On January 26, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon, White House operator, and Rose Mary Woods met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 7:47 am and 7:52 am. The Oval Office taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 656-005 of the White House Tapes.
Transcript (AI-Generated)This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.
I'm upset this way.
Don't give me eyes that I don't see if you have a seal there.
You probably want to use the seal.
Put them over there.
You got a cover?
I didn't really feel like that.
The wind's coming through.
I'll hang the head and I don't want to try this one.
I don't want to hang this one.
Ja.
Ja.
Ja.
Ja.
Two o'clock on a tree.
I believe that was your plan.
He had a plan, too.
It's fine.
I wrote.
Yeah, how are you?
Fine.
How did the party go last night?
They...
They got good.
That's good.
Well, I thought that would give them a different question.
They didn't have to bitch so much.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Good.
What is the...
It's very important to re-put the troops hard on the reaction stuff, because it's predictable.
The Times says reactions mentioned in quiet stories that no converts were made.
That's all my point is.
My point is, I think we have to really get in line, and people like that, you know, they are really great to help on this sort of thing, and anyone who's required international, and that they should tell the truth, or do you have anything in mind, or do you see the necessity for this, or do you agree with me?
My point is, certainly are we doing things, that's the point that I have.
At the outset, it's pushing the positive side, which is obviously what you want to do.
Most of what we've gotten has been about what we want.
Some of it has been what you'd expect.
I mean, the Santorini opiate types are going to squeal, and you're never going to get enough water for testing that.
I mean, I expect someone else has got to take them on.
And now, what we need, which is what you were talking about last night, that we've got to get...
The attacker types on our side to attack the people who get the points on the other side.
In other words, to attack the devices to make the point that the president called for are going together on this so that we could get something done.
They have attacker devices, but also polishers.
Yes sir, we are here.
You know, and that put it out, so as they were, it's got something to put out.
Yeah, we had a whole batch of, last night, they started with this kind of heat, and it just ran down the list of enormous reactions and so forth from across the country.
Do you understand what I mean?
Sure.
Don't just, you've got to, you've almost got to spoon-peek the cigarette or anything like that, so that he's got...
Thank you for watching!
Because I think a letter is better on both sides.
What time is your meeting?
10.45.
Fine.
As soon as you finish, come back in.
Tell them, are they still there?
Yes.
Are they out?
Yes.
Oh, no, no.
Good.
Okay, we'll be finished.
We've got one, just, just, we're set up, we can really make some hay out of that, that goddamn McGovern thing about the president lying on the, on the... That's one that I'm going to...
I know, I know.
He says you lied that they didn't demand the overthrow of the Chinese government.
He knows that the North Vietnamese did not demand the overthrow of the Chinese government.
They only asked that we withdraw our support, withhold our support.
What did you say?
He's got overthrow in the...
We can document it.
They make two depositions for us.
One withdraws for it, which in the end has a valuable consequence of all the drugs.
But they went beyond that and specifically asked us to replace it.
We have it.
That's it.
We have it.
We've documented it without any question.
And if you press us too hard, we'll release it.
I just say it.
Why don't you say it?
The North being the Medes, deny this.
We'll release it.
Put it that way.
I say it.
So, I mean, that's the point you get off.
Europe, I want to say, would you have heard that?
Yeah, that's right.
I think so, that's right.
And there he is.
He was there this morning.
He said he was going back.
Well, it was a great hour, John.
We loved the old man.
So we're glad to have you here.
Right.
Well, well, well.
Well, you're here.
You're always with us, and I do appreciate it, Paul.
We can pick up some of the stuff like this, and make some mileage out of it.
It's no matter debating, it's a matter of naming these people for lying.
I agree.
I agree.
Well, we got it.
You know, one thing I heard, he was in much better shape than I was.
It was great for you to have him up there last night.
I'll make a call to him, I'm sure Dan writes.
But we got it.
See, I didn't want to talk to you about it before the speech, but we got the impression that he had us just...
Several of us were really concerned after the staff briefing because he had his lousy job.
Kissinger is worse.
He came in.
He sounded depressed.
I knew he was.
He sounded depressed.
And he...
One through this recital of how the peace talk, how his efforts at secret diplomacy had failed.
That's what it was.
Well, I don't know.
Well, well, have you, will you please go back and read his first draft?
Okay.
I've never seen it.
Get the first draft.
I've got it.
I've got it.
I've got it.
I've got it.
I've got it.
Well, listen, it was really scary, because you got the impression, I must say, that what you were going to do was go on TV and announce that, ladies and gentlemen, sorry to say that, but really what had happened was, well, we turned that around, that's what we were saying, you know, he got mad, because they started asking questions.
Because he shocked these people.
And they were, you know, these are good, this is our way of getting people on the bench.
And, you know, we're looking at them.
He says these people don't give a damn about the substance, they only care about the power.
And I said, Henry, if somebody doesn't care about the politics or any substance, you might as well realize that now.
But then, according to Scala, by the time he got to the press briefings, he was just totally different here.
And he did a good job with the state defense people.
making sure that we have them on the track.
And so it is.
What are we going to do?
If that hand was wrong, he should have announced it too, offered to resign first, and then come up with the peace proposal, so that you got the much better Mrs. Patti, that PR plan.
He said that?
Yeah.
Put Henry there?
Yeah.
He should have announced, well, what do you mean?
Had he read the speech?
No.
But his point was, you had a great news story in the two-step-down, and that he should have used that.
And then a couple of days later, he should have gone off.
Let two Anansis step down, and a couple of days later, he's proposed.
I mean, is that just people?
Two Anansis?
Of course not.
But the point is that even if he would have, it would not have been wise.
He's always nitpicking everything we do.
Well, plus, he's a dead ball.
I'm sure you're right.
I mean, if he came out, I'm not sick of it.
He did this as a budget reason.
As a budget reason, he did it again this morning.
He just is a current adventure.
Well, the problem is the contracts that is terrible to keep comparing people.
Contracts have been coming.
Coming if you ask you.
How should we do this?
He'll tell you.
If he thinks you're doing something wrong, he'll say, I think it would be better to do two first, and start on that.
But when there's a confronted decision, he never says it.
He only looks for it.
He never goes and appreciates that it's something wrong.
I was just sitting here about all day.
Hasn't it really pissed you off today?
Oh, you're so goddamn negative these days.
Get one.
Got one.
God, but he hadn't heard the speech from the listeners.
The other point was, though, that, you know, you were there for the budget meeting, weren't you?
Remember the same thing?
And, Jesus, he's a nice guy.
I remember when I used to sit in that chair for a year, you remember, I'd sit there and swallow it, but I was always trying to buck up for us, and all that, and you did the rest of it.
God, that's the quietest thing.
Always have to raise the news.
He, he, he sounds as if he's on the other side.
But it wasn't Goldwater's.
Ha!
God, he's refreshing.
Now that's stuff about sticking something up down there, throw it down there, throw it and put it up the other way until it meets.
Ha!
That's what it is.
Probably many things.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It is.
Goddamn, I just heard a blast.
I must say, you just got me down, that's all.
You shouldn't do it in front of other people.
Is there anything more?
I've got another 15 minutes.
Should we get Colson in now again, or is he off?
Don't need to.
It's probably kind of productive.
Frank's done a hell of a lot of stuff.
I'm sure he's talked to other people.
He's got Stanley going.
Stanley's all fired up.
He's got Sapphire working on some backup stuff.
Now let's get out of here.
They might not say it.
I mean, when I said it, I said it.
Of course, most of the leaders are all good.
And to put a goddamn damper on me?
Shit, I thought they should have had that.
They should have been up there saying, God damn it, we're all for it, and this and that.
Shit, I mean.
Part of the problem is he wouldn't have been so good at it.
Do you know about it?
Well, he knows he is going to be consulted.
I encourage him to do it.
I think he ought to be here soon.
But that... Well, maybe he didn't sign the contract.
Well, you know, that's true shit, though.
You turn Henry around.
You know what happens?
You turn him around by being pretty rude.
It'd be like sometimes he means a little bit.
But you've got to do it carefully.
The question, see, those guys are just straightforward, honest people, and that drives Henry mad.
He thinks, he says, that is not a loyal group.
You know, they are not supportive.
And I say, God damn it.
You know, he's like, yeah, I spent an hour with them afterwards, and they're trying to patch him back together.
You know,
And I think he would rather have concluded the thing with a big
He knows that negotiations fail.
He's taken these problems.
If you remember, every time he came back and says, we've made progress, he was tired, it looks better.
And the people was better, and they were nicer.
But this time, he really got them going.
And I think we're going to get it.
Remember, he'd say there's a 25% chance.
Now there's a 50-50 chance that he'd find people to blame all the way along.
Rockets, and they know they're not good.
Of course, I was always the pessimist.
And he tried to say, well, hey, leave them up to this and the reason.
My mom really looked at it, and so forth, thinks there's been a change, and so forth.
And there never was, you see, because Henry, the heir of Henry, was doing wishful thinking.
But the other side of it was, which he always said, even if it doesn't work, we're making a record.
And he made a hell of a record.
He didn't have to pay it off, and that's a record that's worth one.
And that's why I think he feels up today, because he realized it did pay off.
He was still up, not saying anything, after she had been up there in the center for a while.
He says, this is writing so well that I don't think I should do my press conference tomorrow.
You know, I was hoping it would just get in the way of Ron talking about it.
I'm sure it should.
I've wondered about it too, but I think he should.
I think there's...
The point is, we can't just ride on the headlines.
We're dealing with a bunch of dumb people.
So we've got to have this explained to them over and over.
And it pays off.
Now, Martin Kalb did a hell of a job for us last night.
I hate to admit it, because I hate to admit it.
Because Henry Green did it because Scali spent 15 minutes with him after the briefing.
Going back over, simplifying the points.
See, Henry thinks Martin counts a great intellectual.
Scali knows that Martin counts a great intellectual, and that you've got to boil it down.
See, Henry doesn't like that.
Scali boils it and simplifies it, and he says, you know, Scali, you know, Scali's a great intellectual.
Well, Henry does like it when I take this.
Well, no, he can't complain about it when I take the stage, because he knows I have to deliver it.
But I know that he was horrified at my first draft.
You know, he thought that, well, maybe it was a little better, but we kept working and working and working, and I kept cutting and cutting and cutting.
I know that, for that Bill Sapphart, who was a soldier,
But now, for instance, Cal is a guy now, he's committed, in a sense.
To our root, at least for the moment.
And I think Scali should move in now, as he intends to, and just play the hell out of Cali.
Rather than admit it the other way, rather than start to piss on it.
Okay, that's good.
You know why?
I think it will affect you.
I think it will affect you, you know.
That you, I recall that you said, I think you owe President Nixon an apology, you know, for on this thing.
Something like that.
Why don't you come on?
He was squealing last night.
He kept trying to turn it.
It was really kind of funny.
Because he said, well, this makes it absolutely clear now that we won't have all the troops out of Vietnam before the election.
Cal said, no, it doesn't at all.
I said, we would.
I said, we'll go either way.
But he was, they were talking about the time sequence that Segurado was saying, well, it would be, you know, they'll have to discuss it for a few weeks, perhaps maybe a few months, and then they'll move to the sixth month.
And he would have rather added those up and immediately came out with what would be done by November.
He kept trying to put it in the election context.
The others will make the point that this is related to the election.
We wouldn't have our troops up in November if we hadn't agreed on a ceasefire.
We'd have appealed about this back, so it wouldn't have been great.
We would have held care to leave at 25,000.
You'd have most of them out, and you'd be on a course of... Oh, we'd have peace about peace, and see what we shoot at the end.
Did you see Star?
Shit, I got them out of Korea.
And it's... 20 years later.
That's good, then.
But that, we can work that kind of thing.
We've got...
Now, for instance, Brad Morris has got a letter, maybe Chuck told you, from a posse saying, if Nixon did this, this, and this, then I would not run.
Well, you've done it.
Now Brad Morris is going to call it and withdraw from the race, as he said he would.
And the thoughts we're getting all the way through is just,
The shoring up of credibility.
I wasn't sure whether this would go one way or it could have bounced either way.
Remember ours?
Yeah.
And it could have.
It could have bounced the other way of credibility, but it hurt the credibility because you've been doing something behind the secret, behind your back, behind the people's back.
McCloskey's playing that out, though, that he isn't going to get anything out of it because all the others are going just the other way.
And the whole thing, McCloskey said, why do we go behind the people's back?
Yeah.
It was...
More to see, you know, something.
Well, now let's be sure that we get off the ground.
We've got to, that's right.
We're calling in on that.
The right is apparently solidly with you.
Which also surprises me, because your clothes, I think, helped a lot there.
The United States will never do that.
So, I thought we might have to get the right turn off again.
It sure as hell has gotten the attention taken away from the button.
I think we were very lucky that it was this week instead of last week.
Probably.
Because now it can ride.
And at the point we were just talking about, I think we've really got to work on it.
It's not just, we've got to get the instant reaction set.
We've got to not do that at the expense of the people.
Because...
We're going to have to keep this thing going for a while.
Well, they'll be here in a couple of years.
But that's when we've got to keep it going all the way.
At least that was our plan yesterday.
I assume you don't intend to back off of it.
No, sir.
That was the point we were making.
Keep America united.
I thought that was the leaders today.
United America.
Of course, it's our first reaction.
You know, it's quite a bit interesting that the...
So many people currently like the delivery of the speech.
Just another off thing.
You know what?
We haven't done one in a while.
We had two economic ones, and that doesn't have any.
But you know, the Vietnam speech is all we have.
It was delivery together with the speech.
I think a lot of you got the impression that you covered, which was true of course, a very complex thing, and yet came through with it.
You understood afterwards what you'd done.
I don't think anybody can go back and recite it.
I don't think they know step by step, but they understand the process.
They understand the sequence that developed here.
All came through very clearly.
And it is good to look at.
That style, for that kind of speech, is very good.
When you sit in the chair, you read the speech, you hold it there, you don't pretend, you don't screw around with the teleprompters and all that stuff.
And I just think you're absolutely right on that.
And you look up an awful lot.
It's like the speech I've had.
You read it, but you're looking into the camera a good deal of the time.
Oh, it's in that way.
I wonder maybe if we might just sign the economic report today, and then it will look better tomorrow.
And I don't think it's a story that you're creating, but I mean, I mean, we don't really need a story tomorrow.
I'm just thinking that we might have tomorrow off, you know, like Tuesday off.
I'm going to start reading.
We're not doing anything on the schedule tomorrow, I think, or maybe there's some bad scanning, maybe.
We'll look into it in Google.
Scanning.
What party?
Friday, you know.
Friday night, okay.
Uh, there's not a reason to have it the way we want it.
The reason I say that we give it to the Congress today may be my story.
You see, I don't intend to have a press picture anyway.
I think it makes the difference.
We're going to announce stands and things tomorrow.
Oh, Christ, I need to be here to do that.
Do you want to go out and eat or something?
I don't know.
I don't know.
Oh, I guess I'll be here.
What do you want to do?
Go on up to Camp David or something?
Yeah, I'll take you to Camp David.
I'll help.
Oh, why not?
Oh, I don't understand.
Oh, yeah.
I know.
The economic report I can sign today, I need to look at the picture of tomorrow.
I'm just saying.
Yeah.
Scan up the ship.
Do the economic report after the quarter end meeting today.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm sorry about the time on that, but that was my question.
I was curious too, John Connolly, he couldn't do it.
I just thought you... We only did it for John.
He has to leave at 3.30 or so.
You know, I mean...
You know what I mean?
That's the big deal.
That's no surprise.
The story's out, and so it isn't any big bombshell announcement.
I mean, the point is that you can't do it twice.
Oh, God.
You wouldn't swear it out.
That's the story.
Well, we've done most of it twice.
You know, you trot butts out, and then you swear it in.
Oh, that was...
Actually, you could run through a...
