac mae'r Llywodraeth wedi cael ei dynnu gan y Llywodraeth Cymru, sydd wedi cael ei dynnu, mae'n anodd iawn iawn oherwydd y gwleidyddiaeth.

Rwy'n mynd i ddweud gwirioneddau gwleidyddol, ond byddaf yn siarad am yr ymarfer.

Rwy'n meddwl, ar yr ymarfer, dydyn ni ddim yn gweithio â'r Llywodraeth Cymru.

Ond dyna'r ffordd y byddai'n mynd i fod yn gwleidyddol, rwy'n credu.

Os allwch chi edrych ar y sifadau a'r pethau yma, mae'r pethau yma'n bwysig iawn.

Nawr mae rhywbeth arall yn dod ymlaen, ac rydyn ni wedi sgwrsio amdano.

Mae'n rhaid i ni wybod hefyd, ynddynt yn y golygfeydd,

Mae'r cyfnod hwnnw'n gweithio'n fwy effeithiol na'r cyfnod hwnnw.

Mae'r cyfnod hwnnw'n gweithiol na'r cyfnod hwnnw.

Yn ystod y cyfnod, fe wnaeth gweithredu i'r cymuned.

Fe wnaeth gweithredu i'r cymuned.

Yn ymwneud â'r ffordd y byddaf yn ymwneud â'r ffordd y byddaf yn ymwneud â'r

Rydyn ni ddim yn gallu gwneud yr hyn sy'n iawn, unwaith y byddwch chi'n gwneud hynny.

Yn un lefel, mae hynny'n rhaid i ni wneud hynny.

Mae hynny'n rhaid i mi wneud hynny.

A'i ddiwedd yw, yn ymwneud â'r Prif Weinidog, mae'n ymwybodol nad yw'n cynnig cyfeiriadau i ddynion.

Yn y ffaith, byddai hynny'n ymwneud â'r canlyniad sylfaenol ar gyfer yr adroddiad newydd.

Mae gennych chi... Mae gennych chi... Mae gennych chi... Mae gennych chi...

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny, oherwydd mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny.

Mae penderfyniadau gwasanaethol wedi cael ei wneud dros 3 neu 5 mlynedd, ac mae llawer o broblemau yn ymwneud â hynny.

Y peth cyntaf yw'r cwestiynau o'r Mexicain, sydd wedi cael eu cyflwyno i'r llaw, yn hytrach na'r sefyllfa ddiwethaf.

Ac mae gennych chi rhai sylwadau, John, am sut mae'r Mexicwyr yn teimlo am hyn?

Mae'r Mexicwyr yn annibynnol i busni, ac mae Curtis Graves, sy'n arweinydd gwleidyddiaeth Negros o Houston, wedi dod allan yn fawr o ran busni, felly mae gennych chi un o'r arweinyddiaid Negros sy'n cymryd rhan i busni.

Pan fyddwch chi'n mynd i Dallas, rydych chi'n gweld y tec-tec yma yn Dallas nawr.

Mae'r arweinyddiaeth yr arweinyddiaeth yn dweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi ddweud wrth i chi

sefydliadau anodd ar gyfer y rheswm hwn.

Yn gyntaf, nid yw Robert Judd yn cael cyflawni gyda'i man, oherwydd mae gweithwyr wedi cael cyflwyniadau ac nid maen nhw'n cael desegregaeth.

A'r cysylltiad ail gyda nhw yw bod gennych chi'r

Ac rwy'n credu y gall Elliot siarad gwell am hyn oherwydd rydw i wedi'i ddweud yn y llall.

Ond nawr, nid yw unrhyw un yn mynd i desegregu'u ysgolion.

Maen nhw'n mynd i gael ymweld.

Maen nhw wedi parhau i siarad â phobl.

Wel, o safbwynt y leol, rydych chi'n iawn, John.

Ond rwy'n edrych arno o safbwynt gwleidyddol nawr.

Os na fyddwch chi'n ymddygiad, ac yn ystod y cyfrifiad cyhoeddus,

Mae'r awdurdod wedi gwneud hynny.

Mae ymddygiad sydd wedi cael ei ddatblygu yng Nghymru, a hwnnw yw nad yw Llywodraeth Cenedlaethol yn cynnig cynllun penodol.

Mae pob hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cenedlaethol eisiau ei wneud yw cymryd rhan gyda SMAWN.

Felly mae ymddygiad sydd wedi cael ei gyflawni ar ymddygiad hwnnw.

Dydw i ddim yn dweud bod y cynllun hwn yn fwy na ddyluniad o'r hyn a allai ei wneud.

Rwy'n gwybod sut mae hyn yn dod ymlaen.

Nid yw'n bob amser yn dod ymlaen fel hynny, ond gallai'r amgylch fod wedi'i gymryd ar y cwestiwn sylweddol hwn, bod y gwasanaethau ymweld â'r hyn a wnaeth yn ei wneud gan Brifysgol Roberts ddim yn cyflawni â penderfyniadau Swan.

Mae'r swan yn gwneud penderfyniadau.

Mae'

Dwi ddim yn deall hynny'n well i unrhyw un.

Dwi'n deall hynny'n well i unrhyw un.

Dwi ddim yn deall hynny'n well i unrhyw un.

Mae'n iawn.

ac wedi cael ei gyflawni gyda'r adnoddau cyflawni yn awgrymu rhyw fath o ddiddordeb.

Ac roedd y cyflawniadau llwyddiannus hyn wedi cael eu cyflawni a oedd wedi cael eu cyflawni neu wedi cael eu cyflawni gan ddiogelwch.

Yna ddodd penderfyniadau Charles Mecklenburg i lawr.

4 o'r cyfarfodydd llwyddiannus sydd wedi cael eu cyflawni rhwng ddiogelwch H.E.W.

a phobl

a'r ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr ysgrifennwyr

a chyflwyno ar gyfer wythnos arall.

Roedd yn cael ei gyflawni o 14 Maes, ac yn y wythnos ymgynghori, roedden ni wedi cyflwyno'r sefyllfa a'r Cynulliad Cynulliad, Ed Morgan, a gweithio ar y cynllun, a gweithio ar y llythyr i'r adran ysgol, a oedd yn cael ei gweithio ar ddiwrnod diwrnod, cyn i ni gael cyfarfod â'r adran ysgol.

ym mis Ionawr, pan wnaeth y Prif Weinidog ddweud y byddwn ni wedi cydweithio â'i gilydd.

Roedden ni wedi cael cysylltiad â'r Pwyllgor Ysgol ac rwyf wedi siarad â nhw ers hynny, ond roedden ni, roedd yn penderfyniad amdanyn nhw ar rhan o'r Gweinidog Gweinidog, Cynulliad Cenedlaethol, Gweinidog Cymdeithasol ac ATW, bod ni ddim yn gallu cydweithio â'r Pwyllgor Ysgol cyn i ni gael

y byddwn ni'n ymgysylltu â'r Cwr ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli, ar ôl ei reoli,

Mae'n gwybod hynny'n dda iawn.

Mae'r Prif Weinidog ysgrifennol a'r Prif Weinidog y Cymdeithas Ddemocraethol wedi ysgrifennu at un o'n bobl, ond nid yw'r cyfrifiadwr wedi cael ei gael yn y cyfarfod.

Ydych chi'n gweld hynny?

Ydych chi'n gweld hynny

yw John, y Prif Weinidog, ac mae nifer ohonyn nhw wedi rhannu negosiadau gyda ni yn ymdrech i gyflawni cynllun cyhoeddus.

Rydyn ni hefyd wedi cymryd rhan o'r sefydliadau eu hunain gyda'r rhai rydyn ni'n ceisio negosiadu'r cynllun sy'n cael ei ddefnyddio gyda Llywodraeth Cymru.

Nawr, nid oeddem ni.

Nid oeddem ni wedi codi'r Cynulliad Cymru.

Mae'r problem mewn gwirionedd

Beth yw'n mynd i arwain y problem mwy rhwng nawr a Ffwrdd 1972?

Ar y cyd, yn cymryd y sefyllfa trwy'r amser a'r nifer o wledydd yn ymwneud â hyn, mae'n ein gweld ein bod ni'n gallu creu gwybodaeth yn fwy gwbl o'r penderfyniadau y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei angen.

i ddod â rhyw fath o ymgymryd â'r peth hwn.

Byddai'r mwyaf o'r cyfan y byddwn ni wedi llwyddo i gael y sefyllfa o'n ôl i ni.

Os yw'r penderfyniad yma'n cael ei wneud,

Mae'n mynd i fod yn ymwneud â hynny.

Mae llawer o wledydd, sy'n gwneud adolygiadau ar ôl ymgysylltu gyda ni, yn rhaid iddyn nhw cael eu trafod gan rywun.

Bydd rhywun yn dod i mewn a'i ddweud, nid ydym yn gallu gwerthfawrogi'r gofynion y mae'r Llywodraeth yn eu penderfynu amdanynt.

Bydd gennym adolygiad sy'n gallu bod yn

Diolch yn fawr iawn.

Rwy'n credu ein bod ni'n rhaid i ni ymgymryd, yn y penodol am y rheswm hwn oherwydd y pwysigrwydd o'r sefyllfa drwy gydol y Sŵn.

Rydyn ni wedi bod yn mynd ymlaen.

Roedd y penderfyniad o'r Austin wedi cael ychydig o ddau sylweddol yn Austin.

Mae wedi cael effeithiau da arall o ran y gwirionedd o bwrdd ysgol i ddelio gyda ni.

Nawr, gallwch chi sgwrsio am sgolwch y cynllun.

Roedden ni'n eithaf yn barod i'w wneud.

Yn ystod hyn, fel aelod o'r Penderfyniad Cymru,

byddwn i'n annog y rhanbarthau i'w wneud, ond nid y byddai'r Llywodraeth ysgol yn ystyried unrhyw wahanol.

Yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg, yn amlwg.

o'r plant, felly doeddent ddim eisiau siarad am hynny.

Fel mae John yn dweud, does dim rhaid i'r amgylch fod yn amgylch ar gyfer y gwirioneddau o'r cynllun sydd wedi'i arwain gan H.E.W.

ar gyfer y Llywodraeth yn dweud, chi'n gwybod, rhoi'r cynllun i ni.

Mae'n rhaid iddo fod yn amgylcheddol i'r cyflwyniad, yn ymwneud dim ond â'r prifysgol y byddai'r awdurdod a'r cynllun Austin ei hun yn anodd.

Mae'r ysbrydoliad o'r sefyllfa, Brifysgol, yn cael ei ysbrydoli gan y ffaith bod y cynllun, yn enwedig, yn Austin, yn gofyn am, ac yn ymwneud â,

12 i 18 o gyfnod o flwyddyn, gan blant Cymraeg a phlant Cymraeg gyda'i gilydd i wneud ychydig o gynhyrchiadau artistig a chyfnodau.

Nawr, rydych chi'n gwybod, beth bynnag yw'r hyn y bydden nhw'n ymwybodol o'r gradd i'r rhai sy'n nincontigus, rhai sy'n ysgrifennu, rhai sy'n ymgyrchu ac ati, rhai sy'n ymgyrchu

Mae'r Cwrdd Gwladol wedi dweud ei fod yn rhaid i'w ddefnyddio lle nad ydynt yn cael eu defnyddio cymaint yn yr adnoddau rydyn ni'n eu cymryd.

Ond mae'n glir iawn o'r llaw fod y math hwn o ymweldiaeth periodeol ddim yn cwrdd â'r gofynion o'r penderfyniad.

Rwy'n credu y byddwn ni'n edrych yn edrych yn dda iawn.

Felly, os nad ydym ni'n edrych yn dda iawn, byddai yna, rwy'n credu,

ac yn ymwneud â'r canlyniadau sy'n creu'r sefyllfa yn gyffredinol, gallai dim ond cael y effaith o gyflawni a chyflawni a chreu amdanyn nhw.

Rydych chi'n gweld Austin yw'r canolbwynt nerfol yng Nghymru ac mae Austin wedi cael ei gynnal ar gyfer pob sefydliad.

Felly, rydych chi'n gweld, mae hynny'n ar draws y llaw, o gwmpas y sefydliad, nid dim ond Austin.

Nawr, popeth rydych chi'n ei ddweud yn wir,

Ond yr hyn rydw i'n ei ddweud yw bod y cwestiwn ychwanegol yma yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu bod yn golygu

Ac hefyd, efallai y byddwch chi'n disgwyl â mi ar hyn o bryd, ond rwyf wedi siarad â llawer o bobl.

Mae yna rhai sydd wedi cael cysylltiad â rhywfaint o broffesiynnau ECW, ac mae llawer ohonyn nhw nad ydyn nhw'n gallu penderfynu'n fwy am yr adnoddau gwleidyddol.

Yn wir, roedden nhw'n hoffi gweld chi'n sylweddol.

Ac roedd hynny'n digwydd drwyddiant yr Europosi.

Nid yw hynny'n dweud ECW, nid yw hynny'n dweud ECW.

Mae hynny'n digwydd drwyddiant yr Europosi.

Felly rydych chi wedi cael llawer o burofraffwyr sy'n ddiddorol i'ch gwblhau eich llyfrau y tu allan.

John, mae'r ffaith yw ein bod ni wedi cael gwahanol gwleidyddion yn ystod y bwrdd ysgol a'r gyfrif.

Dyna'r hyn sydd wedi dod yn ôl.

Wel, nid yw'r gwleidyddion yn ystod y bwrdd ysgol, ond efallai yw'r cyhoedd cyhoeddus.

O, ie.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud y gwirioneddol y byddai'n bosibl bod yn gwneud hynny i mi.

Nawr, mae hyn yn effeithio arna i'n llaw, ond yn effeithio arnoch yn llawer llai, gan fy mod i'n gallu cyrraedd hwnnw'n dda iawn, ac mae hynny'n mynd i fy llywodraeth, ond rydych chi'n sylweddol â hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud y cwestiwn.

Mae hynny wedi llwyddo, fel rydych chi'n ei ddweud.

Dwi ddim yn gweld sut y gallwch ddychmygu'r problemau yma yng Nghymru.

Yr unig rhan yw hyn.

Diolch yn fawr iawn.

yn ymddygiad i gael nhw i wneud rhywfaint o hynny.

Ydych chi'n gwybod, maen nhw'n dweud wrthym, wel, dyna'r hyn rydyn ni'n ei wneud.

Ydych chi'n dweud, wel, rydyn ni'n gwneud hynny i fynd ymlaen.

ac mae'n llwyddo'r effaith rhaglenni ar ein gallu i gael y sefyllfaoedd hwnnw'n gwerthfawrog.

Felly beth yw'r cwestiwn?

Beth yw'r peth gyda hynny?

Wel, y peth gyda hynny yw bod y sefyllfa wedi dod i'w enw, y sefyllfa yw'r un lle mae ein penderfyniad yn hollbwysig iawn, ac mae llawer o'r casau hyn yn cael eu llwyddo.

mae'r sefyllfa'n dod yn fwy agos ac yn amlwg.

Rwy'n credu, o ran fy nghymdeithas i gyda'r cymdeithasau cymdeithasol rydyn ni wedi'u gynnwys drwy gydol y dde.

Mae'r hyn y maen nhw angen mwy ar hyn o bryd yn mor glir ac yn deall yn bosibl yr hyn y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei angen.

os na fyddwn ni'n gwneud y Prifysgol yn ffawr, hyd yn oed yn y cyfnodau gwleidyddol gorau, i allu bod sefyllfa fel hyn yn ffester fel y bydd, os na fyddwn ni'n ceisio'i llwyddo.

Wel, rwy'n gwybod, rwy'n gwybod, rwy'n gwybod, rwy'n gwybod, rwy'n gwybod, rwy'n gwybod.

Rwyf wedi cael fy nghymryd gyda fy nghymryd.

Ydych chi'n gweld?

Roedd Texas wedi symud ar y cyflawniad yn gyntaf i'r rhan fwyaf ohonynt.

Ac roeddwn i'n siarad gyda Richard Fletcher yn 1954.

Dyma'r lle rydych chi'n mynd i... Yn fawr, mae'r adnoddau sy'n cael eu cymryd yng nghymru'n debyg.

Ond mae'r adnoddau peryglwyr... Yn ôl, mae'r adnoddau cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y cymryd y

Os ydych chi'n ymchwilio'r llyfrau, neu'r alliadau o'r ddiweddar yma, mae'r rheswm cyffredin yn llwyddo'n fwy sylfaenol yng nghymru.

Ac mae hynny'n golygu rhywbeth sy'n rhaid i chi ei gyfrifo.

Felly, dwi'n credu na fyddai'n syniad da iawn i chi gael eich alliadau yng Nghymru gyda'ch gilydd.

Rwy'n argymell yr un math o sesiwn rydych chi'n ei gael yma.

Mae'n rhaid i chi feddwl amdanyn nhw ychydig flynedd neu ddwy yn ôl, ac roeddwn i'n cofio'r peth mwyaf dwi wedi gweld y Prif Weinidog yn ystod hynny yn fy mhrofiad.

Ond, yn siarad am yr arwain gwleidyddol, roeddwn i'n meddwl y byddai'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny.

Dwi'n dweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud y gwir.

Roedd Ysaw yn dechrau mynd ymlaen i'r rhan gyda'r Rheoleiddio, oherwydd roedden nhw'n meddwl bod y ddemograffiaid yn eu defnyddio, ac roedd Ysaw bob amser yn bwysig.

Roedden ni'n gweithio gyda Dixie, ac roedd yn dweud y byddai'r Rheoleiddio'n hapus i ddod o hyd i'r rhan gyda'i gilydd.

Ac nawr mae Ysaw'n cwrdd â hwnnw.

Yn ymwneud â peth y mae'r Llywodraeth yn gwneud y penderfyniad,

Fe wnaethon nhw ddweud, wel, mae'n llawer gwaethaf i'r Rheoleiddwyr, ond nid i'r Demograffiaid.

Fe wnaethon nhw ddweud, rydyn ni'n trafod pobl ac rydyn ni ddim.

Maen nhw'n darllen y ffigurau sy'n dweud mai'r systemau ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol ysgol y

Ac felly dyma'r dyn sy'n gwneud hyn nawr, rydych chi'n gwneud hynny.

Ond os ydych chi'n gwneud hynny, rwy'n gobeithio y byddai'r dyn sy'n gwneud hynny ychydig mwy yn haws am hynny.

Ond mae'n gwybod nad yw'n gallu gwneud hynny.

Felly byddai hynny'n gwneud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud y gwir.

Mae'n rhaid i chi dweud y gwir.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n gwneud hynny'n dda.

Wel, mae'n rhoi sicrwydd i mi.

Iawn.

Rwyf wedi siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwyf wedi siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar.

Iawn.

Rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siarad â chi am hyn yn ddiweddar, ond rwy'n si

Mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n, mae'n,

gwasgaru'r peth hwn y flwyddyn nesaf i'w gynnal yn ôl y flwyddyn nesaf.

Yn fawr, yn fawr iawn.

Maen nhw'n cytuno â'r cynlluniau yng Nghymru a Birmingham ac ati, ac nid ydynt yn cymryd gweithredu lle mae cynllunwyr yng nghymru yn ei ddweud y gallwn ddewis y peth hwn yn ôl y flwyddyn nesaf.

Ie, mae hynny'n... Mae'n rhaid i ni feddwl yn sylweddol

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddatganfod sut i'w sefydlu, mewn gwirionedd.

Sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w... sut i'w...

Roeddwn i'n dweud, roedden ni'n cael, roedden ni'n cael, yn Austin, gan y cyfathrebu hwn o bwrdd ysgol.

Roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'

yr holl beth rydyn ni'n gallu ei wneud yn y cymunedau mwyaf yma, wrth gwrs, maen nhw'n cymunedau mwyaf sy'n effeithiol, mae'n siarad am hynny, i gael y partïau i roi'n effeithiol gynllun sy'n dweud y gwirioneddol fod yn llwyddiant yn cael ei gyflawni mewn litigaeth yn 1972.

y byddwn ni'n gweithredu'n well.

A'r peth sy'n fy anhygoel, er mwyn cyflawni'r pwynt, yw'r ffaith bod llwyddiant yn cael llawer o sefyllfaoedd sy'n eithaf anhygoel.

Rwy'n mynd i wneud hynny ymhellach.

Y cysylltiad rydyn ni'n gweithio ati yw bod y NAACP a'r rhai eraill yn dod ymlaen y flwyddyn nesaf.

rydyn ni'n cael cynlluniau cyfrifol sy'n edrych fel y gallan nhw gyflawni gyda SWAN.

Yna byddwn ni ar y llwybr arall, byddwn ni'n gwneud y cynlluniau hynny tuag at ddiffyg y NAACP.

Mae hynny'n dda.

Rwy'n dweud yw, rwy'n credu ei fod yn gweithio, ond os ydych chi'n mynd i'r peth lle rydych chi'n ystyried,

ar gyfweliad gwirioneddol.

Nid oes unrhyw ffordd y gallwch ddewis hynny mewn lle fel Cymru.

Rwy'n cytuno eich bod chi'n hollbwysig.

Rwy'n cytuno eich bod chi'

Rydw i ddim yn meddwl y byddwch chi'n gwneud hynny i'r llaw, ond rydw i'n ceisio gwneud hynny i'ch tu ôl.

Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i. Nid ydw i.

Rydyn ni ddim yn ystyried bod y blynyddoedd y cynllun yn cael ei gyflawni.

Mae'r broblem yn Austin, ac mae'n ei fodlon, yw, os ydych chi, ac yma rydyn ni'n rhoi'r hyn sydd wedi'i wneud i'r ysgol, oherwydd mae'r ysgol wedi dod i'r cofnod, ac mae'n rhaid i'r Prif Weinidog ddatblygu'r sefydliadau.

Y broblem rydych chi'n mynd i'w wneud yw lle rydych chi'n cael

ac y penderfyniad y mae'r Cynulliad Cymru yn ei ddweud yw, er bod y flwyddyn diwethaf yn gallu a oedd yn rhaid i'r holl gymdeithasau

Mae'n rhaid i chi edrych ar y sefyllfa hwnnw eto, gan ystyried mai nawr, mae'n rhaid i chi ddefnyddio, neu mae'n rhaid i chi ddefnyddio, rhywfaint o gyfansoddiadau nid-continuol, mae hynny'n golygu croesglu.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddefnyddio'r hanner o'r plant sydd yn y gradd 6 yma, a'r hanner o'r plant sydd yn y gradd 6 yna, a chyfeirio'r rhain.

ac i ddefnyddio'r trafnidiaeth sy'n rhaid i ni gyflawni hynny hyd at y pwynt lle byddai hynny'n cael ei wneud yn ymddygiadol.

Iawn.

Felly rydych chi'n mynd yn ôl i'r sefyllfa honno ac yn dweud ein bod ni'n edrych arno eto nawr.

Os ydych chi, mewn ystod Austin, y rheswm pam bod y cynllun wedi'i gyflawni yn ystod y cyflawniadau creadigol, os nad ydych chi, os nad ydych chi'n cymryd y plentyn go iawn a'i symud yn unigol drwy'r distryd, hyd at y pwynt lle mae'r cyflawniadau'n rhy ddwy.

ym mhroed diwethaf.

Yr hyn rydych chi'n ei wneud yw gwneud ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu ysgrifennu y

Ac y cwestiwn yw, beth fyddwch chi'n ei wneud yna?

Ac mae gennych chi hefyd y cwmplaint ar rhan o'r rhain o'r 25% o blant Cymraeg sydd ar gael i fynd i'r ysgol hwnnw.

Pam mae'n rhaid i'n plant Cymraeg fynd i'r ysgol Cymraeg mawr pan mae'r plant Cymraeg eraill yn mynd i'r ysgol Cymraeg mawr sydd ychwanegol yn yr adran.

Ac felly, er mwyn cymryd y gweithgaredd ychwanegol yna o elusenu'r ychydig fawr o'r ysgolion gwledig hyn, dim ond cymaint o gwasanaeth ychwanegol o'r hyn sy'n cael ei wneud yn hytrach na'r hyn sy'n cael ei wneud arall.

Roedden ni'n cynllunio, ac roedd hynny'n cael ei drafod yn anghywir, yn cael ei drafod gyda staff Morgan a Whitehouse ac ati, ac wedi'i gyflwyno'n dda, y byddwn ni'n gallu cymryd y gweithgaredd ychwanegol hyn.

Nawr, fel y dywedodd John, byddwn ni wedi bod yn barod i ddechrau cydweithio gyda chyfrifoldeb y Llywodraeth i negosiad rhywbeth llai.

Roedden ni'n dechrau i ddangos, fel y dywedais i, pam roedden ni'n meddwl y byddai'r sefyllfa yn fwy stafell ac yn dda i blant Cymru ac i...

y bydd plant Cymraeg yn fwy neu'n rhyfeddol na phosib mewn rhai achosion eraill.

Ac ni allwn wneud hynny oherwydd y charakter o'r cyfathrebu geograidd, oherwydd y gwahaniaethau ac ati.

Ond nid ydym yn dechrau gyda'r bwysigrwydd y mae gennym i gyflawni cyfathrebu gwaith.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddod yma, os ydych chi gyda rai plentyn arall.

Dyma un plentyn Cymraeg sy'n cael ei ddweud yn yr ardal ac yn mynd i'r ysgol yn Mary's House, ac un arall sy'n rhaid iddo fynd drwyddi.

Dyma'r ardal bwysig yma.

Na cwestiwn, ond... Nid yw'r Plentyn yn eisiau gadael yn unrhyw le.

Os yw unrhyw un yn meddwl bod hynny'n anghywir, rydyn ni wedi'i gynllunio, rydyn ni wedi'i gynllunio â'r Prifysgol Cymraeg yn fy mhobledd, ac wedi rhoi'r plentyn Cymraeg i'r tri Prifysg

Ac roedd y gwleidydd gwleidydd gwleidydd yn gweithio ar gyfansoddiad gwleidydd.

Roedd hynny'n ymwneud â'r ffans.

Roedd hynny'n eu canolbwyntio ar rywbeth roedden nhw'n canolbwyntio ar, rhywbeth roedden nhw'n croesawu.

Roedd hynny'n ymwneud â'r gwleidydd gwleidydd yn mynd i lawr i'r canolbwynt cymdeithasol o'r gymuned.

Ac roedd yr hyfforddwyr gwleidydd a'r ysgolion gwleidydd yn fwynhau cael y chwaraewyr gwleidydd gwleidydd.

Rydych chi'n iawn.

Rydych chi'n iawn, ond mae'r sefyll

Mae'r ffordd yr ydym wedi'i gweithio'n llawn, fel mae'r adroddiadau ni wedi'u dangos, yn ddiweddar, yn ôl ym mis Ionawr, wedi bod yn fwy sylweddol ac yn dweud wrthym, hyd yn oed yn y ffordd y byddwn i wedi'i ddweud yn ôl.

Yn ystod y ffordd y byddwn i wedi'i ddweud yn y ffordd y byddwn i wedi'i ddweud yn y ffordd y byddwn i wedi'i ddweud yn y ffordd y byddwn i wedi'i ddweud.

Felly mae'r ffaith yw bod hyn yn gweithredu'n fwy cyffredinol ynghylch yr hyn a wnaeth hi 150 mlynedd yn ôl.

Yn gyntaf, gallwn ddweud hynny, ar ôl edrych ar eich sefyllfa, rydych chi'n gallu ysgrifennu eich cymeriad.

Mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hynny.

Ac ar hyn o bryd, dwi'n hollbwysig i'r holl hyn.

Dwi'n ymddygiad, felly dwi'n ymwneud â'r bus.

Dwi'n ymwneud â'r Llywodraeth.

Dwi'n ymddygiad â'r ddynion cyntaf.

Rwy'n teimlo bod hyn yn un o'r pethau sy'n bwysig iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddaf yn meddwl am y cwestiwn.

Efallai y byddaf yn cael ateb arall.

Nid yn y ffordd hon.

Efallai nad ydw i'n cael unrhyw beth yn ymwneud â hyn, ond rwy'n meddwl am y pethau sy'n ymwneud â hyn yma.

Ond mae'r teimloedd i mi wedi bod yn dda iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl eu bod yn...

ac yn dda iawn i'w ddweud yn bwysig, ond nid yw'r problem, wrth gwrs, unrhyw ddemograff, unrhyw un ohonyn nhw, mae'n rhaid i'w ddweud yn ffwrdd, ond mae'r problem yn y sefyllfa, oherwydd mae'r sefyllfa wedi cael trwyddiadau'n dda iawn i'w ddweud yn dda iawn yn Alabama, ond mae hyn yn y math o beth sy'n gwneud ei fod yn dda iawn i'w ddweud, mae'n bwysig i'w ddweud.

ac roedd e'n hoffi ei gael, ac rydyn ni'n dod ymlaen.

Ac roedd e'n dweud hynny.

Mae hynny'n rhywbeth, rhywbeth sy'n rhaid i mi ddweud wrth fy mod i. Dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl, dwi'n meddwl

Rydyn ni wedi siarad ymlaen yma o'r ffordd gorau o ffostro'r peth hwn heb ddod i'r pwynt lle rydyn ni'n annog ATW.

Mae hynny'n iawn.

Mae hynny'n bwysig iawn.

A, fel rwy'n dweud, lle mae'r pethau eraill wedi dod i'w ddweud yn y llyfrgell, mae'r llywodraethau a'r dyfodol wedi cael eu cyd-destun ac rwy'n meddwl eu bod wedi cael eu cyd-destun, oherwydd rwyf wedi gweld rhai ohonynt, i'w cymryd ar y basis o...

Mae HEW yn cynnig un o 20 o'r pwysigrwyddau sy'n gallu cael eu cynnig er mwyn cyfrannu'r penderfyniadau ac ymateb.

Ond yr hyn rydyn ni'n ceisio ei wneud yw ymgysylltu â'r llawr.

Nid ydym yn ceisio gwneud unrhyw beth ar yr adran ysgol.

Yn ystod hynny, rydw i'n gallu gwneud hynny yn ôl.

Nid ydym yn gallu gwneud hynny yn ôl.

Nid ydym yn gallu gwneud hynny yn

Mae hynny'n gwirioneddol iawn, John.

Nid oedden nhw'n dweud y byddwch chi'n cael blynyddoedd i'w desegregio, ond fe wnaethon nhw dweud y byddwch chi'n cael blynyddoedd i'w desegregio.

Yn ogystal â bod yn allweddol i wneud hynny.

Rydyn ni'n ymwneud â'r ffaith y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ymwneud â'r Llywodraeth.

ac mae gennym ddyn dda, rydych chi'n gwybod, Dave Brown, rwy'n credu, yn fy swyddfa.

Mae'n weinidog sy'n gweinidog yn amgylcheddau ychydig o ddwy wladau, gan gynnwys South Texas a South Carolina, ac mae'n arweinydd i ddwy wladau.

Mae'n ddyn dda.

Rydyn ni'n ceisio cael hyn ar draws, ond byddwn ni'n parhau i fynd ymlaen.

Mae'n dda i ddweud y bydd ychydig yn fach yn cyflawni'r rhwydwaith cyhoeddus.

Mae'r cyflawni'r rhwydwaith yn cyffredinol.

Mae'r rhwydwaith yn cyffredinol.

Mae'r rhwydwaith yn cy

Mae'r unig prifysgol rydyn ni'n ei gael yn Jackson.

Ac roedden ni'n gallu cyflawni mynd ymlaen â'r cynllun sy'n cael ei gynllunio gan y bwrdd ysgol yn Jackson.

Roeddwn i wedi mynd i'r Clark Reed ym maes HGW y diwrnod diwethaf.

Roedd hi'n gallu bod yn fwy cyffredinol o ran y ffaith ein bod ni'n mynd allan o'r Ysgol.

Ac yn rhai o'r lleoedd eraill, mae niferau o leoedd sy'n cael eu llwyddo.

Nid oes poblogaeth mawr yng Nghymru, felly roeddwn i'n teimlo bod hynny'n broblem.

Mae'r broblem yn bennaf yn ddiddorol.

Nid oes llawer o ddynion yn y gwaelodau yng Nghymru, ar gyfer enghraifft, yng Nghymru.

Nid oes llawer o dynion yn y gwaelodau yng Nghymru.

Nid o

Mae'n gallu effeithio ar y cyfleoedd o gyflawniad gan Wallace, ond os yw'r diogelwch wedi'i ddatblygu, gadewch i mi ddweud hynny, y byddwn i eisiau ei gadw.

Mae John Steele yma, ac mae'n rhaid i ni wneud hynny.

ac ond mae'n siarad, mae'n siarad yn ymwneud â gwleidyddiaeth cofnodol yma ac dydw i ddim yn siŵr, dwi'n gofyn i fynd i'r tŷ a fyddai'n bwysig am hynny.

Byddai'n debyg, os nad yw hynny'n cael ei wneud, byddai'n newid llawer o newid ac ni fyddwn ni'n cael un.

Ie, yn siŵr, ond rydych chi'n gorfod gwneud hynny hefyd oherwydd rydych chi'n ymgymryd, rydych chi'n gwybod.

Ie.

Rydw i'n cymryd George a Van Dusen, roeddwn i bob amser yn Van Dusen oherwydd roedd Van Dusen yn

y byddwch chi'n gallu clywed amdanyn nhw.

Ie, sir.

Mae'n rhaid i chi gael un ar y swyddfa ysgol hon.

Ac, er enghraifft, mae'r diogelwch sy'n arwain yn y system ysgol diogelwch, un o'r bobl sy'n mynd allan i Richardson, Garland, i'r ystafelloedd hynny, lle nad yw'r blaenau yn ymddygiad yn unig, neu'r rhan fwyaf sy'n cael eu colli yn yr holl bwysau y tu allan.

Ac mae rhywun sy'n mynd i ddweud, a'i argymell, efallai y byddwch chi'n rhaid i'r ystafelloedd ysgol ysgol ysgol hynny

Nid yw modd iddyn nhw ddweud hynny, oherwydd nid oes ymddiriedaeth leol ar gyfer hynny, yn arbennig o ran Mr. Ribacost.

Ac wrth gwrs, mae'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu'r ffyrdd gweithredu.

ond rydyn ni ddim yn gwneud unrhyw beth.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud y gwirionedd.

Mae'n rhaid i mi dweud y gwirionedd.

ac nid ydych chi'n gallu cael unrhyw gwasanaethau ar gyfer hynny, ond ar y llall arall mae hynny'n digwydd.

Mae llawer o bobl yn hoffi byw gyda'i gilydd.

Pwydym ni'n gysylltu'r pols yng Nghymru â phobl sydd ddim yn pols?

Maen nhw i gyd yn yr un cymuned.

Mae yna ychydig o pols sy'n byw gyda

maen nhw'n cael eu rhestr yn eu hunain.

Maen nhw'n cael eu rhestr yn eu hunain.

Wel, rwyf wedi'u gweld yn y sefydliad hwnnw, oherwydd rwyf wedi'u gweld yn y sefydliad hwnnw eithaf llawer.

Mae'n iawn.

Mae'n

Rwy'n ymddiriedol bod rhywbeth yn anghywir ac mae'r cwestiwn yma'n anghywir.

Mae'r cwestiwn yma'n anghywir.

Mae'r cwestiwn yma

Ond, dwi ddim yn gwybod.

Ond os ydych chi'n gwneud hynny'n wir, byddwn ni'n cydweithio'n dda iawn.

Ydych chi'n gwneud hynny?

Dwi'n meddwl bod yna un o'r cwestiynau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud y gwir.

Mae'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud yw bod yna un o'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud yw bod yna un o'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud yw bod yna un o'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud yw bod yna un o'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud yw bod yna un o'r pethau sy'n rhaid i ni ddweud.

ac yna dydyn nhw ddim yn gofalu sut i ddod i mewn oherwydd byddant yn sefydlu'n ôl i ni ymlaen yn y flwyddyn diwethaf ac yna byddwn ni'n gallu gwneud ychydig o hynny ac yna byddwn ni'n gallu gwneud ychydig o hynny ac yna byddant yn gallu gwneud ychydig o hynny

Dwi'n meddwl eich bod chi'n rhaid i mi fynd ymlaen, ond rwy'n gobeithio y bydda i'n cymryd y llawr hwnnw.

Hefyd, John, peidiwch â bod yn hyderus iawn am unrhyw un ohonynt.

Ac os wyt ti'n gwybod unrhyw un ohonynt, rydych chi'n gwybod.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddaf wedi'i ddefnyddio.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddaf wedi'i ddefnyddio

Mae'n ddiddorol.

Rwy'n gwybod eich bod chi'n gwneud hynny.

Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth

Mae'r cyfeiriadau yma'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n

Beth yw'r peth?

Beth rydych chi'n ei ddangos yn ymwneud â'r misiwn?

Oherwydd, os byddwn i'n gwneud y gwaith, mae'n rhaid i ni gael y dealltwriaeth yn glir, rwy'n credu, o ran y misiwn.

Rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig oherwydd, o ran fy marn i, mae'n rhaid i ni gydnabod y cwmniad, ac wrth fynd i mewn, mae llawer o hyn y gallwn ni ddechrau o safbwynt gwahanol.

Rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig.

