Conversation 578-005

Transcript (AI-Generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

If you find out for me, Wendy, the last day, or in fact, the night that the Washington Senators played at this party, this calls on us for both lives and the state of religion.

Diolch yn fawr.

Rydw i'n hoffi bod yn siarad ac yn gwneud hynny, nid yn gwneud hynny'n iawn.

Mae'n iawn.

Mae fy mab yn siarad ac yn gwneud hynny.

Mae'n iawn.

y cwestiwn ymchwil gwasanaeth cyllideb.

Roedd hynny'n hollbwysig.

Felly roeddech chi'n ceisio ddweud hynny.

Felly doedd hynny ddim yn cael unrhyw beth i'r adroddiwr dweud.

Roedd hynny'n fwy effeithiol.

Roedd hynny'n cael ei ddweud yn fwy effeithiol.

Wel, roedden nhw'n gwneud hynny, wrth gwrs, roedden nhw'n cofio pethau eraill, ond dyna'r hyn rydyn ni wedi cael o ran cael camera teledu yno.

Roeddech chi'n siarad amdano?

Ie, roeddwn i'n siarad amdano, ond roedd e'n cydnabod hynny yn ystod y nos diwethaf.

Mae'n ysgrifennu?

Neu, nid yn hollbwysig, ond rhywbeth.

Ac yna mae'n gwneud y peth, ond dyna...

Mae hynny'n gweithio'n wych.

Mae hynny'n gweithio'n gweithiol.

Mae hynny'n gweithiol.

roedden nhw'n gallu cyrraedd unrhyw un, ac mae'n dal i fynd, felly beth?

Yna roedden nhw'n rannu 40 munud o ffilm a ddemystrydwyr y tu allan, ac roeddwn i'n siarad am hynny.

Yna ar ddiwedd y newydd, roedden nhw'n cael clwb o 45 munud o'ch sylwadau am y angen ar gyfer cyflawni a chyflawni a chadw gwaith, felly roedden ni'n cael un ar ddiwedd y newydd.

Yn ystod y bore yma, roedden nhw wedi cael ffotigiaeth o 1.45 munud o chi yn ateb y cwestiwn ar y cyfnod cyhoeddus.

Felly, maen nhw'n cymryd ychydig o ffosgau, ond dim, chi'n gwbod, nid oes hynny'n gweithio.

Yr hyn rydych chi wedi ei gael, byddwch chi ddim wedi gwneud hynny heb y camera, mewn gwirionedd.

Felly byddai'n wahanol, Bob, byddai'n wahanol, oherwydd nid oeddwn i'n telefeithio llawer, ond nid oeddwn i'n cael fy ngwleidfaoedd yno bob amser neu rhywbeth.

Rwy'n gweld rhywbeth.

Wel, nid yw hynny.

Y llun, yr hyn a oedd arno, oedd yn hynod o dda.

Roeddech chi'n dda, roeddech chi'n ymwneud â'r pethau hynny mewn ffordd da a'r holl hynny.

Fel y telecast lleol yng Nghymru, roedd telecast da iawn.

Felly gallech chi ddweud efallai ei fod yn rhywbeth yno, ond nid.

Rydyn ni ddim yn gwybod beth yw'n ymwneud â Detroit, ond oherwydd Chicago, mae'n ymwneud â gwirioneddol, gyda, wyddoch chi, unrhyw beth yw'r rhwydwaith rhwydwaith Illynoedd, rydyn ni'n llwyddo i fynd i'r Wisconsin a'r Indiana a phethau fel hynny, neu Ohio, Ohio, unrhyw beth yw'n ymwneud â rhwydwaith rhwydwaith rhwydwaith yng Nghymru, ond yn Michigan, Michigan, rydyn ni ddim yn gwybod.

Iawn.

Ac i wneud cymaint o waith i gael, beth mae Jeff yn ei ddweud, i gael gyfnod ar ddylwyddiad yn Michigan gyda phobl yn Michigan,

Nid yw hynny'n berthnasol yn unrhyw beth.

Wel, rwy'n sgwrs, mae Browns wedi cymryd pwysau.

Pam?

Oherwydd maen nhw wedi cymryd pwysau fel hyn hefyd.

Mae'n cymryd pwysau'n dda iawn, ond... Wel, nid oedd yn cael ei gymryd ar hwnnw.

Roedd hi'n cael ei ddweud yr un ffordd arall.

Roedd hi'n sgwrsio ar un creddiad gwirioneddol ar hwnnw, bod ni wedi cymryd pwysau'n well drwy wneud hynny, ac i gyd, ac i gyd, byddai'r pwysau'n dda iawn.

Ond y cwestiwn yw beth oedd yn well i ni ddod allan a phant o gwahaniaeth oedd yn ei wneud er mwyn i ni ddod allan.

Pa gwerth oedden ni'n ei ariannu i ddod allan yn ystod hynny?

Y gwaith.

Ie.

Wel, ie.

Fodd bynnag roeddech chi wedi gweithio'n anodd.

Mae'r problem, y peth cyntaf sy'n anghywir oedd gwneud y peth hynny o hyd yn oed.

Ie.

Oherwydd roedd, o ran y ffaith bod yn rhaid i chi wneud hynny o hyd yn oed, bod yn rhaid i chi wneud hynny o hyd yn oed, roeddech chi'n rhaid i chi wneud y gwaith sylfaen

ac doedd ddim ffordd i gael hynny i lawr.

Roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd... Roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd y peth gorau o'r rheswm oedd, roedd

Ac yn rhan fawr oherwydd roedd y teimlad o'r peth honno fel y byddech chi wedi'i ddysgu iddyn nhw os oeddech chi wedi gwneud cwestiynau risg.

Roedden nhw yno.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl y byddai'n dda, ond mae'n dda.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl y byddai'n dda cael cwestiwn gadarnhaol.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl mai'r unig cwestiwn gadarnhaol y byddai'n dda yw'r gynnyrch.

Roedd yn dda.

Ond nid oedd yn gwneud unrhyw beth yn dda iawn.

Mae'n dda iawn.

Wrth gwrs, rhan o'r broblem yno yw gwneud hynny ar 8 o'r nos, 9 o'r nos.

Ie, mae'n iawn.

Mae'n amlwg bod gennych ddigon o papurau amser.

Nid ydych chi'n gallu gwneud hynny.

Nid ydych chi'n gallu gwneud hynny mewn adnoddau TV.

Ie, wrth gwrs.

Yn amlwg, wrth gwrs, yn y nos, nid ydych chi'n meddwl am unrhyw beth.

Oherwydd rydych chi ar ddiweddaraeth.

Ond nid oedd hynny ar ddiweddaraeth, felly nid oedd gennych hynny.

Nid oes pwysig gwneud unrhyw beth yn y nos.

Nid oes pwysig

Os nad yw'n gallu.

Rwy'n siŵr y bydd hynny'n gyfrifol ar gyfer hynny.

Efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, ar ôl 4 o'r wythnos, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi'n bosibl, efallai y byddwch chi

A dyna oedd yr ymddiriedaeth mawr oedd y rally ystod y nos.

Ydych chi'n cofio?

Fe wna i fynd i'r ystafell, nid i fynd i'r ystafell.

Mae'n cyfnod o ddau awr yn parhau i fynd i'r ystafell.

Rwy'n ceisio cyfnod o ddau awr yn parhau i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i

Beth oedd hynny?

Roeddwn i'n meddwl eu bod wedi gofyn hynny.

Iawn.

Nid oes cwestiwn am hynny.

Roeddwn i'n teimlo bod hynny'n rhyfeddol.

Roeddwn i'n teim

Rydyn ni ddim wedi gwneud llawer o hynny.

Efallai y byddwn ni'n ei wneud.

Efallai y byddwn ni'n mynd yn ôl ac yn dweud, wrth gwrs, nid oes unrhyw gwestiynau ar y cwestiynau, ond byddwch chi'n hoffi sicrhau cydbwysedd gwahanol rhwng y gwahanol a'r gwahanol.

Nid ydych chi'n hoffi drosglwyddo ar yr ardal economaidd.

Nid oes unrhyw un yn gofyn unrhyw gwestiynau yn yng Nghymru.

Nid oes unrhyw un yn yng Nghymru.

Nid oes unrhyw un yn yng Nghym

Mae hynny'n gwirioneddol.

dydyn nhw ddim yn gallu ateb y cwestiynau cyffredinol ar eu llyfrau.

Ac mae hynny'n ymwneud â hynny.

Dydyn ni ddim yn meddwl bod hynny'n ymwneud â hynny.

Ond gyda'r arweinwyr, roeddwn i'n dweud ychydig o bethau dwi'n meddwl y byddwn i'n eu trafod yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dyfodol yn y dy

dda, sy'n dda ar yr arweinyddiaethau technegol.

Ydych chi'n gofyn iddo fod yn fwy o'r math, sy'n rhywbeth yr ydw i'n ei alw fel director.

Gadewch i mi ei roi'n ymlaen yma.

Ydych chi'n gwybod, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi ddim yn sylweddoli, dwi d

Yn ystod y clwb, roedd y Prif Weinidog yn dweud, mae pawb yn y clwb wedi cyflawni cwestiynau, a bydd y panel yn ateb eu cwestiynau.

Roeddwn i wedi dweud hynny.

Doeddwn i ddim yn sylweddoli bod hynny'n cyflawni'r diwedd.

Roedd yn ddewr iawn i ddweud hynny.

Roedden nhw'n gwneud hynny.

Roeddwn i wedi gwneud hynny.

Yn ystod y clwb, roedd hynny'n dweud hynny.

Roedd hynny'n dweud hynny.

Roedd hynny'n dweud hyn

ein pwynt bwysig yw adeiladu'r adeiladu'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r adeiladau'r

oherwydd roedden ni'n ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud raddio yn fyw yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn

Fe wnaethon ni ddefnyddio'r ffrwydrau arall.

Roeddwn i'n teimlo'n rhyfeddol.

Nid yw hynny'n dda i Caruthers yn ymwneud â'r holl gwasanaethau, rydych chi'n gwybod?

Mae Caruthers yn ychydig yn dda, ond nid yw Caruthers yn dda iawn.

Mae Caruthers yn dda iawn.

Mae angen, nid yn dda, ond mae angen mwy.

Felly maen nhw'n ysgrifennu'r cwmpas.

Maen nhw'n meddwl bod y cwmpas wedi'i wneud yn dda, ond nid ydych chi wedi'i wneud.

Ydych chi'n gweld beth dwi'n golygu?

Ydych chi'n gweld sut mae'r cwmpas yn mynd?

Ac nawr rydych chi'n mynd i fyny mwy.

gallwch chi ei wneud, er enghraifft, os nad ydych chi'n cael unrhyw un neu rywun fel hynny, ond mae rhywun sy'n rhaid iddo fod yn ymwneud â hyn, ac mae'n rhaid iddo gynrychioli'r peth, yn hytrach na dydych chi'n gallu cydweithio'n llawer i lawr ar y math o beth ydych chi'n gweld.

Yn fy marn i, nid ydych chi'n gallu, neu nid ydym yn gwybod beth yw'r ffordd, mae'n rhaid i ni gynrychioli'n well.

Mae'n yr un peth am beidio â chyfyngu ar gyfer y peth BFW, chi'n gwybod.

Roedd hi'n gynhyrch

A dyna lle mae gennych chi'ch bobl yma.

Yr un peth a dwi'n meddwl y byddai'n dda i chi siarad amdanyn nhw ymlaen, dwi'n meddwl yn y dyfodol, ar gyfer y tro nesaf, y byddai'n cael rhyw fath o amrywiaeth ar gyfer pob ateb i 100 o geiriau.

Mae hynny'n ychydig yn fwy na gallwn roi ar unrhyw un, oherwydd mae hynny'n ychydig yn fawr.

Yna, byddwn i'n ei wneud gyda'r rhywbeth yma.

Mae'n debyg, mae'n debyg.

Mae'n debyg.

Mae'r ffordd y byddai hynny'n cael ei gyflwyno fel un, ddwy, tri awdurdod.

Y peth rwyf wedi'i ddweud am y profiad, rwyf wedi'i gweithio arno.

Beth yw'r profiad?

Yn gyntaf, yn gyntaf, beth sy'n cael ei wneud?

Yn gyntaf, beth sy'n cael ei wneud?

a hefyd i weithio allan i ateb cwestiynau arbennig, i ystyried, i ystyried a ystyried unrhyw un o'r atebion.

Nawr, gallaf feddwl am hynny weithiau, chi'n gwybod beth bynnag, ac nid ydw i'n gallu defnyddio'r unrhyw un, ond unrhyw un o'r atebion, gwelwch.

Nawr, mae'n anhygoel ei fod yn galluogi i ystyried pethau fel hyn.

Oherwydd mae'n gwneud gwaith gwych.

Mae'r stwff y mae'n ei wneud yn bwysig.

Mae'n debyg ar hynny, hyd yn oed roeddech chi eisiau cyfeiriad o'r rhain, roedden ni'n meddwl y byddai hynny'n cael ei wneud ar gyfer bwylio'r gwrs.

Felly gallech chi gael hynny yno i'w ôl i ddarllen'r holl beth, ond roedd e'n dweud ei fod wedi'i bwylio'r rhain i'r rhain.

Ie, ie.

Rhywbeth arall rwy'n credu y byddai'n dda iawn, os byddwch chi'n siarad am hynny, yw eu bod nhw'n gallu mynd yn ôl dros

Mae'r siarad hwnnw'n ddiddorol.

Gadewch i mi ddweud un peth nawr.

Ac rwy'n gwybod ei fod wedi'i ddefnyddio.

Rwy'n defnyddio'r un peth dwi wedi'i ddefnyddio, ac mae'n well i mi fynd i'r cyfarfodydd.

Mae'n fwy cyffredinol i fynd i'r cyfarfodydd.

Mae'n fwy cyffredinol i fynd i'r cy

Beth sy'n ei wneud?

Repetisiwn, repetisiwn, repetisiwn.

Peidiwch â'i bwysleisio amdano.

Maen nhw'n ymwneud â hynny oherwydd pan fyddaf yn cyflawni, bydd ganddyn nhw John Osborne neu rywun yn dweud bodwn wedi'i gyflawni ac maen nhw'n bwysleisio amdano.

Ond roedd Bob Love yn gofyn i mi fod Kennedy wedi gwneud y peth hwn.

Peidiwch â gofyn beth rydych chi'n ei wneud, beth rydych chi'n ei wneud os ydych chi ddim yn gwneud hynny.

O leiaf 100 gwaith.

O leiaf.

Roedd pawb yn dweud hynny eto.

Roedd hynny'n ddigon.

Ac nid oedd ein phobl yn ysgrifennu.

Felly, er enghraifft, pa mor amser roedd y bobl yn ystyried bod llawer o ffyrdd da i siarad gyda'r Cyngras.

Ac roedd gen i'r holl bobl yma yn cael ei gynhyrchu.

Nid oedd rhaid i mi ei gyflawni fel, chi'n gwybod, mae hynny'n, mae hynny'n, rwy'n meddwl, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud

ac mae'r newydd prosperaeth ddim yn llwyr, ond... ac eto, byddaf yn ceisio gweithio gyda chi a chyflwyno'r pethau hynny, a chyflwyno'r cynllun cyfranogol.

Dwi'n credu mai'r rheswm yw, y rheswm nad ydyn nhw'n gallu gwneud hynny, yw...

Maen nhw'n darganfod am y cysylltiadau, felly maen nhw'n mynd i ddweud ein bod ar gyfer cyflawni.

Ie, ac maen nhw'n debyg yn teimlo, o'u hunain, ei fod yn ymwneud â'r hyn rydych chi'n ei edrych arnyn nhw, y dylai nhw roi newid i'r materion.

Mae unrhyw clod yn eistedd i lawr ac yn cyflawni, sydd ddim yn wir o gwbl.

Mae'r arweinydd yn meddwl am beth i'w ddewis a ble i'w ddewis.

Nid yw'r bwyllgor yn cael ei ddefnyddio, nid yw'r bwyllgor yn cael ei ddefnyddio.

Nid yw'r bwyllgor yn cael ei ddefnyddio.

Nid yw'r bwyllgor yn cael

Rydyn ni'n sicr yn iawn, ond unrhyw beth allwch chi ei wneud ar ôl 9 o'r golau, ar ôl 8 o'r golau, ar ôl y golau, gadewch i ni ddim yn cael ein hysbysu i'r cyfleoedd telegraffio.

Gadewch i ni ddim yn cael ein hysbysu i'r cyfleoedd telegraffio.

Gadewch i ni ddim yn cael ein hysbys

Mae'r rhai hynny yno, maen nhw'n fawr iawn.

Rydyn ni'n meddwl y byddai Detroit yn fawr iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl efallai fod hynny'n gweithio'n dda o ffordd i fynd i'r Detroit fel y gallwn ei feddwl.

Pwy sy'n gwybod?

Rwy'n meddwl efallai fod hynny'n gweithio, ond mae'r cwestiwn yw pa ffordd oedd hynny'n gweithio.

Ie, dyna'r pwynt.

Ie.

A pha fyddai hynny'n ei wneud ar hyn o bryd y byddwn ni wedi gofio Detroit ac wedi mynd i rywle arall i fynd i'r Detroit ac wedi mynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd.

Roedd rhai llefydd yn gwneud hynny i mi.

Roedd yr ymgyrchu wedi dod i fod yn rhyfeddol iawn.

Ac roedd Uster wedi gwneud gwaith da ar hynny.