Some morning stuff, and then going up to Camp David at noon and come back.
Time for a parcel on Friday if you wanted to.
Yeah, because you've got that dinner.
It's not the dinner.
The Wallace.
The Wallace.
It's probably not dinner.
But you're clear Saturday and Sunday.
You can go on Saturday morning.
Yeah, we can go to Camp David if I wanted to prepare.
We stacked it all in the morning together anyway, because I've been trying to get some clear time for you for China stuff.
And I think we ought to...
Yeah, we ought to start, because we've made the point of your great preparation for these trips, and that you're not going into China on, you know, your eyes closed and all that, and we know, I mean, you've done the preparation work, but I think we ought to start saying you're doing it now.
We ought to have the stacks of briefing books and all that sort of stuff, and preparations for the discussions, because...
I think we probably, for appearances sake, there ought to be a couple of sessions with you and Rogers and Henry.
Where, I'm not sure if we put out the...
I think Bill would like to do this now.
Bill, you have the zone here on the spot.
Henry was coming back again before his press briefing.
I don't know where he is.
He's gone.
It's all right.
Anyway, I think we ought to start building that.
We'll say that in the spare time that there is, we ought to start pumping down as being China time.
If you don't think that's what it's like to do my purposes on that.
Well, I could go up to my office tomorrow and say I'm going out to do some reading, prepare for my camp.
You could do that.
If I go to camp, it'll be interruptions.
If I go 30th Avenue, I could say I'm going out to do some reading, time away from here to do some preparation.
And I'll be back the next day.
I got on top of this counter-attack that decided to kick my arm in the ass.
I had to, I mean, I had to kick a Klossy in the ass.
It was really tough.
I tried to get the leaders off.
I was getting them to kick my arm in the ass.
It was a, it really, you know, I didn't practice back then.
We really put it to a market, not the goddamn war, great crowd, goddamn park.
And I think we've got a better, certainly a better initial bounce from the media than we thought.
And we figured they'd launch back.
And I think they will.
They have, yeah.
Mr. President, I heard he's about to start his briefing now.
It's at 3.30.
It figures it will be over about 11.30.
Unless he has a guy he should get, he'd like to see him for a moment.
Ja, det er fint.
We're going to be up to our ass in domestic messages.
Yeah, but I mean, it seems to me that's going to make the public news of your interest in domestic affairs.
I don't believe that...
I don't know.
I know that John currently disagrees with me.
My going out and babbling on the television every time I send a message is a good thing, but I'm just bored as hell.
I just don't want to do it.
No, we should let him write just down there.
I'm going to sign that.
I really think so.
Now, you always say, what about the environment message?
What about the drug message?
What about this and that?
Let me find another way.
I think sending a message is not a good way to get a message across.
I really don't think it's a good way.
The only thing, the only thing there, I think we ought to take a stab at a few, are, are, not just on the, uh,
Areas like drugs, stuff, you know, some things where we can make some.
Incidentally, Mindor wants to see you after the meeting with the Prime Minister.
He is so sure of what's the policy about, you know.
Review your discussions with the Prime Minister.
Review them?
For Christ's sakes, is he still the ambassador?
Yeah.
You know, he's returning to his post.
He's here for the meetings.
Never here for the visit.
And, uh, I don't want to get any of your views on the U.S.-European relations.
I really can't even look at France.
You haven't seen it for a long time.
Now, who's recommending that?
Henry?
No.
Well, Rogers is recommending Henry's concurring home.
Of course I haven't seen him for a long time, but... Oh, shit.
I don't think he has a bore.
I mean, he's a nice guy.
He's got that.
We gave you that on the pastor's shift.
Yeah.
And I thought I held it on the pastor's shift.
I thought you said he stood in on the meeting.
Right?
I don't think so, no.
He is who stood in on the meeting.
I didn't do that.
You don't have... Well, he stood in on the meeting.
The pastor's sitting...
Well, God damn it, he can sit in on the meeting.
This is just a courtesy call.
That's the way to be handled.
A privately general meeting will sit in on this too.
Can't we have him?
He's going to the State Department for lunch today.
Bill will give enough stuff on that.
I think you can just leave it at that.
Why don't you sit in on the meeting?
All right.
Put him to the line.
When doors matter, I just like to have him sit in the meeting.
Get him.
Hey.
Hey.
Hey.
Hey.
He'd love to have Bettendorf sit in with this prime minister for any reason he can.
Otherwise, I've got at least a half hour talking to him afterwards.
I mean, is there any reason?
Yeah, you know what I mean?
This guy really shouldn't be sitting even, except he's a Dutchman.
But Jesus Christ, I mean, it's a pure social call, you know, to crap around about some of the stuff and that, but goddamnit, our ambassador sits in.
This is the kind of private talk I usually have.
The ambassador sits in, and then I tell him, I'm sorry, but I'm tied up right afterwards, see?
You see, because they had him on now for a half-hour meeting after the prime minister, and I just don't know how much time has been on hold.
Yeah, so, okay.
What they're trying to do, what they're used to doing with all these things, is a private agenda.
Well, God damn it, this thing, uh,
I thought he was coming back in.
Well, he doesn't need that.
Well, you're going in now for your briefing.
Right, I have to review a few... Good, good.
I have to say, I just want to say that I think the lines are taken fine.
I think that Bob says that they raised this government point that you can read it.
This is what I'm now going through.
I just don't want them to have...
They've never used a good overthrow.
They said change, but you know, you've got to change the government.
Then I say, how are we going to do that?
They said, that's your problem.
You put them in, you know how to get rid of them.
Sure.
They said you know how to get rid of them?
Yeah, you know how to replace them.
Well, that's what we're doing.
And they said, if you make a secret deal with us to get, to replace you... That's over the German government?
Of course.
Then everything else will follow easily.
What do you think are the possibilities of the North Vietnamese?
Well, the North Vietnamese reaction has been very interesting.
How do they respond on this point of order?
I don't think they're going to say that they're not the over the German government.
Do you?
Yes.
So if they hoist you, they won't dare.
If they threat us too hard, we'll just publish the transcript.
I mean, on this one, we're on absolutely safe ground.
Whatever, is there any other points you have in mind?
Well, I was going to...
I bet you want to emphasize, because you're, you know, you're hot property to these damn clowns.
Well, I was going to review how we got to where we are, what the proposals in gross terms were.
Then, first of all, this is our proposal.
This is how we got there.
On May 31st we did this, on August 16th we did that.
Each one of them met their demands.
So now, just so that we narrow the debate, we're down to only two issues.
Withdrawal,
And government.
That's to get the ceasefire one out of the way.
Because I say the ceasefire isn't the issue.
They've agreed to that.
They've agreed to it, or they haven't raised that as an issue?
No, they've agreed in the eight-point plan that's agreed to.
Those are the only two unresolved issues.
So the ceasefire part is just out of the way, and then I'll say now, what is new in our proposal?
We've given up on the proposition of mutual withdrawal, people willing to set a deadline, unilaterally for our withdrawal.
We've agreed to total withdrawal, and then I'll go through this.
Then I'll say,
The only two, but what they want is not a, they don't want a negotiation.
They want a surrender.
They want us to set a deadline that runs irrespective of what else happens, regardless of prisoners, or anything else.
And they want us to overthrow the government and replace it with one of their choosing, regardless of the wishes of the South Vietnamese people.
Those are the two big issues.
And that we cannot get over.
And that we cannot get over.
It occurs to me that I was saying, Bob, before you got into the room today, and there was
Just for God's sake.
Son of a bitch.
The fact was that he hadn't read the speech.
He said, well, I didn't, I know you were there, and he said, well, why didn't we offer?
I mean, he says, it wasn't clear.
He had offered a military thing.
I said, we had offered to separate the military from the military, we turned that down.
He said, well, that wasn't clear from the offer.
Well, goddammit, clear?
It was the clearest English I've ever written in my life.
Mr. President, well, I turned to Harlow, and I said, can't you get into his head that he's on the president's side, and that he can fly back here in the middle of a meeting?
He was totally wrong to begin with.
But secondly, at a meeting where he is with the president and congressional leaders, he should support you.
If he has any questions,
Let him come to your office afterwards and say, Mr. President, I have serious reservations about this.
But in front of...
I beg your pardon?
He should come to you and say that.
Or say it to me.
But it's a great mistake for him to, in front of congressional leaders, to give them...
Well, and then congressional leaders will wonder what the hell is going on, and it is even a question if the vice president...
The poor vice president is supposed to be smart as hell.
I mean, he misses the point, Dr. Frank Six.
Nobody can miss the point on that.
I said, period.
They make the choices for them.
We will either negotiate six-month withdrawal and return proceeds for our $50,000, or we will do the other.
The choice is theirs.
He spelled it out.
But the funny thing is...
Bob, don't you remember?
At the meeting yesterday afternoon, he took exactly the opposite task.
The meeting yesterday afternoon, he opposed the proposal of ceasefire and withdrawal.
I can't understand why you stick to ceasefire.
It doesn't mean...
That's right.
Why don't we stick it in and just hold it?
Well, no, he said they can, as soon as we are out, they're going to break the ceasefire.
Of course, but what the hell?
As long as we're pulling out, would we want our tail shot out?
That's a lie.
Well, no, because they've offered us a ceasefire.
But the hell of it is, we can.
It would be a really total abdication if we protect ourselves.
And they can throw all their forces against the South Vietnamese while we are still in the country.
This is just a way of handing over the country.
I say it's no problem.
They've agreed to the formulation we've got in there.
It's from their draft.
And then you can say, well, then they'll come down to a critical point, and why don't you just offer withdrawal for the prisoners?
I said we've offered, first of all, I'll say... Because obviously a ceasefire is to our advantage, and they've agreed to it, so why should we offer something less than that?
And I'll also say, gentlemen, they have turned that one down so often, that when I went in there on May 31st, offering the president's plan of withdrawal for ceasefire, and prisoners, they didn't say, this is fine except for a ceasefire.
They were saying, we won't discuss this at all.
It's got to have a political proposal.
And since then, they, but we cannot, Mr. President, I have to say, we cannot in honor just sell it out.
I think we all suffer from it.
That's my point, we can't.
I'm just trying to get the goddamn tough arguments to throw through.
If you have a ceasefire, it shows actually how weak they are, because if they were strong, they'd accept it.
They'd save withdrawal for prisoners.
Because they should be able to overthrow Laos and Cambodia easily without a ceasefire.
And then they could turn it all against South Vietnam, but they're not confident enough of themselves.
They want us to overthrow South Vietnam.
The reason they don't want to cease fire is that they don't want... No, I mean the reason they would want to cease fire...
I want to go over something.
The reason they want to cease fire is that they want to stop our bombing.
What?
Well, but that they could get with the ceasefire.
No, the reason they don't want the ceasefire... No, no, they want it now.
You see, you were saying they agree.
No, no, they agree that it is part of an overall settlement.
I see.
The reason they don't accept it, the reason they don't accept it... We are willing to separate.
We are not the ones who are there.
We'll separate the issues, or we'll do it in a package, or we'll face it.
The reason, Mr. President, they don't accept it...
who won't accept even withdrawals for prisoners, is because what they want, above all, is for us to stop military and economic aid, to tube them.
That's why I came to the leader and said, after you, they give you an amendment.
Oh, that's a very strong truth, that the Mansfield Amendment, of course, after you give that, so you withdraw regardless of what they do.
Then I was talking about prisoners, and I said, well, we won't give you the prisoners until you
But they are not, if they were confident, they would do withdrawal for prisoners.
They feel that as long as there's military re-pneumatization, they're not going to make it.
That's their problem.
That's their big problem.
Well, anyway, you should feel very good, Henry.
You really learned this thing.
You should feel very good.
And Roger, but I just say, Bob, Agnew just drove me up the wall.
Roger stood up for Trump defending him.
I called Bob and I said, God damn it, Agnew has just got to be shit.
No, but Agnew really was, it wasn't right.
Yeah, but we just had this all the time from him, though.
But you were, I've never known a vice president.
Me?
I used to sit there and defend Eisenhower.
I knew he was wrong.
That's why I had to.
He's the president.
I'm on the team.
You know, it's like the poor guy.
Play is no good at all.
You're going to get clobbered by the defensive left end.
But what do you do?
Run the other way?
Hell no.
You try to knock out the defensive left end and you get clobbered.
In any event, the vice president shouldn't sit there as if he were just one other participant.
He gave you a harder time than the Congress.
The Congress is fine.
They didn't know anything.
You, Scott, I have to say I met with you and Jerry and Ziegler's office and
He might do the one thing that you should make this, to the extent that it does come up, because Sigler just has kinds of difficulties to say this, but you say there's overwhelming support for the proposal cycles.
Can you say that?
If half an opportunity presents itself.
Oh, there really is.
Is it for Sigler and Duran?
We just said, good luck.
Don't, don't, don't, don't feel, don't feel for one moment.
You have to be there at 10.45.
I know it is, but what I mean is, take time to prepare.
Just go in there.
We'll lay it out and be sure that it isn't too complicated for these unskepticals.
I've got a good presentation.
I know.
You have a good presentation.
You were excellent this morning, but what I had is we'll give it to them the same way.
You even had to call Bill all right.
Yes, I have.
He sent me a letter congratulating him.
Of course, I thought he was trying.
He was pretty good.
As long as I tackle that interview in front of the same people.
I still have a promise in Germany.
I may consider it very favorably in my house.
You all need advice.
I have it.
I have it within two or three weeks after we come.
That's right.
That's right.
Keep your hand on it.
Keep your hand on it.
I haven't promised it, but I have said it.
I'm sorry.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Everybody's out there.
You can't get back to a single one.
But don't rush out there until you're ready.
I'll call Ziggler to hold them.
Ziggler should be ready.
Go ahead and go.
Screw them.
They've got plenty of time to write.
They already have.
We can go at 11.15.
If he'll say anything, I'll go to the president.
You said the wire thing has the God bless you kind of thing.
Yeah, that's interesting.
You know, we get those on this kind of thing.
You can tell when there's an emotional issue, but it's thanks for a proposal to end the war.
People will back you, God bless you, from a judge in Winston-Salem.
You were excellent, God bless you, from a guy in Maryland, an admiral in Maryland.
Hardly endorsed these proposals.
We support your policies all the way.
Continue the good work.
Profound thanks for your untiring effort.
Our whole heart is in support of your continued determination to end the war with honor and courage.
Philadelphia.
Behind you all the way.
Connecticut.
Congratulations on the fine speech.
I think you're a very brave and courageous president.
Skarsten.
Wilma.
Thank you, sir, for being our president, and God bless you from a woman in Texas.
We support you for your peace plan 100%, and we are Americans.
We bring the church of the North Vietnam, reprehensible to us as U.S. American citizens.
A couple of American cities are more desperate needs and adverse.
Thanks for your courageous leadership.
You have our support and prayers.
Columbia, South Carolina.
We agree with Mayor Rizzo, you are a great president.
Respectively submitted, Lillian A. Rago, Philadelphia.
God bless you, President Nixon.
Get rid of your inheritance and please get re-elected.
You're evil and you're broken.
A lot of this is basically religious people.
Maybe you're some minority, but you're religious.
We applaud your outstanding forthrightness in your speech for peacetime.
Judge William Garbosi from Apple, Massachusetts.
That's good.
It's interesting.
Thank God the Americans have it.
I believe I have voiced the view of most responsible Canadians when I say thank God the Americans have a president like you with big guts and gall to stand up and face the foes of freedom, the way you did in your courageous and inspiring speech tonight.
Keep up the good work.
Sincerely, Mrs. Joseph Patrick Kennedy from Winnipeg, Minnesota.
I just want to place back the generation of peace.
Your initiative for a generation of peace.
I don't know about now.
I will say to you right now, this is to be very sharp.
They know that.
Does anybody know that?
Or even if you don't know it, it doesn't work that way.