Fel rwy'n ei ddangos, rwy'n dweud i Pete,

Rwy'n gweld y cyfle yma i fod yn gyfrifol ar gyfer yr ardaloedd trafodaeth mawr yng nghyd-destun y trafodaeth, ac yn gweithio tuag at ddiwedd y negosiadau, y polisïau a'r cyflwyniadau, i gael cyfnod diogel gwell i'r U.S. ac hefyd i greu

sy'n gwella'r system ar-lein er mwyn gwella'r system ar-lein.

Nid yw hynny'n ymwneud â ddwy bethau yn unig.

Yn gyntaf, dwi ddim yn gwybod beth yw'r ffordd y byddwn ni'n gwneud hynny.

Yn unig, rwy'n credu ei fod yn ymwneud â phwysigrwydd mawr, fel rwy'n ei ystyried yn ystod y cyfnod preswyl, i ddweud

bod hwn yn rhan o'r era o drafodaethau, drafodaethau economaidd, ond nid ymgysylltiad, fel y dywedodd Saul yn siarad.

Byddwn yn parhau i siarad yn unrhyw ffordd yr oes gennym.

A ddwy, bod ein ffrindiau y tu allan yn cydnabod bod hyn yn ymwneud â hynny'n ymwneud â'r Adran.

Oherwydd rwy'n credu eu bod nhw i'r diwrnod heddiw, ychydig diwrnod diwethaf, ddwy adroddiadau lle maen nhw'n ystyried y cyfarfod OECD, a'r cyfarfod hynny heddiw, ac maen nhw'n clywed, yn anffodus i'n bobl o'n Deyrnas Unedig, bod hyn yn amgylchedd gofalu.

Ac rwy'n ddiddordeb.

Rwy'n gweithiwr.

Rwy'n ystyried beth yw'r gweithredaeth sy'n cael ei wneud.

Mae'r cymdeithas, y cyfnodau uchel, a'r sefyllfa yma yn gwneud gweithredaeth sy'n cael ei wneud.

Mae'n ymwneud â'r 72 eiliadau a'r farchnad cyffredinol.

Mae hynny'n bwysig iawn.

Yn ystod hynny, rydyn ni'n meddwl y bydd ychydig o drafodaethau o ran ble rydyn ni'n mynd yma.

Roedd Dennis Healy'n gwneud yr adroddiad hwnnw yn Y Llywodraeth Llywodraeth yn ddwy diwrnod yn ôl.

Yn y papurau'r Gymraeg, mae fy ffrindiau yno'n bwysig iawn.

Felly mae'r rheswm rwyf wedi'i gyflwyno yw ei fod yn ymwneud â gwneud swydd.

Roeddwn i eisiau cael hynny'n ymwybodol â chi, beth ydych chi'n ei anghymryd, ac roedd hynny'n ymwneud â llywodra

Dwi'n credu ei fod wedi cyhoeddi'r cwestiwn ail, a'r hyn yw gwybod beth yw'r cyflawniadau, a phwy yw'n gyfrifol.

Dwi ddim yn disgwyl i unrhyw un o chi weithio ar Carnaval, dyna beth rydw i'n ceisio gwneud, gan gwybod bod gennych ymrwymiadau i'r Mhrifysgol Kennedy ac i'r bobl eraill, y cymdeithasau ad-hoc a'r ddiogelwch o'r SDR hyd at y pwynt hwnnw.

Dyna beth rydw i'n credu yw hynny.

Pwy yw'n gwneud hynny?

Pwy yw'n parhau i gynhyrchu hynny?

Ymrwymiadau

wedi mynd i Shultz i'r swyddfeydd, ond roedd yn dweud hynny.

Mae'r SDR wedi cael ei gyflawni ac mae'n mynd i'r Llywodraeth.

Mae amrywiaethau mawr wedi cael eu rhoi i gymdeithasau, ac mae'r cysylltiad â'r Prifysgol wedi datblygu.

Mae hyn yn ysgrifennu.

Dydw i ddim yn gwybod pwy oedd yn ei weld, ond dydw i ddim yn meddwl y galla i wneud y swydd.

Rwy'n mynd i mewn ac rwy'n deall gyda chi beth yw'r ffostr hwnnw a beth yw'r effaith a yw hynny.

Felly byddaf yn gofyn i chi roi pethau.

Un, rwy'n credu ei bod yn dda i'r gwleidyddion gwahanol i'w deall.

Nid yw hynny'n rhywbeth rydych chi eisiau ei wneud.

Rwy'n credu y gallwn ni gael rhywbeth.

2.

Rwy'n ymddygiadol ei bod hefyd yn dda i'r gwleidyddion gwleidyddol ddweud bod yna trafodaeth ac rydyn ni yma i gael mwy o hynny i'w wneud.

Yn ymddygiadol o newid economaeth, economaeth rhyngwladol, mae hyn yma.

Mae'r cynllun rhyngwladol hwn yn gweithio â'r trafodaethau cymdeithasol.

Mae hynny'n ymddygiadol iawn.

uh uh

Yn ail, o ran y broblem cyffredinol, nid ydym ni'n gallu gobeithio i'r Llywodraeth roi problemau i'r Elywodraeth nawr.

Yn enwedig gyda'n ffrindiau Ewropeaidd, rydyn ni'n siarad am Ewropeaidd ac i'r rhan fwyaf o'r byd, ond rwy'n teimlo ein bod ni'n rhaid i ni fynd allan o'r prifysgolion cyffredinol sydd wedi'i wneud o ran hyn, oherwydd ei effeithiau.

y lleiaf yng Nghymru, Yng Nghymru a phobl eraill yn ymwneud â'r ymchwil.

Wel, y lleiaf yng Nghymru a phobl eraill yn ymwneud â'r ymchwil.

Wel, y lleiaf yng Nghymru a phobl eraill yn ymwneud â'r

Rwy'n credu y bydd yna lawer o ymddygiadau.

Rwy'n credu y byddai'n rhaid i ni gael rhywfaint o elusiynau ac y byddwn ni ddim yn penderfynu amdanyn nhw.

Ond mae'r Cymdeithas yn yr un ochr ac mae'r farchnad cymdeithasol yn yr ochr arall wedi edrych ar farchnad trefn bywydol.

Rydyn ni'n edrych ar trefn fel mae rhywun wedi'i ddweud, mae'n adnodd.

Yn ôl y 50au, roedd pwrpas ein traed yn gweithredu ar gyfer ein polisi gwahanol.

Ac nawr, rydyn ni'n newid.

Mae pwrpas ein traed yn gweithredu ar gyfer ein polisi gwahanol.

Dyna beth maen nhw'n ei wneud, a dyna beth mae'n rhaid i ni ei wneud.

Dyna beth rydyn ni'n dod i lawr.

Felly, dyna rhywbeth sy'n newydd i'w gweld.

Nawr, nid yw'r adnodd hwnnw'n cael ei ddefnyddio, ond mae'r Gweinidog yn cael ei ddefnyddio.

rydyn ni'n gwneud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud hynny.

ond yr hyn rydw i'n ei argymell yma yw ein bod ni ddim yn dechrau gwneud unrhyw wahanol newid.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud pob un o'r pethau hyfryd ynghylch trafodaeth yn wych ac ati, ac rydyn ni wrth gwrs eisiau cael cyfathrebu yn y byd, yn y byd agored a'r holl hynny.

Mae'r geiriau hynny'n ddifarog iawn.

Ond pan mae'r negosiad yn cael ei wneud, mae'n rhaid i'r sefyllfa'r Unedau a'r holl ardaloedd fod yn

Mae'n llawer fawr i'w ddangos, ond nid o ran y misiwn Cenedlaethol.

Gallaf roi'r cyd-destun hwnnw drwy ddweud bod gennym, ar y pryd, rhywun yn y sefyllfa hwnnw o fwy, byddem yn ei ddweud, fawr ac ati, yn y sefyllfa hwnnw.

Mae'n, byddwn i'n dweud, eithaf anodd y byddai'r misiwn hwnnw'n rhaid iddo gael ei wneud.

Rwy'n hoffi gweld y swyddfa hwn a'r ffordd y mae'r swyddfa yn gweithio.

Mae'n rhaid, ac mae'n rhaid, ac mae'n ymwneud â'r sefyllfa yn ôl, mae'n rhaid i'r sefydliad gael ei gyflawni, ei fod wedi cael ei gyhoeddi.

Nawr, mae ychydig o brofiad hwnnw wedi cael ei ddysgu yn fy mhobl, ond yr hyn a ddigwyddodd yno, fel y dywedodd

Mae'r bwysigrwydd o gael cefnogaeth cyhoeddus ar gyfer y cenedlaeth cyfan ac ati ac ati yn y Deyrnas Unedig yn cael ei gyflawni'n ffordd.

Felly, roedd yn rhaid iddyn nhw gael cefnogaeth cyhoeddus, felly fe wnaeth hwnnw fynd i'r swydd hwn.

Felly, fe wnaeth hwnnw'r arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth arweinyddiaeth

Diolch.

Yn gyntaf, roeddwn i'n ymwneud â'r adnoddau gwych sydd wedi'u gwneud yng Nghymru.

Roeddwn i'n ymwneud â'r adnoddau gwych sydd wedi'u gwneud yng Nghymru.

Roeddwn i'n ymwneud â'r adnoddau gwych

Byddaf yn gweithio'n dda iawn.

Mae'r Brifysgol wedi cytuno i bwydo flynyddoedd Lachin.

Roedd hynny'n ymwneud â'r un sefyllfa sydd wedi digwydd o'r blaen.

Mae'r Cenedlaid, a'r dynwadau, a phobl yng Nghymru, yn hoff i ddweud hynny, ond mae'r flynyddoedd yng Nghymru wedi'i wneud.

Mae'n syml, ond mae wedi'i wneud drwy'r byd.

Mae'r Cenedlaid wedi'i wneud drwy'r wlad ac mae rhywun arall wedi gwneud rhywbeth arall.

Ac mae'r holl brofiadau y byddwn ni'n eu cymryd i'r

Mae hynny ddim yn cael ei chwarae fel hyn ar hyn o bryd, ond mae'n rhaid i ni gael hynny'n cysylltiedig mwy.

Felly, yr hyn rydyn ni'n ei gyflwyno yma yw ymwneud â newyddiaeth.

Ac mae'n ceisio gofyn am rywfaint o ddewisiadau ddewisiadol, mewn gwirionedd, ac mae hynny'n ymwneud â rhai pethau sy'n ymwneud â hynny.

Mae hynny'n ymwneud â rhai pethau sy'n ymwneud â hynny.

Mae hynny'n ymwneud â rhai p

Mae'r Deyrnas Unedig yn rhaid i ni ddod allan gyda'r un arall, neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas neu rydych chi'n gallu bod o gwmpas

Mae hynny yn rhywbeth arall.

Mae hynny yn y maes antitrust.

Os rydyn ni'n dechrau chwarae gêm, fel ein Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg, Cymraeg,

Os oes gen i ddod i'r swyddfa, byddwn i ddim wedi gofyn i chi ddod i'r swyddfa.

Os oes gen i ddod i'r swyddfa, byddwn i ddod i'r swyddfa.

Os oes

Just do the necessity, not just the little necessity.

It's on that basis that I'm interested in everybody to come down and try to get the results.

That's what I'm... Well, we've got one of the better things we have here.

Pete's office here.

You have a good working relationship, which is terribly important to this.

With our new committee and, you know, the actual policy.

Policy.

Rydw i ddim yn meddwl y byddaf yn y sefyllfa, ond rydw i'n meddwl y byddaf yn y sefyllfa a bod yn negosiadwr am yr hyn a fyddwn i'n ei wneud am sgwydau, a'r hyn a fyddwn i'n ei wneud am hyn a hyn.

Nid ydych chi'n gallu gofyn i bawb ddod i lawr o ffwrdd mawr.

Mae'n rhaid i unrhyw weithredwyr cymdeithasol i wneud hynny, ond yr hyn rydyn ni wir eisiau ei wneud yw i gael eich meddwl, ac hefyd rydych chi'n rhaid cael negosiadwyr i wneud llawer o'r pethau hynny, ond yr hyn rydyn ni wir eisiau yw eich cyfrif, eich cyfrif, eich cyfrif i'r holl ddiddordeb newydd yng Nghymru.

Dyna'r hyn rydyn ni'n ei wneud.

Yn ôl, rydyn ni wedi trafod ein polisi ar gyfer cefnogi ein polisi gwahanol.

Nawr, rydyn ni'n trafod ein polisi amgylcheddol ar gyfer cefnogi ein polisi.

Dyna'r dyniaeth.

Nid oes problem ar hyn o bryd.

Mae'n bwysig iawn.

Beth yw'r swyddfa yma nawr, lle rydyn ni'n symud ymlaen?

Ychydig a hanner.

Nid yn unig.

Diolch yn fawr.

90% o'r amser rydw i'n siŵr y byddwn ni'n gallu cyflawni ein broblemau.

Mae hynny ddim yn broblem i chi.

Rydw i'n meddwl, wrth gwrs, bod rhaid i mi, os oes gen i broblem, dweud wrth fy mod i'n cael mynediad, oes gen i ddiddordeb.

Oes gen i ddiddordeb i ddweud wrthych chi, oes hynny'n arbennig.

Bydd rhaid i mi ddefnyddio hynny, os ydw i'n gwneud hynny.

Rwy'n siŵr y byddwn i'n gofyn.

Rwy'n hoffi bod yn gyflym ac rwy'n gallu cyflawni.

Os yw'n bwysig,

Rwy'n deall hynny.

Mae'r peth yn mynd ymlaen, mae gennym broblem.

Wel, efallai y byddwch chi'n cael rhywbeth i'w wneud.

Mae'n dda, rwy'n deall hynny.

A'r peth am y swyddfa hwn, rydyn ni'n ceisio... rydyn ni'n ceisio lleihau'r nifer ohonyn nhw sy'n gael hynny, fel y byddai'n fwy hynny pan fyddwn ni'n cael y sefyllfa hwnnw.

Mae'r swyddfa hwn yn y swyddfa, ac mae'n rhaid i ni ei gyfathrebu â'r Prifysgol.

Felly mae'n rhaid i chi gael hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny.

Rydyn ni'n gweithio ar hynny ac rydyn ni'n meddwl sut y gallwn ni gweithio gyda'n gilydd.

Mae'r hyn hwn yn bwysig iawn.

Mae'n rhaid i chi edrych ar ffyrdd diogelwch, oherwydd dyna'r ffordd yr ydych chi'n gallu gwneud.

Ond un peth am hynny, mewn trefn, nid yn unig yn y Llywodraeth, nid yn unig yn y trefn, ond mewn ystafell trefn, mewn ystafell trefn, mewn ystafell trefn, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n

Mae hynny'n ymwneud â'r ffaith bod llawer o leiaf wedi cael eu cymryd i fod yn y ffordd y maen nhw'n ei wneud, oherwydd mae'r sefyllfa ddiweddar ar hyn o bryd yn y ffordd arall.

Yr un arall y byddwch chi'n mynd ati ar hyn o bryd yw, wrth gwrs, byddwn ni'n gwneud pwysau ar gyfer hynny.

Byddwn ni'n gwneud pwysau ar gyfer ymgynghoriad.

Nid yw hynny'n ymwneud â'r sylwadau.

Mae'r sylwadau sy'n gweithio'n ddefnyddiol yn eich amser.

Yr un arall y byddwch chi'n ei

Mae'n ymwneud â'r peth trefn, mae'n ymwneud â'r peth trefn.

Mae'n ymwneud â'r peth trefn.

Ac wrth gwrs, mae'r adnoddau eraill, o ran eu rôl, maen nhw'n rhedeg ac yn rhedeg, ac mae rhai ohonyn nhw, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs, wrth gwrs,

ac rydyn ni'n gobeithio y byddwch chi hefyd.

Rwy'n mynd i wneud y cyflwyniad.

Ac hefyd, rwy'n credu bod pob un o'r pethau hyn yn dda iawn yn cael ei wneud, fel rwy'n ei wneud yn bwysig yma.

Rwy'n hoffi gweld yr awgrymiadau, ond rwy'n credu bod un o'r pethau arall rwy'n hoffi bod yn siŵr i chi ddeall yw, rwy'n hoffi bod y llyfr yn dod i me, ac rydych chi'n dweud beth rydych chi'n meddwl y dylech chi ei wneud hefyd.

Rwy'n hoffi gwneud hynny bob amser, ond rwy'n hoffi gwybod beth rydych chi'n ei wneud.

Os oes gennych chi'r llyfr hwnnw, mae'n hawdd i unrhyw un dweud, wel, mae hynny'n ymgysylltiad amdanyn nhw, ymgysylltiad â'r llyfr, ac yna rydych chi'

Ac rydyn ni ddim yn cymryd chi yma i ddysgu beth yw'r opsiwnau.

Gallwn gael graddwyr newydd.

Nid yw'r ysgol llaw yn gwneud hynny.

Ond rydyn ni ddim yn gofyn i chi wneud hyn.

Rydyn ni ddim yn gofyn i chi wneud hyn.

ac nid oes unrhyw sylwad ar yr unigol.

Nid oes unrhyw sylwad ar yr unigol.

Diolch yn fawr.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud y cwestiwn arall.

Rwy'n hoffi cael rhywbeth.

Mae'n dda i mi, wrth gwrs.

Dwi'n siŵr.

Dwi'n deall eich bod yn deall.

Felly mae fy ngwmniant i chi yw, a dwi ddim yn edrych ar hyn fel ymgysylltiad sylfaenol, ond dim ond ymgysylltiad sylfaenol.

Yn rhyw bryd, efallai eich bod wedi cyflawni

a byddwn i'n dod yn effeithiol.

Byddwn i eisiau teimlo'n dda i ddod yn ôl i'r Prif Weinidog, ond rwy'n credu bod amser i mi symud ymlaen.

Rwy'n gobeithio nad yw hynny'n digwydd.

Rwy'n gobeith

Dwi ddim yn gwybod beth ydw i'n mynd i'w wneud, dwi ddim yn gwybod beth ydw i'n mynd i'w wneud.

Dwi ddim yn gwybod beth ydw i'n mynd i'w wneud.

Mae fy nghydweithiwr wedi 17 mlynedd yng Nghymru.

Rwy'n gobeithio nad ydw i'n gwneud penderfyniadau, ac mae hi'n ddyn newydd yn ôl yma, felly mae hi'n ddiddorol.

Mae hi'n peintio.

Mae hynny'n gallu bod yn gwirioneddol.

Efallai y byddwch chi'n teimlo'n isolaidd yn Los Angeles.

Mae hynny'n gwirioneddol.

Yn ôl bod yn gwirioneddol, mae'n gwirioneddol wahanol.

Ond, wel, rwy'n credu y byddwch chi'n dod o amser.

Mae hynny'n ddiddorol oherwydd rydyn ni'n gwneud llawer o feddwl anodd am y peth hwn.