Roedd yn gweithio'n dda iawn gyda'r tîmwyr tîm, y gweithwyr arno a'r Amgueddfa Amgueddfa Amgueddfa Amgueddfa Amgueddfa wedi ceisio gwneud hynny i'r Amgueddfa Amgueddfa i roi'r man allan i geisio hwylio gyda'i bobl.

Roedd yn ymgyrch ar ymgyrch.

Roedd ganddyn nhw ymgyrch ar ymgyrch polis.

Roedd yn ymgyrch ar ymgyrch.

Roedd yn ymgyrch ar ymgyr

Fe wnaethon nhw gofyn i'r bobl am hynny, ac wedyn roedd hanner o'r grŵp hyn yn hynod o hynny.

Roedd hynny'n hynod o hynny.

Roedd hynny'n hynny.

Mae'r bobl yn amlwg wedi gweld iddo ddod i mewn, oherwydd dyna sut maen nhw'n sgwrsio.

Roeddwn i wedi ddweud, mae'r gwahaniaeth... Ie, rydych chi'n siarad am y... y maen nhw'n sgwrsio.

Rwy'n gwybod eu bod nhw'n... Rwy'n gwybod eu bod nhw'n sgwrsio.

Roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n sgwrsio.

Roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud, roeddwn i'n dweud

Mae hynny'n rhywbeth i'w ddweud wrth i mi.

Mae'r rhwydwaith, mae'r rhwydwaith am fynd i fyny a ble rydw i'n sefyll yn bwysig, ond rwy'n gallu gwneud hynny yn 10 munud.

Dwi ddim yn gorfod ei ddweud yn llawer.

Ond rwy'n mynd ymlaen, mae'n gallu bod yn gobeithiol iawn ar hyn i gael ychydig o ddiddordeb am beth yw'r cynulleidfa hon.

Rwy'n gobeithio, ydych chi'n gwneud hynny?

ac hefyd i gynllunio'r rhaglen.

Roeddwn i wedi gwneud hynny'n dda iawn.

Ac rydych chi'n dechrau eithaf gyda phwysigrwydd.

Ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth o'r ffordd roedden nhw wedi gwneud gwaith da i'ch cynhyrchwyr iechyd.

Ond roedden nhw'n gwneud hynny gyda bandiau o'r isle ac holl fath o stwff.

Roedden nhw'n rhoi amdanyn nhw amdanyn nhw.

Wel, mae hynny'n rhywbeth ychwanegol.

Mae nhw'n grŵp heddiw ac ati.

Wel, mae'r clwb economaidd, chi'n gwybod, byddai sister Walker yn marw os ydych chi'n penderfynu cael peiriannau yn seiliedig ar yr adnodd neu rywbeth fel hynny.

Iawn.

Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhyw

Nid oes unrhyw gwestiwn i'r Prif Weinidog am yr economaeth hwnnw o'r blaen.

Nid oes unrhyw gwestiwn i'

Felly dim ond yr hyn rydych chi'n ei wneud, ond mewn unrhyw ffordd, mae'r llwyddiant, a hyd yn oed unrhyw ffordd, y bydd pobl yn gallu ddweud hynny.

Nid yw unrhyw un yn gallu ddweud unrhyw ffordd.

Nid yw unrhyw un yn gallu

Rydyn ni'n ceisio gweld beth rydyn ni'n ei wneud.

Oh boy, that would be, I can tell from that, Jesus Christ.

I mean, what about future sorters?

What about that?

Is this going to be right with that?

Do you think this is going to do that?

Is this fair?

Is that fair?

Before we get through, we're dead.

Absolutely dead.

I've got to stay above that, Bob.

Do you agree or not?

I do.

Just to be honest, and the specifics of it are not going to be as positive.

Yeah.

You hit the back of it.

Just like the last time I said, we're going to have to pay to do this kind of coverage, and again, it's going to have to concentrate primarily on enforcement of major things when everybody's under, and we'll be here for a definite duration.

We're going to keep it on long enough to make it work, and go back to the crew.

But that's how it is.

And here's Secretary Dutton, he'll tell you what it is.

Rwy'n siŵr ei fod wedi'i wneud.

Roedd yn dweud ei fod yn sefyllfa ddiddorol iawn.

Roeddwn i'n gwybod fy mod i'n ddweud hynny, ond dydw i ddim yn gwybod beth yw hynny.

Felly roeddwn i'n cofio ei fod wedi'i ddweud.

Diolch yn fawr.

Diolch yn fawr am wylio'r fideo.

Diolch yn fawr.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddod yn ôl i fynd i'r teulu.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddod yn ôl i'r teulu.

Dwi wedi cael cyfle i siarad â John am hyn, ond roeddech chi'n meddwl fy mod i wedi cael cyflawniad neu beth bynnag?

Dwi'n meddwl eich bod wedi siarad â John am hyn.

Dwi'n meddwl mai dyna beth rydych chi'n ei olygu wrth i mi ddweud hynny.

Dwi'n meddwl mai dyna beth rydych chi'n ei o

Ond yr hyn sy'n bwysig yn arbennig yw, os ydych chi'n ei roi ychydig munudau i'w gweld yn well, mae'n mynd i ddim yn costio chi unrhyw beth.

Beth yw'r hyn sy'n cael ei gyflawni, nid ydw i'n eisiau creu amgylchedd yn well.

Ac efallai y byddai'n ymddangos i mi fod yn ddefnyddiol i chi ddweud hynny.

Yn rhywle rydych chi'n ei ddweud.

Ac mae'n ymddangos i mi fod yn ymddangos i chi ddweud hynny.

Ac mae'n ymddangos i mi fod yn

Rwy'n meddwl bod un o'r rhai sydd wedi cael ymddiriedaeth arbennig, 10% o'r wlad, Cymraeg, 15% neu rywbeth, yn dechrau mynd ymlaen.

Rwy'n meddwl bod un o'r rhai sydd wedi cael ymddiriedaeth arbennig.

Wel, gadewch i mi ddweud, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond, dim ond,

A dyna pam rydyn ni'n cymryd y sgwrs hwnnw.

Mae'n ddiddorol iawn.

Mae'r Ewropeaidd yn gwrando ar bob peth, ac mae'n gwrando ar bawb.

Mae'n gwrando ar y Prif Weinidog, neu'r Prif Weinidog, ac ati.

Mae'n dweud, mae'n rhaid iddynt fynd yn ôl ac yn cyflwyno.

Maen nhw'n gwario'n llawer mwy ar hyn o beth.

Ac rydym yn gwneud hynny.

Yn ein trafodaethau, mae'n llawer mwy ffri na nhw.

ac roeddwn i eisiau bod yn siŵr bod nhw wedi deall beth oedd y gêm.

Rwy'n meddwl mai'r allwedd yw'r gêm.

Fodd bynnag, os ydych chi'n cytuno, mae'n iawn i John a chi.

Dyna beth mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud wrth i ni ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i ni

Mae'r rheswm rwy'n ei wneud yn bwysig iawn, ac rwy'n gwneud hynny gyda chi, ac rwy'n gwneud hynny gyda John.

Rwy'n credu mai'r gorau y byddaf yn gwneud y siarad farnol heddiw yw hynny, oherwydd dydw i ddim yn barod i ddweud beth y byddwn ni'n ei wneud, ac felly roeddwn i'n meddwl y byddaf yn gwneud y siarad a byddwn i'n rhoi'r cyflwyniad.

Mae hynny'n iawn i mi.

Rwy'n rhaid ddweud bod y rhan fwyaf o'r bobl, y grŵp Peterson, y grŵp Wilford, y grŵp State Park, yn anghymryd â hynny.

Maen nhw'n meddwl fod yr ysbrydolaeth yn gyffredinol.

Nid wyf yn barod i ddweud hynny.

Rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn gwneud hynny.

Rwy'n siŵr y

Ac yna byddaf i'n gwneud ychydig o adroddiadau.

Byddaf i'n gwneud ychydig o adroddiadau amdanynt.

Rydyn ni'n mynd ymlaen.

Rydyn ni eisiau gwneud hyn.

Rydyn ni'n ffrindiau, ac ati, ati, ati.

Mae hynny'n dda i siarad â ni.

Beth ydw i'n mynd i ddweud yn y siarad?

Yn ystod y math hwnnw o beth, gallaf ddweud 5 munud ar gyfer y cyfarfodydd.

Ac gadewch i hynny fod ar y rhaglen.

Ac mae'r hynnau hynny wedi'u barhau i'w barhau i'w barhau i'w barhau i'w barhau i

y diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod diwrnod

symud y ffordd y maen nhw eisiau i ni symud, sy'n rhyw fath o gweithredu o'r systemau cymdeithasol oeddech chi, John, wedi'i roi heno.

Rhaid i ni ystyried hynny fel opsiwn i'r dyfodol.

Mae hynny'n un peth.

Nid ydym ni'n barod i wneud hynny nawr.

A'r hyn rwy'n hoffi ei wneud, a'r hyn rwy'n ei wneud, yw bod John yn ei siarad a

a ddylai rywbeth nad yw'n allweddol, ond rhywbeth sy'n ymddangos i fod yn sefydliad gwasanaethol ar ein rhan ac yna drafod

ar leoliadau eraill i weld beth fyddai nhw'n ei wneud.

Mae'n ymddangos i mi fod ar y sgwrs hwnnw, efallai y byddech chi'n gallu cymryd ychydig o gyrraedd, John, o ran yr hyn y byddwch chi'n meddwl y byddwch chi'n ei ddweud.

Mae'n iawn.

ac maen nhw'n gwneud hynny mewn y cyhoedd.

Mae'r un nifer yn yr adnodd gwaith, a'r nifer dau yw'r gwaith.

Nid ydw i'n siŵr bod Arthur a fi'n cytuno ar y gwaith, ond rwyf wedi gofyn i'r gwaith, a'r sgyrsiau rydych chi wedi'u gwneud o ddwy ffyrdd.

Yn gyhoeddus, rwyf wedi dweud iddo ddod i'r sefyllfa.

Nid ydw i wedi cael yr awgrymiad i ddod i'r sefyllfa, ond rwyf wedi newid y prifysgol.

Yn y sgyrsiau prifysgol, rwyf wedi dweud iddo, i newid y prifysg

Ac i fynd i'r Cyngras gyda phwysigrwydd hwnnw, byddem yn agor fwydr Pandora.

Yn wir, byddwn ni'n cael pob sgwrs diogelwch sy'n cael ei wneud.

Mae'n cael ei wneud dros gyfnodau cyffredinol ar ein trafodaeth gyda pob wlad y byddem yn ei wneud.

Ac rwy'n credu y byddwn ni wedi bod yn drafod y pwysigrwydd hwnnw am misau a misau pan fydd yr amgylchedd cymdeithasol yn llwyddo i ble byddem ni'n cael ein gorfod y pwysigrwydd, lle byddem ni'n gallu ei wneud.

at leiaf dyna'r risg neu'r achub sy'n gallu ein gallu symud sy'n gallu ein gallu symud ymlaen yn fwy cyffredin ac yn fwy haws.

Ond fod hynny fel ei fod wedi'i wneud, rwy'n credu bod yna risg.

Dyma'r risg arall.

Mae'n rhaid i ni gael mwy o amgylcheddau.

Yr hyn rwy'n mynd i'w wneud, rwy'n argymell ein bod ni'n

ac mae ein rheoliadau caffael ar amgylchedd.

Os ydyn nhw'n llwyddo, os ydyn nhw'n llwyddo ymddygiadau fel hyn sy'n bwysig i gyflawni llwyddo fawr o'n cyrraeddion yn ystod cyfnod trwyddiant, fel y gallwn ei ddewis, fel y gallwn ei ddewis, beth yw'r cyrraeddion'r hyn sy'n gweithredu.

Mae'n rhaid i hyn fod yn rhan fawr o'r syniad.

Byddai hyn yn un syniad, a byddwn i hefyd yn awgrymu bod yn ymwneud â'r defnyddwyr a'r grŵp o 10.

Rwy'n cytuno â'r amrywiaeth sydd wedi cael ei gyflawni, ac felly byddwn i'n rhaid ysgrifennu'r arall fel syniad.

Yn fy marn i, mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth sy'n rhywbeth

Felly dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael cymhwysedd, d

Mae'n iawn.

Nifer 2, maen nhw eisiau llwyddo'r sefydliad ymchwil.

Nifer 3, maen nhw eisiau newid y cyllideb.

Pam?

Oherwydd maen nhw ddim eisiau cyflawni'r cyllideb ac ni ddim yn gwneud hynny.

Nawr, os yw cyflawni'r cyllideb, nid yw'n gwestiwn sut llawer, ond pwy yw hynny?

Pwy yw hynny?

Pwy sy'n gwneud hynny?

10 miliard neu 13 miliard?

Ac pa fforsiynau maen nhw'n cymryd hynny?

Felly dyma 4 broblem mawr.

Yn ymwneud â'r flodd ymarferol, roeddech chi'n gweld y cyfnod newid prifoedd o ddŵr, oherwydd mae hynny'n cyd-destun ei hun.

Rydych chi'n rhaid ychwanegu'r adnodd arferol, os ydyn nhw, felly dyna'r peth.

Mae'r amrywiaeth wedi'i ailadrodd, ond nid ydych chi'n rhaid i chi ailadrodd unrhyw beth.

Bydd y farchnad yn datrys sut mae'r amrywiaeth wedi'i ailadrodd.

ac hefyd y cymdeithas cymdeithasol, oherwydd bydd y dolar yn bod yn un sefyllfa yn hytrach na'r Yn, bydd yn un sefyllfa arall yn hytrach na'r dolar Cenedlaidd, yn un sefyllfa arall yn hytrach na'r Dd, a'r Ff, ac ati.

Felly,

y bydd hwnnw'n cyflawni pob cwmpas o'r pob broblemau sy'n ymwneud â ni, ac yn gwirioneddol, rwy'n credu y byddant yn meddwl bod y risg yn ddigon mawr os nad ydyn nhw wedi gwneud hynny yn ôl.

Mae'n dweud 25% yn hytrach na'r dollar.

Felly, nid ydyn nhw'n mynd i gydnabod a chyflawni'r cwmpas, yr un peth gyda'r marchn.

ond mae'n gallu atoch chi.

Mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hynny.

Mae'n

Diolch yn fawr.

Pam?

Wel, maen nhw'n debygol iawn ac wedi'u hystyried nawr.

Rydyn ni'n eu ddweud iddyn nhw fod angen trafodaeth o 13 miliwn o arian.

Rydyn ni'n gofyn i'r Cyffredinol Cyffredinol fod hynny'n gwneud y trafodaeth i bobl.

Maen nhw'n teimlo ei fod wedi llwyddo.

Mae'r Cyffredinol Cyffredinol yn ddim yn llwyddo cymaint.

Mae'r Cyffredinol yn teimlo y bydd hwn yn lleoli unrhyw beth.

Rwy'n dweud wrthych chi, un o'r Ewropeaidd, rydyn ni'n gorfod cyflawni unrhyw ystyriaeth, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac rydyn ni'n ychydig yn dda i'w ddysgu, ac ryd

Rydyn ni'n teimlo, wrth gwrs, nad ydym ni wedi mynd ymlaen.

Mae'r hyn rydyn ni eisiau ei wneud yw lluo'r holl argyfwngau a'r holl argyfwngau sydd wedi'u darparu i'r Deyrnas Unedig a'r rhai eraill sy'n ymwneud â gwneud yr un peth.

Mae'r broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf, y broblem fwyaf,

Dwi ddim yn meddwl y byddwn yn dweud Cyffredinol Cyffredinol.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddwn yn meddwl y byddwn yn dweud Cyffredinol Cyffredinol.

Dwi ddim yn meddwl y byddwn yn meddwl y byddwn yn dweud Cyffredinol Cyffredinol.

Dwi ddim yn meddwl y byddwn yn meddwl y byddwn yn meddwl.

Dwi ddim yn meddwl y byddwn yn meddwl.

D

Diolch yn fawr i chi.

Rwyf wedi symud i ffwrdd â phob un o'r Prifysgolion yn Cymru ac fe wnaethon nhw symud ymlaen yn y gorffennol.

Fe wnaethon nhw symud ymlaen yn y gorffennol.

Roedd pobl yn siarad am gynyddu'r prifoedd o ddŵr neu'r prifoedd o ddŵr neu'r prifoedd o ddŵr, ac mae hynny wedi cynyddu llawer o bosibl i sicrhau cyflogwch yn sylfaenol.

Nawr, mae'n cael ei siarad am gynyddu rhywbeth o'r math o 35 dolar i 37 dolar, rhwng 5 a 17%.

Roedd y broblem yn ddiwethaf, roedden ni'n cynyddu'r prifoedd o ddol.

Rydyn ni'n ddiolch i'r holl bobl pech yn y byd.

Roedd y rhwydwaith rhwng rwytiaid Cymru a Chyngor.

Roedd y rhwydwaith rhwng Rhwydwaith Cymru a Chyngor.

Roedd y rhwydwaith rhwng Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith Rhwydwaith

ac rydych chi'n mynd o 35 i 37, nid ydych chi'n gwerthfawrogi unrhyw un o'r bobl mawr.

Felly mae'r holl amgylchedd gwleidyddol wedi newid.

Dwi ddim yn meddwl y bydd gennych broblem.

Nawr, o'r adroddiad gweithredol, byddaf yn parhau i wneud eich sefyllfa, ond byddaf yn arwain bod hyn yn broblem technol.

Ar ôl rhai broblemau sylweddol, byddaf wedi'u glirio.