I will say it.
It can't go beyond five minutes to twelve.
I don't give a damn what happens here.
No.
So I'm going to spend time with you.
If you're ready to have a seat, please.
You're making exactly the right decision.
I'm going to back off a little bit.
I'm going to back off a little bit more.
Thank you very much.
The client just said he's got to be here to handle the domestic truck.
I put it that way.
We just can't run the whole domestic council over there.
And that's a fairly important argument.
He's going to like it, but that's the argument.
There's a lot going on.
There is.
He's got to be here, and he's going to hold it on for him as far as he lets it go to Russia.
Mr. President, Prime Minister Di Zergo, and the entire Prime Minister, I would say I do welcome you.
Thank you very much, Mr. President.
Thank you very much, Mr. President.
Thank you very much.
You sit there, Bill, and now you sit here.
You don't want to take a picture of your wife.
That's the best you can do.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
I know.
Fremont Center.
They produce a lot of tea, don't they?
You probably drank a lot of tea there, so it doesn't really change.
You know, in that direction, you've been there, of course.
In Indonesia, didn't you?
No, I haven't.
No, I've been in India.
I was going to say I've been in Asia.
And of course it was, as it was for all countries in colonial areas, it was difficult to know the wrenching part of the rest, but New Jakarta, New Jakarta, the rest, we have to remember that those who were in colonial powers, in countries like that, left a fine legacy in Magnus Bank's name.
I mean, what you left in terms of the physical appearance and also the education areas and others.
It's well motivated.
Now, of course, we have our dependents, and they've got to move their own way.
Your relationship is good there.
In fact, they watch you right now.
I talked to him so hard.
He said, we keep, because you know the country, and you have, I think one of the points that is very important to like to hear your deal about here in Antioquia and so forth, is that as you move out, you know, and all this, etc., etc.,
Very important to retain as much influence as you can.
They need you.
It's really a tragedy, just speaking here, and we can't say this publicly because of the great devil and so many people, but you know and I know it's a tragedy to see so many of these new countries in Africa and in the Caribbean that are totally...
not capable of running the show.
I mean, that doesn't mean that there's any way to stay.
But my goodness, you take a place like Nassau, in the Soviet area, it's right up the brink of being knocked here at the moment.
The British are getting out, and of course, the poor Soviets are doing their best to try to run it, and throw it straight and dry.
And it really takes a genius to rule in Nassau, but they're doing it.
Now, they'll come back in time, but the point is that the transition could have been a little slower, slower in some way that that presence could have been kept.
Maybe they could make it.
You need to sort of retain that.
We were on the brink of war with Indonesia 10-20 years ago.
We were on the brink of war with Indonesia 10-20 years ago.
We were on the brink of war with Indonesia 10-20 years ago.
Indonesia had a deflection confidence of 600%.
And now, 8%.
Even better than Europe.
I don't know if there's any Dutch prime minister who's been to Indonesia since the independence.
No, not yet.
Not yet.
Our floor time is 2.5 hours.
Yeah, yeah.
Let me, without trying to get into your business, but I think you're good.
This is a terribly important part of the world.
You know, there's still teachers and doctors and so forth who live in Indonesia.
They're a country that wants a private enterprise.
They're not anti either European or white, et cetera, et cetera.
I mean, Sahara is smart enough to know that Sukarno will rule the place.
And sometimes, you know, when you're traveling to that part of the world, I don't know.
I think you kept it longer.
You see, the revolution is too far behind the generation now.
Our queen made a state visitant, which was a big success.
At some point.
I think, for example, in the Pacific area, that gray part of the world, it isn't really a comfortable or healthy position for the United States to be the only non-white power active there.
As I told this to Pete, and of course they retained some sort of a presence now in Singapore, I said it to Dr. Du, and
and suggested that the Germans ought to get a little closer to the Japanese, and they've been, and they are getting closer economically, and they should, and I think that in your case, that you ought not to just resign yourselves to being a very prosperous and a very healthy member of the European community.
That's my view to this.
I agree, I agree, Mr. President.
We have an excellent cooperation in the Intergovernmental Committee, which is dealing with the problems of financial aid to Indonesia, of which your next chair is also in.
You're part of the Dutch, right?
Yes, I am.
The Dutch are in chair.
We added a little bit.
Not quite a lot of art this year.
Because of your attitude, the Japanese, we call them so far too many.
Oh, I know.
You're sure.
The Japanese, of course, think they're very hard partners.
But they've got a whole lot more room to do.
We've all got to help these countries because they're the nation.
We talk about Vietnam and Thailand and Cambodia and the rest.
They're all important, actually.
They're lost people.
So, my god, India's got 140 million people, a thousand miles to go.
Miles.
It is rich.
Resources are just fantastic, you know.
Fantastic.
Now, I remember from my chart, yes, that
Well, tell me about Europe.
And ask me anything you want about what we're doing.
It's in our talks here.
Thank you very much for what you said about Indonesia.
I think that there is a difference between Indonesia and what I've been saying so far, too, in your Pacific relations.
Keep it handy.
Keep it in order.
Not for purposes of colonization or anything.
I mean, that's... No, you don't agree.
I've got to say that.
There's lots of people who are in the Netherlands until I'm not.
Longer colonies.
They are independent members of the kingdom of the Netherlands.
Are they?
They are.
They are.
There are people who want more.
Oh, sure.
They want more.
Progressive.
Oh, I don't agree.
I don't.
As soon as we should leave, my view, you get a process of desintegration of those islands, free of the ones that they speak English, they are free Dutch.
Venezuela has some interest, Aruba, or...
But it is a tiny problem, a little problem, but still it is a problem.
How to deal with that in the future, you know.
I personally feel it could be important to keep some time with them.
Yeah, all of them.
I couldn't bring my feeling into the field of defense if it seemed possible.
Yeah.
To help themselves and others come to us.
And mostly the wrong ones.
I don't.
We all don't, yeah.
Well, my views are quite conservative in this respect, and very practical, originally.
If people are able to govern themselves and defend themselves, fine.
If they're not able to govern themselves and defend themselves, then help them develop the capability, but don't go off and leave them.
It's like throwing a poor bird out of the nasty park and fly.
It's foolish.
And you just...
Oh, I learned that from the first time.
Well, I didn't learn that.
I learned it when I drove around the world in 1953, when I was there for 73 days.
I went to 20 countries where my wife was president.
I remember Churchill, the last time I saw him was about 1958.
And he had stroke at that time, and all the rest of them.
He still was sharp enough at the end of the day to correct himself.
But he made it quite, he shared his envy.
So he's calling us to his head.
He said, it's terribly important that we have to find a way of analysis.
Self-government is the most difficult project in the world.
He says, we in Britain have taken several centuries
I said, you gotta remember a couple of years, a couple hundred years ago, we were chopping off the heads of our employees.
I said, now, what are you going to do?
You're not going to leave these people?
That's why some of these nuts, they really are, who are just fanatics, with regard to a way that everybody should have a self-referential, in other words, fragmentize everything.
They're wrong.
For the good of the people.
It is wrong that they're good, that's all.
In Europe, you see, just here, we are just going the other way.
It can't work.
What the hell?
I love it.
Tell us about our national sovereignty and doing that in the Republic.
I see a good guy following that way.
How do you feel about going to Europe?
How do you feel?
How does it work here in Europe?
Historically, the commonwealth, the nation, when the British, when also, especially a country like France, but I think also Britain, are prepared to...
Not only to go the way of economic cooperation and free trade within the area, but also to operate politically.
Right.
That must be known, Jack.
Because when we only make an economic block, then we get into trouble with the rest of the world.
Right.
That's right.
It's an economic competition, to be right.
But I think it is good for ourselves...
And our responsibility is to cooperate politically.
Exactly.
And if you have this economic bloc, it will mean that you will become a political power.
And eventually, I mean, of course we have to go beyond that.
The economic base, the economic cooperation can lead to cooperation in other areas, political, mutual security, and the rest of it.
A strong third force, or fourth force.
We have, basically, as I see it, there are five forces.
As we look at what we can talk about, I don't need to downgrade Latin America, because, who knows, 50 years from now, Brazil would be a great power.
It's coming fast.
I don't need to downgrade Africa, but it's maybe 500 years away.
The rest of Asia is important, especially Indonesia.
But as far as
The power of the world is concerned, the economic and potential of the military.
There's the United States, and of course, there's Europe.
Free Europe.
There's Russia.
There's Congress in China.
And there's Japan.
That's the key.
And it seems to us that the key to our approach is to see that
Try to live with the great communist superpowers, China and Russia, recognizing that our philosophical differences are irreconcilable, but that doesn't mean you have to fight about them.
But it means also that in terms of the other parts of the world, that Japan, the United Europe, and the United States, where we will be strong competitors, all this is inevitable economically.
Because, you know, that's the nature of things.
We're a free nation.
We're a productive people.
All people.
The people of Western Europe, the people of Japan, the people of the United States, we're the most productive people in the world.
And we cannot produce the time to produce our systems better.
It's a free nation.
But we've got to carry that economic competition to keep it in the right channels, have the right kind of monetary system, and have fair rules regarding trade and the rest.
But from the standpoint of the security and the rest, there it must be to get, because we're all in the same box.
Now here's just Japan.
Japan, an economic giant.
militarily addicted because of what happened in World War II.
The United States must constantly reassure Japan, and as our European friends should do so likewise.
They are part of the free world of economy.
But, as far as we the United States are concerned, we assure them of the viability of and our intention to honor our treaty commitment.
Second, the credibility of our nuclear deterrent.
Because otherwise, this great power of Japan, now the third, soon to be the second economic power in the world, is up for grabs.
So we gotta have a home.
They must have a home in the free world.
Right?
Yes.
And so in Europe, in Europe, when you're really looking negative in a sense, this we would not say to our German friends.
Correctly, but you know it's true, and I know it's true.
There are many, many reasons why NATO must continue until there are, and continue its forces, and not have any unilateral reduction.
One of the major ones being that as long as the Soviet Union maintains, the Soviet Union and the bloc maintains its forces, for us to do it unilaterally would be a very, very wrong table for them.
But even if there were no Soviet military threat, you have to recognize the fact that there needs to be a home for the Germans in a free Europe.
And if they don't have a home and a freedom, the Russians have to take even arms for what they've done to each other.
Right?
This is a group of people who constantly have a conspiracy, as I've seen here, because it's in a constant kind of relationship, a ground-based system.
is the predecessor of East Germany.
We've constantly got to say, look, Germany belong, you're part of us, and that's why Britain coming into the market is a good thing, because it gives them more of a view of what belonging is.
They're out of politics, there are reasons for that, and we all understand, because they have a problem with East Germany.
But we must constantly say that the Germans are reassured
That economically, politically, monetarily, their home is in the United Europe.
Right?
That's right.
That's right.
So, you know, the political cooperation in Europe was started by people like, I don't know, the Gaspari professional.
Those were the giants.
Those were the giants.
The fifties, you know.
And you're too young.
Oh, I know some of those folks.
Yes, I've known the professionals as a member of the European Parliament.
But they were the giants of European continued government, you know.
And we need
And ten governments is quite something to get done together.
But it must be done, you know, it must be done.
The Dutch have always taken a very outgoing position in this respect, haven't you?
In respect to the European...
Yes, there is where a small country like ours is not so important to world affairs.
We can do something.
I think.
On a human scale, absolutely.
There we can do something.
I was very, very true by your statement after the signature of our four new members at Michigan, which was a very positive one.
I know that you in the United States think that the common market sometimes protects you.
I think it is.
What you call your projections, I know some of your organizations, but the absence of the common market buying makers will make, I think, 400 million.
They're supposed to, certainly, because of all the economic things of Great Britain, with the British, they're an awkward-looking people.
They are.
They have been.
And I think he is an awkward-looking man.
I mean, he, of course, is always...
He's, of course, getting into the market, but he is an awkward-looking man.
I think that's what I'm looking for.
Of course.
What are you looking for?
And our country, if you look out, if you look out now, basically the French would be out right now.
Pompidou may change his venture from an economic standpoint, because he's basically motivated by economics.
That's all right, too.
At least he's not rigid.
At least his nature is rigid.
Yes, certainly.
But the enlarged coal market, that is my feeling,
will be less inward-looking, more outward-looking, than the common market of the 60-year-old.
When we started the common market in the 50s, there was one city involved against that was brought there.
They thought the common market would become a continental market.
So the big businessmen of that, they were deadly against it.
Dutch farmers were poor, but people of that land were wrong, you know.
Så de har virkelig brøftet fra Kålmarka i Norsk.
Det er deres byggfaktor.
Det er virkelig brøftet fra Kålmarka i Norsk.
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
Especially with the OC-3, the way that you always have been used to it.
Do you know what I mean?
Yes, hello there.
How are you?
Good to see you.
Well, we...
I'm glad to hear that you feel that the eventual tendency of the New York will not be turning inward, but turning downward.
That's what we have to watch here in this country.
You see this?
Oh, it's a problem in America.
America has a very, very strong protectionist attorney in present time.
And we want to continue looking outward.
And I think we will.
But on the other hand...
It takes two to make the deal, and if a new Europe turns for Texas, they're too tough.
And if Japan continues to be, as they are, very, very tough.
The inevitable reaction here is to react to that.
And I think I'm nothing more detrimental to what we were talking about earlier, the necessity for Europe, the United States, Canada, and Japan,
to work together in terms of security, et cetera.
Because we are basically the three we're in.
The three great powers, I guess, as lined up on the other side of the two great Soviet powers.
It would be a great tragedy if our competition, which is inevitable, became destructive.
That could happen, and that's why it seems that, I think on the monetary thing, I think the group of ten thinks this is a good idea, you know.
Yes.
Because every time we can bring Japan into a deal, we should.
Every time.
I mentioned this to both Brokeheath and Brandon also, but you see, whenever you bring Japan into any kind of conversations, parliamentary conversations, economic and personal and monetary, we discuss.
You know, the group of ten business and so forth.
But because Japan is the only non-white country of the great three countries, and Japan is schizophrenic, Japan's only tie, really, only tie to what we believe in, what you believe in as a European, what I believe in as an American, is frankly very non-exotic.
We must, of course, cultivate that.
We must not be...
Beyond that, you've got to have a political cooperation and so forth.
And now that it's 25 years past the war, despite the problems that Korea has visited, most people are ready for it.
I mean, they recognize the new...
that who Japan can be and will be a very constructive member of the free world community.
But the most important thing, we've got to get out of it, because just thinking of Japan, we're tied in.
Just thinking of China.
More of a question.
What a power it could be.
Because, my, they're an able people.
Oh, they are.
We all are.
We're all human.
They have productivity.
Well, it's fantastic.
They obviously have bills for the world nowadays.
Your property, your people, you either take it or you don't.
The Americans, we built our building a couple of days ago.
I said, you know, I just want to do it.
No, take us, you know, take us out both by the international reform companies.
Dutch Channel.
Dutch Channel.
They buy them.
That's a true movement.
Could I say, I think it might be useful to you
First of all, to say that I would have liked before my visit to Beijing and to Moscow to have had an opportunity to meet Christopher, the heads of all the European countries.
I could not, you know, because time did not permit it.
I have, as you know, with the three, the Italians we didn't meet with,
Because as they're going through that one of those bridges where they don't have a car, it's the most that they don't do well.
And over the last year, they've gotten a burden.
They're just so treated as though they could not have a car at this time.
They've got many more Italian prime ministers and all the good prime ministers in the world, because they have more financial assets and some great people.
Anyway, they had to go 12 months ago.
She's a fine, very good economist.
And you would think they would keep a man like that.
You know what the intent is?
They need something like a French constitution.
They need a strong...
As a matter of fact, if you look to the Latin countries in general, the Latin countries, and by the Latin countries I mean Italy, France, this is all Latin, certainly as many, all Latin America, they need basically more of the French Constitution than the American Constitution.