Rydw i'n hapus i chi fod yn gwneud hynny.

Yn y wythnos diwethaf, roeddwn i'n meddwl bod hynny'n bwysig.

Felly mae'n rhaid i mi ddod o hyd i Carl Gilbert nawr, ac mae gen i ffyrdd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd Cymryd

Mae'n sefyllfa anodd lle roeddwn i wedi gwneud hynny chwe mis yn ôl i wneud rhywbeth arall.

Ac hefyd i chi gael cysylltiad â'r cydweithredaeth sydd wedi cael ei wneud.

OECD plus this.

I know enough about that amount of people and their ways that we can do a job and we can bring in, I think, some of those two decades.

Mae'n debyg.

Rwy'n hoffi gweld ein bod ni wedi cymryd eich ffrindiau ar gyfer unrhyw syniadau sydd ar ôl y pethau hyn.

Rwy'n dweud, nid ydych chi'n gallu bod yma i fod yn negosiadwr ac i fod yn ychwanegol â phroblem.

Rwy'n meddwl y gallwn ni ddweud yr un peth yma.

Mae'n dda iawn.

Diolch yn fawr.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn yn sicr o gael hynny'n dda.

Mae hynny'n dda iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn yn sicr o gael hynny'n dda.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn yn sic

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisiau cael eich drafodaethau ar y bwrdd.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisia

Roedd yn dweud y byddai'r penderfyniad hwnnw'n ymwneud â'r pethau y byddwn ni'n eu penderfynu amdanyn nhw.

Mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan fwyaf o'r rhan

Ac wedyn dwi'n dweud wrth i'r Prif Weinidog fod yn bwysig nad oes unrhyw argymhellion i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud ac nid oes unrhyw sylwadau i'w wneud

Yn gyffredinol, efallai eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n dweud

Mae'r cyfrifoldeb ar gyfer yr economaeth i gydol y dyniaeth yn gweithredu gyda'r Prif Weinidog ac wedi cael ei gyfrifoldeb.

Mae'r Prif Weinidog bob amser yn cyflwyno'r dyniaeth sydd wedi cael ei ddefnyddio.

Mae'n rhaid i ni gael cymaint o ailgylchu, ailgylchu, ymchwil, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y polisi economaidd, a yw hynny'n effeithio ar y pol

Mae'n rhywbeth ymlaen â hynny.

Roeddwn i'n ei ddefnyddio yn ystod y diwrnod diwethaf, ond roeddwn i'n ei ddefnyddio ar hyn o bryd.

Mae'r cwestiwn yw, mewn gwirionedd, pan dwi'n dweud ar hyn o bryd, nad yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cael hynny'n cael ei ystyried ar hyn o bryd.

Mae hynny'n ei adlewyrchu.

Os dwi'n dweud, roeddwn i'n siarad â'r Prif Weinidog y bore yma a dywedodd iddo i mi nad oedd yn bwriadu ystyried unrhyw bethau fel hynny, mae hynny'n ei allu tynnu ychydig.

Rwy

Diolch yn fawr am wylio'r fideo.

23.22.

The responsibility for the economic health of the nation.

Basically, when the president had the event and had the consulate, the president was always in full respect of the events.

He was very concerned about their

have a constant re-examination, re-appraisal of all the instruments that may affect the economic policy, that may affect the economic policy, whether they're on the president or under, or independent of the president, or so forth.

And those studies are going on, and they continue to go on.

I followed basically this line yesterday, but I used at this time.

The question is really, when I say at this time, that the president does not have this under consideration at this time.

That leaves it loose if I say, I talked to the president this morning and he indicated to me that he did not plan to consider any such change.

That tightens it up a little.

I just wonder if you want me to...

Okay.

All right.

But I was over in Madrid.

I was invited to attend a dinner.

After the dinner, I went over to see Nancy, my wife.

I'm the kind of guy who's always got to stay married.

So I was sitting with the vice president.

He turned to me and said, can I talk to you for a few minutes?

So meanwhile, there was a band of musicians playing, honoring him.

He looked like there was something bothering him.

So he stayed there and talked.

During the course of the conversation, Bart Stomer and one other person I was talking about, they all tried to come over to a parade.

I picked it up.

They were blocked off for some reason or another because I couldn't start the talk.

So anyway, we had the conversation.

I made notes the next morning so it would be hard to be happy because I thought you ought to have them.

First of all, I want to make it clear.

These are not my comments, and I don't necessarily subscribe to what was said.

These are his.

And I will indicate when I said something.

Sure, sure.

The first thing he said to me when we got back to the evidence of diving, he said, rather helpful ways.

And I assume he was talking about the China visit in some part.

And I said, well, I assume this was a very delicate thing about the China situation.

Obviously, you have to be paid pretty close to the vest.

Otherwise, we'll go to the ash can.

So I was a little bit irritated.

He said, I'm not talking about that.

He said, it's the domestic program that's going on.

So I kept still, but I just listened.

He said, for example, please understand, I'm not being critical here.

He said, for example, John Irving, charge of the whole domestic program.

The problem is he's not a Seattle lawyer.

This is the treatment made by John and his staff.

He said it had been cavaliered.

And he said, it's just been terrible.

He said, we were elected to do something about this thing with this OEO.

We're not doing it.

He said, for example, Major Cranston, that's a fine thing.

He said, that's a good program.

We've got to go.

But some of these other things that we were elected on, we were going to get rid of.

Nothing's being done on the thing.

He said, when I came in, he said, I was supposed to be involved in a lot of domestic programs.

I've been a governor and the county executive.

And the announcements were made.

In fact, now I was going to be doing it.

He said, I don't have anything to do on any of these things.

The staff, our crew has taken over.

He said they've been encouraged, the entire staff at the White House, to treat him as nobody since they know I'm not called off to be served.

He gave an illustration of some advance out in Dallas on some flight that developed it.

I don't have to be concerned with that.

Or the vice president gets calls from staff, people over here, and almost like he's being ordered around like a flunky, apparently they get an instruction to get in touch with the vice president, and so they get in touch with him, and then everybody gets uptight.

He said, for example, he said he got a call at 1.30 in the morning.

He said, my military aide gets a call to the effect that the president was going to be made in the very important announcement.

and to tell the vice president not to make any comment on it whatsoever.

So Donald Schultz was the person who called.

I don't know who called.

He didn't tell me.

I didn't cross his hand.

Of course, he said, well, the vice president's asleep.

He said, well, wake him up.

This is important.

So Donald...

what the announcement was.

Well, it was about the China situation.

So then he said, for example, he said, I made a statement that I knew about the possibility of Dr. Kissinger going to China three weeks ago and it's been discussed.

And he said, I can't say something.

He has a face, he's hurt, he's crying.

He says, and then what happens?

He says, the lady from the White House issues a statement.

He told me about something about that.

And so I asked him, I said, well, who would make that statement?

Well, I read it in the department.

He said, it was John Scali.

He did it.

So I said, yeah, Scali did it.

That's what he told me.

So I said, well, now that he says that, he said, I am positive.

So then he said that he had wanted to go to Greece, because his father had been born there, and he just told him he couldn't go to Greece.

I said, well, I can see the possibility of why he should not go.

Why he should not go to Greece is due to some question about the type of government there at the moment and all that sort of thing.

Then he said he wanted to go to Peking and to Taiwan both.

He said, no, you can't go to Peking and Taiwan.

Well, I said, of course, if you're my president, it's not my place to say what should or should not be done.

I'm not privy to these things that are going on over there.

But I said, I can see as an outsider that the utmost secrecy would be required, that you are a marked man, if you're my president, and you couldn't possibly get in and out of China without the whole world knowing about it.

My own personal thinking is that even the Secretary of State wouldn't have been able to do a thing like that.

He'd have to run somebody.

And somebody who isn't coming on the official side asks us, even though Dr. Kissinger obviously is ranking out as the spokesman of the White House for president.

So then he says, well, I can't stand another four years of this.

He says, I just have up to here.

He says, I just can't take it any longer.

He says, I will never hire a president, anyone at all.

He says, I'll campaign for him.

I'll do whatever he wants.

I've done it.

But he says, I cannot stand another four years.

So knowing that he was up very tight, and because of what Bob Hill had said to me previously, which I'll get to in a moment, I said, well, Mr. Vice President, I said, you never want to do something that your enemies want you to do.

Your enemies want you off the ticket.

I said, there may be other people who are not your enemies who think it would be better that you're not on the ticket, but your enemies don't want you on the ticket.

I said, for example, when Nick Timmons had an article where he came up with this idea that Hoover was going to resign as head of the FBI and that the

I said, I'll give you something like that.

I said, even if you announce to the whole world that you simply did not want to be vice president anymore, no one will believe it.

I said, they will think that you were kicked off the ticket.

Now, if they believe that, I said, people don't vote for a vice president or an heir.

I said, he rides along.

But I said, if a lot of people thought that you were treated shabbily in any way at all, no matter how you tried to dress up, they might sit on their hands, and it could possibly affect, adversely, the ticket.

So my suggestion is, well, it's not my place to tell you what to do with the vice president, is, you know, just take it in grace and see what happens, and grind along, and so forth.

I said, furthermore, this is what I said to him, I said, you know, being a vice president is an occupational hazard.

I said, I know that there are other vice presidents out of St. Louis.

the President hadn't treated me properly during the time that they were Vice President.

So then he said, he said, well, it's obvious to me that the President must have

He was the vice president.

Otherwise, he wouldn't possibly be doing the things to me that he hadn't been doing.

This guy's uptight.

Now, remember, I have never been a buddy of the vice president.

I've met in cash.

And for him to talk to me this way, he wanted to get something off his chest.

He said, there's so much going on in this administration, both domestically and internationally.

And he said, I'm really not a part of it.

Now, getting to the purpose of shutting out, he is near the breaking point on this thing, which makes you fear that he may say or do something that could be embarrassing.

Bob Hill told me about when they had the dinner there in Shane, where the vice president and Prince John Carlos and so forth, that near the end of the dinner, the vice president got up from the dinner and motioned for the bill to be run out.

So he went out into the hall, kind of looking...

And the vice president says to Hill, and they're out here, and they have a group.

He says, who's the chief of state here?

She said, I don't know.

You'd think he would know that.

So Hill said, well, of course, that's what's on the front.

The chief of state, Prince John Carlos, is scheduled to succeed him.

And, of course, the vice president is here, so any toast that you might be offering, you must be certain, of course, that it wasn't the vice president of Spain.

And Hill told me that the vice president turned and said, I did it.

So we all could see that the guy was really, you know, up to the very top.

So then he mentioned about the fact that some of his staff people had said to him, well, why don't you sit down and talk to the president about it?

And I said, well, look, I said, I've got a few times with the president.

What's the president going to say to you?

He's going to say, gee, Ted, you're doing a great job.

So that's what I told my staff.

He said, they just don't seem to understand.

So that was his whole tenor of the thing, that it is at a point where it is really rough.

So I ended up, oh, by the way, he had told Hill, apparently, that sending Bryce Harlow with him was a way of indicating that they didn't trust the Vice President to say or do the right thing, and Bryce had been sent along to watch him and advise him.

And his leaving from Korea and so forth is supposed to be a part of that setup.

Well, I saw Bryce before I went to Europe.

He was over at the U. Scott reception.

And he sort of involuntarily said, well, I came on back.

I said, I was like, really?

He said, well, I came on back.

I thought I got some extra club on the log.

There's not much point, you know, in my going along.

So then I ended up in a conversation with him towards the end.

and that is

Just take it in stride, it's an occupational hazard, being the vice president.

And I said, may I remind you someday, if I'm still around, how you are treating your vice president.

So he started to break up at that point, and I said to him, am I to consider this as a confidential conversation, or am I at liberty to use my judgment when I do it?

He hesitated a moment, and he said, you do, let me give you the instructions of that question.

Well, my judgment was that I'll share it.

And I'm not here to give advice for Mary to report that this guy's going to be buttered up.

Not on the question of whether he's on or off the ticket, but he might get so uptight that he might say or do something that could be harmful.

So that's the purpose of my call.

You know, we have a few of us on the phone.

He starts to be quiet and sad and sad.

You can't really believe it.

I was trying.

I mean, I knew he would run into this problem on a trip around the world.

He didn't get some news.

You know, he refused to do anything.

You know, that's why he...

They don't do that.

They refuse to go to a hospital or refuse to do anything, you know.

He just studied a little and he could see that the only way a vice president who never has anything substantive to do with a criminal can't have, because he just goes and holds hands and listens and so forth.

He just wouldn't take it.

Apparently he's got a staff problem there.

But the main thing, I think, is that

In terms of his, of how he's treated, I was thinking, he was thinking about the trips.

You know, I've been about six trips around by his friend.

You know, in that whole period of time, nobody ever came to the airport to meet me, except once.

I had a hard day, after Latin America.

My God, we send Rogers out each time.

I go out for an hour.

We do all this stuff.

We're really doing everything we can.

And he's terribly sensitive.

I think his back is legally broken.

Well, it's bad.

But he doesn't know the history of the city.

He doesn't know the history of what the situation is.

Setting him on these trips, we really shouldn't, you know, just because he's not quite eligible.

You know, due to the fact that he's fine on these trips.

and where he's, you know, he comes out after meeting with the African cannibals and makes his comment about that.

He's perfectly right.

But, you know, so that's what happened.

But the point is, was he good to help himself with it?

I mean, the rednecks in the South, they don't like to say anything.

So why not say something good about the African?

They say, well, uh,

It's this kind of thing that does present a problem.

But DeFoto, of course, has been extremely loyal in terms of his campaign.

He worked his butt off.

His main problem, I think, Murray, is now it's almost a paranoid attitude on the press.

He's just having fun.

He probably didn't see them all the way around.

He had DeFoto with him.

Except once when he made this sort of comment.

And, of course, they're going to stick up for that.

And whether he's able to understand that, I feel exactly the same way about the presence he does.

But the way you do it is true, rather than stay away from it, you know.

And he's got to get some of that worked out.

Whatever you're working on, I'll tell you, he's terribly, he is insensitive.

He can't, he's got to understand, of course,

The only effect on the staff that he mentioned was John.

That's the only person that he mentioned.

The others, he just whacked them.

You know, he said, I got to call my staff.

You know, he puts it that way.

And he said it in German.

And he named his guy Mr. Ray.

Yeah, he named him Mr. Ray.

And I'll tell you, Vic Gold, the night before his travel, the press man, told me that he was satisfied.

I said, gee, what did he do?

He said, well, he said, someday I'll tell you.

So they're convinced that it is Scali.

But that started out...

I was going to say, we got Scali in while he was here yesterday, and I gave Scali instructions to knock down the story about Lucy, that terrible story we had.

Lucy, what about her?

Well, it's just a bad rap, and as Scali said, so I gave him instructions.

I didn't realize that Scali was the man, because he said, I'll write you a number.

Now, the only thing that concerns me about the whole thing is if he were to make an announcement, that he will not be able to take it where it's his choice.

Frankly, I think it hurts us.

I'm not saying he should be on or off.

That's not my province.

But it would look like there was a rift no matter how you dressed it up.

And he's in a frame of mind where I'm a little concerned about it.

I'm glad that you had Secretary Rogers and Cabinet people out to greet him.

You know, he came back.

So I don't want him to greet the Secretary.

Yeah, I accept it all.

Well, you know what to do about it.

Let me, uh, yeah, let me suggest this, uh, to, on the conversation, uh, why don't you, you know, the other one I, uh, the one you could report it to would be our, uh, Mitchell.

I mean, you, you, you're working with Mitchell on something.

Well, as a matter of fact, there's been a cutoff in his office.

Well, there has been, I don't know.

I can't believe he's under the impression that I should not be him, and I refuse to claim to get him.

I'm available, and I don't have to be coached.

And actually, I'm doing very well, and I can afford to have him back here.

Well, I know that.

You know, I tried to see John about five, six different times, and I got no response.

So I'm not complaining about this recording.

That's something that's doing well.

However, if you want me to make contact with him, I will.

Let me have him call you.

That's what we'll be able to do.

Please understand, I'm not playing.

I know you're not, but let me ask that.

That's much the better way to do it, though.

That's much the better way to do it, very much the better way to do it.

We had that one job, because we got these people to do it at a later time.

I don't know.

.

I must say, I can do everything we can.

We have...

And we've had him more socially, we've had him use camp data, you know, we've had him use, you know, we've given him all the personal purposes that, frankly, I never got.

But he's horrible at night.

Yeah.

I'll be certain.

Okay.

He didn't really understand why he didn't go to the meeting.

As a matter of fact, when I did explain, I said, you're a marked man.

I said, you can't get out of a country without the whole world knowing it.

But he didn't press the point.

He wasn't.

We couldn't have that because of us.

I'm sorry.

He's going all out.

He misses me.

Good morning, friends.

This is Tommy Tate.

I'm surrounded by Tate.

Who's Tate?

I am.

So I don't believe him.

He just got confused.

Are you very open to him?

Certainly.

They start busting at your distance.

You say, well, let's take it.

And the message you're giving me, I say, well, you can't just throw that one.

That's right.

I didn't.

Roll over.

That sounds good.

We better get it pretty fast before we get lunch.

They were renting a leech.

Remember when we went into it?

46, 929.

Hey, Brad.

We're horrible.

We're terrible.

No, I wasn't.

He's out of the game.

And, uh, wasn't, uh, Jim, Jimmy, Vince, and I have about three or four years.

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

Right after the war.

Yeah.

Were you still in the house when you were fighting with American Relations over Pennsylvania?

Yes, sir.

I was in the house regarding that.

I'd love to hear there was another video.

Yes, sir.

That's right.

I remember what that was like.

You know, it was a hell of a fight.

And we thought we'd all get beaten by it.

We had to fight.

I think there were 50-some-odd numbers.

That's right.

And there's not a lot of ones that beat Linda.

That was the genesis of the Charter Marching thing.

And for Jackson and Moran, I saw about that, and I talked about that, and all of us, I mean, Jackson and Lindy, it was really, it was not, it was just,

Kennedy coined that dollar, and the cargo supposedly retired this year, so if I get reelected, I'll be the only survivable.

Does that party a great little group?

Well, let me say that I'm glad...

That's right.

All right.

Well, I think that the only thing wrong with Don is that he passed before you did, Mitch.

I think you ought to be on the other side.

You've got to go this way or that way.

Mr. President, do you ever feel we've passed?

Since we've been running the thing, it has been formally announced.

Yes, sir.

And we haven't been careful, and we don't think we have been extravagant or...

We can't sit and let a lady lose her husband in this town or Kevin for all this money that somebody don't offer.

And we can't let our boys go to school get such a small amount of money that it isn't a bad thing.

raised the education rate about 33%.

And there's still some complaint among our members that we didn't raise it enough.

We did all the scholarships, we did all the schools across the country, from the cheapest public school to the highest private school.