Byddwn i'n ymwneud â'i trafod gyda chi.

Mae'n angen i mi ofyn i chi hyn.

Beth yw'n fwy o'n bwysig i ni?

Mae'n fwy o'n bwysig i ni, neu yn fwy o'n bwysig i ni.

Mae'n fwy o'n bwysig i ni.

Mae'n fwy o'n bwysig i

Rydyn ni wedi gwneud ein cyfraniad i'n cymryd cyfraniad hwnnw.

Nid ydych chi'n meddwl bod hyn yn rhywbeth rydyn ni'n siarad am y flwyddyn hwn.

Nid.

Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n iawn.

Yr unig ffordd y mae hynny'n effeithio ar hyn o bryd, ac rydym ni'n ceisio ei adeiladu, rwy'n credu yw'r rhan fwyaf ohono.

Rwy'n credu yw'r rhan fwyaf ohono.

Rwy'n credu ei fod yn bwysig iawn nad yw rhywbeth yn dod allan ystod y wythnos hwn i ddweud bod gennym ffyrdd gwahanol yma.

Dyma beth roeddwn i'n ei ystyried.

Rwy'n credu'r hyn rydyn ni angen yw rhwydwaith dealltwriaeth yma, ac hefyd yr hyn rydyn ni angen yw ymarfer gwirioneddol

a fydd yn cyfrifol iawn oherwydd rydych chi'n gwybod cymaint o'r llyfrau hyn ac rydych chi'n gallu gwneud yr holl bethau rydych chi eisiau, byddech chi'n gwybod.

Mae llawer o bobl ar hynny.

Nawr rydyn ni'n mynd i ddweud wrthych chi, i weld a yw'r ffwrdd unedig hwn yn eithaf unedig fel mae'n ymddangos, rydych chi'n gweld?

Nawr, er enghraifft, rydych chi'n gwybod ei fod yn ddiddorol i'r Ffrain, ac rydych chi'n gwybod ei fod yn ddiddorol i'r Ffrain.

Mae gennym eraill, y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y... y...

Ond rwy'n credu bod ein symud ymlaen rhwng nhw'n gallu gweld rhai achosion yn eu hwynebu ac hefyd eu cynghori nhw.

Yn hytrach na'r trin y byddwch chi bob amser eisiau ei wneud.

Roeddwn i wedi mynd i'r llaw.

Felly rwyf wedi cael ddychmygiadau o'r Ewropeaidd yn cymryd rhan o'r ddechmygiadau Cymdeithasol ac rwyf ddim yn gwneud hynny ar hyn o bryd.

Mae hynny'n ddigwyddiol.

rydyn ni wedi cael llawer o ddynion ac rydyn ni wedi gwneud yr hyn rydyn ni wedi'i wneud ar gyfer Grant, ar gyfer Lennyn, ar gyfer Eric, nawr, nawr, galla i ddechrau symud ymlaen yma gyda'r Dynion.

Bydd hynny'n mynd i'w gwylio, yn amlwg.

Hefyd, yn ymwneud â'r Japonais,

Mae'n rhaid i'r ddwy ohonyn nhw gadw'i i mewn ar y cain, hefyd ar safle gwleidyddol, ac i'r llall, hyd yn oed â'r Ffrindiau.

Nawr, fe wnes i ddweud hynny am y rheswm hon.

Roedd ganddo problem gyda'r rhwng y diwrnod diwethaf.

Rydyn ni wedi gwneud ychydig o bethau gwleidyddol ar gyfer y Ffrindiau.

Nid maen nhw'n fawr, ond rhywfaint.

Yn amlwg, nid ydw i wedi'u cymryd arnyn nhw, ac roeddent wedi mynd i'r Cymru i'r Cymru, ac roeddwn i'n rhywfaint yn hawdd â nhw ar Rhodesia

Mae llawer o bethau yr ydyn nhw'n eu cymryd yn gyfrifol, ac mae'n gwybod hynny'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas.

Nid yw hynny'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas, ond mae'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas.

Mae'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas, ond mae'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas.

Mae'n dda iawn yn y Gymdeithas.

Mae'n dda iawn yn y Gym

nawr rydych chi'n ffermwr, neu dwi'n meddwl ei bod hi'n rhywbeth sy'n ymwneud â ffermwyr, ac ati, beth yw'r peth hwn, a beth yw'r sefyllfa mewn gwirionedd, ac mae'n cael ei ddweud ei fod yn hollbwysig.

Mae'n dweud bod Croner, pan mae'n ychwanegu'r digwyddiad hwnnw, yn dweud nad yw'r sefyllfa Brydeinig yn hollbwysig ac yn hollbwysig iawn.

Nawr gadewch i ni edrych ar ein sefyllfa, oherwydd mae'n rhaid i'r Brydeinig fynd i mewn i'r farchnad cyffredinol.

Nawr, dyma'r

Yn ogystal â'r hyn rwyf wedi'i ddweud, rwyf wedi'i ddweud wrth fy mod i wedi mynd i'r Ewrop ar ôl i'r amgylchedd, rwyf wedi'i ddweud erioed ers hynny.

Mae'n iawn bod yng Nghymru yn y farchnad cyffredinol.

Fodd bynnag y byddai'n cyflwyno problemau i ni o safbwynt economaidd, yn edrych ar y dyfodol dyfodol yng Nghymru, mae'n well i ni gael yng Nghymru.

Dyma beth rwy'n credu, oherwydd rwy'n credu nad ydych chi'n gallu cael unrhyw Europa sy'n mynd i fod yn effeithiol yn ddiwylliannol gyda'r Nghymru nawr, oherwydd rydych chi'n cael y broblem amdanyn nhw, yng Nghymru, yng Nghymru, yng Nghymru, yng Nghymru, yng Nghymru, yng Nghymru, yng Nghym

bydd yn rhoi cyfrifoldeb i'r gwleidyddiaeth hynny os na fydd wedi'i gael arall.

Mae hyn yn bwysig iawn.

Nawr, mae'r ochr arall o'r cyllideb hwnnw yw ei fod yn rhoi'r Cymru i'r farchnad yn ddim yn ein bwysigrwydd economaidd, yn sicr yn y rhan fwyaf, ac yn gwneud hynny yn y rhan fwyaf, oherwydd rydyn ni'n cytuno hynny gyda'r 300 miliard o bobl

ac maen nhw'n rhaid iddyn nhw ddod ato i ni felly nawr mae'r Brifysgol yn gwybod bod y Brifysgol eisiau mynd allan o safbwynt cyhoeddus oherwydd eu bod nhw'n gallu bod rhywun sy'n bwysig ar gyfer ein bod ni'n chwarae'r gêm hyn ar y llaw ar y llaw efallai ein bod ni'n rhaid i ni ailadrodd hynny efallai nad yw'n gweithio nawr pam mae ein rôl yn bwysig yma oherwydd y penderfyniad

Felly, yn ymwneud â'r Rhwydwaith, nid yw'r Rhwydwaith yn ymwneud â'r economaeth, ond yn ymwneud â phosiboliaethau gwleidyddol.

Yn enwedig, mae'r rhwydwaith yn ymwneud â'r Rhwydwaith.

Yn ymwneud â'r Rhwydwaith, nid yw'r Rhwydwaith yn ymwneud â'r economaeth.

Yn ymwneud â'r Rh

Ond yn ymwneud â Pompidou, mae'n rhaid i ni gofio, mae Pompidou wedi dod yn llawer.

Efallai na fydd yn cymryd ychydig yn llawer.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddai'n rhaid i ni roi ychydig ar blad Pompidou ac mae'n dod yn rhywbeth yn fwy gyffredinol yng Nghymru.

Nawr, rwyf wedi sôn am y pethau hyn, oherwydd mae'n debyg i mi, John, ac rydw i ddim yn gwneud hynny.

Mae'n debyg i mi fod rhaid i ni ddweud iddyn nhw nad yw hynny'n broblem economaidd.

Mae'n rhaid i ni gydnabod bod i'r Rydw i, i'r Ffrancaid, i'r Gymraeg ac i'r Jepuniaid, mae'r holl bethau wedi'u cysylltu â'r gwleidyddiaeth.

Ac felly, rydyn ni ddim eisiau rhoi'r pethau cyhoeddus iddyn nhw.

Os nad ydym ni'n cael rhywbeth economaidd, rydyn ni'n cael yr un torfyn cyflym ac y gallwn ni ei ddefnyddio o ran y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn gwleidyddol i gael cyllid, ond maen nhw'n rhywbeth eithaf anodd yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n ei wneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud yn y ffordd r

Dwi ddim yn gobeithio bod y penderfyniad hwnnw'n cael ei wneud.

Hefyd, fel roedden ni'n ei ddweud yma, mae'n rhaid i'r Cynulliadau Cymru a'r Cynulliadau Cymreig ddweud yn fawr ac yn fawr, hyd i'r Elydiadau Cymru ym mis Llywodraethu'r 72, y rhan fwyaf o gynyrchiadau gwleidyddol.

Oherwydd mae yna, mae'n wir, yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn fawr yn

ac rydw i'n ymgysylltu â nhw, sy'n amlwg, ac mae'n rhaid i ni fod ychydig ychydig yn ôl iddyn nhw, neu rydych chi'n mynd i'w gweld hynny.

Ac rwy'n credu ein bod yn gallu.

Mae'n effaith bach.

Mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn gyfrifol iawn ac mae'n rhaid i ni gyflawni'r bobl Cymreigion ein bod yn sefyll arnyn nhw am eu penderfyniadau.

Dyna beth mae'n cael ei wneud.

Dyna pam mae gwneud penderfyniad ychydig yn gyflym, yn ymddangos i fod yn ddigon allweddol, ond hefyd yn ymddangos i fod yn fawr ac yn gyffredinol ar gyfer penderfyniadau Cymru, yn bwysig iawn i ni ar hyn o bryd, o safbwynt gwleidyddiaeth gwleidyddol.

Felly, beth byddwn ni'n ei wneud yw, nawr, gadewch i ni ddod yn ôl i'r sgwrs hwn, ond a yw'r sgwrs hwn gyda'ch peth cyffredinol, y byddwn i wedi gwneud ychydig o ysgrifennu ar yr amser o'r cyfyngiad, a byddai'n ffyrddol yn gyffredinol â'r rest, ac mae John yn gwneud y sgwrs yn ôl i mi.

Dwi ddim yn y Prif Weinidog.

Dwi ddim yn gwybod... y byddwch chi'n gwneud pethau gwahanol am hynny.

Mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae'n iawn, mae

Dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Felly dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Felly dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na... Dwi ddim yn gallu gwneud unrhyw beth yn fwy na...

y byddwch chi'n mynd i fod yn ystafell cyffredinol iawn.

Mae'n iawn.

Ni allwch chi fod yn ystafell cyffredinol iawn pan fyddwch chi'n mynd i'r sefyllfa hwnnw ac mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hyd yn oed ystafell fwy hyderus, fel y gwelwch chi.

Mae'n iawn.

Ac mae'r hyn hwnnw'n deall popeth rydych chi'n ei wneud.

Bydd hynny'n deall hefyd gyda hynny.

Dyna beth roeddwn i'n ei ddweud.

Ie.

Rydych chi'n gwneud mwy o waith arnyn nhw.

Ni allwch chi fynd i fyny yno a dweud, chi'n gwybod, rydw i'n

rydyn ni'n mynd i'w gweithio, mae'n rhaid i chi symud o gwmpas.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, rydyn ni'n mynd i siarad â'r cynulleidfaoedd Amur.

Byddai'n anhygoel.

Rydyn ni'n mynd i ysgrifennu'r cyfarfodydd, ond nid ydym yn anhygoel am y cyfarfodydd.

Yn ystod hyn, gallaf ddweud, gallaf fod yn ddiogel iawn yn ystod hynny.

Ac rwy'n credu mai dyna'r lle i fynd allan.

Ac hefyd, gallaf gweithio o gwmpas ac efallai y gallech chi a John ddod i'r cyfarfodydd.

Byddwn i'n ceisio bod yn ystod

ac rydyn ni'n gwneud ychydig o bwysau.

Mae'n bwysig yn fwy na'r rhai eraill.

A sut ydych chi'n gwneud ychydig o bwysau?

Rydyn ni'n gwneud ychydig o bwysau.

Rydyn ni'n gwneud ychydig

yn rhai o'r cyfarfodydd prifysgol.

Brifysgol, rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisiau... Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisiau ymateb ar hyn o bryd, oherwydd mae llawer o bobl yno.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisiau... Rwy'n meddwl y byddwn i eisiau ymateb ychydig ar Tom yn ôl yma.

Roedd David Eckert yn siarad.

Roedd yn dweud bod Tom ar ein llawr.

Mae'n hollol iawn.

Mae'r byd wedi'i reoli gan fy rheswm, ond nid yw'r byd wedi'i reoli gan fy rheswm, ac yn leiaf yn y cyfnod hir, mae'r emosiwn, y ffansiwn a hyd yn oed y ffansiwn yn reoli'r byd.

Nid yw hynny'n ymwneud â phrofiad y gwleidyddion eraill, ac mae'n rhoi amrywiolaethau ar ffrindiau, campion, ffansiwn ac ati, ac mae llawer mwy o ffansiwn yn gadael.

Mae nhw wedi gwneud hynny.

Dyma ffaith nifer un.

Ffaith nifer ddwy.

Ffaith cwestiwn.

Ffaith nifer ddwy.

Mae hyn yn rhywbeth rydw i'n mynd i'w edrych arno.

Ond mae'r cefnogwyr canolbwyntio yn cadw Bob Taylor.

Mae yna sylwadau o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod o gyfnod

a chyflawniadau ar gyfer y Prif Weinidog, ond maen nhw'n dod i lawr, ac maen nhw'n ysgrifennu, ac yn dweud, pam ydyn nhw'n rhai o'r prif weinidogau?

Pam ydyn nhw'n rhai o'r prif weinidogau?

Beth ydyn nhw'n ei ddweud?

Dwi ddim yn gwybod beth yw'r rheswmau sy'n cael eu cyflawni yn Japan.

Mae'r rheswmau sy'n cael eu cyflawni yn Japan.

Mae'r rheswmau sy'n cael eu cy

nid oedd unrhyw gwestiwn ddiddorol amdanynt, ac mae'n gweithredu yn y byd fel gwleidydd, ac mae'n mynd i'w wneud hynny.

Felly dyma'r rhan fwyaf i'w wneud.

Ie, ie.

Yr hyn rydych chi'n ei wneud yw... Yr ironiaeth ar hyn yw, os yw'r Ewropeaidd yn gwneud i ni gosod eich tŷ i ni, a chael eich cyflenwi,

Mae bob un o'r wladau yng Nghymru a Japan yn cael fwy o gyflogiad na'r rhai rydyn ni, yn ymwneud â'r rhai rydyn ni.

Mae'r rhai rydyn ni'n cael y polisi cyflogiad mwyaf yn y byd ac mae'r rhai yn gwneud ychydig o gynyrchiad.

Wel, edrychwch ar y pwynt da y mae'n cael ei wneud.

Nid ydym eisiau cael ychydig o fawr yn y flwyddyn nesaf, oherwydd bydd hynny hefyd yn effeithio ar ein cymdeithas.

Mae'r economiwm effeithiol yn llawer yn gyffredinol.

Dwi'n mynd i ddod â phethau yma.

Dwi'n mynd i ddod â phethau

Diolch yn fawr.

Fe wnaeth Bob Alderman siarad â chi am sut y gwnaethoch chi ddod i'r Cenedlaethau Cenedlaethol.

Ie, roedd yn gwerth.

Roedd yn gwerth.

Ond roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, mae'r Adran Gwleidfaol wedi gwneud y rhestr.

Felly roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn,

Mae llawer o bobl i'w cyfarfod, ond dwi ddim wedi gwneud unrhyw un o'r ddau.

Dwi'n teimlo bod hynny'n bwysig.

Wel, oherwydd gallech chi helpu, rydych chi'n gweld.

Ond roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n cofio, roeddwn i'n co

Ond nid ydych chi'n bwysig.

Nid ydych chi'n bwysig am fy mhrofiad.

Rydw i wedi gwneud hynny'n ddiddorol hefyd.

Roeddwn i wedi gwneud hynny yma.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, dyna unrhyw beth roeddwn i'n ei ddweud, dyma'r pethau sy'n rhaid i chi ei ddweud.

Dyna'r unrhyw beth roeddwn i'n ei ddweud, dyma'r pethau sy'n rhaid i chi ei ddweud.

Dyna'r pethau sy'n rhaid i chi ei ddweud.

Rwy'n gorfodi'r record oherwydd roedd gen i adroddiad yn ddiweddar heddiw.

Byddai'r diwrnod heddiw yn cymryd 10 munud o'r cyfnod cyhoeddus.

Yn ystod y cyfnod ddiweddar, roedd yn cofnod y cyfnod ecologaidd a chyfnod swyddi.

Yn ystod y cyfnod ddiweddar, roedd yn cymryd 10 munud o'r cyfnod ddiweddar.

Yn ystod y cyfnod ddiweddar, roedd yn cofnod y cyfnod ddiweddar.

ac roedd CVS wedi cymryd 3.5 munud yn ystod y ddwy munudau sydd wedi cael eu cymryd yn y rhan gyntaf.

Felly roedden ni wedi cael llawer o amrywiaeth.