You agree?
They didn't have, now, I don't mean that he became dictators or anything, but they needed a strong, because they otherwise tended to franken times, to crack like that, and they had to, but France was a disaster, including De Gaulle.
De Gaulle's great contribution to France was not a port policy, it was in the spirit of pulling together, giving in and out, but they didn't have government for it.
As we look over the security of NATO, at least since I've been here and I've jumped in since then,
The Dutch have just been, you've been like rocks.
You've been tough, and we appreciate that.
You stood out there, and I know you've got a public opinion vote in your country.
You've got U.S. strong support.
Your country has an outlaw.
Of course, it's the movement of Rocio's job to be a fine man.
There's a strong, vigorous, articulate man.
And so I'm glad that we can have this kind of talk.
But I want to say that before going to Peking and Moscow, I think we'll re-run down what I think we're trying to accomplish in both places.
The two trips differ very much.
They're only alike in one sense, that both are communist countries.
But an indication of how different they are is that, and this is ironic, that as far as Egypt is concerned,
While there was a time when the United States was considered to be enemy number one in any communist country, we're now number three, and we welcome that, because basically the Russians consider the Chinese to be number one, and the Chinese consider the Russians to be number one.
It's gone down the line that the Chinese might think that the Japanese are potentially more ignorant than we are, so to speak.
For whatever reason for that,
We now come to the Chinese basically as one in which we are trying to start on long road.
We do not order over land, neither do they.
But we do believe that by starting a long process of some sort of contact, I will say how this treaty will not come to recognition on our part.
Because it cannot, since we still recognize Taiwan and will continue to honor our treaty commitments, they know this will not come out.
What may come out of it could be however there is some method to engage in the future, some contact in the future.
And
Perhaps, reducing the chance in the immediate future of a confrontation between the United States, DRC, and Asia, such as we had in Korea, and looking further to the future,
When they become a superpower, a nuclear superpower, to be in a position at that time, we will have such relations with them that we can discuss differences in, and not inevitably have a clash.
Now, also, no one can look at Asia...
And take the Chinese out of it and say you didn't have any policy in the Pacific that will succeed or prevent a war without having the Chinese part of it.
Just as cold-blooded as that.
This is not done at the expense of the Japanese, it's not done at the expense of any other country, not done at the expense of India, or any other.
It is solely a question of the United States looking to the future, our future, as a Pacific power, with the responsibility to try to keep peace in the Pacific.
And we cannot leave that responsibility unless we develop some relationship with the Chinese government.
And that's what we're doing.
So we'll discuss a lot of things.
We'll discuss their role in the Pacific and our role in the Pacific.
We'll disagree on a lot of things.
But the most important thing about that is that it occurs, and that the Chinese and the United States will have begun a process of, shall we say, getting to know each other.
Now, this is not said in any sense of sentimentality.
There are many people who have looked at China as a...
and interpret it exactly the wrong way.
They say, oh, this is great.
Now in the United States and China, we've never had any differences.
Everything's going to be settled.
It's not that.
No one in this world knows how great the Gulf is between their philosophy and ours, their interests and ours.
But also no one in this world, I think, knows better than I do.
How imperative it is to see that great nations that have these enormous services, where you've got the nuclear hanging in the mountains, have got to find ways to talk.
It's in heaven.
If they want to live for 20 years from now, they'll be a superhuman power.
20 years from now.
And that's what we've got to think about.
Not the good people, but what we've got to think about.
Now, obviously our Russian friends don't look for any favor on this visit.
Not because they didn't wear out their hands.
But because they are sort of paranoid about the Chinese as the Chinese are about them, we're seeing how they are.
My total line, both the Russians and the Chinese, is that we're seeking good bilateral relations, both.
Without making any chance for the other.
It may be helpful for them one day.
Who's your attack?
You see, the problem they have, the Russians, let's suppose, let's suppose that China's isolation is contained.
What kind of world are we going to have 15 years from now?
All right.
The Russians...
A huge border, standing there, and a hostile enemy.
The United States, far across the sea, having fought with Korea and directly with Vietnam, and Japan, an ally of the United States, India, whom they despised, also an enemy.
What had happened?
What had happened to them?
could be the very congregation without them.
You see, so somebody has got the right to do that thing.
I'm talking to the papers.
They're papers, militarily.
I mean, because the...
But we, because they know that we are their only rival in the superpower game, except the Russians, that might threaten them.
We are the ones who have to do the deal.
That's the way it is.
So you've got to look at it that way, too.
In fair, that's a deal.
I really ask you to help, sir, with Preston.
Also, you are going to talk with him.
I've seen your budget yesterday.
You have increased your defense budget.
Yes, sir.
And that is, I said to the Secretary of State yesterday, that is very courageous, that it will help us in Europe too, you know.
Ha!
We increase our country to a percentage, a percentage too, for the first time.
It's never pleasant for you to do.
No, no, no.
We can't help you.
And I want to say, but I'm saying, what you're talking about, one day, when the NATO countries have that billion dollars, you know, that holds in arms for a year at this time.
Oh, yes.
Otherwise, people would say, you know, we've got the man's human right, and all these other things, which
You're foolish.
But nevertheless, I have great support.
People like to bring home two or three divisions, and put the money into the ghettos.
Well, that's my answer.
You're not going to have any ghettos or any cities at all.
You know, you must have a bit of defense, but these arguments fall on deaf ears.
In your country, some places, and in ours, too.
Now, on the other side of the coin, now that you've had your budget, the Russian visit is a very different one.
It is highly subjective.
We have relations with the Russians.
We talk with them all the time.
In the time that I've been here, we've had differences, but we've avoided confrontation.
But the Russians, of course, are interested in any number of subjects.
They're interested in trade, they're interested in the Middle East, they're interested in...
arms control, as we are, as we're negotiating to solve.
And of course, we're vital to Europe.
Now I would start with others, and actually, whatever subjects are still open at that point, like our arms limitation, these, trade, of course, will definitely be discussed, and maybe some arms will be made.
However, on the other side of the coin, I would have to accept
As far as Europe is concerned, our line is very rigid, and we are not going to percapitate like any other.
We have no intention, whatever, of allowing that to be a subject for discussion with that.
Well, that's something we've got to work out on ourselves before it's discussed with anybody else.
And so, that's how... And also, in terms of arms competition, as you know, your government has been briefed on our assault.
They've written down why, as the other NATO countries.
Under no circumstances...
We allow our arms limitation talks to in any way compromise our NATO commitment.
Now, they constantly are trying to break any forces and weapons and so forth that really apply to NATO.
In other words, to get us to Knoxville.
And we constantly know that's not the subject we're here to discuss.
We're discussing...
a limitation of those arms that have to do with the ability of each of the two powers to bring the beauty to each other, and not anything that would affect our relations with NATO.
Now, as far as the Russian business is concerned, I heard Kim said that it would be very hard for him, here again,
We all have to realize, there's that old song, you know, one of our musical comics, I'm getting to know you, and there are many naive people.
If you just get to know people, you won't have any differences.
My God, some of the worst differences are on married people that know each other too well.
Getting to know you doesn't solve problems.
Getting to know you just simply may provide a method to discuss the problems.
Now, we know the Russians will.
They know us will.
And where I think this summit, or whatever it's called, may have a chance for substantive success where others have not, is that it will be highly regrettable.
I know them, and they don't need, I don't say this in any sense, either of what you know because of my background and theirs, and we have been very forthright about it.
We haven't had any collusion.
We say, look, we do have some differences, and you want something different based on the media.
As far as I'm concerned, they wanted to ban Joe Ruskin, we want one over them.
So we both recognize that.
So we bargain hard to see that neither gets it.
And that's the only way to make a deal anyway.
And so far as Europe is concerned, we actually say, look, we're not going to go here and talk with you about how we're going to send out our friends.
I mean, that's another matter.
In the future, maybe we can talk about that.
One other subject I should mention to you, which is a very lively subject in Europe and all the other in the state of racing in America, and that's the European Security Conference.
Bill Rogers has probably spoken to you about it.
The point is there that they have talked about the European Security Conference but our view is that
That's something that is still down the pike road.
I mean, it is ready to move it.
It's something that certainly can be explored on a bilateral basis in discussions among various people.
We've got to find out.
I think we've got to examine what we think can come out of it, what good purpose it can serve.
Now, in Western Europe, there are varying views on this, varying views of intensity.
Italians are very strong for it, and several others are.
At the issue meeting this afternoon, Mr. Chairman,
For that reason, our view is deliberately unopposed.
We will consider it, but we're not going to buy into it.
We think what is most important is for us to remember that the security of Europe
is what has kept the peace and kept Europe free for the last 25 years.
That must not be compromised.
If that is compromised, then this could all unravel, particularly the German problem, right in the heart.
So therefore, what we have to do is to maintain
That basic security here, that's why NATO is still supporting.
It doesn't mean that forever you're going to have to have a huge budget to maintain forces in Europe and the rest of it.
Maybe there is going to come a time.
I don't know how many years.
But we can see some limitations in this area.
Certainly we're willing to talk about it.
But at this particular point, we've got to look at the other side, what they're up to.
And as far as our Russian friends are concerned,
Their aim is to take off the Germans.
What do you think?
Yes, I think you are right.
That's always the nature of them.
To get loose Europe from human distinction.
I should not hold your peace in that nowadays.
Yeah, they would like to have, they would like to have Europe in an archipelago that's owned by most of the European nation, and the most of the United States.
Therefore, the end of your discussions are also of vital importance.
Of course, for the European Union.
You can be sure of those things.
We looked at all the schemes.
How do you like it?
I might say we just haven't seen one yet that is not going to be at our disadvantage.
Have you any idea about the timing and the linking of any of our discussions at a European security conference?
We're very cautious about this.
Very cautious about it.
I think we've got to sort out ourselves first.
Yeah.
I don't think there should be...
I think there shouldn't be a linkage between NBFR and NBFR.
When I say linkage, we couldn't put the two in the back.
I think we should consider both separately.
But on NBFR, as Al said, what we have to do is to sort out that problem
among ourselves to see what kind of a formula we could agree to that would not lead us vis-à-vis the law.
That's what we have to do.
And we have not yet found such a formula yet.
And Rosio Mission is looking around at this.
Now, the European Security Conference is another subject.
I think you should be treated as another subject.
Because I think if you confuse the two, or mix the two,
That the inevitable result would be to say, well, they have a European Security Conference, and then maybe the VFR doesn't make much difference.
And I think the European Security Conference, which has nothing to do with security, it has to do with culture and a lot of other things.
I think so far.
Do you know anything else about it?
Well, I think that all of the data will probably be related somewhere down the line.
Oh yeah, they talk about that.
But at the present time, if you look at the decomposed agenda that they have,
And we don't, when Jamaica was there, we went, well, what's the agenda?
I said, well, that's what everybody was very good at, a conference, and what's going to come out of it?
And, in a sense, at this point, I would have to say, I don't mean that this will always be the case, because eventually there will be a European security.
They're looking sometimes.
They're looking at us.
They're positive.
They're positive.
They're positive.
You know what I mean?
They are.
And also, I must say, I feel for those people in Eastern Europe, those countries.
If there's anything that touches Congress, do that.
But that's where I, I mean, I've been to most of those countries, as I'm sure you have.
God, when I head to the polls, I'm not thinking of their governments, but the polls, the Romanians, the Hungarians, the Czechs, the rest of the great people.
You know, here they are.
All over the video.
At the present time, all that I have been able to see as far as I can for Europeans,
That's what we have to do.
And we have not yet found such a formula yet.
And the Rosio mission is looking around with this and that.
Now, the European Security Conference is another subject.
I think you'd be treated as another subject.
Because I think if you confuse the two, or mix the two, that the inevitable result would be to say, well, we have a European Security Conference,
Maybe the VFR is something much different.
And I think the European Security Conference, which has nothing to do with security.
It has to do with culture and a lot of other things.
I think so far.
Do you know of anything else?
Well, I think, ultimately, they'll probably be related somewhere down the line.
Oh, yeah, they talk about that.
We've got to reach a different direction.
But at the present time, at the present time, to look at decomposing the agenda that they have,
And we don't, when Jamaica was there, we might as well, but what's the agenda?
That's what everybody was very good at, the conference, and what's going to come out of it?
And in a sense, at this point, I would have to say, I don't mean that this will always be the case.
Because eventually there will be a European Security Conference, I think.
There will be some time.
There will be.
And that and a strong position.
There possibly should be.
Also should be.
That's right.
There should be.
You know what I mean?
There are.
And also, I must say, I feel for those people of Eastern Europe.
of those countries.
If there's anything that such a conference could do, that's where I, I mean, I've been to most of those countries, as I'm sure you have.
Got my head in the polls, I'm not thinking of their governments, but the Poles, the Rumainsians, the Hungarians, the Czechs, the rest of the great people, you know, here they are.
All of them, you know, and so if we could in any way that we could level that a bit, I'd be for.
But at the present time, all that I have been able to see as far as an enchantment for European security conference would indicate
that our friends on the other side would like to have it for the sake of having a meeting.
Now, we have that kind of a conference for the sake of having a meeting.
That's to their interest, not to ours.
What we have to do is to get some fairly specific things that might come out.
There might be, for example, more communication, more trade, more...
a few other things, eventually perhaps the problem of security.
But again, we must buy a conference with the thought that that's the
that solves these this enormous problem the division of europe uh the germans of course are the one i imagine the titans the germans have a tremendous goal in that respect because you know brown actually being a harder possible taking the risk
But our attitude, as I emphasize, and as Rogers will also very much share, is our attitude is one that when we talk to our European friends is,
And EFR, we're taking a very hard look at it to try to see if among ourselves we can find any kind of a market that we can offer.
And that's what we should say.
That also helps you in terms of your domestic.
We're looking into that.
Let's not do anything illiterate.
We'll do it all together.
And we won't delay.
If we weaken the alliance, it's going to be those who might oppose us.
As far as the European Security Conference is concerned, well, it's an interesting idea.
Interesting idea.
But as far as, as General Manchin, that we must see, we must see on ourselves what might come out, what can be discovered.
When you say to the European, what it should be capital,
Just a little.
Yeah, that we, on our part, do not see that this, see, yeah, that we have to take a poll, we have to be able to be a part of it.
Now, that doesn't say we won't, does it?
But it just says take your time.
Yes, take your time and see what we're buying here.
And, uh...
Yes, that's another conference we get in the course of 72, and that is what we call a summit, and that is the conference of the heads of state, heads of governments of the
You call the market companies.
In the second half of the year, where will they be?
I don't know.
Not yet fixed.
I think that conference will, before we officially start with the new members, might be useful, especially for what might be useful this time.
also to discuss our relationship with other parts of the world, the United States, the communist countries, and Japan, and the developed countries, you know, that might be useful.
I think that will be useful.
That'll be a very fascinating topic.
You know, the reason I was not really in a position to suggest a headache or something,
I don't think you can have that conference in any one of the four, like London, Paris, Milan, or Rome, because, you know, you should have it in one of the countries that are small, one of the smaller countries.
Right.
Yes, although you have to go right over the stairs, you can have it in Brussels, you can have it in Luxembourg, you can even have it in Strasbourg.
Well, I mean, you...
I think you're the only, as I said, and I'm so glad because of your schedule that I have on the agency, but I think you're the only
I'm very grateful, I'm very grateful.
We were lucky last night, you know, we had a dinner.
That's it.
Oh, I know you are, Master.
We saw your television broadcast together with your secretary of state.
Yeah, and Mr. Mansfield was there.
Yeah, yeah.
That was quite interesting.
Yeah, yes.
And that was the compliment, you know, for the way you did it.
I did it right there.
Oh, you did it there.
I did it there.
The cameras here.
Yes, yes.
As you know, you have been in politics for a long time.
It's about 15 drafts.
I do a lot of, I do writing myself a lot.