And we tried to get a balance of what to not pay all the way for a boy from the school to pay enough that if he wants to go, he can go.

There's a word on the side.

Since we've increased our pension compensation, there's probably about 10% increase in cost of living.

And we've got to look at that.

And one of the reasons we talk about you just leaves in the back of the world of danger, talking about millions and millions and millions of dollars.

We've had the last few years, we've had the last few years, we've had the last few years,

But we do have to look at our hospitals.

I was talking to Don a minute ago.

These quarters out here, Preston, Arizona, where our building is at present, I tell you, it was a train stop back.

Preston, Preston, Arizona.

You got the hospital out in New York.

It wasn't a hospital.

How old is it?

About 90 years old?

About 90 years old.

Cover-ups.

It was built originally in New York.

And it's very good.

We do need a plan for renovation and new hospitals.

And I assume they've got some kind of plan.

We'll be very close in 1973 to...

Let's see, Justin, what you had, the committee had one-to-one in psychiatric and two-to-one.

And General Michael said, you know, didn't you, Max, say you'd come up with almost the same figures?

Yes, sir.

Sure.

This is something that we have.

This is something I think Donald will already have.

We're going to push very hard on him from the budget standpoint to be sure that we get quality care.

That is not as high as we possibly can.

I'm trying to give a lot of emphasis to that.

I think we must be certain that the kind of directive control I can just get in.

The reason it was put on, Tom, for us, because we, to begin with, this was before, of course, before he came in as President of Ohio, and it was just not to recover, to recover.

I understand the heart patients

with the same illness will stay longer in a veteran's hospital than he will in a general hospital because he's farther away from home.

Three police, several hundred miles from home, and he can't go home as soon as he could if he were in that hospital.

So, Congressman, we've got this down to that major factor in something that does a lot more damage than he does.

That's fair enough.

But the only difference between a private and a VA hospital

that the doctor ordinarily does in his own office.

The lab testing is going on over time, about 24, 48 hours.

Speaking of something, before we got away from the hospital, I noticed that he had agreed to go to work on something on that forward facility that, you know, we had in Nashville.

Our doctor comes in, he just comes in, and everybody, I thought he was upset and said,

I don't want to talk about the house.

Now, last year, you people added another $50,000 that you sent your budget up.

Then we added about another $105,000.

And George's people then goes and tells Don that you can't use any of this money for recurring costs, which means that they did not hire any staff.

It was $155,000 last year.

None of that money was staffed.

Now, we've done about the same thing this year.

I hope George can hear me.

I'm going to have to hire more people.

We've put in $8,000.

I'm going to have to hire more people.

5,000 people.

86,000.

What is the greatest thing?

Let me drag out the broad aspects.

What is the greatest thing in the rest of time?

The facilities.

Yes.

But you mentioned some of these.

Yes.

We have to have some kind of a renovation program.

Renovation or a village.

Right.

We have to build a building in California.

Is that correct?

We've got that whole Southern California plan with you now, and I think yours has it, too.

And that's a big involved project, which I think here's another one.

There's another one, too.

I figure I have something under consideration.

We've got a hotel complex under consideration.

There's one.

My God, that thing was built 70 years ago, too.

And it's been around.

You're then saying the more sensitive problem is rather than building to staff.

Do you agree with that?

Well, I think we're approaching the staffing ratio that would be in the flexibility in which we've been able and which we've gotten each year through seven, which we brought up to you, to new modalities of care that I think is a facility.

Mine is the one that is of major concern because it's such a

proposition from when you get the word go to finally get somebody to sell it.

But we have at least 8 to 12 areas or hospitals that need major renovation or replacement, like the Bronx is.

If I had my brothers, that would be the number one to be replaced in this country.

I think I heard, uh,

has been to say that we want to do the absolute best job we can for veterans with service-connected disabilities, number one.

Number two, we want to do absolutely the best job we can for Vietnam veterans.

And the thing that we're trying to be careful of is that

The number of vets are expected.

The load has gone up, and they've pushed us on that very hard.

But I think there's a concentration of service connected on Vietnam, something we felt deserved to have a great emphasis.

that's something we've worked on very hard.

I recognize your problem.

We've given, we've given some ground up.

At the same time, we've tried to do everything.

Our fear is we may not wind up doing as well as we should with these first priorities.

The bad thing, Peter, is that what you do, see, another track closed, under 10-15 knots, which was...

They're telling them to move that down 5,000 beds, which is 10,500 dead hospitals.

And they've got plans to go down to 6,800 or 6,800.

George, I haven't been able to get it from you or from the committee.

No, the same actor, Jack.

I've seen likes out of this Jack Ashton.

I mean, two versions of Jack Ashton.

Hey, the number of circles.

I've seen the Armageddon Reserve Commission, the people of the one-legged community of Jordan's Heaven.

Yeah, well, uh, could we look at a couple things here?

Do we really have a long term...

In terms of that

We ought to take a pretty hard, we really ought to take a long-term look at the whole hospital program

On the other hand, if you could have a program which really looked to the future, say, look, over five years, ten years, ten years from now, Vietnam winners, and then say, over the next ten years, we're going to do this, this, this, this, this, and people would say that instead of artists on a hit and miss, that's what really, I think, you're hitting on here.

Johnson took a look at it, and he has a budget problem, and we've got a budget problem, so John said, all right, we'll cut here, so we say, look, cut here.

And we deal with that.

That's facilities.

The other thing, of course, has to do with personnel.

Now, the personnel thing is, it's something else that we, I think we've got to, at least who follows George, and I think Don will agree, they probably know more about this than most of us.

They've forgotten more than most of us will ever know.

You've probably seen, you're familiar with Michael, and it's one of our agent commanders.

years and uh i'd like to take a hard look first now you actually will help us you know we've got a health problem we'd like to do more in fact we appreciate the fact that you have resisted both of you and ordered the demands but i have to i i do not want particularly with regard to the budget in this period of time that was on me that was on me

that American servicemen are savage, dope baddies, and so forth and so on, and, uh, uh, sadistical, uh, that, uh, they're a low breed, and they're dropouts rather than the intellectuals that stay here and grow beards and down straight and try to tear down the bush.

Uh, I don't know why they think they're better than the nevertheless most do, but nevertheless, if you look at the whole proposition, you have a major attack

due to the fact that there's a frustration over Vietnam.

And it goes even beyond that.

Unless Vietnam is over, the United States want to get the hell out of every place.

They want to get out of the world.

They want to turn in.

They want the United States to be a great power.

They don't want us to have a presence in Europe.

They don't want us to have a presence in Asia.

You and I know this can't happen.

What's all this got to do with this?

What it has to do with this is that there is basically, we all hear about the pro-veterans lie.

But there's a hell of an anti-veterans lobby now in this country.

It's an anti-veterans lobby.

And sure, you talk about the votes we can get.

You always get votes for hospitals and the rest.

What I'm getting at is that I think that, and this expresses my own views and convictions, I do believe.

a bunch of bums in the public mind.

They come back, they go out and serve, and it's like World War II when everybody served, unless he, you know, had something wrong with them.

Hell, these are the poor guys who got out there, and then the privileged kids found a college, you know, and took 18 more degrees or something, and they had an appointed service to demonstrate against the government.

So not for that.

So I think the veterans should have an answer to that proposition.

Second, one, will you give them an

And that's doing pretty good, isn't it?

I think that's one job statistic that is better, isn't it?

Yes, sir.

It's very good, isn't it?

We don't, we want to, now, in terms of the, in terms of the, in terms of this, I want to, I want to approach it in a way that we can, we can solve in the country as a, a long-term solution.

where we're looking at the facilities, we're looking at the treatment, and in a way, which is different.

Now, there's a point of view that goes the other way, and I realize this too.

And frankly, it was quite prevalent in the 50s, and the point of view was that since Mary

As far as the Vietnam veterans, everybody hasn't been a veteran.

And the Vietnam veterans have taken a bad rap.

And you agree?

I agree.

And the thing is, they're trying to attack the armed services.

I must say.

who's in the Navy and so forth.

So, you know, it's very hard for these kids that are in the Navy and the Army and the Air Force and the guys that happen to have the numbers to get called.

And I think of the other kids in our unit, I say, I'm not against the kids in our unit.

You know, that's the law.

But I do feel that we have, we're going to keep some spirit, some in this country of willingness to maintain the minimum forcefulness

to play a peace-keeping role in the world, that we've got to change the attitude toward, first, going into the Armed Services in the first instance, and second, if you're a kid, and if you do happen to be done with all the services and so forth, that you are properly treated.

And that's just a little edge.

That's what 380A is all about, right?

It's an edge.

And I can

I mean, it's a terrible problem.

And frankly, I must say, there are a lot of other places that we're constantly concerned in.

Rather than here, I think we can.

And I think I have a long-term program looking at this problem.

I guess it's been studied and studied and studied, but looking at it in the light of the new situation, looking at it, we know what's left from World War I.

We know what's left from World War

Mr. President, immediately after I came on board, we did make such a study.

All we had to do was update it with some new input.

With the thought in mind, going into the year 2000, with the changing modalities of health delivery, of the nursing care, the extended care, as most of us on World War II get older, all of these things are wrapped into this study.

And I think we are rapidly approaching a few times when I talk about a study, and they're on a facility study, that all we need to do, in fact, is ask our suppliers or our suggestions of ours on the facility thing.

And I think that what we need to do really is to incorporate

What role will VA's play in VA medicine, but in the overall national health strategy that is going to be developed in this decade by the executive and by the Congress?

You're working with the new health doctor over there.

We've attempted to observe that it hasn't been a high-level test.

strong conservative thought.

I mean, I think he, I don't know how he feels about this problem, but I think he'd be all right.

I think he'd be a good businessman, but I think this is all what I understand.

You haven't talked with him about it, and let's be sure that there's a, because there is a tendency, I must say, for the professional medical guy to say, well, I'm going to help you preserve the service for the health of the nurse, right?

But they are classed apart in this instance for very good reasons.

I think there are other good reasons, though.

that you yourself have set up a system that's a VA hospital system that's a nationwide system, a national resource.

Our affiliations with any one of the medical schools in the country.

Yeah, that's very important.

All of that is attributed to medical.

It's one of the indirect ways that you support members.

You started to say something.

We have an area of movement for veterans in rural areas.

where the money's not available.

Take a $600 million revolving fund.

This broker's making a profit of over $100 million.

Only 12 weeks out, we got a police problem.

This year, out of the clear blue sky, they didn't get a chance.

And we didn't.

Figures are weak, and we don't understand them.

We're all weak now.

Tell me if you'd like to pack that system, and I'll also give you an answer on what's going to happen.

Well, I may have disagreed, Mr. President, with the approach that was done.

I do agree with the objective, and that was that we had a limitation on our direct loan paper that we could not be sold at less than 90% of our.

It's the only direct paper in the government that was so effective.

There is now, and there has to soon be, and it's now the only bill that removes that limitation.

The moment that since it is administration-sponsored, I'm assuming that you're going to recommend it, or something like that,

At the moment of that, if you do sign this, sir, we will be reinstituting the direct loan program.

Okay, yes, sir.

And, uh, good.

And I don't know why you're talking like this.

Well, you know, it's good.

It's not a scam.

It's good in the process.

I'm just trying to disappoint your drug abuse message.

You think that he's going to take his wallet back?

He's already said he's going to do something about patterns and drugs.

where you kind of leaped on with the, which I'm interested in, not much.

Well, you might be able to move on too, because there's a couple of questions.

I think, I don't know if you disagree, as I did before, I disagree with some of the mechanical operations.

As far as I understand, the president has told me, you've got to pack up on into the short step, whatever money was needed, but

With you, I do want to say that this party, this development, this, um, we insisted that you be a part of that.

You were in the meeting, right?

Yes, we're all, God's all part of the, uh, of the drill here.

But if there's, uh, uh, if I have to make one matter, we have to.

You said you didn't have enough facility.

You needed more, remember?

Is there a VA?

In fact, Jack pointed this out.

He said the GAPA just didn't have them.

And I don't think I hear the third.

If the drug abuse message was wrong, or at least it's funny, there's certainly no intention of not using VA. As a matter of fact, it's

We don't have people that do this job.

But I can ask you, Mr. President, I can't go overpowering some of the people in the government who have really turned the bus on.

You've been doing that, haven't you?

Yeah, and they're doing it now.

We now have banking centers in operation, and there will be eight more by October 1st.

It just matters some simple remodeling of facilities.

And along that stretch, I thought,

basically have just added another man later on bureaucracy.

But the purpose was to take all the armistice orders of this government and do them more effectively.

Now on the B-8 then, I really feel, I'd like for Chappie to read Chappie this evening.

I'm just thinking, Chappie's, you know, he hasn't seen me, but he has that book for me.

And his testimony, Mr. Bernice, he said he's going to take a lot of jobs in Washington, and he's going to take a little bit higher, and I have to run the show.

I see.

Actually, there's a problem.

Well, there must be.

I know there's a lot of people who try to do that, but I'm just going to give you a shot.

Let's just see if it's wrong.

Kathy's a very go-go kind of a guy, but so are you.

Now, you fellows, I want you to sit down.

I want you to sit down with the two T's, and let's see if you have this damn thing straight.

If there's any, if you have any problems on this, Tom, you see, you know what I mean?

Just speak up on it.

I particularly don't want to see,

But you've got old facilities that could be used and personnel and upgraded and get a double shot at them.

That's my point.

No, I don't see this as an L.A. for B.A., but I know.

So you've got 19 B.A.

centers.

I know the ocean tendency as well.

We'll go out, we'll go to Brantley, we'll go to another call, drug addicts and all.

That isn't any good in my opinion.

Let's use our hospital.

Let's use the VA. Let's use all the rest.

There's trouble with this government every time we have a new problem.

We said, well, we've got to build a whole new building.

And there are wonderful guys, good, dedicated people.

You've got psychiatrists, haven't you?

Yes, sir.

Of course we've got to have them, because their psychiatry problems are a hell of a lot worse than drug problems, you know, people who have been in the war.

The only thing I'm very honest with, sir, is that we're going into the paper.

I was supposed to do what we're called in the program.

And it's short-term leases and absolutely minimum money that's involved.

You have a good doctor?

Yes, sir.

Your shop?

Yes, sir.

How close is somebody's got to be to hospitals?

They don't have to be close at all.

What we have to do is, the hospital stays the first day.

It's after we get them stabilized, detoxified and stabilized, that if you have one methadone, you have to dispense it once a day until

And it's a birth tube, some counseling rooms, a place to leave a urine sample, and to... Have you seen Jack?

Excuse me.

Now, this is a urethra.

This is a hand probe, you know, with a probe tube.

It's a probe that's on the wall.

And he's a great young guy, isn't he?

If you listen to CBS, 50% of all veterans in Vietnam, all people in Vietnam are on heroin.

So he estimated before he went to 10% were on heroin.

He went out there and found that at the very outside, there might be 4%, 4%.

So the problem is not as great and significant, but not all that great.

But it's that expensive.

The second point is, though, that they have developed, and this is the best thing about it,

I mean, they develop things, you know, to handle a boat that's got a foot problem or something else.

But one of the good things about this is that Kathy says they have already developed, as a result of just working here in a controlled atmosphere, they have developed some fascinating new methods, one for planning out a product and a second for treatment.

So what could come out of this whole hullabaloo

Because I don't need to tell you two thoughts.

The drug problem is not a Vietnam problem at all.

It is a service problem in Europe at all.

But it's a youth problem all over this country, and it isn't just black kids.

They're out in Beverly Hills and Santa Barbara, right?

Sure.

And ATW.

Mr. Barrett, I think we should go take a look at that Fort Worth facility.

I think there's some, maybe some progress that I can make.

And I said, I'm going to Fort Worth tomorrow, and I've got to say something down there.

And he said, well, you can say that Fort Worth, Dallas, Farragate will have as good a drug organization as you can have, but he didn't want to say anything about the Fort Worth facility.

I think it would be very good while we're talking about this.

Do you have Duval?

Do you do?

I couldn't get the object in them up to my office to launch my lesson.

Sure, I can't get Duval.

Yes, you have to.

My money should be there to be around.

This Duval is a perfect copy.

I know I have.

I'll leave you with something.

I have a good deal.

I'm not going to steal it.

I don't have it.

It's not better in this field than any, say, of the nation in Drumfield.

And there's a lot of other things.

There's two vows to help a guy.

And also, I'd like for two vows to get the field.

You see, he's the advisor to our minister.

Take him to get the field of the veteran side of it.

You know, got no doctor can really get the field of it unless he sits in.

But you know that?

And you count it.

You guys count it now.

So that he knows what that is.

or something else.

But I'd like to get Mr. Bell as a realist, good guy.

When we came home, you said on a training camp, or we had a service.

Today, when they come home, when they go there, then they're usually out of service.

Now, we have put, in the beginning of the proposal,

the same type of thing he said in West Germany.

We raised this entire thing.

This was raised, in fact, as a result of what your committee did.

It was raised at a meeting where Hotch, your member, was in and all the rest.

And I said, by God, let's do this.

It's just terrible to take these kids, and none particularly, on a labor market.

A labor market that is not as...

World War II, you didn't have an escalation.

Well, you didn't really have one at all because Korea came so soon.

You didn't have an escalation as far as unemployment was concerned.

It was around 4% you could call.

So it stocked them up.

But now you're on these kids' backs in the labor market where you've got a climate rate of 5.6 or so.

It's complicated.

Mr. President, what do you think of the birdie thing that you've got there next?

The birdie thing that...

You know what I mean?

I don't want to hear it.

All I want is to get these boys all together.

I mean, again, by the time I'm in Germany, I can read it.

And South Vietnam.

I mean, South Vietnam is where he was.

I mean, I can't believe it.

I know he's going to be out in a couple of weeks.

Instead of just going out and drinking beer, he goes down and learns something.

What is it?

And I understand also where he's been swamped with kids that he could.

Tell me, do they learn something in that?

Yes.

before would you agree to

This week, yes, this happens sometimes on my street.

I heard that you mentioned a long one, and I would ask if you concur with the two.

I don't expect that today because the pressure, this is a building program in Southern California to take care of some of the problems in Brentwood, Westworth, other areas.

The pressures would be tremendous if there was any real leak on it.

I do see that.

.

and save it any place.

We've got to make it worthwhile.

You see, that's the reason why the cop-out resolutions are so wrong.

If they don't get rid of the war, Jesus, if they get rid of that war, you can't even tell the mothers and the fathers and the widows of 45,000 Americans saying, you fought an immoral war which failed.

That's a great thing to tell them, huh?

Yeah.

It'll do, though, if you give me a hand on this.

I'm getting tried as the war criminal was Saturday night on the steps of the... Well, I know.

Let me say, if you want to work with you, and I do, and I know your responsibility, because they said you took the lead.