Mae hynny'n ymwneud â'r hyn rydyn ni wedi'i wneud gyda'n gilydd, ond nid oedd hi'n ychwanegol i'r un person sydd wedi cael ei wneud.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddod yn ôl i'r gwaith yn y White House.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddod yn ôl i'r gwaith yn y White House

Rydyn ni wedi'i ddweud wrth Lucy, fel y dywedodd hi, roedd hi'r unig un sydd wedi bod yno a ddim yn gallu gweld beth fyddai'n digwydd.

Fe wnaeth hi siarad am sut roedd hi'n llwyddo'i hun.

Fe wnaeth hi siarad am y proclamaeth arferol o Lincoln.

Roeddech chi'n rhoi adroddiad o'i hanes yn ysgwrdd i'r ystafell Lincoln a'r stori o Winston Churchill, chi'n gwybod, yn newid ystafell yn y cyfnod o'r nos, y Lincoln yn eistedd yn ystafell yn ystafell yn ystafell.

roedd yn ddiddordeb i'r plant pan wnaethon nhw ddweud yn ystafell bwysig, roedd yn ei ddweud, nid ydym yn gofyn unrhyw ddwyloedd yma, ac rwy'n gwybod pam bod ychydig o'r bwysig wedi'i gofyn.

Roeddwn i'n gofyn fy hun yn y bathroom ar y tair ddwyloedd.

Ac roedd Nixon yn sgwrsio ac yn ymddangos i fod yn mwynhau'r plant yn ysgrifennu ar ei llyfrau ac yn ei ddilyn fel os oedd yn bwysig.

Roeddwn i wedi cymryd stori dda iawn am hynny.

Mae hynny'n dda.

Gallem gael hynny.

Mae Helen Thomas-Loves yn gwneud y math hwnnw.

Mae hi'n gwneud hyn yn y tu ôl ystafell yng Nghymru.

Mae'n gysylltiedig â'r gwasanaethau UPI.

Mae'n llawer gwell rhoi'r gwasanaethau i hwnnw.

Mae'r gwasanaethau hynny yn fwy na'r gwasanaeth sy'n cael ei ymwneud â hynny.

Mae'n cael ei ymwneud â'r 10 fferm.

Mae'n cael ei ymw

Mae'r peth arall y mae Rumsfeld wedi'i gael ar rywbeth yr oedd e'n meddwl y byddai'n gallu ei wneud, ac efallai eraill, ychydig o bethau.

Ychydig o bethau.

chi'n gwybod, pobl Jafanesaidd eraill ar safbwynt personol, ac mae'r ffaith o'r prifysgolwyr prifysgol ar safbwynt personol, a chyfarfod ar safbwynt cymdeithasol, dros y diwrnod diwethaf yno, sy'n cwrdd â'i safbwynt personol, ac yn dweud, rydyn ni'n bwysig, chi'n gwybod, rydyn ni'n bwysig.

Mae hynny'n digwydd ar gyfer Amgueddfa Cymru.

Y peth arall yr oedd e'n meddwl ei fod e'n gallu ei wneud, ac mae e'n gallu ei wneud hefyd yn Amgueddfa Cymru,

ar eich cymorth i wneud cyflwyniad oerol ar gyfer Taiwan, y cwestiwn bwysig yn y DU, fel y byddwch chi'n cael grediad ar gyfer cefnogi tyfu Taiwan.

Dydw i ddim yn gwybod sut mae'r gwleidyddiaeth byd yn ymwneud â hynny, ond mae'r gwleidyddiaeth amgylcheddol yn anodd os ydym yn cael tyfu Taiwan.

Mae'r gwasanaethau'n mynd i fynd i fyny.

Byddan nhw'n gwerthu popeth i'r sefydliad o'r PRC a'r Cyngor Diogelwch.

ac roedd ei meddwl ei fod yn mynd i ddynion fawr ond mae pob dynion fawr yn cael yr un cyllid fel rydyn ni'n gweithredu'n fawr.

Dwi'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n gorfod gweld pwy yw'r dynion fawr sydd wedi cael eu defnyddio.

Dwi'n meddwl nad yw'r dynion fawr wedi cael eu defnyddio.

Dwi'n meddwl nad yw'r dynion fawr wedi cael eu defnyddio

show case used for your concert touching the base of the farm.

Just at home, not at the UN, and go to your personal representatives.

He didn't know whether it was a good idea, either.

It was just one that... Do you want me to talk to George and see if there's a...

Mae'n rhaid i ni fynd yn unig.

Mae'r bwrdd cynllunio yng Nghymru yn ystod y cyfarfodydd hwnnw.

Mae'n golygu nad oes unrhyw un o'r EOB yn gallu droi dros hynny os ydych chi eisiau.

Byddwn i'n cofio.

Byddai hynny wedi'i wneud.

Byddai'r bobl gyffredinol yn hoffi eich gwneud hynny, ond nid yw hynny.

Byddwn i'n hoffi cael y cyflwyniad yn ystod y cyfarfodydd hwnnw, ond nid oedd yn golygu unrhyw bwrdd.

Iawn, dim ond yn ystod y cyfarfodydd hwnnw.

Dwi'n edrych ar y cyfarfodydd hwnnw.

Dwi'n edry

Nawr mae hyn yn mynd i fyny yn y Cynulliad Gwasanaethol i ddangos y pethau eraill, ond mae hynny'n llawer o bobl ychwanegol.

Pwy ydych chi'n meddwl y byddan nhw'n mynd i fod yn sgwrsio'r holl dydd?

Mae'n un o'r pethau hynny.

Mae'n yno yno os ydych chi eisiau.

Dwi'n gwneud hynny i fynd ymlaen, os na fydda i'n mynd i fynd ymlaen.

Fe wnaethon nhw ddechrau ar 9.30 ac wedi bod yn 5.00.

Mae'n dweud wrthych chi, Arthur Cymru.

Rydw i'n meddwl bod hynny'n dda iawn.

Iawn.

Rydw i'n meddwl bod hynny'n dda ia

yn ymwneud â'r pethau yr ydych chi'n siarad amdani yn ymwneud â rhai o'r digwyddiadau sy'n mynd i fod yn digwydd ac yn ymwneud hefyd â'r cyfnod cyffredin o amser a dwi'n meddwl fy mod i wir wedi cael ei roi i'r Llywodraeth ar hyn o bryd

ac mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac felly mae'n golygu'r fl

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i chi dweud hynny.

yn enwedig yn ystod y dyniad newydd a'r holl hynny.

Mae hynny'n dda iawn.

Wel, gallwn ni... Mae'n ddim yma.

Diolch yn fawr iawn.

ac mae'n mynd i'r Califorgiaid i wneud 80 Jews, neu Castrider, beth mae'n ei wneud ar leoliad cyffredin.

Ac fe wnaeth ei ddweud i'r Castrider ddweud ei fod yn gallu cael 500 neu ryw fath o leoliad, ac nid yw'n gweithio.

Mae hynny wedi'i wneud.

500 o bobl i gynnal bwysau mawr.

I Harrison, rwy'n dweud, Henry.

Rwy'n dweud, ac yna roedd David Frost yn mynd i fynd ar ei rhaglen cyhoeddus.

Rwy'n dweud, chi'n mynd i fynd ar ei rhaglen cyhoeddus.

Rydych chi'n mynd i fynd ar CVS ac yn sefydlu eich sefydliad, nid David Frost.

Rydych chi'n gwybod beth rydw i'n ei ddweud?

Ie, rydw i wedi'i ddweud yn fawr.

Roeddwn i wedi'i ddweud.

Iawn?

Iawn.

Yn Illynoedd, mae'n ddiddorol.

Mae'n ddiddorol.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud,

Ond a yw'n 500 neu 5,000 yn golygu nad yw'n bwysig i'w gael ar TV neu'n bwysig i'w wneud yn symbole.

Mae'n debyg i'w wneud.

Rydyn ni ddim angen eu arian.

Iawn?

Rydyn ni ddim angen hynny ac mae'r cwestiwn gwirioneddol yw a ydyn ni'n mynd i gael hynny?

Ac os ydyn ni'n mynd i gael hynny, a ydyn ni'n mynd i gael hynny?

Ac a ydyn ni'n mynd i gael hynny?

Ac a ydyn ni'n mynd i gael hyn

Diolch yn fawr.

Rwy'n siŵr.

Mae'n yr un peth rydyn ni'n dod i mewn.

Maen nhw'n mynd i mewn o bob sianel.

Maen nhw eisiau i chi feddwl eu bod nhw'n mynd i fyny ar gyfer eich reoleiddio.

Ydych chi'n cofio siarad am hynny?

Iawn.

Mae'r holl gyfansoddiadau wedi cael eu trafod.

Mae hynny'n rhyfeddol iawn.

Nid oes unrhyw un ohonyn nhw wedi mynd.

Ac fe wnaeth e ddod i'r camp Ysrael.

Nid oes unrhyw un ohonyn nhw wedi mynd.

Rydw i'n mynd i droi'r cyfnod, os nad ydych yn anfon y fflânt yr ydynt amdanyn nhw i'r sygwyl yr ydynt amdanyn nhw, ac yn parhau i ddod o hyd yn oed pan fyddant yn meddwl y byddant yn mynd i'r fflânt.

Ydych chi'n meddwl y byddant yn gwerthu'r fflânt?

Ydych chi'n gwybod beth yw hynny am hynny?

ac rydyn ni'n cyfrifo ein hunain hefyd.

Nid oedd yn gwestiwn anodd, ond cwestiynau anodd.

Roedden nhw'n anodd, oherwydd roedden nhw'n brys, ond roedden nhw'n ddwy.

Ond roedden ni'n gwneud hynny.

Nid oedd unrhyw un o'n bobl yn dechrau gwneud hynny.

Roedd unrhyw un o'n bobl yn dechrau gwneud hynny.

Nid oedd unrhyw un o'n bobl yn dechrau gwneud hynny.

Roedd Faust yn y dyn cynnyrch ac roedd Chatham wedi siarad â'i ffrindiau a'r Rheolwr ac fe wnaethon nhw ei gynghoryddu i'w gwneud yn ddiddorol, ond roedden ni'n bwysig iawn i'w ceisio, yn enwedig oherwydd roedden ni'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n mynd i fod ar y teledu.

Ac mae'r peth cyntaf y mae'r bwysau eisiau ei wneud yw gwneud y peth o sut rydyn ni'n ysgrifennu'r cwestiynau.

Felly roedden ni'n dweud, os ydych chi'n ymwneud â'r cwestiynau, unrhyw ffordd yr ydych chi eisiau eu hannol

Nid ydym yn gwneud unrhyw ystyriaeth.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddeall yn glir.

Rydym yn gwneud hynny eto.

Mae hynny'n ddigwydd.

Roedden ni'n gwneud unrhyw ystyriaeth.

Roedden ni'n

Dwi ddim eisiau cwestiynau tŵm.

Dwi eisiau cwestiynau da.

Mae hynny'n broblem.

Mae'n awgrymu'n ddrwg iawn i'r panel arbenigol am ofyn cwestiynau.

Nid yw'n iawn, mewn gwirionedd.

Ar gyfer telefisio.

Nid oes rhaid i ni wneud hynny ar gyfer unrhyw beth arall.

Mae'n ddrwg iawn.

Fel canddeithas, roedd hynny'n ddrwg iawn.

Roedden ni'n cael anodd yn ymwneud â'r cwestiynau anodd.

A chadw iddyn nhw fynd yn gyflym ac roeddwn i'n sgrinio'r cyllid.

Ond nid oedden ni'n sgrinio'r cwestiynau, nid oedden ni'n sgrinio'r cwestiynau, roedden nhw'n gwneud iddyn nhw eu hunain.

Rydyn ni'n sgrinio'r cwestiynau ymlaen i geisio darparu cydbwysedd ac ar y telethons rydyn ni'n sgrinio'r cwestiynau.

Ond nid oedden ni'n gwybod ble mae'r cwestiynau.

Well, you didn't know what they were, and we screened them only on the basis of trying to get some balance so that you didn't have a... By the way, last night, all the questions had one subject.

No, I'll tell you what, you did everything for a certain purpose.

One purpose, a certain purpose.

Don't have me go on the actual television and ask you questions about race, too.

Mae hynny'n dda.

Roeddwn i'n ymddygiad â chi.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl bod hynny'n llwyr iawn, ond nid oedd yn gwirioneddol.

rydw i wedi cyflawni eu cwestiynau, ac mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi trefnu'r rest.

Roedd Mike wedi'u cyflawni ac wedi siarad gyda mi, ac mae'n dweud, byddai'r sbith rydych chi'n ei wneud yn dda i'r amgueddfeydd America.

Ac mae'r sbith hwnnw'n cael ei gyrru i'r Amgueddfeydd America.

Fe wnaethoch chi siarad â'r amgueddfeydd America, ac wedyn mae'n rhaid i ni siarad â'r amgueddfeydd.

Roeddwn i'n dweud, iawn, pan fyddai gen i'r cyflawniad, byddaf yn siarad am 5 munud, ac byddaf yn dda iawn

Ydych chi'n gweld, mae'n iawn.

Yn siŵr, mae'n iawn.

Mae'n iawn.

Yn un paragraff, yn yr economaeth gwirioneddol, roeddwn i'n gweld llawer o ddigwyddiadau.

Roedden ni'n mynd ymlaen i ffwrdd â'r rhain yn unig.

Roedden ni'n mynd i ffwrdd â'r rhain yn unig.

Roedden ni'

Mae hynny'n dda iawn.

Rydyn ni wir wedi gwneud ymgymryd â'r Cynulliad Cymdeithasol Cymdeithasol Cymdeithasol Cymdeithasol Cymdeithasol

Yn gyntaf, mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r gweithgareddau a'r rhan fwyaf o'r gweithgareddau yn cael eu gwneud yn ddifrifol ac yn ddifrifol, ond hyd yn oed am bobl yn y cymuned busnes.

Roeddwn i'n meddwl, a yw hynny'n iawn?

Roedd hynny'n iawn.

Yn ystod y cyfnod yma, roedden nhw bob amser yn ymwybodol o'r syniad y byddai rhywbeth yn anghywir ac nid ydym yn mynd i fynd yn ôl pan fyddai'r system llawn wedi'i gwneud.

Ydych chi'n gwneud cwestiynau da yn ystod y nos diwethaf, a dyma'r hyn y byddai wedi'i wneud yn y cyfnod cyhoeddus.

Byddai wedi gofyn gwestiwn am hynny mewn ffordd wahanol iawn, a byddai wedi rhoi cyfle i mi gyflawni'r syniad y byddai wedi ei ddweud.

Wel, beth fyddwch chi'n meddwl, Prif Weinidog, am y ffaith bod Senatore Connolly wedi llwyddo yn ystyrfaoedd?

Ie.

Dyna'r hyn y dylen nhw ei ofyn, ie.

Rwy'n dweud nad oedd yn llwyddo.

Rwy'n gweld pan fydd y dyn yn mynd ymlaen a'i negosiadau ac yn defnyddio'r nôl, rwy'n cofio ei fod wedi dod yn ôl ac roedd pawb yn dweud ei fod wedi ffail.

Ond roedd yn dweud hynny oherwydd doedd hi ddim wedi rhoi'r stori allan.

Mae'n hawdd i ni wneud y prif gwasanaeth i roi'r stori allan, ond rydyn ni ddim yn gallu hyderu i wneud hynny unwaith mwy.

Roedd y prif gwasanaeth yn gwneud hynny, ond roeddwn i'n barod i fynd allan ac roedd unrhyw un yn gofyn cwestiynau.

Rwy'n gweld nad oedd y cwestiwn wedi cael ei ofyn

Mae'r ton a'r cyfnod yn ffordd o'r cwestiwn.

Mae'n gwneud gwahaniaeth i'r ffordd y gallwch roi'r ateb.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ddweud yn fawr.

Mae'r rheswm y mae'n rhaid i chi gofyn yn fwyaf yw eich bod yn gwybod y cwestiwn.

Mae'n rhaid i chi ateb y cwestiwn, ac wedyn ysgrifennu, pam ydych yn ceisio cyflawni pwynt nad ydych yn gweithio.

Mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hynny.

Mae'n gallu gwneud 500 gwaith a gwneud hynny, ac mae gwybodaeth.

Mae Lachlan wedi gofyn i'ch gweld chi.

Mae Mitchell yn gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gallu ei weld.

Yn siŵr.

Mae'n ymwneud â'r tefnogaeth cable.

Mae'n gallu gweld y byddwch chi'n gallu ei weld oherwydd ei fod yn ffrind da iawn.

Ac wedyn, pan fydd Prif Weinidog Dada'r Pwll O Tynion, sy'n gweld chi fel Prif Weinidog Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas Cymdeithas

Mae wedi gofyn i'r pum Gweinidog gwahanol sydd gyda nhw yn gallu cymryd rhan yn y cyfnod o'ch sgwrs, bod yn gallu cyflwyno chi i'r pum Gweinidog gwahanol.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud yn siŵr.

Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n llawer gwell.

Diolch yn fawr.

Rydyn ni'n ceisio'i gadw'n unigol, ond mae'n haws i'w gweld yn unigol.

Mae'n haws i'w gweld yn unigol, ond mae'n haws i'w gweld yn unigol.

Mae'n haws i'w gweld yn unigol, ond mae'n haws i'w gweld yn

Unrhyw ffordd rydych chi'n gallu.

Maen nhw'n argymell cwrtau cyfarfodol gan bwysigrwydd Bernion sydd wedi dod yn ôl i Belgrade.

Oherwydd y cyfarfodd Tito, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati, ac ati,

Diolch yn fawr.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud.

Mae'n dda.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, fel penderfyniad, mae'n rhaid i mi ddechrau.