Because if I have to get it in my own idiom, is other people's writing is more elegant.
In your own, it's got to be the way I say it.
The people know how I talk.
So I use my own cool expressions.
That's what he said, wasn't it?
That's what he said, wasn't it?
Yeah, I talked to Robert, to Robert this morning, and also last night.
And he said, he told me that they're with you.
He told me, he told me, he said, you know, this is very interesting, the television that they're asking, but...
This is amazing.
I've noticed this shit in politics.
It's just, it's just communication.
I mean, every reason I've been able to, it's just buttered up the press.
We have, we can impress them.
It matters, really.
But television is it, isn't it?
We have weekly camera sessions, and every Friday evening I'm live on television to report on our decisions.
You go on, on live television?
On live, and then I'm interviewed by my friend, by the progressive voice of the television.
They're growing and growing now.
I know all of those.
Has your television stayed in control?
No.
Good.
I mean, I said good.
I mean, ours is... We have low government companies, bureaucracy companies, but also with problems.
All of them are problems.
But I have to hear all of you say very progressive.
They are, they are.
But that's part of the grief.
But I have a feeling that you're...
Your plan for peace last night will be welcomed and will be judged positively in Europe.
That's my feeling.
That's my feeling.
Well, let me say, especially about what you said also about free elections now.
Well, we've gone really as far as we can.
We've got two of our bases all set down a month before the international body.
They'll run the elections.
They get a free shot at it.
Let me say that I would anticipate that our Vietnamese will reject it.
That's what they always do first.
They will give us a pop, or give Tom Kinn on a pop in the next two or three months.
But then they've got to look down that.
barrel and decide, are they going to fight forever, or are they going to take a deal?
Because they can't win now, mind you.
The South Vietnamese are strong enough, with our continued assistance, to defend themselves and so on from that.
But North Vietnam, I think, is going to have to make the decision, and North Korea many, many years ago, that they're going to have to live with the situation for a while.
But whether, when, where, if you want to do that, there needs to be a state.
But we have to set the position ourselves.
But the essential part of your plan is, if I understand it well, is we leave six months after the political agreement.
That's right.
We go to land.
Oh, no, no, no.
First of all, it's a good reason to try it.
And the thing is that we are going to continue, of course, in our assistance to South Vietnam, economically, because after all, the Russians and the Chinese are continuing their assistance to North Vietnam.
We trust eventually that we can come down some.
I'll take you out of your car here.
Three minutes.
Well, I've got to say, uh, I've had a look up, and I just want to mention that, uh, I plan to be doing a more extensive circle, like, uh, on this trail, uh, in the spring, I guess.
Oh, you do?
In account of the, you know, that you make.
Like your old self, huh?
Well, whatever you want it to be, it's up to you, Bill.
You know, we, what you want to say, or, you know, it's your choice.
I appreciate it.
But it's, uh, we, we need your advice.
But I think that, uh,
jurors such as Hallberg before.
I'm afraid that my jury said that these new complicated laws push them.
Well, that's my question.
I mean, they have to organize all 30 states now, like I said.
So I don't know.
Well, no, Jerry, no.
We're going to have a poll now.
We can't tell you.
We're working on the forms.
Yeah, I worked with Jerry this week.
But listen, I need you to send your pictures.
Yeah, there was no question.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He got an answer.
Oh, he told me.
That's the reply.
Oh, that's right.
So I'll work it out.
I'll work it out.
Before I announce, we shall talk to you about the news.
All right.
whether that's later in the spring.
Because the school season is probably around June 1st.
Look, we won't say a thing.
But as soon as you're ready, you let us know, and we'll try to have a successor ready and all that sort of thing.
And if I'm leaving today in June, would I announce, whether we can announce in advance, what would be the proper time?
What do you think, Al?
Oh, I think much later now, maybe in another...
two months.
We should have it back in a month, two months.
I think a month.
What do you want?
I would like to announce it a month in advance.
I'd like to work with Morty Stantz and Jerry.
Fine.
You work out with Morty Stantz.
You work out with Morty and Jerry.
Why don't you like to have an announcement and so forth.
You tell us what to do.
You work out the details.
I've never been better at it.
I think with the Dutch, and I think that they're very impressed with you, particularly the last six years.
Bill, you've got a money clip.
One of my money clips that I had.
You know, I thought that would be nice.
I did.
Can I talk you down some money?
Yes.
These are new.
These are the best they can give away.
It's a presidential seal.
And it's only for the greatest money.
Good to see you.
Good to see you.
I ran into the police.
It's your brother, huh?
All of them's gone to a board of trustees meeting at 10 o'clock.
C.A.
Scott.
He is the editor of the Atlanta Daily World.
That's 404-659-1110.
I guess it's trying to get out of my face.
Oh, y'all.
I'll tell you what, I'm sure you've heard of it.
It's one of Santa's.
That's a really, it's a very nice one over here.
It's really, well, I don't know if it's good, but it's wild and it's standing strong today.
I don't know if it's good, but it's hard to get to eat it.
It's not good in the United States when you get a border.
Oh, just to leave some room for the doctor, I assume.
I thought this was great, but I bet it called me a mess, though, for each of us, and that was fantastic, by the way.
You know, the way that we, that I do those, or as Henry was saying, you know, that someday they've got to write a little story about how you do, how much work you do.
You do more work in speeches, of course, than whatever few in the old days did.
Some presidents wrote their speeches, Wilson wrote his, some I did, and so did G.R., and I write some of mine.
But, he said that no modern president has ever
I've done the enormous work on it, but you know it pays off, because I get out the stuff that doesn't fit me, and I get it boiled down and boiled down.
You notice how we cut that damn thing down.
Oh yeah, well, and you have to do it to get it to sound like... You've got to cut it, and cut it, and cut it, and finally get it down to something that's...
Right.
So your brother's going to...
He called right away, so he comes to the parlor.
You know, I just wanted to tell you that I am very sorry to hear about your brother's death.
And also to tell you too that Stan is just doing a fine job on our staff here.
Well, yeah.
He's a fine young man.
Yes, I know they, I know you were very close to him.
Well, yeah.
Would you tell them that I called and express my sympathy, please?
Bye, Mr. Scott.
And the Yolks and the Buchanans, and they had Mary Totner and Nancy.
Who's Nancy?
Who was it?
His wife.
I think it's like, oh, I forgot his wife.
She's a lady.
She's the next wife.
And they seem very happy.
I hope they are.
They're really very happy.
She's an attractive girl.
Very attractive.
She has two daughters, I think.
One in high school.
I thought you might want to write a little sedative pad or something like that on the corner.
Not with mine, I'm not going to take that one.
And someone suggested, you know, that now that John McCormick's wife has gone, maybe he would come something at night, but you had suggested maybe having her, you know, in to spend the night.
You don't want to do that before there is time to trip, do you?
And, General McCoy sent me the letter that I must have gotten yesterday, while I was not secretly, again, suggesting a meeting.
I just gave that to Kissinger, don't I?
You don't want to read his letter, do you?
General McCoy.
And, you know, the advisory committee on arms control and disarmament.
And, we need to do an autograph for a picture of
Carswell.
Somebody had to judge Carswell, and I was pleased and honored to force you that, because I didn't cut you into that deal.
Oh, quite right.
I wanted to judge, uh, what's his... Harold.
Not judge him, I see.
What is his name?
He tracks them off.
Harold?
Harold Carswell.
Yes.
Appreciation for his, for his, uh...
is funded for his outstanding and dedicated service to the nation of the Spine.
I have out there for you.
Oh, somebody wrote... Oh, you might have to read Dan Beattie's letters sometime.
I'll put it in there if I have to.
Dan Beattie's required.
You know, the publisher of that Orville...
He's still living.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah, and he's having a good editorial all the time.
And I've written him, and you've written him.
We've sent letters to him.
We've sent it here.
And he's just a cute old man.
Yeah, we just sent him several letters.
That's why he's saying he doesn't send them in four letters.
In a column that somebody sent to me, Mrs. Marksburn said something about they hadn't been back yet, or they couldn't make it to Julie's wedding and so forth.
I think I've been to the Western White House either, she says.
I don't know why they tell people that.
She doesn't sound critical.
No, she wouldn't.
She just was asked, and they asked.
Yeah.
I don't know what she's to do when they come.
I don't know what to do.
I'll take this call and say that if they are coming... That call that we have, we have a band, we have church services, and...
But they might want to be here for one of those.
I think that's the thing they'd like the best.
Of course, if they come, we'd have to have them for lunch.
Well, that's terrible.
There's just no time.
Well, I wouldn't mind.
I think what I should do is have them let us know if they plan to check back in.
We would like to see them.
There might be a special event.
They're wanting to give tickets to the Kennedy Center.
Come on in.
Do you agree?
Yes, sir.
And that, for example, that there are going to be, you know, complimentary tickets for the Deputy Senator and a door to the White House, of course, you know, special tours and so forth, and I hope they can do that.
I don't question why else they ought to be, I don't know.
I just think somebody just ought to, but we're not there.
They call us to the well-earned place.
Ask your papa to do that.
He ought to, right?
This is a paperweight outfit.
I don't know if you just want to go around with one of those eyes and hearts.
I'll keep it here.
Okay.
You've had it for quite a while, Tex McCrary.
I have a pretty, a beautiful box that Tom Pappas brought you from the head of the Greek Orthodox Church.
Oh, yeah.
I'll, sometime today, I'd like to show you that before Tom Pappas comes.
He's coming with that dance.
He's got all of them now.
Okay.
We're going to see.
Because you need to, and he can't have them.
He's coming tonight, tomorrow, right?
Friday night.
Friday night, good.
Did you get a good list?
I just typically want to say that the one that Bob Halton gave me...
But you've got a post list as much as you could.
And they are having this party for some of the others, you know.
Yeah.
Great.
And they'll come in for the... Yeah, I'll talk to them and bring them in.
And the only people that are in the past as a contractor will host it.
Because all those people will know each other.
Did Alice Hoffman get invited or not?
Yes, she was not on the list, and after you mentioned that, I had them call her, and she'd come.
That's great.
A lot of the people who were suggested the first time... Dead.
Well, they're out of town and so forth, like Goldwater and Brooke and... A lot of them.
Two or three or four senators.
We only had one congressman.
I don't care what it was.
Goldwater, come in.
Brooke, Johnny Brooke, come in.
All right.
I just wanted to give you a brief report.
The best job he's done since he's been here.
He first of all outlined with great clarity and good feeling and passion, you know, conveying your feeling and your determination and so forth.
Read your letter.
We had still taken, but we did not use it.
Well, it was a close call.
You know, afterwards, we thought, well, we blew it because we didn't have the TV cameras on.
But I don't think he would have presented himself as well with the TV cameras.
But he went through and read the communications that you had sent, talking about Dr. Kissinger and the feeling.
And he said he started off in a way that,
conveyed the sincerity and determination to achieve a just and workable solution, recognizing their side.
And so they did an excellent job.
And then he went through and said, here's where we are today.
Here's where we stand.
Here's where we're going.
And then he went through and recapped the position that you presented last night with great clarity.
And what he felt the
The Future Held, and then he went through a little bit of the progress of the series of negotiations.
And he spoke for about 45 minutes, which was good.
Because he didn't, you know, it took him a while to read that.
It took him a while to explain it all.
Then he told them a little bit about how, just for three minutes, which there was total silence in the room, about how he got there.
How did he explain it?
Well, he said that the military aircraft... Just so you know, we're not talking behind your back.
I think you should consider it, too, as you know.
The ambassador would say to me, he said, he did the best job that he has ever done.
Is that what you told me?
Yes, sir.
You said that he was lying.
Well, I told you that he was lying.
Go ahead.
Tell me about the three minutes.
What did he say?
Well, he told them, and Helen Thomas, I think we're going to have to remove the chair, but Helen Thomas asked the question.
Right, yes, sir.
How he got in, and Henry said, well, I don't want to get into details because we want to maintain the channel, but generally we flew in military aircraft to a field, and then we transferred to other airplanes, and then we ended up in smaller airports that are seldom used.
You could see everyone saying, my God, this is what it's like out of a movie.
And he said we stayed on the outskirts of the town, and...
The other side made the arrangements for the meeting place, which never became known.
And he said, when he was there in July on his round-the-world trip, that it was particularly difficult because he was there openly.
He did point out that he'd been there after he came on the way back.
He said, you got that out of the state, but you got that out of the state.
Remember how the son of the rich said, why didn't you, your kind of a ministerial should have stopped the mosque.
And, you know,
Well, that was basically it.
He took 15 minutes of questions off you.
But the interesting thing, Henry, and you weren't out there, but when Scott, and it was a lot of the same group, when Scott and Ford went out to the press room, you could sense a few of them going to the judge, well, is it true that you never offered a
Fixed date just in exchange for POWs.
Well, when you were finished, you did get that question.
Because it was explained so clearly.
In other words, the fact that in November we offered for exchange of POWs a ceasefire, we would be out by August.
So that statement in itself fixed in their mind the fact that yes, indeed, if they would have agreed to give us our prisoners back at a ceasefire, that
Why do we ask for a ceasefire?
But he covers it.
You see, the point is, on this proposal, nothing but the ceasefire is agreed to anyway.
That's not the problem.
We're not asking for anything that they didn't agree to.
We're in good shape on that.
I think the government is going to have one hell of a time.
No, he didn't ask, but Henry hit it because he said...
He went for about four minutes on the overthrow, indirect, direct overthrow.
And on the indirect, he talked about the aid he'd be taking away.
But on the direct overthrow, he said, they left it to our own.
They were gracious enough to leave it to us.
They didn't tell us how to do it, but they said we should do it.
And I said, now, we are trying to protect the confidentiality of this channel.
We want to say no more than is necessary for the American public to have a clear opinion.
So I hope we won't be foolish in approving what we have said.
But you can.
But we can.
On your behalf.
So... Well this, the thing about this rock is that what Henry just said there
And this all goes back, incidentally, uh, remember I told you, you didn't know what Henry and I were up to, but I told you to forget that goddamn, you've never heard about any faction anyway.
But I said, it's all going to wash out.
Do you realize what this does to the Indian-Pakistan ship?
Sure.
Do you also realize what this team does to the Batman in the future when they say, well, are you telling the truth?
when we say, well, maybe we're doing something else.
They're going to be very, very respectful of what even they can write.
I dropped the seeds of a few more things in that respect, because they said, you want to say what you discussed in Peking?
I said, we won't discuss our efforts with respect to any other government on this affair, because those possibilities are still open.
The other point, sir, was silence, too.
Very, very well said.
quiet in the room was when he said, well, they may ask why we have an eight-point proposal, why the President put forth an eight-point proposal, and they had a nine-point proposal that they gave to us secretly.
And then you indicated we could not agree to the assistance.
To reparations.
The only reason we have eight and they have nine is because we forgot reparations as part of the settlement.
We can't pay reparations.
But
But before you went to but, you can see, oh, there it is.
And then Henry went, but we told them that we were prepared to, that the president's personal commitment to involving the, and more so to... Is that your father?
Three times I said that.
No, they didn't.
They didn't.
They didn't.
I just want to say before you say, this is very bad.
And this had a stand, so I was coming across.
So that's probably very valuable.
Up to what?
Up to the bottom.
In the bottom.
So I don't know if I'm going to send this to cover the metal, but I think you ought to see that before we talk about it.
Should I send this over to the presentation?
I don't think that's right.
Yeah, I'd like for her to... Could you hold it and send it to Julius here?
Because Julius is going to be enthusiastic about it.
Well, I'll send it over.
I'll send the little one.
Send the little one over and send the other one too.
So now you can say, Tom, have us send this.
As a matter of fact, you ought to tell her on the phone that it's a hell of an issue and it's worth, you know, $50,000 or some damn thing.
So the real problem is maybe $25,000.
How much of that stuff do you sort of take off before you ever get into here?