See, now you're dead.

And he's a hero.

He's a great war veteran.

all the time attacking him.

So we gave that law to Jackson and the rest of us, you know.

Mr. Jackson, I think, would have been in the war.

I mean, he wasn't in the war.

He wasn't in the war.

I think I must have won the war, like, with the closing of the Amendment for Money for Hospice.

There you go.

I want to give you a couple of credits to take a walk here.

I think you'd have to go right to your wife's.

This is for Secretary.

It's the case that they would like to have a cigarette.

I usually let you burn my balls.

Oh, okay.

I've got, I've got, you've got to burn my balls.

All right.

I only give these to you because I didn't care.

You can get another panel.

Thank you very much.

Secretary, this is something new.

This is a little takeaway.

Thank you, President.

Let me see.

I don't think they've done anything.

Don't worry about it.

It's the end of that work, Colonel.

Oh, I'll submit you.

Hold on.

I didn't have a fee.

They had a record for me.

I don't think they've done anything.

Yeah, thanks for your good job.

You may not be able to get him back.

We're trying to locate Anderson now.

Marko asked if he could.

He was here at this time.

He said he couldn't come back.

Mr. President, we sent, just for your information, we sent a letter in your name, a formal one that doesn't preclude a handwritten letter.

Yeah, I understand.

Just in case he refers to it so that you're aware of it right after we came back.

I expected one at dawn.

Yeah, and I just want you to be aware of it.

Incidentally, Rush has concluded the agreement at just one point, which is up to us to be settled.

And he said if anyone had told him three months ago that such a good agreement was possible, he would have said it was crazy.

We'll never get credit for that, but that was a major achievement.

Now the problem is how the circus is enough to ask your answers.

How the circus is no one knows if it is done.

Well, we'll work it out.

Let me tell you about it.

It was that Russian.

I'm deeply grateful, Brian, for the role you played in the recent incident.

Actually, the role of President Yaya is somewhat known.

But I am aware of the fact that you were among the three of us in this room.

We're the only ones.

Except for him, he's a man of hate.

We're the only ones who knew of the first message that you delivered.

It seems like three generations ago, again, it must have been two months ago, that you delivered to him and brought it up to me in my bedroom and read it to me.

And since then, of course, you've been kind of seeing it again.

I think the thing that is really impressive to us

This is vital importance to be handled in such great discretion, great judgment.

Thank you.

I also realize that there are people who do put the, you know, the interests of future generations ahead of the immediate consequences next.

And also to have this happen at a time when your country is under rather malicious attack against some of our interests, perhaps an attack which I know and I'm sure you realize that we, I personally am,

trying as long as we possibly can to mute how we can get it muted of course is a problem I told Fargo yesterday though that we told him in the background and to get some of the true facts out regarding what the government is doing is a huge problem and to get some balance into it but in any

I'll tell you personally how grateful we are.

You will get credit only in history books, but I want you to know that I know where the credit walks.

It's been designed to feel very generous.

I suppose I didn't really want anybody in my position to expect it to do anything of the importance of this.

It was not me.

It was, you know, Andy preserving a secret.

It was...

me about the cessation of the position of the office.

I have constantly wondered and regretted and even resented at how difficult the international relations have become, on account of the fact that the greatest power in the world was not on speaking terms with the largest nation in the world.

At every turn in every country I have worked in, it has created conflict.

happened to become friendly with each other and ourselves, made overtures to each other, as long as twelve years ago, and that was misunderstood throughout, by everybody, including, by both friends and acquaintances.

And then, so that was such an obstacle.

Whichever country I was working, conducting relations on behalf of my country, that it was an obsession with us Pakistanis, in a lot of ways.

We'll talk this week, we'll bring about some kind of a change in the acting of the bridge of thoughts.

I did move in this matter long ago, so I took it up with President Ayub.

And he was worried whether we had the

this status or the capability to play this part.

And then, of course, he had been, a lot of advisors around him who had sort of sold the idea to him that we should burn up, he would burn up if we interfere in between the three world powers and so on.

So he wouldn't agree, he wouldn't touch it as he kept on telling me more than once.

I think Vishwanath has done that.

I was an ambassador there.

I remember being at the exhibition booths on the fringes of Uttar Pradesh.

And we were having that talk.

I was there on the Uttar Pradesh location.

Your ambassador was, my colleague was, Tom Thompson.

And we were there to ask that he can do a spotting.

So then it was, but then I took it up again when President Yahya came in.

And there was the same opposition from our foreign office.

We would be most risky.

They were, to my surprise, they were worried not only that we may not be able to do anything, but they thought the Chinese would not do anything.

And I kept on... We know how to deal with the Chinese.

They want you to put all the cards on the table, and if you are straightforward, and if you explain to them that we are doing this, would you like us to do it?

We would not do it.

and make a move when we would like to.

We have been talking to both the States and the Americans in President Johnson's times, trying to put in a good word for each other, but can we take the Chinese into consideration?

Well, I must say that unless President Yahya had agreed, well, nothing would have happened, because the attitude of the advisors around him in the beginning just was like Firoz's game on his visit.

And it wasn't exactly the same.

But by that time, he accepted my advice.

And he knew I had been pressing for a long time.

And he decided he would move to the subject with Secretary Ross.

So after that, thanks to your encouragement and after your wise guidance and advice, the thing then moved forward very freely.

But this is what we discovered with the Chinese.

And I like that a lot.

Sweden, then the Swedish-Chinese investment, Sweden then to Pakistan after that, then in London and so on.

They seem to have this fixation that if you make out a case to them and put your cards on the table, afterwards keep them informed that if you want to make any change, that you feel anything you want to do might give you a sense of the association.

If you send a message to them in advance, look, I'm going to do this, it's for this reason.

Do not misunderstand.

They take it very well.

And they understand me, particularly Chawla.

They've really got a true mother.

Yes, we met him.

And others have met him.

And our ambassador, the UN ambassador, Shafi, has been at all the foreign conferences with Chawla.

He's been on the visit of President Biden, President Bush, and so on.

and together I've been there during all those discussions.

So this is what we are talking about this week.

And I think this week, particularly in the fall, as you know, I think it's not just a lack of tech managers, but a lot of people understand this, and don't be something that catches much surprise.

They're very disappointed.

The other team just now finally made a very humble suggestion.

It's now on this thing they've come up with.

Immediately in front of you is the decision about the UN and the Chinese city of China, the vote, the procedure.

Because immediately after that, we're going to have the election of a Secretary-General, of a new Secretary-General.

Most probably, I don't think this move to draft a new government will succeed or at least succeed or not.

Now, normally this question would come up, or the Chinese question would come up about November, but this year I understand it's going to be taken up, end of the general debate, which is held in October, because the Albanians and others who sponsored, they want to take it up early.

And the reason being, they wanted to influence the Secretary General's election, which will come up in November.

Now, it will be a big day.

I mean, I don't know what we're going to do about the city of China, but assuming that China is like this, or even assuming that China is like this, I don't know.

I think that's a good point.

for us to, I can't read it, to your channel, there's a way to shape it and handle this, is to say, we would need to be sure that the man, we eventually, this eventually becomes the Secretary General, it's not one of his persona, rather than that, right, would be very, very important.

And it makes sense to them, saying that now they have to select a man in the draft, but if you don't want this

And even if it was to even go further and say, we are thinking of this one, two, three, have you, would you like to express anything?

Would you like to, you know, take, the number is going to be a very difficult choice.

Yeah, as far as I can see, because there is Jacobson, and I think the Arabs are going to oppose him.

Oh, and I think it's had to, that's the problem.

I know, except they are going to, they're scared about that.

They'll oppose, and then there is Makonnen of Ethiopia, who's supposed to be African, and others seem to think he's too arrogant or something, and in any case, he wants

There is one way, yes, there is one consideration, and that is you want to select a man that would be more appropriate to the Chinese, or more approved by the Chinese, than anybody else.

Because that's going to be the big thing.

I think we can have a little dialogues, messages in regard to this.

Very secretly, of course, because we are the Russian people.

And the other thing is, I don't know what is the timing of your trips.

I think, of course, on paper I was telling Henry that May next year will be tempting.

Tempting fortune a little too much.

The world-shaking event of this time, as you can see, has been a great sensation.

I think it should be expected, completely possible, after the Chinese go and settle in the U.N., possibly.

I mean, maybe we will not get as much out of it.

I'm preparing a very long opinion, but at the same time... We have no desire to say

They haven't been booked in late.

As a matter of fact, we were, we were, we were interested in going earlier, but it has to be at a time they want to.

Yeah, yeah.

And it's a question really that we haven't had any understanding.

Well, I hope you talk to them about it.

What time is it?

Well, we'll book it out at the end of the process.

And now you've got that man in Ottawa.

And I saw a big plan.

And you could not even touch him, you know what I mean?

If there is anything that you can do to talk to that man, you know what I mean?

Sometimes you don't want to touch somebody, but you want somebody else.

And we know, too, that we can crush your distraction, and we can get it.

On the big play, you can still go on the big play.

You let him know that it's good and everything else.

The second thing is that the $80 million commodity aid, roughly if that is the year, last year's commodity aid, this was stopped.

But it was stopped really because we were going to devalue, and AID did not want to sanction this $80 million for last year until we devalue.

Then of course we got into these mass troubles and devaluation of some of the bonds.

Now, America, United States, is the only country which has not paid last year's consulting money.

All other consulting countries have paid.

It's the AID.

Not the current year.

Current year will take a lot of the other consulting countries for the October meeting.

But last year, why should the U.S. be the only country

Did any other country pay as much money as they had paid before?

This is the question.

Anything that can come, because 60 million of that is in the private sector, 20 million is in the public sector.

Now, the new West Pakistan factories, private sector and so on, they extremely experience a shortage of commodities.

We get a lot of new raw materials.

whatever is possible to put into the pipeline.

On the ground, and this is not in the news actually, it is really last year, a year, when it was possible.

But then I had to walk in.

Well, all right.

Thank you.

Well, I'm sorry to interrupt.

You have too much knowledge in the back.

I think we have to draw on it one way or another.

All right.

You did a paperweight, didn't you?

I've always had to steal gimmicks around here.

You've got to have that for your walking bikini.

You don't have the system for walking.

You've got to have that.

If we can, I must say, it's a...

I think it's a...

I'm not familiar with that version, please.

or something like that.

Our Constitution wrote that in, you know, because I heard it in the United States about the British and all that.

And as a matter of fact, the American president, well, my wife was a victor, Ruby, if you ever gave her, an American president cannot extend a declaration.

Well, we are, and we are greatly, greatly appreciative of everything, and we'll keep it in the closest touch.

Obviously.

Thank you.

We've got this group here.

The Anderson thing is off.

Do you think we can locate it?

No, we think we can get him back.

And what we had in mind is that this group is off.

It's good identification.

Young people were just sitting in a meeting.

Press photograph at the beginning while Black is presented to you.

And then before you say anything to him, we'll move the press out.

And I think by that time we can get Martin Anderson back.

I don't see any theories of the same.

I don't think he's...

We will present the flight to you.

We will press up.

Directly.

Well, you've got something to give Dawn, but you're not looking.

We'll give it to the girl that spoke to you.

How are you?

Mommy?

I understand what you're asking.

This is the first time.

Thank you very much.

And there we are, good.

Yeah, that happens, right.

I think we've got a, uh, we're gonna get pretty busy.

If it works out, we're gonna rally.

If it doesn't, we're gonna fix it all.

... ... ... ... ... ...

I really appreciate the way that all of you have been doing it.

I'm very grateful to the students and also to the rest of the faculty.

There's nothing that you can do for any of our faculty.

And I just want to say thank you so much.

Thank you so much.

Thank you.

How long have you been working here?

I've been working here for a long time.

How long have you been working here?

I've been working here a long time.

We haven't had much sleep in a little while.

We've been working on our dinner.

Well, we'd like to give you something on your ear.

Well, this is a cute little thing.

You might want to see this.

Now listen, we want you each to have a little remembrance.

The owner is the seal, which is the floor.

And usually it's the carpet.

So that here is the carpet.

There's the seal.

So we watch it all.

Well, we've brought along a little memento for you, too, if you didn't like something we'd like to possibly bring on the part of your wardrobe.

So...

Yes, you have the flag on, sir.

You just have the flag on.

I am very grateful now, and I will put this in a...

It's the right size.

I...

I... Let me help.

It's fine.

Since you've got a blazer now, you're all set to be an official member of DECO.

I want you to try to make our National Leadership Conference.

It's all waiting to take place.

It's our work.

So we certainly won't invite you to come.

I'd like to be able to, but I get to know you because of this group being sort of a business argument between each other.

I'll show you what I mean.

Normally you sign it, but you're trying to sign it with a number of N's.

So this is the place that you sign it now.

Your user sign.

We're giving it to a friend.

You're going to have a good time, I believe.

You're going to draw a generation of peace in the world.

That's going to be a very challenging time.

People may live through a period of war, as hard as it is, but what you do with peace is also very, very challenging.

And people are going to be disturbed.

I'll see you next time.

Hi, Earl.

I've been here.

Mark Adams is sending you over.

Mr. Earl, I'd like to bring you the head coat for the one minute departing White House settlement.

We're working with the janitor for just a tangent in Fort Graham while waiting for it.

What's that?

What about the clothes?

The clothes is on some call, and we'll call you when it comes.

Just come to my house.

So, the coat will just be the head coat.

This is one minute working with the janitor.

That's the White House.

What about the hats?

We don't have them.

He'll be here in just a second.

Oh, he's coming right away.

That's it.

That's all very good, Mr. Chancellor.

Yes, sir.

Good right hand, and what are your results?

Well, we're in San Diego, so in a sense, they're all waiting for us.

Great, great.

You're going to San Diego?

Yes.

You've got a good background for it, haven't you?

He'll be very well.

We're going to catch him in a while.

Well, you've got a pretty good start, you know, San Diego.

It has all the possibilities of being there.

It's better to be turned into a soul.

That's the problem.

I get it.

It's a man.

That's right.

It's a man.

Quite a bit.

Surprisingly so.

I have worked on him this morning again.

I understand why you're getting balance into the staff on the moderate conservative side rather than the important side.

And I think what you could do is simply tell him face to face that you consider that important.

Tell him that you hope he can find his way clear to rejoin us.

Now, whether he turns us down or not after that is not as important as the fact that you've made the decision.

But why don't you sit there while I talk?

Sure.

And I'm going to take a minute.

I don't mind the outside.

I can break it off, right?

Well, I've had church also.

I can break it off.

Right.

You said it's my time.

Revitalized car

The 1950s foreign trade was used, and quite properly so, as a device for serving American foreign policy.

Now, the situation is reversed.

Foreign trade must be used for serving American domestic policy.

I said, that's the way the other governments of the world, not just the Soviets, the totalitarian governments, particularly the Europeans, the Japanese, the Blacks, we've got to get in the meeting.

So that's an entirely different viewpoint.

And he's going to have one hell of a time.

market-oriented design, and you are, I mean, that's rather important, but I look back even to what we were saying a year ago in this trade area, and it's no longer relevant.

In other words, we don't want to go, what was it, when it came in, we've got this thing up, and we have to have a new round of reducing

and they find very effective ways to do it to us without appearing to it.

They've got all sorts of compromise and so forth.

There's this business of an airplane that I found out they've done this plane.

I find that it's assembled only in California.

made the wings there, and something else was made in Italy because of the fuselage, because they couldn't buy it unless they made something there, so they bought a few planes.

Something else, the engines were made someplace else, and they bought the planes, and so what do we end up doing?

Not a damn thing.

Just putting it together.

It's quite a good plan, the damn thing.

Even the most ardent free enterprise would admit that it's a two-way street.

Well, it's a two-way street, but it's

That's not true.

They do not have free economies.

They do not work that way.

They don't take that whole leader-denial attitude.

To them, it's cold turkey, but we'll help you if you help us.

Now, that's not free enterprise, right?

That's not free trade.

So, yeah, I'm fine, but if they want to play the game, we've got to play the game, too.

That's all.

That's the way to get the barriers reduced, too.

That's right.

Then they'll say, well, if

There's nothing in it for them.

See, if everybody plays this game of having non, what we call, NDPs, then they become irrelevant.

But if only a few do it and get away with it, then it means that those that don't play it get screwed.

I know that there's another secretary, John, that's talking to you about what we're... Let me say what I have in mind, and I may not be your personal plans, but...

I told John that I feel that our domestic staff, particularly since economics now is becoming, to particularly the economic side, it's becoming, could very well be the major issue for the 1972.

And that it needs balance.

Now, it needs, I don't mean by that, and you well know the idea that Ervin is a flaming liberal and

all of his staff are and so forth.

It's ridiculous.

The point is that the point of view, which is represented by what I would call the conservative thinkers, the responsible conservatives in the economic community, at least from public appearances, it does not need to be represented.

In my view, as I've seen some of these presentations, I'm not sure that it is.

I think it is.

I think John tries to bring the balance in.

I bring it in, of course, because I lean that way myself.

But even taking this whole field of reprivatization and frankly welfare, which we're jamming on with the hard look.

And again, in all of these areas,

we have intended to deal with the problems, have had a very, very substantial input from those who, well, they aren't really just witted at what we're presently doing, but on the other hand, their attitudes with regard to what we're presently doing are different parts.

Well, I'll give you a specific example.

A major issue that we have now is OEO's extension.

uh when i looked at the budget presentation two or three days ago i said well and they said what do we do i said the senate's loaded it down it's a terrible bill and so forth that you can't afford and uh i said oh no we're not gonna i said we're not gonna do that

All the OEO programs that are virtually all of them are now in special revenue.

Anyway, those are worth a damn.

The others should go out.

But it's simple what we want.

Then when we, so I said, all right, let's just decide now that we will let the Congress load the bill and screw it up as badly as it can, and then I'll veto it.

And it will be sustained, and then we'll have a clear cut issue on OEO.

But then it comes in from so many people who said, oh, we can't do this because that'll put 300,000 people out of work.

I have no use for any of them.

Not one damn thing.

You know.

And you also, I hope, have found that that isn't quite true.

I'm not going to have a fallacious argument put up on this.

He has the item, not for illegal.

I mean, it's a challenge that we were not to present to him.

What I'm getting at is that we now are in a position, as we prepare the 73 budget, you see, a budget which will never be enacted.

But if I can't, it will only be made.

As we prepare that, we're now in a position to take a look at everything we inherited in the British society and make that an issue rather than simply going along as we did in the beginning, you know, trying to clean them up here and there.

We started with the Special Revenue Sheriff, which does quite a job on these programs.

For example, that you saw when you did the model studies, I'm not really sure that was good.