Mae'n dda.

Rydyn ni wedi hwylio'r syniad i'r flwyddyn nesaf, neu'r flwyddyn nesaf nawr, y diwrnod nesaf gyffredinol gyda chyfranogwyr miliwn o dollar.

Roedd un sylw i ni wneud hynny yn Camp David, neu rydych chi'n siarad am wneud hynny yn Camp David, byddai'n fuddsoddiad arbennig ar hynny.

Ac roedden ni'n meddwl efallai ein bod ni'n gwneud hynny i'r rheini.

Yn gyffredinol, mae hynny'n ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n ei wneud.

Yn ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n ymwneud â'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gwneud.

Felly maen nhw'n gallu gweld y cân.

Iawn.

Ac rydyn ni'n gallu gwneud hynny.

Rydyn ni'n gallu gwneud hynny.

yn cyfarfod yn Pittsburgh, dwy dydd ar ôl eich cyfarfodydd Cymraeg.

Yn gyntaf, rwy'n meddwl mai'r pethau bwysig yw bod yn rhaid i mi weithio'r pethau hyn ar y ffordd yr ydych chi'n ei wneud yn amlwg, felly rwy'n meddwl bod y pethau hyn yma.

Rwy'n rhaid i mi weithio'r pethau hyn ar y ffordd yr ydych chi'n ei wneud.

Rydyn ni wedi bod o gwmpas ar hyn o bryd.

Beth ydych chi'n meddwl, Bob?

Rwy'n meddwl y mae'n rhaid i chi wneud hynny.

Rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl,

Mae hynny'n rhywbeth am y cyfarfodydd swyddfa, ac mae'n rhaid i'r cyfarfodydd yn gweld, fel perfformiad, pam nad ydych chi'n gallu gwneud hynny gyda'r TV Cenedlaethol sydd ar gael.

Rwy'n cytuno â hynny.

Oherwydd y pwynt perfformiad, ac yn ystafell y bobl, mae'r swyddfeydd ddim yn rhaid iddyn nhw fynd allan o'r des, ond yn rhoi'r swyddfa.

Nid yw'r pethau hynny'n rhaid i chi ei wneud.

Ond roeddwn i'n gallu ei wneud, ac mae'n rhaid i'r cyfarfodydd ddweud beth y gallwch chi fod yn barod amdanyn nhw

Rydyn ni'n mynd i fynd i fynd i fynd i fynd

Rydyn ni'n gwneud un penderfyniad arall.

Mae'n cael George hefyd.

George nawr yn mynd i fod yn gyffredinwr felly mae ganddyn nhw hynny.

Mae'n cael hynny.

Maen nhw'n mynd yn dda.

Rwy'n ceisio gwneud hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud rhywbeth.

fe wnaeth hi hefyd ddweud y byddai'n mynd i fod yn rhesesiwn mewn Jepun ac yn rhesesiwn yng Nghymru, sy'n eich bod chi'n gweithio'n dda oherwydd bod eu economaethau'n anodd ac yn cael llawer mwy o effeithiol na ni, ac maen nhw'n meddwl y byddwn ni'n gwneud hynny, ac felly rwy'n meddwl y byddai'r artist yn ymwneud â chi mewn gwirionedd, yn ymwneud â'r adnodd yn ddiweddar iawn i ryw fath o system cadarnhaol.

Doeddwn i ddim ei ddweud, ond dyna'r hyn rwy'n ei gael.

Felly, rydyn ni wedi ceisio ceisio gwneud hynny.

Rydyn ni wedi ceisio gwneud hynny.

Felly, rydyn ni wedi ceisio gwneud hynny.

Mae hynny'n ddiffrydol oherwydd maen nhw'n ymwneud â'r rheoliadau cyfrifol.

Mae'n ddiffrydol oherwydd y bydd pobl yn dod yn ôl ac yn dweud, iawn, mae'r rheoliadau cyfrifol wedi'u rhoi i chi.

Mae'r rheoliadau cyfrifol wedi'u rhoi i chi.

Mae'r rheoliadau cyfrifol yn un o'r broblemau gyfrifol.

Oherwydd rydyn ni wedi bod trwy hyn nawr yn y flwyddyn diwethaf rydw i wedi bod yma, yn ymwneud â'r trafodaethau hyn, am pum cyd-destun gwahanol

Mae'n ymddangos bod yna amser pan fyddwch chi'n gallu rhoi'r cyfrifoedd hynny.

Nid oes cymaint o amser.

Mae Arthur yn yr argwyr mwyaf, pan wnaethon ni'r cyfnod cyntaf.

Yn ystod y flwyddyn cyntaf, roeddech chi'n cofio ar Arthur, ac roedd e'n gofyn i chi roi'r cyfrifoedd yn eich amser.

Mae'n iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl ei fod wedi'i wneud.

O, ie.

Mae'n iawn.

Cofi, os gwelwch chi'r cwestiynau.

Roeddwn i wedi dynnu'r ffyniad i fy mhrofiad y llynedd.

Roeddwn i wedi dod i'r Prif Weinidog yn y Llywodraeth Cymru.

Roeddwn i wedi cofnodi fy rôd i Arthur a chi a'r grŵp yn 1968, cyn i chi ddewis.

Roedd y peth cyntaf y byddwch chi'n ei wneud wrth ddod i'r swyddfeydd oedd i chi ddynnu'r ffyniad ac i gyrru'r holl amrywiaethau.

Byddwn i'n meddwl y byddai'n dda iawn.

Y peth y byddwn i eisiau ei arwain yn arbennig yw hyn.

Mae'n bwysig iawn y bore yma i mi ddweud hynny i unrhyw un arall.

Mae'n bwysig i unrhyw un arall.

Mae'n b

does not mean that he fails.

I mean, when you go abroad and don't give a star away, you succeed, in my opinion, which is basically what he didn't do.

Now, Connolly did just what he was supposed to do at this point, and we have now got to, now that we've taken this rather traumatic step,

ond yna, yn ogystal â'n farchnad ein hunain, yna, gadewch i ni ddim, gadewch i ni ddim troi'r tawl a mynd yn ôl i rywbeth yn ddiweddar.

Wel, ond rydych chi'n, rydych chi'n llwyddo, rydych chi'n llwyddo.

Rydych chi wedi llwyddo'r system bywyd a'r ffordd nad ydych chi wedi'i llwyddo.

Wel, roeddwn i'n bwysig am hynny.

Rwy'n gwybod bod John, John Cohn, sy'n ddiddorol iawn, mae'n darllen popeth o'r preswyr.

Rwy'n siŵr ei fod wedi'i ddysgu am y ffaith ei fod wedi mynd i Ewrop ac roedd pawb yn dweud, dyma'r un peth rydych chi'n ei ddweud am Johnson, ond yn y lle hwn, nid yw hynny'n ffair.

Connelly yw'r peth sy'n siŵr ei fod wedi'i ddysgu.

Rwy'n siŵr ei fod wedi'i ddysgu.

Rwy'n siŵr ei bod wedi'i ddysgu.

Rwy'n siŵr ei bod wedi'i ddysgu

Mr. Solomon a John O'Rourke.

Ac roedd e'ch cyfarfod gyntaf gyda John.

Rwy'n meddwl eich bod wedi dod ymlaen yn ddiddorol iawn.

Iawn, mae'n ddiddorol iawn.

Iawn

Yn gyntaf, mae fy nghydweithwyr fy hun yn ddiddorol iawn.

Maen nhw'n nifer un sydd wedi bod yn llwyddiannus.

Nifer ddwy sydd wedi bod yn ymwneud â'r prif gwerth.

Nid ydw i'n ymwneud â gwneud unrhyw beth am y prif gwerth.

Yn y ffaith, yn hytrach na chael y prif gwerth, byddwn i'n ymwneud â'r prif gwerth.

Nid yw wedi cael unrhyw beth am y prif gwerth.

Mae hyn yn ymddygiad, mae hyn yn ymddygiad.

Pwy, pwy, pwy, pwy yw unrhyw un ar gyfer hynny?

Roedd Harper yn dweud ei fod yn gallu ei ddangos i mi.

Mae'n ei ddweud oherwydd ei fod yn rhan o'r Ritual, neu mae'n ei ddweud oherwydd'r Rheligion neu rhywbeth, neu'r Matholeg, ond roedd yn dweud, mae'n rhaid i ni fynd ymlaen at hynny ers hynny.

Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud wrth fy modd, roedd Arthur wedi argyfwng yn fawr am wneud hynny.

Roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i'n argyfwng, roeddwn i

Rydych chi'n gweithiwr cymdeithasol yng Nghymru, ac rydych chi'n sefyll yn y Parlamenni.

Ac mae'r Parlamenni a'r rheolwr yn rhedeg, un o'r cyngorion, yn dweud wrthych chi, a ydych chi'n gweithiwr cymdeithasol?

A ydych chi'n gweithiwr cymdeithasol?

A ydych chi'n gweithiwr cy

yw darparu iddyn nhw gyda phobl gwleidyddol ar ffwrdd, oherwydd, mewn gwirionedd, newid prif gwerth o gwrdd yn y llwybr trwy'r llwybr, nid oes unrhyw ffaith.

Nid yw'n gwneud unrhyw gwahaniaeth p'un nad ydym yn gwerthu gwrdd ar 35 ariann, neu nad ydym yn gwerthu gwrdd ar 38 ariann.

Fodd bynnag, o'u safbwynt eu hunain, maen nhw'n gweithredu'r ffaith bod gwrdd yn rhan o'r prif gwerth.

Maen nhw'n gallu ddweud wrth y gwleidyddol yng Nghymru, beth rydych chi'n gweld y mae'r DU wedi

Ac mewn ffordd, mae'n debygol iawn i'w wneud, oherwydd mae'n costio ni ddim.

Ar y llall arall, y rheswm i'w wneud yw, oherwydd dwi'n meddwl ei bod hi'n ymwneud â hyfforddiant, ac mae'n anodd ymlaen.

Rydych chi wedi gwneud cwestiwn i'w gwneud, ac os ydych chi'n ei gydnabod ar hyn o bryd, mae'n rhaid i chi ei wneud eto.

Iawn.

Rwy'n meddwl y byddaf wedi mynd i'r holl ffynciau rhyngwladol sy'n gysylltiedig â hynny.

Ie.

Mae'n debyg.

He said, just on the grounds of this mystique and how you would bring the whole world system down, suspended human ability.

And it's a result of his hysteria.

No, sir, but I'm there.

I think I can explain there, don't you?

It's very simple.

It's pure fluke.

You're a sample biker in France.

And you stand up in the parliament.

And the parliament and management is running.

One of the congressmen says to you, are you on a dollar standard?

Are you a satellite kind of tail of the U.S.?

And the satellite like to be able to stand up and say, no, we're on a dollar standard.

And that's 100% of the whole thing.

is to provide them with the political freedom at home.

Because, in fact, changing the price of gold and still keeping the window closed has no effect.

It makes no difference whether we don't sell gold at $35 an ounce or we don't sell it at $38 an ounce.

However, from their point of view, they can maintain the fact that gold has a role to play.

They can say to their politicians, well, you see, the US contributed to this change.

And in a way, it's very tempting to do it, because it costs us nothing.

On the other hand, the reason I'm opposed to doing it is because I think it just promotes an illusion that it's dangerous in the long run.

You've now made an issue of what you can face up to.

If you now say to them to do this, two years later, we'll have to face up to it again.

All right.

All right, now.

Where do you move now?

Well, the thing is, you're spending a lot of time doing the whole International Patriots of the Incorporated Surgeon.

Yeah.

You're going to be able to keep up, aren't you?

If we don't get rid of him in the next couple of weeks, he's going to be gone.

In a couple of weeks?

Of course.

Well, there's no way.

No way.

No, you don't have a choice.

There's no way.

There's no way we can get rid of him.

We just can't get anything to go with him.

Well, maybe if it's a month, I mean two weeks, literally, except if they're dramatized.

And it seems to me it has to be very soon.

And the question is, what do we want to get from it?

Now, point number one is that we have already done a great deal, which would have happened if it were the import search charge.

You would not have had to bring the Japanese hands on it.

If it hadn't been for the import surcharge, the German mark would not be as much under pressure as it is.

You would not have had the comments from European countries about the unaccepting sound flood.

In other words, as long as it's in existence, it limits the amount of flood.

Because the equilibrium price of the yen is different with the import surcharge, and it never happens.

Let's suppose you have an import surcharge of 10% and you have the Japanese yen appreciated by 10%.

That's equivalent to a 20% appreciation, not the import surcharge.

So, the least you can get for it is that both Japan and all the countries must be willing to let their exchange rates appreciate more with the import surcharge off than with it on.

Third, I would certainly get as much as I could in one of the reductions in barriers to trade.

But I think it is, in my point of view, a great mistake to put the issue in terms of a numerical shift in the balance of payments.

Because the problem for the United States is not to solve this balance of payments problem.

It's to try to get a system set up which will keep setting problems for the rest of the future.

And what we need for that is the important thing to me are the reductions in trade barriers on the one hand,

And Gregor's less than one of the currencies on the end.

It seems to me that's a little productive.

But that's a real hard problem.

But that you can't bargain for the import search.

And that, the import search is harmful rather than helpful.

Yeah, because it builds an illusion by running.

Let me just amend or add to one element of what Stilton said.

So the relation of the surcharge to the exchange rate.

The surcharge relates only to imports.

The exchange rate relates to exports as well as imports.

So to the extent that you have an equilibrium with the surcharge and you take the surcharge off and you get a new equilibrium, what you do is you help the export industries

as well as those suffering from imports.

And the farm people, to my surprise, never raised this argument.

I don't know that they really understood it.

They raised the problem of the surcharge in their eyes had to do with retaliation and the possibilities of that.

A more powerful argument from their point of view is that the farm people are the big exporters.

So if you make American goods cheaper abroad, the principal good you're affecting is agricultural commodities.

And so they gain...

Right, but they're the big exporters.

This is a very pro-agriculture thing to do.

Oh, okay.

I said, if you really wanted to have a crocodile,

All you've got to do is get up and rant and rave about these dams and these ferners that we held for 25 years and now trying to screw us up.

We're going to screw them up.

And people will tell when they've got a strike.

That's what they want.

But do you think there's an element of truth in the argument that we have, as I've been saying and trying to put this in the Senate, from 1916, when Woodrow Wilson was elected, to 1968 when he was elected, American foreign policy, which we'll describe as

We were going to make the world a safer democracy.

We were going to leave all of these bad countries up by their hands.

It seems to me what you have done, and I think it's one of the most important and constructive things you have done, is to change

the pattern of policy from benevolent paternalism to cooperative partnership.

So I didn't work on them.

Did you work on them?

Yes.

Did you get back to me for my, I don't know if I'm speaking or something.

Hey, you got something?

It does seem to me.

It's true.

It's a little clearer than that.

We don't want, you know, that was supposed to be a very sophisticated policy.

They never really cast precise questions where we bring it up.

So what we're really trying to do is, all we want is a fair opportunity to compete.

We don't want to run fair.

And we will take our chances.

But we're having one hell of a time.

That's why it's so important to get this new court surcharge.

You said there's no possibility of a deal within two weeks.

If you've had a deal, the following next one.

Well, we have this plan that we've

reached out and that we had some discussions over there in a small group, as you know, of saying that we will suspend the surcharge with any country suspended, not eliminated, if they will allow their currency to float freely through that George County dual slot.

Well, we are alleged to be, the GATT rules are the thing that people talk about.

We are in violation of the GATT rules now, according to the .

Maybe because Germany is already building a proper rhythm about Germany.

Canada is floating.

We could probably, Germany and Canada would qualify just like that.

So now it seems to me the crucial question is the deal with Japan and Britain.

And it seems to me that you can offer Japan and Britain to take on the third charge, provided they will let their currencies flow, and provided that they will reduce their barriers, their non-tariff barriers to trade.

And what does it do, though, in a hot space?

What does it do?

There was a very key element of the fact that Japanese

Ford, of course, automobiles rose in January from 15% of the market to 21% in August.

So you take off the surcharge.

So what happens?

Ford, of course, started closing in again.

Well, the surcharge is on automobiles is from 6.5%.

6.5%, right.

But the Japanese yen is now appreciated by God.

That's about 13%.

A Japanese appreciation of the Japanese yen at 13% is exactly the same.

So maybe you don't have all of them.

But if the yen appreciates at 10 to 12%, no, 10 to 13%, I'm saying maybe you can't get as much benefit for the other bidders.

which you can come very close to.

It doesn't take much, because if the Japanese yen appreciates 10, 12%, you've essentially got the same effect as you did on the Japanese yen.

Well, we have to do the same.

We could get the same.

All right, let's leave that subject and get to the other subject, which is to...

to our problem on the domestic front.

May I add one more thing on the international matter?

I think you have another middle finger here that would be very helpful to everybody, and that is to eliminate the prohibition on private ownership in purchase and sale.

He's working on it.

And to no one is it particularly attractive to some of the conservative people.

I worked it up and I'm grateful to send it over to John.

John has responded and said his bureaucrats all to it.

He sent me all our stuff and he wrote a note saying that he agrees in principle with the suggestion that he doesn't think this is a good time for it.

And I just sent him a little note back yesterday saying that if we want to dramatize the fact that we by God are going to stick up for Americans,

And really, when all is said and done, we don't think the gold issue is all that important.

But this is a pretty good way to do it.

Every other country, their citizens can own gold.

Why is it that the American citizens shouldn't?

And it's sort of a free thing.