You know, I usually get wonderful things.
They sent me, you know, the peaches from Oregon.
They used to send me some magnificent pineapple from Hawaii and the rest of it.
God, I never hear about it.
I caught it the other day.
I stalked somebody, you know, and said they'd been to Rose's place, their apartment.
I think you should have seen the marble sprues and all the shit that stayed in Kansas City.
And I didn't see it.
There we go.
That ain't supposed to come to me.
She takes off.
That's what it is.
That doesn't even get as high as me.
Well, just don't get caught stealing.
Don't mind anybody stealing, but don't get caught.
I try not to.
All right.
But then they go ahead and they, but then they were pretty funny.
You know, I thought they were funny to expect for the question.
They were?
Absolutely.
They were.
Well, but...
I don't know about that.
There have been times that... What I've had is in this instance, this instance, God damn it, they're picking away at it.
You know, I already nailed it at the last legislative meeting, and when I made the point, I said, now let's understand the kinds of people that we're trying to appeal to.
I said, you know, I will not like this because their goal, of course, is something that we cannot give at the overthrow of the government, or a change of government, I'm going to call it.
As far as our domestic critic is concerned, there are some honest people, and there's a reason I said that, there were two degrees in that room, that voted for the goddamn Mansfield Amendment, who felt that we had the better of each side, but who now can be and may be satisfied, so we must go for that.
However, there are others who, for different reasons in Hanoi,
But people who think it was a mistake for Kennedy ever to get us involved, and I, of course, think of that every time.
It's not 16,000 per person, it's Vietnam.
People like the governor, who honestly oppose it all along, who frankly don't want us
And those people are going to criticize this for another reason.
So you can't win them.
On the other hand, the greater majority should be for it.
And I think that's a powerful thing.
One thing I heard today in this briefing was a number of the commentators I heard this morning said, why do you have such a complicated plan?
Why didn't you choose a simple one?
I said, no, I want you to know that I didn't do it.
This plan is complicated because it follows the outline.
They wanted it this way.
We came in with a proposal which was very simple.
Prisoners.
Prisoners cease fire and withdraw.
They never said cease fire is wrong.
They never said this or that.
What they said was it must have political elements.
So it is in order to speed up progress, not to slow it down, in order to meet the demands, that it's complicated.
It is following their outline, not our outline, that it is like this.
Then when you get the question... Now listen, let me say that when people raise the complicated line, that is just a goddamn camouflage.
They're against it, that's all.
They're just trying to find something wrong.
Don't you agree?
But there wasn't, after all, you remember, Ron, when I briefed before the President's April speech last year, and somebody got up and said, that just isn't enough.
Do you remember?
We've had really emotional meetings.
This one, I may be wrong, but I think even those who may sort of nitpick away at it are really quite impressed, and they...
They're sort of hacking away, but they haven't hacked so much.
I watch television.
No, you have to keep in mind, too, Henry, that most of them have carried a view about the war.
Most of them are in the category that I mentioned, the leaders, who think it was a mistake to get in, who think it was a mistake to stay in, and indeed want to prove that they're right and want us to lose.
And also who are concerned that maybe I,
politically might succeed.
Now, therefore, they're gonna piss on us.
And, goddammit, let's face this, kick them in the balls!
Right, Green?
Of course, they're a hell of a start, but at least a few started at this question of, why are you making it public now?
Because it's a hell of an argument for them to make, considering that they're making things public.
But you answered it well.
What did you say?
What, thereby?
That they're making things public.
Somebody, I think, lyrical has said,
Why make it public now?
Somebody asked the question, why do you make it public now?
Is there any other reason except for domestic disharmony?
I said, well, the domestic issue isn't negligible.
We need to have a united people to end this war with dignity.
I said to the leaders, one thing, incidentally, I hope somebody takes notes of this, or I made the point, Henry, and they said, well, what about the Mansfield amendments?
I said, well, let me be quite candid.
I said, if we have the Congress after this speech, which goes as far as we can go, go off in every direction, you can kiss negotiations goodbye.
you're going to kill them.
Now they have got the statement, don't you think so?
I'm just going to put the monkey on their back.
What are you going to say to them?
I said, secondly, the second reason is because
Because when you ask what was new yesterday, what was new yesterday is that the President and President Chu said publicly what we said secretly before.
The other side would have considered it a negotiating given.
Now they know we are committed to it.
The mere fact that President Chu has offered to resign changes the political landscape in South Vietnam and is in itself a tremendous confession.
Thirdly, I said every government, we have that experience, every government has experienced that they don't want to make a decision unless they have to, and that they may have thought they could wait a month or two months.
We are now asking them to take a decision.
Those were our principal reasons.
Well, that summer, did you do it because of the offensive, I said?
The basic decision was made at the end of December, at a time when we thought there'd be a series of high points and not as offensive.
We did it because with Congress coming back, we did not want to be in a position where our public and private positions were totally inconsistent with each other.
We need a united people, so the President decided, soon after Congress came back, he would put before the American people, before the Congress, enough of the facts protecting only those elements that were required to keep the confidentiality of the Channel alive.
And I was quoted in North Vietnamese about not tempting us into the review of a number of things.
You don't want to be forced into this.
But you said we're prepared to have them released.
I said if they want to release, we won't release the nine points because it's sales, but if they want to, then I gave an explanation of the differences between the nine and the seven points, which one of them, which I hadn't realized until I studied it yesterday, was that their ceasefire in the nine points is much more detailed than in the seven points, and is a real ceasefire.
Well, the second one was a sort of way.
So this killed the ceasefire issue right there.
I said, now one big difference is that the nine points offered a genuine ceasefire.
See, so then no one came back to me and said, why do you have ceasefire in your package?
You know, that's a very good point.
Ceasefire's in the package because they've already opened it.
That's right.
It's not a problem.
We've accepted it in principle.
We've accepted it in principle.
And I said, just so that we can narrow the questions to the contentious issues,
of the eight points we have, there are only two that are, in any sense, in dispute.
Which are?
The withdrawal, and the two, and I said on withdrawal, what they really want is that we get the deadline that runs no matter what happens.
And on overthrow, what they want is not that, uh, we, uh, that a few goes.
What they want is that we put them in.
And, uh,
And that is what we object to.
To ally ourselves with them.
They want us to ally ourselves with them against the people who've been relying on us.
That is what we can't do.
We will give them a fair chance at the political process.
I think this country, I don't know, but I think they're going to have a hell of a time dealing with this because, as we were willing to say publicly, it is not true we are protecting any particular government.
In our August 16th proposal, we should be able to say we are not ready to any government.
Yesterday, the President said we will accept the outcome of any political process.
It's in our proposal.
The Jew offers to resign.
Jew offers to put the whole electoral process under an electoral commission, which he doesn't control.
Then somebody said, does he appoint the electoral commission?
I said, no, the electoral commission is negotiated between us.
It's negotiated at the peace conference.
That was a good thing.
You've really got to go back to the Harris short.
They must be mad as hell.
I thought they didn't get it.
No, what I mean is that they're mad because they didn't get you.
What do you think?
I thought they didn't get it.
Yeah.
Well, anyway, incidentally, speaking of friends, I tell you what, I'm going to go back and use one of these meetings.
You don't need any enemies, do you?
He wasn't there.
Were you there?
Were you there?
I had to come in late because I was preparing for your session.
What did he do?
Well, he started fly-specking to promote more than the leaders did.
He said, why didn't you have this?
Why didn't you have that?
Well, he didn't understand.
He said, well, I don't agree.
One thing that wasn't clear is, is it true, Rudy, that we have offered a straight proposal of a ceasefire, no, of a withdrawal ceasefire from POWs?
I said, oh, yeah, sure.
I said, do you remember I said that?
I said, we offered that in, we offered to negotiate it in June, May.
We offered it in 90 months in August.
And then in October 11th, in my speech yesterday, we offered it in the alternative.
We could separate that out and do that alone.
We'll do it as part of the political package, or we'll do it as part of the page.
But the choice is theirs.
God damn it, if there was anything clear in that speech, was that that speech was very clear.
But he didn't care.
I don't know.
I wonder if he read it.
But he's in a contrary mood because yesterday afternoon at your staff, at the staff briefing I did at four,
He took the opposite line.
There, he said, why the hell did you put, he said, that proposal, trust of withdrawals and ceasefire, isn't good enough, because as soon as you're out, they're going to break the ceasefire.
So, what did he want?
What did he want?
Well, he, uh, he doesn't have an idea.
One thing I did is I read the two notes with which we transmitted the documents.
And I said, those were secret notes.
They were never intended for publication.
They just give you a flag of the spirit with which we approached the North Vietnamese.
We haven't used invective.
We have said we want justice.
We have said we will admit it.
Of course, I have to confess, I always had in mind that it's a... You always said, Henry, after every one of your meetings, you brought in great folders.
Just remember, we're speaking for the record.
He knew goddamn well.
I've got a lot of beautiful speeches I made, which I'll address to them, which if they drag it up.
Oh, if they forget to put the whole thing up.
The thing is, though, one thing I think we have done, Ron, Henry talked to you last night in the morning, and saw me and Henry talking.
But I think what has happened here is that, first, I think we caught your friends in the press corps off-balance.
Absolutely.
Yes, sir.
And second, I think we have caught our enemies in the Congress off-balance.
I have a very interesting thought, Congressman.
You remember this fellow who was fasting?
in Lafayette Park, Brian MacDonald, during camp four years.
He was two of us, yeah.
Gibson, Poole.
The Quakers.
The Quakers.
The Quakers, to whom I then talked into breaking his pass.
He called me for an hour and a half last night at midnight.
You took the call?
I said he cried.
I said I wanted to know.
I apologized.
I doubted you.
You've done everything you've ever done.
Uh...
of, can I help the administration?
Anything I can do.
The last, the last of the bloody fastest.
I'd like to say thank you for the client.
Can we put it out?
Yeah.
Well, if not, call it today.
I'll tell him that you can make a statement.
Or he would simply approve you saying that to someone.
Or just say, would you mind if I made it?
But he was, I couldn't get him off the damn phone.
His wife was assassinated, was murdered by some Negro.
She was a Negro herself three weeks ago.
And he said if only Alex had been there, we would have seen him.
No, he's an Irishman, not the Irishman.
It wasn't just, I literally- What did you tell them about?
I got the phone again, because all of a sudden, did you tell them about this?
The Marine, the Marine, the colleague, the professor from St. Joseph's College, who called and said that he had been one of those who was doubtful over the last three months, and he was again in tears.
He said, he said, if I had only known
He said, if I had only known, I wouldn't have been one of those back-fighters.
He said, I knew.
He said, he voted for the president for you in 1968.
He said, I felt then that the president of the United States could be one of the greatest presidents in the history of this country.
He said, tonight I have no doubt about the fact that he is the greatest president in the history of this country.
And, you know, great emotion.
He said, three of my students came back in coffins.
He said, I've been one of those that has been back-fighting the president, has distrusted the president.
He said, but there's no question in my mind now that everything that he is doing, everything that he is undertaking is in the best interest of the people.
We have been constantly having a fantasy now for the next two weeks or from the time, from now until we go to China, answering every on-the-spot, every false attack right in the middle of the air, not letting it off the ground, none.
But I think we've killed the government in this region today.
Yeah, I think so.
We really, and I deliberately did it, I said, I began by, you know, saying nothing has been more on the President's mind than to unite the people in ending the war after all the anguish, after all the suffering.
We are here to do so that at least we can end the war that has divided us so much in dignity and in unity.
Those are the principles we have.
This is the spirit in which I'm giving you this briefing.
We are just trying to put before you what happened so that you can raise your questions at the level of the President's concerns.
I don't know whether they're going to carry the text of this.
It's on the record.
It's on the record, but do your best to get the text carried, I mean.
I think it will.
Times ought to carry it, but they don't carry it.
It'll be a big story.
Oh, sure.
You mean the interview?
The interview.
This will be?
Oh, sure.
But last night I thought maybe we shouldn't do it, but after I saw some of the stories.
Yeah, this was important.
Yeah, well, it just keeps us on the intensity that answers the questions that some people have.
It helped with Scott Porter, Scott Porter, possibly when they came out.
Scott got himself caught a little bit up on surrender, but that was all right for him to say that.
It's fine, you know, for Scott to say that.
You can say that.
Sure you can, sir.
Well, I didn't think it was his records.
No, no, no, no.
He said that anyone who
who advocates simply withdrawal and change for the POWs and less than this.
No, he says the difference between people accepting this
a reasonable mind and then those who want to surrender entirely.
And then it came down a little bit on who you're saying surrendered.
But that's right, it's a quotes movie.
The responsibility of the world except for that.
We're not going to attack O'Brien.
We're not going to attack these left-wingers.
I tell you, McCloskey, I saw McCloskey on television.
He said, I think the guy has flipped his lid.
Even Roger Mudd jumped on him.
He was on with Brooke.
He made Brooke look like a right-winger.
Brooke defended you, not very enthusiastically.
He said he wished you had come further, but this is a tremendous step in the right direction.
Then McCluskey said he's deceived the American people.
Did you see it?
Roger Mudd said, how has he deceived the American people?
He said, because he didn't mention it in the State of the Union address.
He's confusing them for their difference.
He's deceiving the American people.
Even Mudd does not look like a human.
He said you shouldn't put this in the State of the Union.
That made the State of the Union 50 minutes long.
That, if we get no worse criticism than this, we're in trouble.
It's like, McCloskey speaking is like the head of the Quarks Club in Dallas.
Yeah, it was.
How long was the speech last night?
Nineteen minutes.
Nineteen?
That's good.
It's a good one.
I thought it was the best delivery that I have heard you...
Your right face.
Strong.
That one was strong.
You didn't appear to apologize.
Well, anyway, have fun.
But, Ron, I want you to watch.
Have Scali watch on his son, if you can.
Don't bother me with it, because I know you bother me.
Goddamn it, Rick.
But I don't bother him.
Whenever anybody raises their ugly head and says something that's wrong, get over the Colson group, you know what I mean, and chop their damn heads off and have a denier come at us.
Get Rogers.
Make him say something.
He will.
He will.
And say, look, will you answer this?
Now, you talk to Colson, will you?
That's part of his job.
so that we do not allow the little lies now to be called.
We've got a good position, and the way we summed it up, Cameron, is the way a lot of people are saying, I've gone as far as we can go, let's stick right there.
Now, one other thing, and this is very important,
Every son of a bitch now is going to come up with some new proposal, some new way to do it.
Let's do this, and why don't we do that?
And they're going to say, why don't we offer straight prisoners for withdrawal?
Or something like that.
Although I think you killed them pretty well.
But nevertheless, the answer is safe.
We have made our proposal, and we're standing by it.
And don't give in.
Don't change.
We support your proposal, and we're standing by it.
As you said in the leadership meeting this morning, someone has to make the decision as to how far we go.
That decision has been made, and we stand by it.
That's right.
Well, the leaders were told this morning for a change.
Goddamn it.
You were very strong this morning with them, too.
All right.
Bye.
Bye.
I like that play.
You really knocked it down.
You should have heard it bigger.
He's, uh, he's, you know, he calls it, he's, he's, he said that he, he slaughtered us and passed us.
But I'm telling you, from now on, we're going to take on the fish next to us, and if they, they crap on us, by God, crap on them, we've got to fight them now.
We've got to fight them.
I'm a little sorry I wasn't online, because I was really eloquent today.
Oh, that's what he said.
God damn it, I wish it was an election speech.
Must have been taking me.
Not on television.
No, but I know all these radio things, Peter.
Of course, I didn't know I had a son.
I spoke extemporaneously to him.
If you've been on live, it may not have been quite as good, though, you never know.
The television tends to make us all flee.
Let me just see if the, well, they all have reporters, but I wonder if they have reporters.
Well, they have the text, the hell with the text.