Mark was in on that.

but when that came up i remember my hand was here and so we i said what the hell why don't you keep them they said oh you can't go up because the cities will blow well so they'll blow i don't know i don't think it will i think it can be done artfully and this is this and still have the issue yeah i just what i want to be sure we do though i want to get rid of the wheel you know what i mean right it is a symbol of what we inherited

the poverty programs and so forth, and an approach that I think is, you can't get your vetoes sustained.

If the argument can truly be made to threaten thousands of people, oh, don't worry, never, never, I said that, that's true, right, and I don't want to veto it.

Again, what are Republicans in the spot where they all can't do it, because they'll stand up on this thing.

But if you think all the 300,000 are going to be out of work, they'll...

uh you know

And you also, I hope, have found that that isn't quite true, that they have to go out.

It's beginning to appear that it's not.

I'm not going to have a fallacious argument to put up on this.

I am not for a legal, I mean, a strategy that we will work out to present to you.

What I'm getting at is that we now are in a position, as we prepare the 73 budget, is a budget which will never be enacted.

As we prepare that, we're now in a position to take a look at everything we inherited in British society and make that an issue rather than simply going along as we did in the beginning, you know, trying to clean them up here and there.

We started the Special Revenue Sheriff, which does quite a job on these programs.

For example, the

that you saw when you did the model city.

I'm pretty sure that was good.

Mark was in on the, yeah, on the plow.

Well, the community action that, if you remember, when that came up, I remember my hand was here, and so we, I said, why don't you keep them?

They said, oh, you can't go in because the cities will blow.

Well, so they'll blow, I don't know.

I don't think they will.

I think it can be done artfully.

And this is, and still have the issue.

Yeah, I guess what I want to be sure we do, though, I want to get rid of the wheel, you know what I mean?

It is a symbol of what we inherited, the poverty programs and so forth, and an approach that I think is, you can't get your defense to stay.

If the argument can truly be made to threaten thousands of people, oh, kill work, never, never.

That's true, right?

I don't want to veto it.

Because they'll stand up on this thing.

But if they go at $300,000 and try to be out of work, they'll overwrite just like that.

And also it's a bad issue for us because we don't care about the unemployment.

But this is the kind of thing that we're coping with.

We're doing on this one, well, take the various things.

Remember, now this education study that I wrote, I'm not satisfied with that job.

It shows $6 billion is being spent.

Now, for Christ's sakes, the trouble is it's all being spent in higher education, subsidizing a bunch of goddamn socialists.

and others, I bet you know what that's like.

You know, and MIT, for Christ's sakes, what are they doing?

They couldn't even have a defense contract.

They don't believe in it.

They get more federal money than any other university.

I know, but they don't believe in it.

They're acting like son of a bitches.

It's rather, rather, you know, everything, everything, everything.

You want to trust them with a defense contract?

Why do we subsidize MIT?

I don't know why.

Yeah, get them to open them up.

Maybe they're not as bright, but they can't learn to be bright, can't they?

And maybe it's right.

I think they are.

A lot of it's overestimated, this idea and stuff.

Because brains without character sometimes produces cells.

Yeah.

And the other thing, you've got that.

You've got education.

Health is one of the rooms.

That is one of the rooms we're doing well.

At least we've got the kind of thing.

But where do the private enterprise stand?

And we may make it work.

I don't know about transportation.

That's just a pain in the ass.

It's a management problem.

And it's bad.

Just in the club, right?

There's some great political asset.

And there's a lot of restaurants.

But you can't run a goddamn apartment.

We're spending billions of dollars over there.

And it's housing.

I don't know.

I just talked to Rodney out here a little while ago, and how the kingdom housing industry is right now.

I would say that we are making some progress.

Mark, I was talking about suburban integration with a lot of us this morning, the problems we had.

And the reason we need balance in the staff, that whole thing is a certain case study.

Now, on suburban integration, how are we going to run it?

And he said that down with him about HUD.

I asked him, he gave me a paper on the Republican staff member of his committee.

See, he's on the House of Representatives.

There are people, despite what I have said, despite what Ron has said publicly, are still

to get to people like tower and we've heard this from other people and said bring us a specific case

Because you get a lot of vague mumbling about things.

Well, this fellow did, and he gave me a memo that I sent to you.

He's got a specific case.

We can move right in, because Romney is a board.

And we can get those guys out of there.

But let us just be sure that all over this country, that we don't get into the business of supporting integrated housing.

I want to talk to you about another topic.

All right.

We can talk about that Austin case.

Yeah.

I don't know what the hell we can do about it.

We've got to appeal to that thing.

He isn't going to like it.

We're on the wrong side of it.

The hell it is is the judge.

It's already not.

He said there are two legs to that case.

You've got to appeal one and leave the other one alive.

And I think it could be done.

That's all I have to talk about.

I think there's a way we can do it.

But we have to think.

I think we have to go the other way.

We're talking about it.

The post is coming.

Way beyond the time you see anything else.

It's going to get worse for it if it's better.

Because there are a lot of people who just believe no questions asked.

They believe no questions asked.

It's going to get worse.

It's going to be a very tough place.

Well, anyway, there's a number of these now where in our whole budget and goals study, which John Ray told you about.

The reason I told him I want to see every program he's got.

Everything.

Every program.

I don't care.

That's just me and the agencies.

We don't give a damn about that because it can't be proved that it was you.

for the election.

You see, we present a 73 budget, and it can be, in this case, we'll present the thing and say this is what the Congress ought to do, and if the Congress doesn't do it, yes, it will not.

The Democratic Congress will never do it.

We can say, well, this is what they believe, that's what we believe.

And of course, implicit in all this is the tax tax.

And that's the whole, to have a tax reform is a reform rather than simply a patching up.

and, uh, one that, uh, doesn't our friends.

Could we have done enough?

We would, I think.

Uh, so I'd just like to consider that, and I, if you could do it on any, of course, any basis, it would be helpful, but, uh, we, we need this, this kind of, uh, this kind of input, uh, we need it from you, uh, particularly, and, uh, it would be extremely helpful.

If you, I realize that it's a suggestion that you've been around this track here, or you may wonder whether, whether you believe the main conversation, whether it's for real, but that's the question, whether you just don't know whether you're going to be listening.

And that's a cold decision that you make.

I can assure you that that's what I want to hear.

As I said earlier, I'm going to tell you, I sent off memo after memo on this mic.

I've explained, Mark, how terrifically tough it is to get balance in the work that comes to you.

But when you ask people themselves, they take it all like coal.

Coal is as balanced as any man I know.

He hasn't had a lot of time at all.

He has a hell of a time, Richie.

When you go out through the agencies, the goddamn agencies aren't going to give you balance.

Right, you're one way.

They're all...

Every one of them.

ATV wants to have one.

He'd take Rumsfeld.

If Christ takes him, Rumsfeld was an OEO.

L.D.

was for the biggest empire builder there was.

He wouldn't give up a damn thing when he's out of OEO.

Over here, now Rumsfeld says, no, we've got to get rid of some of these things.

And so it is with the other cabin officers, you know?

They all say, well, this is my agency.

This is my program.

I don't see how people can be so goddamn dumb, you know, to go over it.

You know, there's a chemistry that works there.

When they go there, those big offices get set up, big offices.

People come in, and of course they see the people, and, oh, we can't let this all out.

I mean, we know his wife's going to have a baby, or it's near Christmas, or there are 1,400 here that we want to go, but on the other hand, it's tough.

It's tough when it comes to people.

But that's one thing.

Program is something else again.

An approach.

And here we are making some progress.

We're doing a lot of things that are interesting at the moment.

I think we'll show progress in the second year.

I don't think we'll be surprised.

Even at this point, it's a surprise.

It will be a surprise, even at this point.

But we get it out to the federal government.

I don't think particularly we get the tax thing wrapped around it.

Y'all know a little about those types of things there.

We'll finally get some of the tax proposals that have been dear to my heart, you know, in terms of, you know, I mean, everybody, the treasurer's always against it.

They never want to use it.

First, they don't want to change the system.

Second, they don't want to use the taxes for social purposes.

They say, what the hell is the income tax?

What's the social purpose of it?

Correct.

What's the sound for, sir?

The whole system, yeah.

But, you know, the taxable value of the money, the

Well, reprioritization comes in right there.

Well that wouldn't bother me.

But I don't want great big government daycare reprioritization.

If you want to, I can see that.

But this is the battle we're having with ATW now.

ATW wants a federal system of daycare centers.

And we want a system of contract authorization for permanent operation daycare centers.

Oh, well, I think you could, for example, you could even encourage factories and plants to set them up on the premises for a person to go to work, leave a kid in one part and go to work, and pick up the kid when they go home.

Yeah, they do that in foreign countries, you know.

I was in Mexico visiting a plant.

I remember even best far back in 1953, I went out to see a plant.

It was the most marvelous little playground, and all the little tots are in there being fed and having their lunches and all that sort of thing.

And the mom was working in there with the needles.

That's right.

Black ATWs against this?

Oh, absolutely.

We could fight this battle for four months.

I've decided it.

There's no more doubt.

Your decision will assist us, but it will not prevent our ATW brands from getting in the fight.

Well, and it goes all the way across the hill on this kind of stuff.

And this is a problem.

That's what I see, Dougie.

We've lost the goddamn organization.

We've got something new.

I've always given this body the paper we wanted to use.

I don't mean to judge you with this, but whatever the paper here is, can't be held up without always getting rid of the paper in a way that it matters.

Let me just say this, Chuck.

I've never told you how many things I can do to be a helpless and be happy to do so.

Do you have anything to say?

May I stand for now?

Sure.

I wanted to just retire from the job that she's... Oh, is she?

No, I'm not stupid.

I'm moving on.

So that, and this is really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really, I mean, it's really,

I said, God damn it, get me the other side.

I sent back paper after paper and said, I don't want to see just one second of all this.

Uh, I can fight with it.

I really feel it.

You're the best qualified man to present the other side.

When I say the other side, uh, don't think that you're gonna be in an army.

Uh, I mean, uh,

but uh

We both ask you to support family and citizens.

They brought this out for the wrong reason.

The important thing is that it had to be done.

It had to be done.

And they heard some of our serving men, but they don't understand.

What do we do?

I don't know why.

I just don't know what the best of all else came up.

But basically, they don't understand because there's no doctor there.

They don't see the summons.

In other words, first of all, there's a guy with a COVID agent like...

So, no, and in Pakistan, a pastor said to me just a moment ago, he helped us, he was one of the three who was on hand in history, and I brought the first message to him, which went on.

Well, that's true.

And he said that, he said he had felt for years that one of his major missions that we can hire, and he said it was there, that he could see that the most powerful nation in the world had some communication with the most powerful nation in the world.

That's what's all about.

So, anyway, thank you.

I wish you would consider it.

And I guess you're right, too, though.

I'm going to take both.

No, I didn't.

I didn't know.

In this case, I was like, I think he's a good guy.

I don't know if he or she wants to get to a vote.

I don't know.

She says she's also listening on the radio.

Drugs always seem to be delaying it a little bit, right?

I'm not saying it, but I can't quite discern it.

Badgers, distributed education clubs, John Chalmers, Bill Everly, and Martin Anderson.

Is it better?

Oh, God.

I just can't get it.

See, what I did, as much as I did what I did, what I did, what I did, what I did, what I did, what I did, what I did, what I did,

I say to someone, you know what, we didn't plan it this way, but I was glad we got all three spats on the same day.

I'm down with that.

I agree with you on that.

I don't mean to be polyamorous, but we don't like an unfavorable trade balance, and we don't like a 23.2 deficit, and we don't like the leading indicators turning down.

That was a rather mixed bag.

The coincident indicators were strong, huh?

The leading indicators were slightly down after seven months of the rise.

The reason they were down was, you know, it was because the housing permits, which are one of the indicators, went way, way up the month before, just skyrocketed.

They came back down a little bit, although, about a month before that.

So that had an impact.

And then another leading indicator is industrial materials prices.

which came down.

Well, that's one of those things that, on the one hand, this is a sensitive indicator of expansion.

Having it go up, it's a volatile kind of a series.

But in another sense, it isn't so bad.

So the leading indicator thing doesn't bother me at all.

And the deficit was something that everyone expected.

If it had been lower, in the sense that we had lowered expenditures drastically in order to get it down there, that wouldn't have been good for the economy at all.

Even the people who are criticizing must have their tongue in their cheek a little bit, because on the one hand... Well, I think everybody has to accept that the economy has a gap, a lag.

You have to spend more, right?

It's a low seat.

The Republican just today, I reminded them that Eisenhower had a 12 billion dollar deficit on May, but we had a 7 or 8% of the planet.

And we all thought it was horrible, but it was right.

That was an odd ceremony yesterday, particularly the Speaker.

He must be really drinking pretty heavily or something.

I forget that makes sense.

It was quite apparent in the audience that the president was a little lost.

He was, uh, he was shaking.

He obviously couldn't quite see, you know, vision.

I think he just had a pillow hang over him.

I felt sorry for him.

I didn't know he had, I didn't think this person was going to be able to do it.

Everybody can drink.

Most people do.

At that age, there's a potential alcohol addict in the audience.

But, uh,

But what we really find out is when they come under great stress, when they're under great stress, some people just drink too much.

Well, go to the bathroom, give a little George Mayhem a bath.

He's a fine person.

He's a very fine person.

And easy to work with, honest and straight.

Action.

I call on him frequently.

He's the best.

I mean, you talk about Canada, too.

You're into the boat.

Lay on his head and shoulders a boat.

Just a better man.

More balanced.

Decent.

Harder.

Non-partisan.

You know what he said?

I had a whole list of kinds of odds and ends that I wanted to keep you posted on.

I'm just sort of moving along on them and I hope I start to get right.

I'm a steel thing.

There's been a slight break in that, apparently.

The management has put forward an offer that's a little shamed.

Abel is evaluating it.

He agrees that it's motion and start coming.

They haven't gotten to the canned level by a long shot, and they haven't gotten to face-up cost-of-living escalation questions, and those, I think, are critical.

Kurt is having a reading on that and will let me know this afternoon how it stands further.

And depending on what I find out, I might call each of the parties and then perhaps tomorrow, if it seems appropriate at all, we bring them over here.

Sunday would not be a time under, no matter what happens, when there'd be any point in here doing anything.

But how will they strike Sunday?

If they were real close, they might extend.

I can't imagine that either really wants to strike all that badly.

Management probably would be more strike prone now than the union for that matter.

Well, I just hope we get the message to management that we don't want to strike.

I think that's going to be difficult.

Well, we'll do that, for sure.

And we'll just have to take the heat of the rising prices.

I'd rather take that than the other.

Well, so that's where that stands.

I mean, there are...

But, Monday, would you think they'd want to see somebody Monday?

What happens if you come up to these strike deadlines is that there's

As they move to that deadline, that's a time for concentration on getting a settlement.

Once a strike gets called, then everybody's attention moves away from the negotiation onto the question of managing the strike.

And when you put 300,000 people out on the bricks, you have a management job to do in just doing that.

So I think the general pattern is that once a strike starts, there's just nothing to do for a couple of weeks.

until that kind of settles in and then you can get the parties back together again more easily.

That's not always the case, but that's a fairly typical pattern.

But at any rate, this is something we will stay very close to and do everything we can to see that they don't have a strike.

I think from the standpoint of the management offers, we have enough leverage so that if we really wanted to tell them

why they would be quite forthcoming in their wage offer.

And then, of course, they would take no backdoor from anybody when it came to putting their prices up.

I don't think that's all too bad.

Well, I'll hang this one out.

Everybody wants it.

I think it's with us.

It was a pain for a while.

And, you know, when you look at it, it's really true, George.

I got to study those figures again last night.

It is true that inflation profits, you notice through the eyes of me, 1% would go down with whatever you do.

There were three or four years, and I saw years where my brain was in place, went down by three-tenths of, four-tenths of a percent.

The economy would try to sluggish, too sluggish.

That's the other point.

Now, we have a situation now where

In 1968 it was 4.2 and then it went up to higher this year.

Last year it was 7.

Now it's 71.

But it's gone from 4.2 to 4.5.

4.2 is the GMPD fighter and the CPI for the first six months is about 4.

The last two months being high and the first four months being low.

Well, under those circumstances, though, that just has to be designated as stopping the rate of increase and, to a certain extent, breaking the rate of increase down.

I don't know.

Well, last night...

But he shouldn't say that if it isn't true, he should say you're not stopping it enough, that I understand.

But I don't think he's gonna say you were making no progress on inflation.

I don't think, I don't consider that true.

Do you?

I think we are making some headway.

It's disappointing that it isn't more.

The point that I tried to get home to the Republican senators last night wasn't to say that the program isn't working, it's totally wrong.

That if you hadn't done the things you've done on the budget, and they had the kind of strict monetary policy we have, inflation would be at a 10 or 12% level by this time.

And if you discontinued those things, it would have been soaring up and feeding on it.

Oh, now without a doubt.

Without a doubt.

There was that much coal, oil, and gas.

Tremendous.

He reports that his spirits are lifted a little bit and he thinks there will be some chance of getting another negotiated settlement.

Meeting this afternoon at 2.

And he has raised the question of

of a possible thrust in the negotiations of bringing, of having me meet with Luna.

I've known Luna, met with him a lot in the early days of her administration.

And either over at the Labor Secretary's office or over here.

And I said, well, all right, if that'll help, bring him over here.

And I had in my mind the possibility, depending on the time and lives and so on,

that maybe you'd like to say a word to them.

Sure, sure.

Either bringing them in here, or it might be this afternoon, it might be tomorrow sometime.

They have another bunch of roads going out tomorrow.

We could do that, or another thing that you could do is we have...

tipped off.

It's what you and I did on that postal thing.

You remember I called you once from the room with all them sort of listening.

That's right.

If you wanted to and you could just stroll into my office up there and say something and leave and then you wouldn't have the problem of them being in here and having to get them in and out.

But there are all kinds of different things.

So that's what I should do.

We should be quite casual.

I agree.

Yeah.

Absolutely, but yeah, it'll be the best to get through, right?

If we don't get anywhere this weekend, then I think we pretty much have to go for legislation.

And I think my own feeling is that what we should do is ask the Congress to put into effect the emergency board recommendations, which include the work rule changes.

And that'll be very tough for the Congress people.

On the other hand, Luna has made a number of statements that he'd just as soon go to Congress because he says, I've got Congress wired and they'll give me what they want.

And we're trying to let that get around a little bit that he's said that.

Also, get as visible as we can how much more efficient the railroads actually are.

In fact, operating with better work rules.

so that the Congress is in a position of being a patsy for inefficiency in the system.

Some have raised the question of whether we should kind of really position ourselves in this dispute on the side of the railroad, because it is a very popular kind of an issue.

I can see a lot to that.

Rather reluctant myself to see the administration or you get so identified with management, I agree, in a labor dispute.

Even though this particular one is very popular, it tends to carry over that you've become partisan against labor in a dispute.

But anyway, that is something that I agree with.