Nobody has any.

You can see that it really has any substantive effect on anything we're doing at all.

just doesn't it seems to be something that's all plus and of minus as far as i can figure out that that is one of the treasury arguments that it may take legislation but we think that uh that that's certainly but do you read the the section three of the gold reserve act i guess it is i've read that i'm not a lawyer but my gosh it says in plain english that the whole

holding of gold and so on is subject to regulation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

That was my impression of the Dover executive order.

And it's small-minded, but it has great symbolic importance to particularly agree that from a political point of view, the Conservatives, the Conservatives are right in that.

They're really hard-line Conservatives.

Because they've always regarded that as an infringement on their rights.

And they were correct.

We never should have put up with this disgraceful inflection.

When was it done?

1933.

And the reason it was done, there was only one reason it was done, and that was to keep private people from profiting by the rise in the price of gold.

I was entirely for that purpose.

It had no monetary function whatsoever.

If you see, FDR raised the price of gold from $22 an ounce to $35.

And he didn't want private people who owned it to profit from it.

And so what he did was, I've always argued this was an act of expropriation, no different from cash extortion, for example, where Chile expropriated an economy.

We did exactly the same thing.

Here you were, you had some gold, and on the market it was worth $35.

Mr. Roosevelt said to you, we must turn it into $22.

Oh, I understand.

And so...

I think we ought to pursue it.

I'm pursuing it in a cautious fashion.

Now on the domestics.

I want to bring it to you with John.

Yeah, sure, sure.

The bureaucracy is against anything that has any boldness

Or an anomaly to it.

Also, that anything that departs from all the system they've been working in and in which they have a vested interest in not changing it.

It's why they don't want to change it.

They don't want to play it against government organizations.

It's why they're against remedy checks.

It's why they're against welfare reform.

But I say they.

So many people in the bureaucracy as well as the Congress because they're comfortable with a system even though it's obsolete.

It should be changed.

It's the best arguments for changing it.

Go ahead.

There are just two classes of problems.

One is the technical problem of how you unwind the price control and what you substitute for it.

But I think there's a more fundamental and basic problem.

The great danger that I see in the past is that under cover of suppressing the inflation, the true inflationary forces will be increased.

And that's the real danger.

because the congressman says, why do we have to believe in legislation?

Here's CLC, they're taking care of it for us.

Now, that's a very real danger, because we want to look forward.

They'll spend more.

The same danger with the Fed, that it says, now we can print more.

Now, from your point of view and our point of view, we want to look forward to 1972 and beyond that.

We want a victory in 1972, but we don't want a victory which has to be followed by a course of action that puts Democrats in power for 20 years.

The danger to be avoided is interesting.

If you let the revolutionary pressure go that way, you may be able to hold it down through the election.

and send the earth to no collapse.

When it does, you will have a great upsurge of inflation, and then there will be again pressure for stepping on the brakes hard again.

We will throw away the advantage of what we gain with the cost of the 1970 recession.

You will have to have an even worse recession.

And if in 1974 you're forced to superintend a severe recession, that's going to put the Democrats back in for 20 years.

Now that's a horror story.

And I don't mean to say it's .

Now the question is how to avoid it.

And the key to avoid it is our friend Eric.

Because I was telling you last night.

The Congress will not be able to, I think, for that first time, you're going to have a whopping big deficit.

If the Fed now monetizes that deficit and increases the quantity of money, anything like the way it did in the first six months of this year, I'm afraid the scenario I've described is inevitable.

Well, let's just say we don't convince our neighborhood too soon.

They have been contracting the supply of money in the last month or so.

I'll tell you, the quick chill that throws on, I'm more and more impressed with.

It happened last fall, and it seems to be happening in the third quarter.

Well, they're going to start contracting the supply of money.

It's one thing to move from a rate of increase of 10% or whatever to 10%.

down to 4% or something like that.

It's another thing to have gone hog wild in one direction and all of a sudden they go hog wild in the other direction and contract the money supply.

And that really throws a spanner across things, I think.

Well, don't overestimate that, because these do average out, and these figures from month to month are so convoluted and unclear.

I don't think you have to worry about showing them too soon.

I think we've got a healthy expansion going.

Had one going before this, it's going to be, if anything, smaller now.

I don't believe you have a problem next year from the Beyond Club.

I really don't.

You think expansion is on its way.

I think of his apartment freeze because all the numbers even, you know, you start believing your own figures when I talk about it.

I said, well, since the first of the year, retail sales were up 15%.

The leading indicators were up 15%.

Automobile sales are 25% bigger than they were a year ago, having in mind the fact that some of that is due to the fact that

People buying because of the dissipation of the freeze going off.

Housing is at a new high.

What the hell?

There's got to be something here.

And of course, I could have said inventories are low.

and consumer purchasing power is not as high as savings are high, and spendable earnings, real spendable earnings are the highest in history of purchase figures.

So there's a lot of stuff there.

Your point about a lot of spending and the further trouble is, well, I guess that would be reflected in the...

You've got the next summer's on the third quarter, don't you, so far?

So far, first of all, we have is the courts on July.

Basically, that's what they've got.

They don't have any sort of essential... Over all of this, from the point of view of the council, if you look back at the economic record of this county, there's no exception to the fact that once you get an expansion underway, you don't stop at this point.

It has a momentum of its own.

You don't have one month come down, maybe.

But you know.

What about the expansion in 37 months?

Do you remember that one?

I don't understand.

I only remember reading about it.

No, you had a sharp contraction in 37 to 38.

A very deep recession.

And then it started up again in 38.

37.

It was four years long.

It started in 33 and went to 37.

I see.

Now, what happened was, because you had come down so deep, you didn't get out to where you were before.

Those four years showed the fastest growth of any four years in American history.

It was just, you were starting from so deep, deep down.

What's happening now, and this thing was so annoying about all the discussion before, if you have a mild recession, you don't have very far to go coming up.

The 1970 recession was the mildest one America ever had.

And therefore, you can't go up very fast.

But you have been going up to about the same relationship you were before the recession as in earlier recessions.

It just isn't true that this is in any way an abnormally easy, soft, slow expense.

What happens is that you start from a high point.

6% unemployment is politically bad.

But in terms of earlier comparisons, it's the lowest .

There's no doubt.

There are now, and this is an actual hard number, there are 200,000 men in the workforce who wouldn't have been in the workforce if the war were still at the same level.

Well, that poses a little bit of a problem.

It does.

It poses a problem, not really.

It poses a problem not so much from the two magnets, but from the geographic distribution of it.

And it's heavily concentrated.

You've got California, 8%.

Chicago, 4%.

But Gary, 20%.

Or something like Michigan.

Connecticut.

So I think the odds are you've got to not let yourself get

taken astray by this short-time perspective in Washington where people will look two weeks at it.

One month may be bad, but there's basically a real expansion underway.

Unemployment, I would be willing to wager any amount, is not going to be your problem next year.

The real problem remains of not getting much steam built up under this for the post-election period.

And the key to that is our commitment.

I agree with George that it shouldn't go through.

10% up, 4% down.

If he can only keep that down to a 4% or 5% rate from now until the election, that's planning to provide the steam you need without making the bill unaccessible.

Now, your other classic questions are the technical questions of phase two and so on.

As you know, I understand

from a political point of view, why you did what you did.

But I haven't proved what you did.

And I'm making credit for that, too.

It's the economist's fault.

And I'm sure you agree that it's desirable to do it.

If you let too much approval grow up over this, it's going to be very hard to get rid of it.

And I know that.

You didn't want it anymore because you had a crush.

And people could get awfully used to it.

Everybody would say, isn't it great?

You're controlling prices.

My advice is agree at all.

We should give it a cause.

I know that.

I appreciate it.

But the problem is that at this time, with the enormous public support for it, we've got it.

And now the problem is unwinding it with something that appears to be effective, but which actually will simply ride on what we hope are

forces already in motion that are going to gradually decelerate the CPI.

Well, I'm trying to think about it a little bit.

I don't really have any confidence in my judgment.

What I'm saying may not be right.

My information would be to use it as a sanction, only postponement, to use the policy of saying that whatever class of industries and humans you continue to control, must ask for approval of later price increases.

and any that are disapproved cannot be put into effect for 60 days.

Because it has an effect that you want.

Go ahead.

You would ask.

You would have.

You're going to have some kind of a wage plus.

All right.

Now I'm going to ask for approval.

And if it's disapproved, a wage and price increase.

And if it's disapproved,

We have no right to keep you from doing it, except that you may not put a full effect for 60 days.

Or 90.

It's 90 days from now.

Because that has the effect.

It's a minor amount of sun juice, and there's not going to be any large pressure to evade it.

But it's strong enough to provide a cosmetic influence on the price index, which is 13.1.

In effect, and I did this because I'm charged totally that this was the line of commission.

He said that we have indicated that the restraints would be across the board, that the concentration with regard to supervising restraints and placement would actually have to be in those major industries that have the greatest impact on the inflationary thing.

If you say across the board,

It's almost impossible.

You can't administer it.

You've got how many million, four million, five million firms?

The wage decisions and the price decisions are enormous.

Of course, I don't know the thinking as to what we're going to do about all these deferred increases.

That's going to really blow the lid.

That's why we can't really keep those .

Only the ones that are just way outside.

I think that it's conceivable that a labor management panel would try to lower the boom on tremendous deferred wage increases.

When I left, that was very important.

No, it wouldn't affect the deal, and it wouldn't affect the automobile.

And there is a point that's been coming up, Lauren, that's been sort of interesting from both union and management, and that's the notion that one of the things that has stood our society in good stead is the idea that a contract made between two private parties has a certain standing and validity, and you don't lightly overturn it.

And the union people have been arguing that, that we made a deal, we made a contract,

and we gave some things, and we got some things, and that's an agreement.

Now, that has a certain sanctity, and you don't abrogate that contract lightly.

By the same token, it was interesting to me, Jim Roach, in our meeting with the management people, argued the same point.

We have a contract.

We don't want to see that contract abrogated, partly because there's an underlying principle

with respect to union relations that goes back into the 30s when there was all of the wild time with wildcat strikes and the unwillingness of union leaders to stand up and make their members live by a contract, that this has been pounded on and pounded on.

And they like the respect for a contract that has been built into our labor movements.

that once you've signed the contract, it's enforceable and you have to live by it, and if you don't like it the next time up, try to change it.

But the contract itself has a validity.

And so the argument is that aside from the fact that you may not like a big wage increase or something, if that's an agreement that some private parties make, you should think very long about having the government go in and tear it up.

And the union people are saying,

that if that is done on a broad scale, they will consider that the whole contract has been set aside, and then they'll go back in and negotiate a new contract.

The railroad unions will argue, for example, that they gave up these archaic work rules and the 100-mile limit on the length of the run and so on, and they got something in return for that.

Now, if you go and say you can't have the wage increase, they'll say, all right, let's go back to the 100-mile run then

I don't think you've got a line.

I believe that that is what you're going to go to, but Arthur is going to say it's unacceptable.

But, you know, it doesn't do anything.

Well, you notice I indicated last night that I thought we would have to have some equity and respect, because I just know that there's no way.

Well, that's unacceptable.

What the hell would he do about it then?

That's the point.

Well, we had a meeting the other day.

What's he say?

He said we've got to have some specific...

guidelines and make everybody live by them.

I said, well, Arthur, all right, you've got to strike that on the West Coast.

It's been going on for two and a half months.

There is the equivalent of about 14% per year on the table right now.

Been there.

They're striking about it.

Now, sooner or later, there'll be an end to the damn strike.

And there'll be a contract.

And what

What are you going to do with that 14%?

Our person says it's unacceptable.

It's got to be 4%.

Well, all right, then.

What are you going to do about the strike?

But somehow, these are very hard kinds of questions.

And here is where...

I think we better have a look forward rather than back.

Well, my idea on these longshore coal, where we're going to have a settlement, they can get the steel settlement in coal.

Yeah.

is to try to get them settled and say, look, declare it a part of the past and forget it.

Right.

And go on from there.

I think it's better to look at the future and not at the past.

Going in and reopening to get that clear.

No, I was going to say, I want to mention one thing.

I think one thing we should certainly do by all means is that you should appoint the right to chairman of the wage pressure as you will.

Now, there's a real precedent for it.

In 1932, Eugene Martin, who was chairman of the ... was also made chairman of the ... And that would be, that would be poetic.

Parker is a very close friend of mine, but still, nonetheless, this is poetic justice.

He's the person that's most responsible for evading this box.

He ought to be chairman of the board that gets us out.

I don't understand why there's a problem about the wages.

What you're really concerned with is prices.

There are no deferred contracts on prices.

The deferred contracts are almost all on wages.

You'd be surprised.

There are great many.

It's interesting how you get into trying to breeze and fuss around with this economy and the complexity, the intricacy, the ingenuity of the

the deals that people have made with the forward movements and then it's gone.

It's just staggering.

Let me ask you this.

Would you set a guideline?

Would you set a number?

You're just going to hang yourself with the number you set.

It'll bring everything.

The number is set to be some kind of an average.

And if you're a union leader and without the number, you wouldn't be able to get that much.

You're going to come up with that answer.

Also, you're pretty sure that a region, I think, the other thing is that you can set some principles, though.

You know, you talk a little about productivity.

That's the way they'll do it.

They'll have courage to be entrusted with the answer.

Our probability is that they'll be the last time to slap our heads if you talk to them.

Well, that's not bad.

How far are we going to go?

You're going to be surprised if we're good.

But it wouldn't have stayed the same.

Well, you have to say, you have to say.

It would have been better to say, oh, I mean, it would have been better to say, a low number would be able to say, we didn't get much better.

Well, that may be.

We did quite well, didn't we?

Well, if the freeze works really well, and we suppress the index as well and so on, why, that'll lower it.

But we are now estimating about 10.55, which on percentage deviation,

will be closer than 90 percent of the forecasters yeah well i got one of the most hilarious things and he testified how disgraceful it was that everybody knew it was only going to be 1950 having 1050 and here's a guy who's saying 1060.

The consensus was about less than 10.

Well, the consensus was down about 10.45 or 10.40.

That's gradually been coming up.

Oh, no, no.

On the whole, let's have 10.65 as closer to the truth than the consensus was.

Oh, I get it.

I get it.

You have some people like Mr. and Alan Greenspan who are down to around 20.

Well, Alice, given this, I must be well-mannered for coming in on it.

You're an anchorman.

Don't worry about your charges, still.

I'm not worried about it at all.

Oh, I'm not worried about me either.

I don't want you to listen to me.

You might have statistics for political purposes, but I have a difference from losing the faith.

Not much.

Oh, I don't mind.

But if I have all the evidence, I can't stand part of it.

I can't imagine.

Bob, you take those puppy dogs down to the Congress.

Puppy dogs don't listen to me.

And the business.

You know, you talk about the culprits in this thing.

You know, the real culprits are not labor.

Not labor.

It's his goddamn business people, including the business council.

Those blue ribbon people.

Except for one or two, they were all there begging for a wig.

And the regents were begging for a bot because they wanted to control labor.

But I wish...

They're the worst.

I wish you hadn't...

So we have no habitants.

I wish you hadn't said the nasty trash about the spec layers, though.

Say to the ones who achieved our results for us, who made the Japanese?

Tell them, Mark, after you made your announcement.

I didn't make any money off of it.

Oh, no, my God.

Oh, give it up.

I think we've done that.

The next thing is to accomplish something.

Well, I wish I did, Mr. President, but I think that comes after the election.

I really do.

We've laid out a focal point.

We've got to do it.

We cannot drop out of that race.

Let's keep all of our assets to the extent that we can.

We get back into that business.

That's certainly one of the main objectives of this new Technology Opportunity Program.

Now your time is close, and I thought if we could just help them with this, we could cover the whole section.

John asked me to pull the whole focus of technology together on urgent national needs.

The first thing I did was go to the government, do what would amount to a library sort of research, see what else is going on so we don't get cross purposes or embarrass ourselves.

The first thing I found was a congressional study called Government Practices on Securing Things.

A large number of people view it as a congressional study.

So having reordered it, the first thing I had to think about was the entire state of it.

Then I discovered that there was also a study of very unbiased, straight through the internet, national transfer of technology.

What's good about it, what's bad about it, what's indifferent, what it should do.

And John had asked the National Aerospace Space Council to do a study that was right on target with the first question.

What's the health of the aerospace industry and air transport?

The SST is a part of that.

That's due on the 1st of October.

And then I caught a gap.

No one had looked at the industry.

So I wrote 50 letters to the top trade organization using John's benefit criteria.

That will grow to a thousand inputs.

The enthusiasm for that has been just almost beyond belief.

Under Secretary Lynn, I'm not a fairly yellow class, but we need to talk about this.

So this is going to get us not just the government department, but it's going to get us from every type of industrial discipline in the United States an input.

What are three things?

What are good ideas that we should help stimulate?

What kind of initiatives does the government have in the way of tax incentives?

So everything is to go to Congress for an appropriation, an early depreciation, I don't know, so maybe an R&D bank could grant loans, right?

And I found that Congress was doing a study called Innovation in Industry and Government.

that I have organized six task forces.

The first one is the scientific or the engineering one.

That's headed up by Dr. David and Assistant Secretaries for Research in each department.

But I felt the need for a good legal look at what kind of things would happen to these technology initiatives aimed at urging national needs and economic opportunities if we had a repressive or a stimulative input from

anti-trust laws and policies.

So, Tom is going to give that assignment to Luke.

That's very quiet, kind of sensitive, we don't talk about that much.