I was thinking of, even if it's not on television, we can get out a radio show on the day of the same.
Turn the radio to turn your call.
Do you want to hold it?
I'll finish it and take these on.
All right, okay, thanks.
Yes, yes.
Hello?
Hello, how are you?
Are you in a recent meeting?
Hello?
Hello?
Yeah, how are you?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Are you in a recent meeting, I understand.
Well, we called, Henry, I guess, called you with an advance or hey here.
Yeah, yeah.
Right.
Yeah.
Right.
Let me say that I couldn't agree more.
If the line could be taken, we have gone as far as we can go.
We cannot join our enemy or overthrow our ally.
But beyond that, if we could also say that any chance for negotiation
will be destroyed if we go off in all directions again.
But if the American people unite behind this proposal, then the enemy will realize that they can't gain the United States the victory they can't win out there.
And I really think if you could hit that line, let's unite.
Because it's really true, Rob, you can't speak with a babble of voices and expect the other side to negotiate.
There's got to be one negotiator.
Now, this is
If they want to go off on their own, then they have the responsibility for destroying this fine chance for peace.
Now, I understand the first reaction of the enemy will be to turn this down.
But that's all right.
We'll just keep proposing.
And after they've had their offensive, then we'll see what they're gonna do.
Right, right.
Yeah.
Well, let me say this.
He is top-line, and he certainly is one who could conserve any place in government.
He's that good, in my opinion.
with regard to this situation we're on at this point because of the relatively short time
I feel that at this point that, and John, I talked to John Mitchell about it, that the best thing probably is going to be to take Kleindies and have him serve until the, you know, the 10 months that are left.
And then, of course, Kleindies has no ideas.
I mean, I don't think he's going to have that.
But I can assure you that
is at the very top of the list, as, of course, Smith would be.
Smith, particularly for the court, and Cap on the AG thing.
I know his heart is set on that.
But you can see that at this point, if you moved a new man in,
who, you know, on top of this whole pile, inept with all the intricate things they've got to operate and all the cases that are up there, it would just take an awful lot of time for him to learn what the hell is going on.
The Justice Department, the Justice Department is the most intricate deal of all because of the cases they have.
But I got your message, and frankly, if you have no objection, I'm going to tell Kev who talked and feel appreciated, too, because he's done a fine job.
And give my best to the student editors.
Oh, wait for that.
Bob Fitch was at the city yesterday and said he was coming out to see you.
And he had a couple things to pass on to you, and I think it would be very decent here.
But he, I think he left a couple of questions.
He said he was going to see you today or tomorrow.
But I've come up with, you know, you talked about the phone, but I think it was.
If you want to talk to me after you've seen him, head on ahead and call.
Okay.
Because I'm not getting involved in California politics.
But it's up to you.
I'm glad to interview you.
Could I get you to take that?
Yeah.
It would be a good idea to take Henry's breathing thing.
And to go over it in terms of, and get somebody who's helped on how
questions come up and so forth.
But what he tries to do is answer various questions there and prepare about two, three pages of questions and answers, you know.
What I meant is that he answers the question about whether we offered this and what we did that and so forth and so on.
Buchanan is probably the one that could do that the best.
or Sapphire, one of the two.
Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe Sapphire.
But what I mean is I get it right away and get it to, how to, you could talk to Paul about who should get it.
Our, maybe some congressmen probably need them, senators are on that.
Maggie, the press, people that have to answer questions, okay?
Is Secretary Kahn here yet?
As soon as he arrives, I want to see him first before the others come in.
Would you try to share pitches?
Don't do it now because I don't see you getting any more.
Mr. Snyder of Kentucky Police.
is after that meeting.
Oh, yeah, I think so.
Hi, John, how are you?
I'm good, how are you?
I want to see you again.
uh the deficit the deficit aspect of the budget uh the fear of inflation what what extent the impact of it
on the thing, and just the economic situation here in the U.S. and so on.
Yes, and I can give you some, we certainly should get back to all this.
Okay, yes.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
Well, I'll tell you, I will be tied up for an arm, so I'll call back.
Yes, Mr. Brody.
I had another call in, but would you hold them now for an arm?
Right, right.
He comes in.
They come in, they find out.
All set for the pictures, I'll tell you.
All right.
All right.
I've got this.
I have a working session, Mr. President.
Here they are.
All right.
I like this very little.
It really was, Mr. President.
I called Henry last night and told him that.
You got him?
Yeah.
I thought it was actually true.
I was interested.
Jack Colton asked me.
He said that he talked to you.
He asked me to call Clark Kerr.
And he had Clark for me.
I had to get him to see Clark.
And that's a public statement.
I was reacting to the casting, so it'd be the last one.
Well, at least, it is scheduled.
Yes, that is.
All right.
Basically, it says the audience would suggest that you drop it out and support Brown as you did with the war on Earth.
The speech that happened.
What war?
Oh, I don't know.
Well, he's been having a committee that's been making suggestions about Vietnam and Vietnam.
Yeah, it's not a devilish committee.
On the other hand, we're pushing particularly on the ceasefire.
Yeah, it's not way out there.
It's like many other groups.
Well, I thought we ought to have this meeting a sort of general rundown of it.
On various matters, it occurred to me, you talked to John, perhaps his partner, he talks a lot about the low-income, as you were, what's your evaluation type, I read your paper that you sent to me, and perhaps we ought to hear
Mark, do you want to cover in regard to the supply and so forth?
John?
Yes.
Perhaps some up-to-date information in regard to where it stands in regard to able to...
But if I could put it the federal way we want, should we start with the economic side first, and then the national side first?
You can fit into these things, too.
And John also.
Well, I get in front of a price.
I gave a chair view this morning to the Republican leadership.
I feel a little more worried about this, I think.
I feel a little more worried than I appeared to have this morning, I'm sure.
But we have a forecast of a strong, steady rise in the economy, by all means, an excessive rise in the economy.
But that forecast depends very heavily on the expansion of spending.
It's really an amazing expansion of spending.
Well, federal spending, I mean, from the expenditure drive, according to our estimates, from the fourth quarter to the first quarter, that's two quarters, by more than an increase in the last seven quarters.
Furthermore,
The, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the,
It just wasn't the case, in fact, either way.
Well, it was down.
Why it was down, I don't know.
It's very preliminary.
We'll get better figures soon.
But I've never had a previous one, so it was not.
But the first indication of the start of the conference, as I said, I was sure it was going to be this month.
As I said, it was January.
I'm not encouraging a lot of people to say I was there.
...so that...
They don't seem to start.
Some people I've talked to who go around and talk to business people, they're not starting with the vigorous you might expect from the drive that we're looking for.
And, uh, I don't know if you can see this, but I'm calling it a desperation.
I can't repeat it.
I tend to forget and draw the vex, but it is vexed.
I didn't push it.
I was just going to draw the vex on it.
Well, I know Arthur is pushing at the same time, but we're lucky to see any growth, or hardly any growth, of the 7-1.
I'm particularly conscious of the complaints that we are getting at the same time that the situation is all incredibly strange.
Our very expansionist policy, our very expansionist policy, our very expansionist policy, our very expansionist policy,
We've had already cables from Paris and various French officials who are already going to get them again.
And I'm sure we're going to hear a great deal later about our policy making advancements and tour advancements.
Irresponsible is what they've been responsible for.
And I think, to me, that the president's wishes on me is very, very terrible.
And I think it's very exciting for him.
And I think it's very problematic.
that, uh, that are aligned with respect to the analogies of things.
Well, they should try to do it.
The other point of concern that seems to me is the prospect of a wage price.
I think it's, uh, working moderately well, but things like the doctor I've written about indicate how, kind of, fragile the whole thing is,
Excuse me, if I went there and the doctor's right, which is still a part of your body, but anything that hasn't been suggested, that's a reasonable stand for me for you.
That's a great question.
I don't think there is any internal consistency in the lawyer, but I guess my guy has me worried sometimes when we are supporting, maybe, for hearing him step in at some point.
Basically, I think it is going to contribute something to our job here as a church.
So that might help us.
You have no particular... Well, of course, it's hard to tell us.
I intend not to have to tell.
It's the best we know.
I had an impression up until recently that we moved very well in December.
Didn't you, John?
Yes.
What did we move to?
Retail sales.
You talked about retail sales in December being dead poor.
Well, you didn't mean poor, really.
A little number of figures.
indicated me slowly climbing.
Climbing from which last year?
I don't remember.
I think it has to be, remember, when they seized me and Justin, they go from November to December.
They were really taking a series of figures.
What about sugar figures on January?
Well, we've been having a couple of weeks, and the weekly figures were even worse than the monthly figures, but the Department of Power's record then is indicating a change where it may be down again.
It's a slight clue.
And the economy that we're expecting to rise by 9-10% to
that we have any evidence that we're not going where we want to go.
I guess the main thing I want to say is that going where we want to go depends very heavily
I'm not very confident.
I'm confident that we do not see a lot of independent autonomous living.
So we have to keep looking out for the business winter and getting off grass and stuff.
All right.
What other judgments do we have on this for you, Mark?
Well, in fact, I'll comment on some of the budget things.
But what I heard, the first was regarding some curbs and analysis of the where we are.
I'd be more, I'd be more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more, I'm more.
I'd be more,
Cyclic recovery.
Lengths of the work we've been making back here in the past few months has risen sharply.
The, if you look not bad, you know, in the last quarter, last few months, contracts are up.
Commercial, industrial, orders for capital are up.
business appropriations for capital expenditures are up.
Well, they're a little too big a percentage, so there's a drop down somewhere.
Well, you know, they're wadding from month to month, so we're right.
Oh, that has to be correct.
But if you take this from a broader trend, I see business capital expenditures, and this has been the lagging factor of the economy.
But you see that the...
What do you think?
What do you say, John?
Well, basically the same thing.
I think by any standards, regardless of the December 4th quarter, did it need to have a 6.1% rise for your GDP?
And I'm not satisfied that you're the center of retail figures when the departments are correct.
I remember seeing a couple of stories in the Wall Street Journal in which they actually interviewed people about the first of the year, major department stores around the United States, Mr. Sears, and so forth and so on.
And they were saying, fantastic, unbelievable.
This was the sale that was being posted the whole Christmas, between Christmas and New Year's.
And they just say we're 17% above last year, but this is the best December we've ever had in the history of solar and all this kind of things.
I just have to question the Congress and the preliminary figures.
But author's right.
The labor market indicators, I think, suggest for the Kings and some months ahead, your work week has increased, I think.
Layoff rates down, the uninsured, the insured unemployment rate fell 3.8% in December according to my famous list.
And hiring rates up, health and water advertising is up.
Prices were not particularly good.
good in December, but that was the fullest we were all expecting.
And then we all worried about housing.
December housing, I don't quite believe this is a big figure.
You'll probably prove to be wrong.
Housing started from $2.5 million in December, housing permits were $2,231,000.
That has to be, that has to be, which has to be, I'm sure, a lot of subsidized.
It gets reported in early months.
It gets reported in December.
But if you knock it down, if you knock it down, it's still a good two and a quarter million.
Two to one, three million for the fourth quarter.
So the fourth quarter, how does it start?
Now, all of you, most of you are...
I got some information this morning that hurt me.
I feel like it's a composite leading index to be served or to be made public tomorrow.
It shows a continued strong advantage.
It's leading in the year.
That's on top of a revised, upward revised November figure.
That's right.
And it's strong on a broad front.
It's leading in the year.
It's better to take Herb's picture as a starting point than John's or mine.
The way you think of John's or mine is more nearly correct.
I agree, I agree.
Well, then these meetings should be the first to almost talk about the problem rather than...
That's what I've asked all of you to do, so I just want to be sure that we hear it exactly as it is.
And say everything's going to hell every time you have a bad figure, because it isn't.
It's always all a question really of measuring.
Because of what people's expectations are.
I have a couple of additional things to add, Mr. President.
I want to mention the layoff rate, which is down, down to the, say, late 1969, I don't know where it lies.
The accession rate of manufacturing is up, and the accession, the accession, the measured layoffs,
Those would be involuntary operations.
The numbers are people who quit voluntarily.
And the Conservatives look bad against the rate at which they were being added to payrolls.
The accession rate was 4.2 per 100 employees, but they have a rate of 1.4 per 120.
So there's a big differential there.
On the curve rate, the question of federal spending,
Before you get into that, may I just say one thing?
Arthur, you weren't at the cabin meeting, but John is undertaking responsibility for pulling together
and all the commerce and so forth, and analysis of who are the unemployed.
Now this is, people have gone through this before, you know, but as you know, the heads of household numbers would be pretty good.
You have a hell of a problem with regard to women and other, and there's two jobs in the back of the deal, and of course, 18-year-olds and so forth and so on.
You'll have that in about, do you think, in about three weeks or so.
And I think this will be interesting.
If you're a cop,
You don't do that kind of work.
Would you make a contribution to that thing, to the force?
We're just going to know who the hell the unemployed are.
Herbs are going to do it, and the commerce people, the labor people will probably get the best figures to play their role.
Are there seven?
Yeah.
I think we'd all like to know, and then we can see what the devil will do about the problem.
Do you think this is useful?
An analysis of the actor.
Also, I don't know how to talk about it.
You ask for what I think of it.
It doesn't really take much.
We've all been here for the same figures.
And honestly, we don't take more of what I think.
I suggest, Kevin, I just don't want to get you wrong.
No, no, here's what I would do.
I'd like to get John to do it.
John can do it.
And let John send it around.
And then we'd ask for track, rather than do it independently.
Because we're going to be using the same sources, we probably wouldn't want to put the same thing.
You think you all use the same sources?
Well, the only sources I can do that with.
Maybe we can come up with a recommendation for a special service.
Well, if you want a special survey, John, let's have it.
Right.
I think that, you know, I mean, if you want to order something, you might have to do it.
Let me tell you something that you probably don't know.
I don't want you to know this, George.
These unborn contestants were revised.
Now, one of the key questions in my survey is as follows.
If you find a fellow, he doesn't have, he's not working, he doesn't have a job.
Well, what has he done, you see, to look for a job?
Now, you can ask that question in very many different ways.
One way of asking that question is,
A very simple way of asking the question is, what have you done within the past four weeks?
Another way of asking the question is, what have you done within the past week?
You may have done nothing within the past week, but you did something four weeks ago.
Now, a special survey was run.
No, it's okay.
And if the question were, and the question they use is, in the survey, what have you done here in the past four weeks?
If instead of asking the question in the last four, if they were asking the question, what did you do here in the past week?
The number along the rate would be down by 1.5% more.
This is an unpublished document in the mainland survey.
But they decide in the four weeks.
Now you ask the question, why should they decide that way?
Well, you know, these statistical people are pretty objective of what they have in mind for politics, too.
I don't know if that's good or bad.
I'm just describing it.
They...
I have my own ideas.
If they had taken the definition on a one-week basis, they would have been a great in the series.
They found that by taking it on a four-week basis, you could have something that looks continuous on the chart and wouldn't have a sudden drop.
And they decided not to have this sudden drop.
But actually, my book, the proper question is not what the hell you did four weeks ago.
You did nothing during the past week, as you say.
And that makes quite a bit of a difference.
You got it wrong.
who sat in front of this first one.
All I did was picture you, however you wanted it.
Another one of you had a picture of me, but I wanted that to be the only one.
You know, just that one.
Okay, well, in good time.
Do you like the use of the division?
I think you might have to suppress them and take them away, right, too, because they won't use it.
I've got to talk to them.
I'm sure they're glad you're here for, you know, the business, magazines and so forth.
Let's take a picture and walk it out.
You can do that.
Sure, anytime you want.
All right.
Okay, now, John, you do it any way you want.
All right, George, budge it.
You started going right around the corner.
You had a lot to talk about.
I would make a point or two about the spending, but we are, my father was a part of it, pushed very hard to spend the money that they'd have offered.
Good, I raised one with you.