I don't think there's anything to be gained from that.

I don't want to be lined up with management.

Goddamn management.

They, uh, they've got to realize they have the best friend or spouse they could ever have.

And, uh, if we're willing to do things that nobody else is willing to do, I think this is better.

They better just take it out on faith.

That's what NASA's got to do.

The profit statements are coming pretty well.

Railroads are, have looked better this year.

The airlines are showing a little better performance.

We did get that $58 million for them.

That's, I think, is now through the conference committee.

So, some of these problem industries are beginning to show a little bit better picture.

But also, your predictions on the profits.

I know there's a lot of old bills and others that are showing bad profits.

GM is, I think they've only had one quarter of their history better than the second quarter.

So, they've been doing well.

On the productivity commission, I'm charging ahead now.

and saying you're calling a meeting September 21st, which is the date we have on your calendar, and figuring on putting in the statement that the president hopes to participate in a meeting at some appropriate time.

That's not an absolute commitment.

The expectation is that this would be an occasion where you might want to make a

pretty careful speech on all of this business and productivity and cost and so forth.

At least you can consider it for that.

So I'm moving ahead on that.

I know I mention this only because of the comments in the budget meeting about commissions and meetings and so forth.

A lot of things turn out not to be worthwhile.

This could turn out not to be all that worthwhile, but I think a

Giving visibility to the importance of productivity just by itself is a worthwhile thing.

I noticed even Time magazine gave us a pretty good pat on the back on this line that we've identified a fundamental thing.

It's a problem.

You have to make the administration at least do something on it.

There's a fairly good side right up in it.

On the international front,

The difficulty with commissions generally, and I suffer in this one, is that it appears to dodge so often.

And people say, hold on, here's another one.

And second, where it's a controversial issue, all you do is put your fate in the hands of a bunch of mad demagogues, and then you do this to find out what to do.

I mean, use a commission, but don't announce it.

And like when you go through a hundred commissions,

We now have a budget for this productivity commission of $800,000.

So we have the ability to do a little bit more than we had before.

On this international monetary front, as I mentioned to you last night, the proposals emanating out of Treasury are very...

bold and tremendous in terms of to close the gold window, close the dollar, install a wage price freeze, et cetera, et cetera.

This is a gargantuan thing to do.

And in these little meetings that are going on intensively now, I'm consciously trying to

prove it all a problem and make people come up with something more than their opinion and generally not dragging my feet particularly but but uh peeing a little bit on the gum slow and think it over side i don't see any

prospect that we would be ready to have something tremendous like that this weekend.

They just don't have the answers to perfectly ordinary questions.

Well, let's get at this.

When I got a copy, he said that 30, at least the last time, 30 years ago, he said that he thought, he hadn't thought that we ought to do something like that.

about it, and then cuddling afterwards, I thought to myself, he felt probably the best time to do something is in September.

That he, that thinking of doing something now is all, and I think it's kind of a blatant argument that all the Europeans will be on vacation, that he didn't do something in the month of August, the Congress was going to be gone.

That isn't a good reason for doing anything at a certain time.

He thought that doing it just before the international conference, maybe in September,

First, it gives us more time to decide what we're going to do.

Second, it might have a good impact in terms of that meeting.

I also come to the point that it's very important to do the right thing here.

And we have to take every day as long as we can.

And that leads me to another...

I think that there is a tendency

The International Monetary Crowd and the Treasury and the Council and everybody else, everybody that was exposed to this, to cry wolf more than is justified.

At least three or four times over the past many years, they've come in here and said, I've got to call the German Chester on the phone or I've got to call the England Mozart.

I haven't done it, but within a minute or so, it would have been it.

Very good statement of wisdom and empathy on those things.

But they thought that showed you how deeply involved they were, and so forth.

Now, if the crisis is that bad, in other words, if Volcker thinks, well, they're going to come in and do all these things right now, maybe it's best to let it happen, and then do it.

I don't, I don't think you're, that's what I think you've got to check in terms of your conclusion.

Is it that bad?

Is it, is it something where, where we have to have now?

Now, one other point I think, on the wage price freeze part of it, and I've talked commonly about this, from a, we should think of a wage price freeze in my opinion only

that we can only say at the end of this year or at a time that it could be put off and lifted as soon as it hasn't worked too well.

In other words, have some effect, but not now.

If you have a wage rights freeze now, I think it would only mean there's a flattening

to admit that yet.

Second, if a waste price freeze comes now, it's certain to screw up about March or April of next year, September, or let's suppose they even have worked that long, five or six months, then they say, then what are you going to do?

Even if you try it in, say, December or January,

for six months.

So it finishes off in June.

By that time, it's too damn confused, and maybe not too much would happen.

But I guess what I'm saying is that while the wage price freeze is maybe part of the package, and it's a bold move and all that sort of thing, I think it should be treated separately as something that we do later.

I think Conway is

days ago.

Now, as far as the other things are concerned, the export rebates and the import thing that Peterson was talking about, not cool as it was.

As far as the fact of the way of raising tariff, I guess so.

things we just got to take a look at to see what can work.

The thing that concerns me about the, what was Peterson's original thought, you know, McCracken's original thought, McCracken and I was on this, we were just, well, let's let everything float, let it float, and let's devalue, basically.

I just think, politically, it would be awfully hard to explain that.

In terms of jobs, let me put the whole thing.

First, we've got a problem with the international financial situation and the dollar and all that crap and so forth and so on.

In terms of the 200 million Americans, there are perhaps 50,000 that understand the whole thing.

That's about all it's in general sense of it.

We say, well, we're running out of this.

If the story is that, well, your dollars aren't worth as much or the value is down, that's a dynamite thing.

But the political issue that's standing here can't be solved.

If you could, you can't agree with it.

You could handle it.

On the other hand, you might handle it.

In a situation where, say, on the export rebates and port licenses and so forth, maybe some of that, although it runs contrary to

I don't think we ought to do something.

I don't feel myself having to do something.

Is Connelly Pressler doing something right now, you say, crazy?

Is it Volker, Connelly?

That's a news that we thought I'd guess at your discussion.

Peterson, McCracken, Volker, and I have been... Yeah, Volker.

...being quite a lot.

Yeah.

Presumably going to then go to Connelly when we've...

Right.

...got our thoughts straight.

And Volker initially has been pressing for a decision to do something this weekend, and I think by this time everybody's convinced that he doesn't have the...

evidence to show that.

We'll take a look at the brokerage.

The brokerage represents a certain point of view that we have to consider.

He is part of that community, of that net community, and they always want to do something, you know what I mean?

It's hard to learn from the brokerage.

You know, he's got to see what kind of a five-day chapter you can go away and believe in instead of international monetary things.

Well, it's going to work.

It's going to occur.

In my opinion, my view is it's going to work or it's not.

Certainly not going to work with us just if we go away for a weekend and we don't know what we want or what we'll give up for it.

In other words, we aren't prepared for this.

That's right.

The next person to raise the price of gold, Stephen, the doctor also has.

Well, that would simply create chaotic situations.

While you're waiting for the damn Congress to act on it, the Congress might not act.

You know what I mean?

You'd just be in for the scale.

That's what I'm saying.

Well, I don't think it's...

Well, I...

I think Voker is a good person.

He knows the deal.

But I must say I don't really have a lot of confidence in his judgment on these things, which is why I'm sort of testing him out all the time.

And I'll continue to sort of take that role independent of what I really think.

I'm sure I'll do that.

Well, you see the devil's out of you, and remembering that.

What about the second look at the second quarter GNP versus 1904?

Does it come upside?

Well, the first figure they have is the 1907.

And I guess next month there'll be another reading on it as they get more figures.

It's Wednesday that they'll announce the retail trade statistics, so I suppose we'll get them probably Tuesday.

Wednesday's the announcement date.

We also have an unemployment figure that will be announced Friday of next week, so next week we'll have another batch of those.

I think the wholesale price index is also in there.

Perhaps Thursday or along in there.

One thing I would caution you is, and really a strong measure on this international thing, is not to make any casual comments about it to people outside this very, very strong circle.

Because it's so...

Explosive.

And any reference to gold or the gold window or anything like that, right?

That's what we agreed, colleague.

Well, everybody agreed that nobody would see anything.

No papers would be read.

No papers would be circulated.

In fact, I don't know if the doctors say anything about it, so I don't say nothing.

Okay.

But we're waiting to hear.

What's the, uh, on the, uh, on the item five thing now?

Well, no, it's just that in that survey, it's a sample survey, and the sample's all taken at one time, and the data was gathered at one time and bundled up, and when you have the result, you have it, and you don't have any piece of it beforehand.

It's in the nature, whereas in the consumer price index, you do get some bits and pieces.

We get better food as well, so we don't have any

Okay, preliminary.

What presently is, what is the last, what was the last month unacclimated?

Was it 5.6 or was it 6?

It was 5.6, seasonally adjusted.

The unadjusted figures started out in February.

I heard some data that started this morning referred to a 6.1 unacclimated as being the present figure.

Well, he must be losing it anyway.

The unadjusted last January was 6.6.

That's a high month seasonally.

So it was seasonally adjusted and announced at, I believe, 6.2.

Then it declined through the fall, and in May it was 5.3.

It was a steady decline one month after the next unemployment decline.

So it declined by...

1.3 years.

This is this particular year that we are in.

So, two months ago, it was 5.3.

Now, in unadjusted, unemployment actually declined during this first five months of the year, 6.6 to 5.3.

Seasonally adjusted, you expect unemployment to decline.

So, the figures were more or less stable through that period.

From

May to June, unemployment went up again.

And the actual figure was, I believe, 6.2.

But usually it goes up more than that.

So seasonally adjusted.

They said it went from 6% or 6.2 to 5.6, whereas it actually went from 5.3 to 6.2.

And so it's that kind of a picture.

And also they think because it was the first month of the year that they adjusted it too much that the property over-adjusted the first month, I mean the first week of the month.

That's right.

Well, this will be the first week.

Well, this one doesn't have the same.

Wherever this one falls, there's no holiday around it.

The school leaving date is not involved.

There's nothing special about the August survey week, as far as I know, so that people will read this as being a sort of a verification one way or another of whatever was said about that June figure.

I just can't believe that's the case, unless there is a very, very profound change taking place in the whole economic system.

George, some of them were saying that unemployment would be at 7% now.

And they were saying that the rent rate was saying back in 1969 it didn't make any difference what you did.

The plant and equipment spending was just going to go way up so fast.

And there's just no way to turn off the boom.

So he was wrong on that side.

One of the reasons why I suggested to Paul that he

in his presentation to you last friday that he put down those bars of what the various forecasters said is just to show if we were if we wind up with a gnp of say 1055 or something like that

That week, the 1065 will be closer to the fact than two-thirds of the forecasters.

Alan Greenspan, who is on our side, and the guy we respect here, is 1031.

So he was just way, way off.

Well, he's too low.

He's way low, yeah.

So you have those extremes.

Yeah.

Buckle off.

Two other things on my list have to do with the budget.

First of all, on the defense budget, they are just sort of waiting for Henry and take whatever lead he gives.

And we're, as I envisage the way you want that work, we just don't do very much on that subject.

Now, I think that we have a situation where...

There are a lot of very knowledgeable and effective resources in the OMB to work on the defense.

Absolutely.

So that... No, I don't think we don't do that.

What I'm trying to get out of Henry to shake out of the whole thing is a fundamental change in regard to the mix.

But as far as what the budgeteers do for you and making defense take it up like everybody else, go ahead.

In other words, you can't give them a certain number to work at.

No, there's nothing that I'm concerned about.

I think we've just got to take a look to see how the hell we can change the next...

give the Flyboys less and the Navy more, or maybe, maybe what happens the other way around.

My own instinct on the Defense Department, from having messed around with it now for a year, is that the Navy is being shortchanged, and we need to do more there, so we have different things.

That the Air Force is not only

uh out of phase in terms of their weapon system but that they're way over man and they haven't done the job of taking down their structure the way the other services have so they're fat in a manpower sense but the army is is uh in the most serious need of good management of any of the services that it is

It has just not been run very well.

And that it's in desperate need of a good strong hand.

That there is this big soft spot in the bases.

So that represents a sort of something that's out of bounds as far as we're concerned.

We're guarding it that way.

But that at some point in time, after the election or whatever,

But that represents an area where the defense budget can be brought down without injuring the effectors.

Oh, I'm not sure we've waked you down long enough, unless you'd like to have an arm's effect on MPs.

But, uh, then we... That's what I mean.

I think we've done a good job.

We really haven't grabbed it, just because we haven't grabbed this intelligence thing.

The intelligence is another.

Captain, of course, you said cut sex 25% out, so I'm...

And we do have this effort with Henry, and as I understand it there, we are more or less constrained by our work with Henry, as we don't move ahead independently in the intelligence arena.

We do it in conjunction with Henry, and that means that we don't...

We can't move, and I've told Cap, well, Cap, we just can't do that until we get this considered.

The president approves the general plan, and there we have this whole problem of how bold to be.

And I think there is a program, a bold program, that I think will produce a better intelligence system.

and will save us a lot of money.

Uh, I'm not so sure Henry shares that view.

He knows a lot more about it than I do, but I don't know.

See, but he's wrong.

I mean, Henry builds big staffs, too.

He's a staff owner.

And, uh, on that one, when it comes to the staffs out here, it's just coming down on the toll roads, too.

The CIA, the FBI, and the rest of it just are, you know, those people, you know.

At some stage in this, I'd like to, uh,

get a half, three quarters of an hour of your time to go through some of the background of this intelligence setup as we've flagged it out.

The defense area is the area where all the money is.

And if you put that out of bounds, then there's not a lot you can do.

You can do something with the CIA, but they really don't have to spend all that much money.

On the general budget,

business.

We're moving ahead on the 250 guidance.

We think we can get it with toughness.

But I think we have to flip the chart.

It just isn't acceptable to just continue to let it go up.

particularly in 73, let's say, here we are.

Now we can say, as I said yesterday, now we're trying to pick up the lag in this region.

Therefore, we have to find an unbalanced budget this year and an unbalanced budget next year.

And so you come on next year and say, oh, we're going to unbalance the budget to $30, $40 billion next year, man.

Can't do it.

It just will not count.

It won't set.

It won't save.

That's what I think.

In terms of my personal outlook and philosophy, we'd like nothing better than a real effort to get this budget down.

I see how difficult it is to do that.

There are two related things that I would mention.

One, we told you about this problem of the average grade level rising from 7.3 to 7.9.

Basically, in the last four years, it's been a very rapid increase.

We have a program for turning that around.

And it's very, it'll be very rough going with the agencies.

But it can be done.

And I understand we have a cabinet meeting possibly next Tuesday.

Yeah.

Maybe, probably Tuesday or Thursday.

I could talk about this program in general terms, the problem and the program, and we could launch it then.

It can't be done unless you sort of round the table a little bit and say this has to be done.

I believe that it is just essential because the personnel costs of government are going up so fast.

The Defense Department is clearly with payroll about 60% of the total cost.

It's a very labor-intensive industry.

They've got to figure out ways over the long run to handle the whole thing differently.

And the same is true of government generally.

We just have to be more efficient.

We have to be more considered in the way people are put into these higher-priced jobs.

So I'll be prepared if it turns out that's a reasonable agenda item.

But it's something that I think any cabinet officer who's thought about personnel problems

We'll listen to it and know that it's going to cause him a lot of difficulty.

So it'll take a push and... We'll get him.

We'll get him.

One last thing.

Maury Sands has a... We've been working with him on the minority business enterprise subject.

And this is an area where I think some good work has been done

it's very difficult to figure out a reasonable basis for any amount, any particular number, for spending under a new program, which he has concocted and which we have gone along with.

So, as a result of a lot of discussion back and forth, we have said that a program at roughly the $65 million level is as much as we can see.

Actually, that's more than...

that i think he can really spend effectively because this is essentially a consulting firm type of operation now lori feels that that is uh not nearly enough and he's he's appealing

My suggestion, and I'll try to bring this in a much more considerate way when he really does it, would be that rather than raise him just as an object lesson around the captain, that maybe you ought to give us, Cap and I, a little help for having gone too far already and knock it down a little bit.

And that can be done because we're already late enough in the fiscal year

So that when his program is introduced now, the way Congress is going, he's not going to get anything much going in this fiscal year anyway.

So that there's room to knock it down a little bit.

The thing is that we've got to start putting out signals now in terms of supplementals, all these things that are going into fiscal 72 that it's building a problem for 73.

You may have a bigger income in fiscal 72 than me.

I think we will.

I just don't.

I keep it down where it is and scare everybody with a budget and all that sort of thing.

But George, I think this economy is, I don't know, I must have been maybe influenced by Donald Friedman.

But I watch this, that's why I say this, retail sales.

I think that people...

Well, their profits are moving up sharply.

That was a big reason for the down of revisions in the fiscal 71 budget.

And I think that bounce back has been a surprise to Treasury just as the amount it was down surprised the Treasury.

So I think our estimates now are on the low side for actual revenue.

But we'll just keep it that way for now.

Keep it low and let it ride.

Is there anything more in terms of the... How much did you say the Congress has added to our budget, to the 372 budget, or 86 centimeters?

Well, it's more like seven to eight.

And we have some big appropriation bills coming down.

Agriculture and the APB.

Can that case be made?

Can we make it this year so that it's clear?

Or are they going to take it a lot of offense?

They can't do that.

They'll never make it a lot of offense.

I think that point should be made every time publicly you can.

If the Congress is adding $8 million to our budget, I just put it right to them.

Is that the case?

Yes, that's the case.

Okay.

We can talk about the president's budget and then the Congress's added budget.

So I think our threat, we couldn't talk about that.

Well, in 71, as I've talked about that, it's in terms of we stayed within the full employment revenues, but that was only because of the discipline imposed by your...

Right.

Which is also what you're saying.

We said we'd stay within it, and we did it.

So that was responsible, and that got through a few stories.

That's what I saw.

And we got away with this defense, moving that defense money.

It was a little flip about it, but nothing much.

So we got that.

On the Congress now, exceeding our budget, I think that has to be a... Everybody in college should have at least talking paper.

All the administration people should have at their talkers.

Anybody about the budget is working damage.

The only thing that has made me hesitate a little bit and maybe this is now not a good reason given your views is that

If we project that too much, they'll say, well, you've got a good, easy way to solve the problem, and it is drop revenue sharing.

And since that's one of your initiatives that we've been pushing on, we haven't wanted to get ourselves into that posture where we have to choose between revenue sharing and responsible budgeting.

But I suppose that's one that we'll

We'll be able to see before long whether anything is going to come out on that.

All right.

You can position yourself.

All right.

Okay.

All right.

Where you going?

Come on, let's do it.

Come on, where you going?

Heal me.

Yeah, I want to heal you.

I don't know.

Everybody under fire?

Yeah.