We're, uh, we're in a meeting this afternoon with the attorney general about the comment on that.

We didn't get preliminary results yet on what he's for.

The second task force was to work with the industry and with the other government to see what type of initiatives were available.

that issues each opportunity arises, what's the best way to fund that?

Maybe we can do it by cash drive.

So early is the appreciation.

Oh, by the way, that's getting headed up under Dr. McCracken, by the new gentleman, Ed Russoff.

He's got a good team, and he's working in the infrastructure ministry.

The third one, a very sensitive one, extremely sensitive one, is some of these initiatives might be unwise because of labor crises.

In other words, you might decide to do an airplane that just is no good because the alpha said you had to actually pilot, so the very others would say you had to have a fireman.

But we don't want Mr. Meany and people to think we're doing something funny, so Jim Logan is looking at that and he's just, again, very funny.

All of these opportunities, which we are getting to be about an eight foot high stack now, are going in each of these groups to be scrubbed down.

to other forces, which is to look at the acts of transfer in and out of the country.

I laid out a schedule, and we had finished our first look at these initiatives.

I wasn't proud of it.

The problem had given the assistant secretary and the departments a little bit of their eyes open, a little bit of their eyes open.

But we're slowly getting them, I think, so to think, in terms of the new government organization.

Now that may be what I didn't analyze.

In other words, maybe I had a so that here are some bold, innovative things that we can do to marshal technological resources in human resources, in natural resources, in community development, in economic development.

that's not the way you go to Congress.

You go to Congress for appropriations by the present departments.

But amazingly enough, they fall out of those categories.

And when you don't go into those categories, they get so diffuse, they're not very well-focused.

The real problem, of course, that I have is dealing with scientists and engineers.

It's hard to get them to think big.

We'll do that.

So by the first week on foot, we should have a first cut.

That probably has something that we would be ashamed to breathe through on.

Parallel to that, I must do two of them.

I must get some review people outside of the government to review two functions.

In the technical area,

They've got to advise us from an unbiased viewpoint if these things are needed and if they're reasonable.

Because in the business departments, people will tend to have a vested interest.

The third thing I need is actually a group like Ben Shrieker and Mr. Jeanine and people in that group that can tell us what's the smart way to manage it and how it would be a wise way to finance it.

And that's this so-called work-to-count procedure and process and form.

After they extract the initiative, and of course the industry inputs will continue to come in, by the end of October, we would hope they have something.

Now, as you left, I did say, everybody working on that said, don't agree with that.

They're not going to get it.

But since about the 7th, by the end of November, I think they're going to get higher.

You want to look at what they do with this.

It's the most important thing we're going to do.

First of two things.

One, what we do and what the country thinks we're doing.

And at this point, it's far more important to do what we do boldly and grammatically.

Well, you know, we announced that $100 million program for cancer has coursed around, haven't gotten anybody to head it up, or is that any other thing?

you can sort of lose the feeling about it.

I mean, is it going to make any difference?

No, as a matter of fact, as a matter of fact, Richard, and of course, the PGW are exactly correct.

Probably the best way to just piss away the $100 million I'm getting to the Institute of Health out there, you know, let me say that in this instance, the $1 we will have is irreplaceable.

come up with, well, just do it the way you've been doing it previously.

Do it quietly and do it well.

Bold.

That is what we want.

We have got to do it in a very bold, exciting, interesting way.

And that means you've got to have innovation.

You've just got to, even though it may not be the best way to do it,

Because there needs to be psychological lifting, a variable, and you're not going to get a psychological lift by doing things in a gray, dull, efficient manner.

And we usually do things, you see.

That's our problem.

So we can say the man on the project wasted a lot, shot to the moon, wasted a lot, but it cost still over six.

I come to the point that I just can't emphasize too much on leaning hard for a new agency, something we can talk about so that people can think something is being done rather than to do it better and more efficiently through the routine, dead-ass government agencies that we presently have.

I've asked on that subject.

John made that very clear to us.

It's the first time he's politely shooting at us against the political side here.

Those are very important.

People ask, they always ask this question.

They don't say, some of them ask, are we going to subsidize American industry so we can compete with subsidized Japanese?

Well, they answer, well, we might have to consider it.

Of course, the way we subsidize it is through tax write-offs.

But the main point is that this whole area, it's got to be something that's new, that's breakthrough, that's initially purpose.

Rather than, I can eat without even reading them.

I can tell you what you've gotten already from the agency, the crap you'll get from the Treasury and from the Congress and all that.

They don't think they...

Right, John?

Yes, sir.

We run into this in everything we do.

We have a hell of a time, for example, in the law enforcement field.

We've done quite a bit, but we're having one hell of a time getting any credit.

The only part of the next big law enforcement is every time they arrest a...

Here's what I've run into that verifies what you've said.

None of the agencies, with a single exception of NASA,

a little bit AEC, a great deal in DOD, which is not sanitary in this field we're talking about, although they can help.

None of them have program definition, system management capability.

They think little.

They don't understand the word feasibility.

They don't understand the word a market need or a public need.

So what's needed is the kind of management capability that was available on Manhattan, was available on Apollo.

So after John

It really made your point very clear to me, and he did.

I went to see Fletcher and Lowe very quietly, and I asked them, since you're the only agency that has a steel T that has it, is NASA, tell me what systems management in these new initiatives you could take on or how you could provide the manpower by, say, taking your best guy or your next best guy and forming a nucleus to do this job in a separate system.

They're working on that.

The horror that I have is that if we take this on in a new area and we don't do like we did Apollo and we provide the Sam Phillipses, we had 150 of the very best program managers from the Air Force.

We just pulled them out and shoved them in and made Apollo work.

Because NASA didn't have these capabilities when space started.

They have it now and they have it in space.

So if we're going to have a new NASA, we've got to have some old NASA heads, old airport heads that really know how to do this without getting into some horrible thoughts, wasted effort, mismanaged environment.

We've got to have the very best.

I'll give you an example of how people don't think big.

I went through the DOT NASA package.

NASA was guilty of this, too.

There was no SST in there.

And I said, well,

Let me take this package, which is this big, and work backwards from a threat on aviation.

And a threat is what we talked about in our first meeting.

The rest of the world has a nationalized plan to have a Concorde, to have an A300, 300-passenger short-range airbus, 150-passenger wide-body Mercure.

They've captured Boeing and the STOL because Boeing got to survive, so they're getting funded from the Italians.

Pratt & Whitney and GE, this week, are going to make a decision to build their next modern jet civil engine with the French, with Senecma, the 20,000-pound, which will capture the market.

Within a month or two, the Japanese are going to sign up somebody else.

So I looked at the NASA and the DOT and the Commerce people, and I said, well, this package solved that problem.

And they said, oh, no, we've got a little research on noise, and we're going to buy up some tire molds to cut noise on the highway down.

And I said, get your eyes up.

This whole industry is going to disappear if you don't come in with a bold, imaginative program to alter this course of events.

So I've sent them all back to the showers and I'm going to get with, and I'm not sure the right people to get with, but I'm selectively picking people in the area.

Some are very low and some are very high that understand this problem and put together that package, which is the one that counts.

And that's why you said, don't lose the SSD.

What I think you're really saying is don't lose civil aviation.

Now, none of them have thought of that.

Now, industry might think of that, but everybody's a little chicken right now, Mr. President.

The situation of the proxfires and the Gaylord Nelsons and the soap, and the problem of the Democrats trying to keep unemployment high has got a lot of little people trying to say a low profile will get us through this thing.

And that's just wrong.

That's what you're saying.

You're going to make it.

You're going to have to be bright, imaginative, and do something dramatic and new.

And I'm not going to be able to get that in front of you by the 6th of October.

I'm going to do it.

I'm going to try.

And I'm not going to let anybody off that schedule when it's 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Well, this is in context of this.

It's another thing.

Two of us get a touch point.

The other thing has to do with education and tax reform.

and is as bold as anything that has come down the road in a long time.

And that has to do with education costs linked to a rebate of property taxes or an elimination of property taxes.

in a loop, and it ties to this California case.

Now, these two are really both about very much the same thing, and that's 20,000 new jobs.

This is 20,000 new jobs.

This is getting the people ready to quit.

So they've taken 20,000 new jobs.

So that at that point they touch, but they are two very high visibility items that talk about this country ten years from now.

I hope you're keeping that out of it.

Well, they're working on value add, but they don't know why.

They don't know how it links.

They must have some suspicions because we've had to send them back to the drop boards because their numbers came out all pay-wise.

They want to link specifically to our need requirements.

So sooner or later, we're going to have to cut them into this in order to get it.

Either that or we're going to have to set up our own tax department over there to see if she can't do that.

So, Eddie Cohen, I have talked to the Secretary about this, John Tomlin, and because we were getting no action at all out of the church, I don't want to change anything.

Well, look, you're on the right track, such that you're trying to look like you are.

I understand why you can't reach me.

I mean, and that, what do you, I mean, you know what I mean?

Well, don't tell anybody now.

No, I understand.

You and I are just kicking in the butt, which of course you will do.

But I must say that it's time they were thinking about this.

I mean, they, in fact, people should have started thinking at the minute we lost SSP.

That should have shocked this country into thinking, what the hell are we going to make?

Right, John?

What the hell are we going to make in the world?

You see, the point that a lot of people realize, don't realize, is this.

And they kept saying this morning, references made to the fact, well, only 4% of America's products are exported.

In other words, our exports are only 4% of our GDP, whereas maybe 30% of Canada's and 5% of Japan's, 30% of Britain's and the rest.

But the other side, they ought to realize, we're not talking about the export market alone.

We're talking about the market in the United States.

We're the biggest market in the world.

Japan sells 30% of its exports to the United States.

Europe sells it.

And what is happening is that American firms are getting their buzzfeed off in the United States.

That's it.

So when we talk about, well, this idea of being competitive in the world really doesn't matter because we don't depend on exporters.

Well, it doesn't matter.

It matters to great people because the United States is part of the world, and this is a real big market.

It's the other side of that coin.

We have a milestone that you may be involved in, and I would like to lead with it.

Sure.

One of the problems of the scientific community is inertia, you know, don't try to regulate it.

The basic research all comes in handy.

You're going to get appointed very soon, a gentleman to head up the National Science Foundation, because I think it's the last one to leave.

I think that's a very good appointment.

Peter's a man who understands what we're saying, but not a highly-powered man.

Yeah.

I'd like to give John the kind of names that we should give him.

I am unfortunately with Dan.

I think a lot of us should.

Thank you.

I think we would like to get a press picture, it seems to me.

No, we ought to put some flags on it.

I think that would be nice.

With sort of a good backdrop.

So we'll all start to get here.

How do you want to set it up?

We'll do the flags and get it like this, and then we'll divide it up and see what happens.

That's right.

hold on

You get around like that.

All right, let's go.

Come on over and sit down here.

The Navy, uh, uh, has talked about going to back and having a one-star rank, Mr. President, because they want to, uh, promote a woman to Conover.

I, I told the Navy that I thought it would be a mistake to have a different rank for women.

And...

But the Army and the Air Force all have their women generals, but the Navy is taking it seriously and promoting it.

Well, it's really...

And I wouldn't ask you anything about the way you work.

Oh, yes, of course.

I was thinking, though, in the Navy, you always think of, I mean, everybody has to be able to run a destroyer or something like that.

Oh, yes, of course.

And the way it's the medical corps.

Well, I want all of you to know that the Secretary is, as you know, a great advocate of this kind of promoting policy, which is represented here today.

He certainly has a mind to support us.

He has it for two reasons.

One, because I think it's vitally important to get the best man for the job, and when you're trying to find the best man,

Nobody can be ruled out from that.

I think back, for example, I always think back, and it's hard to realize that this has happened in the area of sports.

I came from Southern California, and I remember seeing Jackie Robinson play against Oregon, and Coliseum, and Kenny Washington, who's the stroke pass system, a brilliant player he was.

And then, later on, of course, as you know, he went to Montreal,

and was brought up in the Dodgers.

I was here at Sheckley Rounds.

He was the first, you know, the first black player to be on a major league ball game.

Now, you go out to the ball games today and you wonder, you wonder when you, when you see fellows that are white and blue and those folks that shit, how did it take us?

Did they do it before?

How did they handle the players?

You look at football.

You see it there in the field of sports in other areas.

For years, George Preston Marshall, you know, would have been an all-white team in this town.

Marshall's a southerner.

West Virginia, I should say, but I know I should have .

And George, I said, I remember particularly one year, I saw Jimmy Brown just carrying the Washington line .

He said, you're not gonna beat him, right?

You gotta get a psychology guy, you gotta cover the thing.

And so he got, and so does Mr. Sparks is wondering, here's an area, every area of life, we have got to have our best people.

We don't rule out any people.

As a matter of fact, we know that talent can exist throughout the Iron Churches, and I must say that now the Secretary has just been very insistent on this, and of course the Chiefs are too.

The other point I want to make is this.

As we move now into the period of our peacetime forces,

they're going to be, as you all know, a perhaps larger proportion of black in the ranks than there may be in the white area.

It's extremely important that that follow-up goes in, particularly on a volunteer basis, that he know, as he looks out the line, that he's got a perfect job.

If he doesn't think he's going to go to the top, he's not going to come in.

Also, if you're going to have a large proportion of enlisted men, that's the term used in the Navy, of course, if you have a large proportion of enlisted men who are, say, have to be of one race or so,

And they look up the line and they see what's happened to the officer corps.

It just won't wash. And so it seems to me that what we would have in fact done, we've just come a long way.

We didn't, when Al asked me to set this up, I just told him, look, we're not doing this just for symbolism.

And we're not, we're not going for tokens.

But we're doing it because with the interest of the service required, and the interest of the service in terms of our future needs required that we make this move.

Does that state the case?

No, it doesn't.

Then I wish that you folks would go out because you'll be asked to make speeches.

And I want you, to the extent you desire, whenever it's appropriate, you go out and just vote.

And I said, that's just exactly the way I feel about it.

We're proud to have you in this rank.

You're there because

Because you have.

Not just because you happen to be in a minority group.

And this proves that there's opportunity in the service.

Opportunity to go to the top.

And we're going to recognize that opportunity.

We're going to encourage it.

We're going to be looking for good folks, good people, who got the base.

And they got it.

They're going to go up.

Well, there's much that can be done in the service.

All the services that you're doing at your job, there's

We can still do a better job in these areas.

We were talking a little earlier about the D.C. National Guard.

And their officer corps is up to about 30% black.

But we still can improve on that.

Well, in D.C., they should.

Yes, that's correct.

They're all looking at the population in D.C. and changing that to... No, it's not improving.

Yeah.

You can't have, but they're up to 30%.

You're gonna have to go on.

They can come, they can come.

And the main thing, too, is to be sure you move them up.

Of course, if your fellow's well known, be sure you move them up.

And the fellow is the best qualified guy that you can because he's gonna hack it when he gets up there.

He's gonna have respect for those fellows.

I had, for example, one of my military agents, Colonel Coffey, who is the,

He's a colonel.

He's a lieutenant colonel.

He's an outlaw.

He's a remarkable, remarkable fellow.

And he's in that rank.

There's no question.

He's over there because he's just the best man in the job.

And that's the way we like to feel about this.

I want all of you to feel the depth of this.

Let's get that spirit out.

It's a little hard.

There's always this constant tendency to make it appear, well, this is a racist country, this is a racist service, and you can't get a chance, but, and you're gonna be discriminated against, and so forth.

And on the other side, let's face it, there is prejudice in this country.

There is, there, there, there.

We have to recognize there always will be.

We're just gonna call it as much as we can, but on the other side, you'll have some who are, who will say, oh,

just because it all happened to be not quite, he gets a better break, and I have another break, and so forth, and so you've got to do that.

But you as the leaders in your certain areas, I mean, we need you as much as anything else just to knock down the myths, just to tell the truth, you know, and present the case as it is, because if that's done, you've helped us a lot in our programs.

I think it's important, you know, Mr. President, that at least my experience has been, and I don't know about the others we've had, but where I've met with groups, I haven't regarded it as an idea going on for long.

You have another person that's been selected as a figurehead.

I think that the realization is that the opportunity is there, and the situation is better than the one.

Yeah, if you ever get into the Uncle Tom classification, then you're dead.

Yes, sir.

The only kids are dead.

That's what we've got to be doing there.

But the main point is, we don't think you think you're being Uncle Tom.

That's the point.

I want you to emphasize.

I think my experience has been a lot the same as his, and I've made several thoughts like that.

For example, I go out with a group of servants.

It's like, you know, that's my grandchild.

Yeah, I think my experience has been about the same thing.

Sure.

There is opportunity at the top, and I think that gets charged.

Right.

And I think that's the way that kids like that talk, too.

So, the law, I guess.

You know, it's not the one thing I want to say, too, is that

Uh, I do not go along with this concern.

I mean, we all know that the volunteer force is quite a way along.

I mean, just speaking among ourselves before, but, uh, now that I'm practical about it, I know it's quite a way along.

But, often, when they talk about this concern about, well, there'd be too many Blacks, and, um, let me say this, that the, that the, uh, that if the opportunity is there, uh, you know, and if it's a, if it's a, if it's a good,

and it's an occupation for all to be in, fine.

I think it's great.

I mean, that's, and the, it's very interesting to know that when you see what has happened to minority groups throughout our history, they have generally moved into areas where others were not.

Take, for example, let's take the city of New York.

Now, there are, of course, a great number of Jewish people in New York, as you know.

But as far as teaching is concerned, it's practically a Jewish profession.

Why?

Because there they found an opportunity, and they moved in where the Catholics and the Gentiles, basically, and the Protestants and so forth were not going in.

And so they got in, and they got to cut in.

So is it in so many other areas.

Take, well, the Irish are an excellent example.

Why is it that the Irish have become and have been so effective and so dominant in city politics?

It isn't because there's so many of them in New York and Chicago and other places where they build it up in this area.

The reason is that it's an area of Boston.

The reason is that it was an area where, based on opportunities,

where the Protestant elite and so forth in those places were not competing effectively, so they moved in and they made it their domain.

And then of course, had you come to that point, and got all the recognition politically, then they move on into business in all other areas.

So here's an opportunity to serve as a teacher.

And here's the way to go.

Well, thank you very much.

I want to get each of you some presidential compliments to take with you.

Yes, sir.

There you are.

Yes, sir.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you for having me.

Are you golfers?

Well, take one.

Thank you.

I'm not dead.

I wasn't out there.

I wasn't gone.

I didn't have a stroke or two, no.

I want you to know that this is a marvelous job.

You know, we, the secretaries of defense, always catch a lot of hell for things that are in the room.

And he has really worked in this field.

With this, we have a strong cooperation with the chiefs.

Oh, the chiefs have been tight.

Right.

Yes, they certainly have.

Well, thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

But we'll also send you copies of the picture.

Are you sure of that?

Mr. President, this is Michael Naranjo and his sister, Ms. Gunner.

How are you, Mrs. Underwood?

How are you?

Very glad to see you and meet you here at the Oval Office in the White House.

Mrs. Underwood's mother.

How do you do, sir?

How do you do, Mr. Underwood?

How are you?

Good to have you here.

That's you, then.

Uh-huh.

It is.

It is you, then.

Yes.

And this is Fred.

Oh, here are the things you don't like to have done.

Oh, yeah.

Strictly by field.

Are you studying how you do that, Mike?

I would imagine somehow you retain certain things that you feel very close to.

Being a dancer is very close to being my people, therefore he stayed well within me.

The feeling was strong and with this feeling somehow I was able to create him.

You did this, you molded it in clay first?

Did you work in clay?

I molded it in wax.

In wax, I see.

Then it was taken to a foundry and casted.

Have you done it before, as a youngster, or did you just take it out?

No, I did a few things prior to... You've been interested in it.

You have an artistic bent, huh?

Yes.

I know that the reason I asked is because I couldn't do it.

It's one of my worst subjects.

I think it's going to be slow going on.

This is true.

I can't believe the record isn't too heavy to lift.

Let's have you come over here.

I'll take pictures.

You might understand what I mean.

You wouldn't.

I think you'd put it in your hand.

I thought you'd give us an idea.

It's impressive.

It's how we made it.

You know, the director, Robert's character, John Thompson, he just had another job.

I didn't see him on that show.

He took me to character.

I bet.

He took me to character.

Oh, I used to do character.

What did you say I heard about John Thompson?

John Thompson.

They're very proud of him.

Good job.

This is done entirely from memory.

Entirely from memory.

Why don't you attend the writing press and come back and have a chat here about this.

This is Mr. Frank Barnier of the Associated Press.

And Mr. Colin Thomas of the United Press.

And why don't you tell us a word by word as to how you did this.

It's something just like you told us, so it doesn't really matter.

Go ahead.

Something you feel very strong.

The dancer, the dancer who presents, he gave me a very strong...

He described it.

How he did it.

Very high.

Something you feel, go ahead.

Feeling this inside you for your people, the whole meaning of the dance, it comes out within you.

You sit there and you work and you get such a very strong feeling for it that you don't stop for anything.

It's just overwhelming.

And I don't know how it comes out, but it's there.

Did you mold this in wax in the first instance?

And over what period of time did you work on it?

I probably thought about it for four months before I started working, and then probably two weeks of constant work on it, anywhere to 15 hours a day, all hours of the day, working constantly.

Have you seen the dance?

Yes, I have the form.

Yes, I do.

Yes.

Is it on a reservation?

It's a beautiful work.

It really is a marvelous field work.

You can see I hold it up to take away 35 pounds.

I know nothing about art, but you can feel that as he describes it, can't you?

What did you tell him, Mr. President?

Well, I heard he said something about a hundred thousand.

He has done so much for this country on his service.

He's made such a great sacrifice.

And for him to create this work of art, and my view, not being an expert, but a beautiful work of art, coming as it does from his heart, about his people, and of course, our first people, is sort of...

And he also demonstrates again that someone who may have had a misfortune, a handicap, doesn't give up.

It doesn't matter that that may lead him to create something he might never have created before.

Otherwise, he's demonstrated again the earnest

strength of the character of an individual has and that he has to rather than just sit

to work to create something of beauty.

So it's a fine example for all of us.

We all believe in ourselves.

Think what you did.

So we thank you.

You helped our day very much.

And I just wish you very, very good years ahead.

You're continuing this work, are you not?

Yes, sir.

Mr. Berman, he had a whole display of his works in the library of the Central Office.

Interestingly, he's moving some of his activities into biblical figures and Greek mythology, as well as the Indian background.

Let me show you something that might be of interest only from a historical standpoint.

Here's a figure that came from Paris.

It's the second century AD.

If you feel a profile, you'll note it has a very interesting characteristic.

It was a Greek place.

And what happened, what happened is, is that I understand that the person, and this is also true, I had over in my office a Greek Buddha, they call him a Greek Buddha, the king of Afghanistan, from the same area, in the 3rd century AD.

And he explained to me that the reason the Buddha's in that part of the world, the Asians,

where greed wasn't, it's, it's like the greed culture has spun it out of that part of the world and stopped there.

And so, go ahead and figure out, then, you get a greed thing in Pakistan.

You see, you see the, the, and also the, you know, given the, the cheap bombs.

Now we'd like to give you a few mementos here.

We have a couple of them.

Here's a money clip with the presidential seal on it.

I mean, you can put money on it if you want to.

And here's the presidential couplet.

Do you want to feel it?

Do you feel what it is?

That's the seal of the United States.

Now, that same seal is in the ceiling of this room.

And on the floor, the rug, to get out of it, what you have on the floor here, you can feel the stars right here.

Feel the stars.

And move it, move it this way.

See, it goes fair around.

Now come over here, you can feel the eagle.

Now move, now move over here.

See?

And on the other side, the palm.

That's all woven into the rug.

Now, get over here to the palm.

Now, all of that is in this couplet.

So, these couplets are in your money clip.

And we have one of these over there that's for you, Clarence.

And they would be both for you.

And we also have a couplet for you, Sandy.

We wish you the best, and we're very, we can be very proud of your heritage.

I mean, of your people.

My coach in school was a lost woman.

They called him Gene, the marvelous man.

Played at the University of Southern California.

One of their great stars back in 1923.

30 to 34.

Strong man.

Still is.

We'll say goodbye and hope you enjoy your stay here.

Thank you very much.

And now, we want you to work time to it.

That was what you got.

For all I think that in this country, anybody that's entitled to something, you should have it.

Thank you.

Now we hope it's you as well.

Bye.

Goodbye.

Thank you.

You're going to be the guide, aren't you?

Pretty good.

The guide.

Oh.

Were you out there?

No, sir.

Great.

This is a very moving thing.

Thanks.

Oh, God.

Oh, that's one of the most beautiful faces I've ever seen.

He's got his hands.

He's got a gut like this, hasn't he?

He has a sense of humor.

In many graves, on a horse, you can feel the backbone.

So, he traded our .

One thing you might do is to tell Helen Thomas or somebody, I was so impressed with the beauty of this space and the sensitivity of these hands.

Yeah.

Okay.

Very proud to have you with us.

All right, I'd like to do that in front of the house now, of course.

Sure.

Oh, there we go.

I know.

Mrs. Merritt is in the cabin.

Oh, yeah.

If you'd like to give Mrs. Merritt one of those contacts.

I think she's the one with you.

Yes, no, Marquis.

shots and both heard that whole damn thing on the radio.

They thought it was great.

They said, you came over here to read these.

Good, quite good, good.

They probably did.

For our people, for an intelligent guy who's looking to get the story across and all that, not looking at it in terms of its impact on the slot,

And, you know, that's sort of Marion's kind of people, the people who are asking those questions.

He'd feel right at home sitting in the Detroit Economic Club.

Was he here, too?

Did he come in the morning?

That's pretty good.

Yeah, I've got the, I still don't have the people reports that show any kind of, well, that's, I have a large number of people reports.

The new stuff was very big.

We ran 10 minutes on one.

Sure, I checked it out.

Yes, the chart station, they concluded with interviews from people in the audience who were very favorable, highlighted by Lynn Townsend, and thought that

You're strong and excellent at it.

A loss, that's for damn sure.

You gotta stay down.

It was just a hell of a lot of work.

That is the only thing I bitchin' about.

It's all right, Chief.

I'll be down in a minute.

Down in a minute.

Do you want any further input from Pat?

Yeah, I just tell him I don't want him rewriting anything he's done, but just say, based on that, what would he expect to be?

Just briefly, questions that might be asked.

Just give me a few brief pages.

I'm not as into as the inevitable

The police will always have a comparing with another.

So we do a pretty big audience in Detroit, but we compare with getting 50 million in prime time.

And we compare press comments in prime time or interviews and so forth with sophisticated, good questions, tough or not, as you want, with a group of people that ask dull questions.

I've often said, and I've never done that, but I've often said that the way these trusts matter, they really want to come and get action.

The way they really get action is to ask no questions.

They don't know what to do.

It's hard for me to get at you, but it also hurts them.

That's how embarrassing it is.

I'm afraid to not tell you what I'm going to do.

Hold on.

Well, Walker's sister says the performance was exceptional in every way.

It marks a high point in the President's contact with the nation.

Putting him in a clear position of believing in the free enterprise system showed his desire to return the nation totally to that system of proper safeguards as soon as possible.

Union reaction will be favorable.

It would be most helpful if a similar format were done elsewhere in the nation.

whereby the President speaks extemporaneously on the vital issues.

It was all just wonderful.

This was the way we wanted it, and it was the way it turned out.

It was particularly important that it be done in Michigan.

There is no better platform for such a topic than the Economic Club, and the President added to it, saying, the appearance demonstrated that the nation is incapable of hands.

Sweeney, the President, said the positive response to Detroit is overwhelming.

The publicity is playing down the protests, and there's positive on substance as well as performance.

The format helped a great deal.

There should be much change just because of the way it was done.

Steel Man on the panel just loved it.

I knew he did.

Milliken was unusually pleased.

He characterized the event as a tremendous performance and commented he thought the president both enhanced acceptance of his economic policies and improved himself politically.

On the way out of the hall, the comments directed to the governor concerning the president were uniformly favorable.

Senator Griffin's staff say the event was very well received, posing a significant boost to the senator, and he was very grateful, which is good.

The papers haven't had time to report it fully yet.

Detroit Free Press, out of state edition, carried a headline, No Timeline on Contracts, Nixon Tells Detroit Crime.

Front page picture, Nixon, Pat, and Air Force.

All this in commentary, very good.

Attorney General, please.

Sister's quite a guy.

Yeah, he is.

He's so, you know, he must be satisfied.

I heard, when did we get there before?

58?

56?

You know, I was in this room.

You said that they gave me a badge.

Yeah, they did.

All of our prices.

I must have said that.

It was like a fall off.

I didn't say that.

I said, sir, that... Yeah.

Yeah.

John, I don't know, are you, I was thinking I might step out for two, three hours this afternoon.

Are you free by any chance?

Could you please call?

What time?

Well, now, I think maybe we could ask her a little bit about that office.

Is that what it is?

I'll tell you, I'll get a hold of John.

Could you do it tomorrow?

Bye.

All right.

Well, I'll tell you frankly, everybody knows I've got to talk to you about this traditional thing.

We'll just have to put that off.

Okay.

Shall we?

I'll tell you what we'll do.

Do you have your sunburned trigger here or where?

Yeah.

You've got clubs, fine.

Well, I think the best thing is for us to go separately then.

Fine.

When could you leave, or when would you like to go?

Fine.

Well, let's see, it's now 1-10, and you could,

Why don't we say that we'll be there at 2.30.

That gives you time, gets you close.

I'm going to dress here, and I'm going to watch you dress up there, and I'll come back.

And we'll be at 2.30, and I'll meet you there.

Please go ahead.

No, you don't.

I think it's her.

She's just sitting there alone.

Uh... Why do you think that I'm here?

I don't know.

It's been a long weekend, man.

I'm not moving out of town.

I'm just a dirt man.

I promise I'm gonna be a long, stuffy day.

I think it's good to go back.

It works hard.

It's way farther that way.

I guess that's probably what we better guard against, too, because as we go on, you know, what the time is, we just can't expect that everything we do is going to be, is to reach optimum.

So I suppose we've got to do some things that sort of crack me.

Well, that didn't crack me all this time.

And this wasn't.

We've still got to work to, you know, optimize this thing and get it as much out of the pilot's head as we can to do it.

We don't have to sell it.

That's what it's like.

Montana is going to be a really lost cause, and just to be a crowd at Kalispell at the airport, and then you get in a goddamn helicopter to go to Libby Dam.

As far as I know now, you can't land even at Libby Dam, so it's just a matter of taking a look at it.

Manchester doesn't have anything to do there.

And what he's like, you know, I think instead of having to come out and spend a long weekend, come out on a Thursday night or Sunday, go around, look at the park, and sort of question how it will go.

That's it.

That's what it is.

And he gets to show you a little of his face and his standing.

It's a big deal.

And it's all right.

He agreed to travel to the airport.

Went to the airport and stopped at the helicopter door on top of it.

And that's about it.

And the son, it's a big thing for him.

He's done it.

And you don't owe him a horrible hug anymore than you owe him.

Except for the fact that in many of his public statements, he's much more muted than he would otherwise be.

You know what I mean?

Well, he's still around at the end of the day.

He said the president's forward policy on balance is a plus.

Well, no.

He pulled it apart.

Yeah, that's what he said.

He said something startles the hell out of us, and then something startles the hell out of his own people.

That's why it's good to keep, yeah, keep them on balance at least.

Well, it'll not be too much of a problem.

Unfortunately, you can...

And if you're through fairly early, you're out of the airport, aren't you?

Airport, and then that's an airport job.

No, no, you're going into this.

You're stuck in town there, but you do the crowd thing at the airport.

The people, part of it.

And I was hoping you could do the whole hotel set up.

There's nothing good there, apparently.

They couldn't.

I will.

It's going to be a very long day.

What are we doing in Alaska?

I mean, bold receptions?

Probably not, because it runs into competition.

If you do the publisher's reception, it will be unannounced in the last minute drop by.

In other words, we've told them no.

They're not expecting you there.

No.

Probably just as well not to.

Well, I think it probably is just as well not to.

Yeah.

But at the last minute, you want to just drop by it without saying anything.

And you can do it.

It's in the same general area as it was placed.

It works that way, but...

I think we'll ask the question...

I suppose maybe the 50-state thing is just sort of a little...

I mean, it's not bad.

We haven't reached too hard for it.

I mean, you had to do so much of it anyway that it was only reaching for a couple.

And doing West Virginia is a good thing to do anyway.

The Queen of the Festival there...

Which explains part of the reason for the pressure to start.

Sorry, I got it.

Stagger's daughter.

Turns out Stagger's the one that's given hell to the negative networks.

Pretty good.

That's right, man.

He's...

I'll get it.

Tying in the bird is... Did you see where that caught?

who was dead and short.

I was thinking, oh yeah, we'd start a network.

God, it does that.

I am inclined to think that was seriously a infectious crime.

Why didn't you search him?

Just completely, because that was a campaign speech.

It went way beyond anything that has any analytical, any other digits in it.

It's more of a personal attack.

It's fine.

It's just that much more ammunition.

I mean, it shows the true colors.

I guess it's hard to use it.

It's not to be used in any speech.

As an example, it's being mindful of the problem.

This also, though, it's not to be used internally in the CBS.

Trying to play what we have close to Colson.

I see.

Hmm.

Thank you.

I'm sure they thought that I sent a note on it because it's just so blatant.

It was a mistake.

I mean, he just, it was just plain stupid for any commentator to go that far on hitting the President of the United States.

It's just, you know, we've made some speech.

Yeah.

It is a speech of me.

Or of him.

Well, we know he's a vicious son of a bitch, you know.

He's been cutting us for a long time and then comes in and coaxes out a man and he denies it.

He may have thought he wouldn't get caught.

But, you know, it was picked up in the wire service story.

It is wrong.

It certainly is wrong as a commentator.

Now, he has a right to abuse, but don't you think that he reaches his position completely by, uh, his position as a commentator.

I mean, let me suggest that Colson should send that to CBS Affiliates around.

He says, uh, this man's supposed to...

I said I didn't have that.

How would that be?

That this was an idea of a man with his hairless arms.

Well, Glennon has, Glennon has got to do that on that, you know that, there you are.

Project Data going on the affiliates.

Is that it?

That's a damaging quote.

That hurt, it seems to me, the more you get that out, the more it hurts the guy.

I mean, he's, he,

We know he's mad.

Well, but he, you know, the thing that I, he could, he could, he could, it was a general play, a general program.

But when he went in to promote him, yeah, it says he has no, you know, what was it, no commitment.

There's two, there's two very bad quotes that he had.

One was, yeah, that you don't, that you don't care about, you don't care about people who are delirious.

But another was that you have no,

I pulled it out of the news story, which had more stuff in it than it had.

It was bad enough.

Part of what I said isn't too bad, but there were two just really juicy, and they were in quotes.