I don't want to risk it.
The jury at work have handed a note to me.
I always get a little sent to me at these meetings.
But anyway, his note is about HUD.
He said George Romney's got a hell of a lot of money around for various projects, and he and a number of people, a number of congressmen say that HUD is just one of the worst.
not through going forward on our knowledge i don't know it may be that this involves uh there's some very controversial kinds of queens or what i mean is but it means also that they're not doing it would you look at that that's all right i certainly will the i told you to do that to have these various inner city public housing types of things because we have just a failing program
That is also very slow-spending money.
We do have some money that we're still reserving out of bonds, and we'll be testifying on that tomorrow, which represent programs we talked about at Camp David.
Now, to some extent, this water and sewer type program where you have slow-spending programs, which gradually the federal government is being brought in,
to build all the sewer systems all over the country.
It just doesn't seem to make sense, and we're trying to drag our feet up.
But for the most part, funds have been put out.
We are, of course, being accused by the press in the sense of having withheld all these funds and now dumping them all out for a purpose of stimulating things before the election.
I think that it may be we will get attacked for doing any withholding.
And actually, the withholding you do for the non-apportioned money that is
That is, that it handled that way for financial reasons is about the same as it was last year, about $12 billion.
So it may not be bad right now, given all the worry about the deficit and so on, that we'll get a headline for the battle of at least holding back funds, at least it shows that we're trying to be prudent in the management of money.
On the other hand,
With that respect to our statements about a firm spending ceiling and his housing funds, we are pushing other departments to spend the money, and they have a tremendous amount of budget authority, as was brought out of the cabinet meeting.
Let's understand one thing, Dr., you weren't the captain, but I made this point.
I said spend the damn money in the first four months of this year.
because we talk about holding until the month before the election.
That's too late.
If you spend it then, it doesn't do any good.
I mean, sure, you could make an announcement that you're gonna spend money, but if it's going to wrap up the economy, and if you agree with this, don't you, the thing to do is to get the damn money out now, later on.
If we, then we can pull in the rankings.
I'm sure it's especially true of that argument.
That's correct.
And also, in terms of economic effects, there's also this.
The...
You're old now, and I think very wisely, a rigid expenditure ceiling.
I've got a good plan, too.
All right, now then.
At least some time before they go, you get the money out before you get that ceiling.
We've got a plan for 73.
What's that?
That applies to 73.
That only applies to 73.
And that won't have it.
That's the plan.
Mr. President, you've done this in the Congress.
Yeah.
Your recommendation was for 73.
Yeah.
congressional people out, and they will start playing with the idea.
And it may not come out just the way we want it, but we'll see.
But let's take our number for 72 and sign it out, and that's all right.
We have it in ourselves.
I'll leave it right there.
The majority here wants to present a certain recipe.
Once you present that idea to Congress, there's only one ceiling to the president to propose, and that's the ceiling to his budget.
Well, when Congress starts moving and acting, they may take that ceiling or some other, higher or lower, depending on the politics of the city.
Well, just to give an idea, Mr. President, about the defense area and the burden we've been carrying in terms of GMP changes.
You saw that chart of the burden in terms of numbers of jobs, and the chairmen are very conscious of that.
But in the third and fourth quarter of 69 and the first quarter of 1970, the spent defense spending was on the order of $79 billion in annual rate.
From that figure, the first quarter of 1970,
down through it, went from 79 to 75 to 74 to 73 to 72 to 71.
In the third quarter of 1971, the defense spending figure was $70 billion.
That's a tremendous decline.
That's spending.
That's spending.
Now, the counterparty has that chart on jobs that we saw, but here's the numbers.
Now, beginning
In the fourth quarter, it has turned around.
It went from 70 billion to 71.5 in the fourth quarter.
What is doable in getting it up?
What is doable?
Well, they are going to spend, they claim, and we're on their back in the last two months.
They're going to get their rate of spending up to 75.8 in this fiscal year.
So that means their increase in the first and second quarter has to be very steep.
Now, lots of people don't think they can make it.
I think they have to spend a great amount of money for the next six months to do that very fast.
Yeah, because if I see your number, you have to air it out.
Okay.
Well, that's good, John.
But I think, assuming that the Defense Department can do it,
And our people think that they may be able to hit 75.
They swear they can.
And we're sort of letting them swear and putting them on the spot and saying, all right, you fellows say you can.
There's the number.
Now you go ahead.
But we don't think you can show us.
And they're pretty good at getting rid of money over there.
And you have equally good men working on the domestic agencies, even though they spend a hell of a lot less.
Right, George?
Well, we're working on it.
uh... uh...
of modern information technology.
And this is one of the things we've been working on since I've been at OMK to get better.
A real little budget system would be called so that we can get these numbers very properly.
Could you follow the scheme of, I mean, I host a fine group of guys, men and women that you've had there, having one person
just a writer of each one, you know?
Yeah, we do.
We do.
Yes, sir.
We would ask for each one to write their back every day because I agree that many of the departments now, it is just a product, for example, of the Treasurer.
Because, I mean, you've got to understand, they just collect.
But mine is never that much.
Well, I mean, they don't have GSAs and that kind of stuff.
Yeah.
Okay.
So that is the...
That is going forward strongly, and we're doing everything we can to take our lives for the better.
All right.
What is your feeling about the state of energy, with regard to how we handle the size of that?
to be, just as Herb has indicated, to be non-apologetic, very affirmative.
That a, that a, that a, that a, that a deficit when an economy is operating at a low full capacity is non-inflationary.
That's what the Rupert Cook is saying.
Remember, it's true what we're saying, what John and I both said, what I did really think.
We want to see the climate rising.
And this is, in some ways, the best medicine we have to take.
And it's an investment in an expanding economy.
And we're trying to use a counterpoint in saying that we have worked hard not to have fiscal 73 out of control.
that we do have a declining rate of increase in traffic, that we do have the spending ceiling, and we're trying in all sorts of ways to keep the thing from being in a position where two years from now we can't greatly extend the outlets of the residents.
That is going to be.
We're working on a 74 budget now, beginning that process.
And it's very, very hard to see how this is going to be done.
But we'll have to, we'll work around it.
We are in a very tight situation, all right.
I'm sure the analysts will see that.
But we're, our whole approach is that this is what we're doing.
We have no apologies to make.
Well, we've been disrespected in our life.
I am inclined to think that as far as your expansionary budget is concerned, I'm speaking now, I was here for the 73 budget, you need not be concerned about the fact that we've asked for our student.
They probably will not give, they'll give us one on ourselves and not on them.
And as far as the cutting is concerned,
I would confidently predict they're not going to end up cutting the budget because of the forces that operate against each other.
The big defense guys want more of our defense than we believe in.
And so they're going to fight like hell in the cuts in that direction, and they'll end up along their heels.
And on the domestic side, hell, they're going to add to this question.
They're bound to add to it, because the main good God with all his candidates down there, I mean, they've got all their pet programs, must-use water program, can be self-procured, and all the rest.
But we're going to be feeding every chimpanzee or what have you in one of that.
And I have to go for a trooper.
No, that's all that God has to do.
That'd be fine.
The point is that your argument about the budget, though, it seems really relates not to what the Congress does, but it really relates to what George is able to get the departments to do in the next six months.
I'm not clear about that.
That's the biggest step up.
It's a great thing.
from the second half of that county here to the state locality.
And I don't know how much of that depends on that selection.
Does that depend on the general revenue sharing?
The big increase is the general revenue sharing, and that, of course, depends on getting it directed.
Can I ask another question?
General revenue sharing in one, I mean, revenue sharing in one form or another is probably going to come out.
Is that going to help?
Do you think?
Well, I think if the states and localities, especially if the states and localities are very confident that it's going to come along, I think there was that kind of thing.
Well, that's an additional lag.
It's an immediate avalanche.
Do you think that will get better?
Yeah.
As soon as they're confident they're going to get it.
Now, the committee is holding hearings now.
Is that correct?
Yes, sir.
Isn't it?
Yes, sir.
What's your estimate?
What's your estimate?
I can't prove it.
I can't prove it.
I can't prove it.
I can't prove it.
Well, but see, if they may just get on their horses hard here, because the heat on them is enormous.
If they get done in March... Well, you see, there's a lag in legislation.
There's going to be a lag in tooling up at the state level.
The levels will be higher for this money.
So then, I don't know, the effect, I think, will be mainly the one that Herb's going to be getting through psychology.
Right.
And now, knowing that this money is coming along,
And they can be bolder than their own.
They won't fire policemen.
A few other things.
One other attack being made on the budget is that we have shifted money from fiscal 73 to fiscal 72, and thereby distorted the extent of stimulation in fiscal 72.
And I heard about the amount in 73.
And what we have said on that is that indeed we have shifted.
Where we could find construction projects that could be speeded up, we speeded them up.
We pointed out that we have moved some welfare payments to the states across the line that this will be here in about a billion dollars for the sake of helping
Is that going to help?
Do you think?
Well, I think if the states and localities, especially if the states and localities are fairly confident that it's going to come along, I think there was something to say about that.
Well, that's an additional lag.
It's an immediate lag.
I don't care if it doesn't matter.
But as soon as they're confident they're going to get it.
Now, the committee is holding hearings now.
Is that correct?
Yes, it is.
What's your estimate?
He's going to tell us what you did with this.
What's your...
I wasn't marching.
They might get it by...
They're not getting the march.
This will come out as interesting.
I can't prove it.
I'm going to get whatever it's worth.
That is not going to be...
Well, let's see.
They may just get on their horses hard here because the heat on them is enormous.
If they get done in March.
Well, you see, there's a lag in legislation.
There's going to be a lag in tilting up at the state level.
There's going to be a lag in this plane.
It's going to be a lag.
will be banning the one that hurt Wendy through psychology.
Money is coming along and they can be bolder on their own.
They won't fire police and a few other things.
One other attack being made on the budget is that we have shifted money from fiscal 73 to fiscal 72 and thereby distorted
extended stipulation in fiscal 72 and I heard that it dampened the amount in 73.
And what we have said on that is that indeed we have shifted where we could find construction projects that could be speeded up, we speeded them up.
We pointed out that we have moved some welfare payments to the states
across the line for the sake of helping the states with their fiscal problems, anticipating the revenue sharing would come in and would take that up.
And so that's a move in that direction.
So we've been candid about what has been done.
That's not overly common or crucial.
They mean that they mean something more.
Namely, that you have that amount of shifting on the books which simply cannot and will not take place physically.
Therefore, the rate of expenditure during the year will be more even than the budget suggests.
Now,
I think the way, and I think that's true, Mark, maybe.
Now, the way I would handle that, as you said, although it's simply to deny it, but not belligerently, because if it's more evil, it's not a bad thing.
Well, I think there's another thing about that, for example,
You're working on it.
All these things that we've been talking about since the fiscal 72 are in the hands of the Catholic.
Now, they don't have services that would put yourself in a mental hurt, and I have this, and I have John, I have the teacher, and I have the Catholic meeting.
Is it clear to the cabinet, or is there need to be anything else said on, do you want me to do anything more, call anybody, do anything, and so forth?
What do you think?
No, I think it's perfect.
Okay.
I think we'll follow up on it.
We'll follow up on it.
I would have been surprised to talk to the various cabinet members now.
A little, they didn't understand.
About what their jobs were doing.
Yeah, they don't understand.
They don't follow their budgets perfectly.
Well, they follow them to the best.
I'm older, but Tim was there.
He was not very good.
He knows exactly what I'm talking about.
Good.
All right, we'll school the others.
All right, we're even.
Good, good.
And let me say, use my name in vain or any other way to help you.
Okay.
Now, you just tell them why you call them the president every 30 minutes.
Every 30 minutes.
Every 10 minutes.
Every 10 minutes.
Archer, how about a word on money supply?
You heard, sir, says that M1 is, the M1 is the figure that concerns you.
Well, yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
You know, we have, you know, it's very, it's a big increase.
It's a chance to be as we're expecting, but I don't care if it's not increasing.
So, Bertha's right about that, but I don't know what to do.
I'm doing everything that I can, but you see, we don't control them.
What do we control is reserves.
People decide, people make the decisions.
They'll keep their money in their checking account.
That accounts for that money.
or they'll put in an interest-bearing account at a commercial or a restaurant.
Yes, sir.
And we can't be silent about it.
Now, let me just show you the, uh...
They don't mean to sign this for us, but we don't mean to want to be shitting on it.
They just get back to the point.
You see the...
The N1 looks sick in the fourth quarter.
A rate of increase of 1.1%.
Terrible, you see?
Then you look at N2, and the rate of increase is 80%.
Now, if you look at time and savings deposits, other than the large certificates of deposits,
And the rate of increase is 15%.
And people are deciding.
You have my own reasons for the moment.
You can only speculate about that.
People are deciding to hold their liquid assets not in the form of cash so much, but in the form of interest-bearing people.
Well, we're pumping reserves into the commercial banks this month.
This month we're pumping in reserves at an annual rate of 25% plus.
And the bankers are going wild.
Very, very, very glad to be here.
Your response is one of mine, not two.
Did you hear me yell the other day, when I received the answer, Lee, I've got a subject, a subject much hanged over there.
A man hanged over there.
Well, Mr. President, the, uh, the, uh, on the management side, I've got the... Of course.
On the manager's side, the New York bank is less than fully cooperative, and I've almost at the moment taken over the New York bank and running that operation myself.
The manager is down at least once a week.
All I can tell you is, Mr.
Friend, do all I can, really.
But when he criticizes, and I can't just dismiss his criticism, he's not going to help, am I?
I hope you're really all right, because that is the management of the accountants in Washington.
The what?
The management of the old farmhouse.
Well, you know, this is, uh, this is, uh, you know, this is a very difficult problem to deal with.
But you see, one of the difficulties is,
We have a private public system, and we show the implications of it, and why this is a difficult achievement.
The Federal Reserve, the chairman is 42,500.
Chairman, Mr. President, I think you know he's not complaining.
I don't want to change him.
Not for me, ever.
The...
I will say it.
No, I say it.
I'm not going to take five and a half years.
Now, the other board members get 40.
The staff is a jester to them, you see.
And they walk pretty high.
I haven't done a simple service.
But, through that season, during New York, the president was under my control.
He gets 90.
The manager of the desk, the vice president, is 75.
The fellow who runs the desk is 25 or 60, you see.
Now, if I move into
How can I move him?
Don't move him.
I don't know if John's going to be sizzling.
What's that?
Just move him.
Sizzle.
Don't move him.
You really ought to take over that area of the operation.
He probably complains to the janitor a lot more.
I'll take the night one tomorrow.
The tail should wipe the dog down.
I don't know.
Well, it's not wiping the dog.
John, if I can find a way of taking it over,
My devices, other than those that I'm using now, which are psychological, you say, you understand?
I'll do it.
I'll do it.
I don't want to work.
I'll help if we can.
Well, you can help, Mr. President.
No.
Would you call one of them?
No.
Get rid of Brown.
Brown?
Yeah.
Well, now you're talking about the U.N. Yeah.
Well, that will give me enough support.
Well, do call one, unfortunately.
The U.N.
I'm going to check to see whether that thing's about to be that job.
The one job is not one that we can claim for crime or even a new ball must be given to somebody else from another country.
But I'm going to make another check.
I ask you to help me, if you will.
That is of very great importance to us, to you, Steve, you know.
And we've got to facilitate an ambassadorship.
You know, the UN, I think he likes us permanent jobless.
You know, there's enough prestige attached to the UN.
Well, you see the different ideas that's there, but I see what you mean.
Would you call Bill O'Connell up?
We've got to have him in the UN job.
Okay.
All right, John, can we go around the clock to the international problems, or anything else that you would like to?
Well, there are two or three things of interest.
The trade, Belarus trade negotiations with these various countries have been going fairly unsatisfactory.
The Europeans are going to agree to something probably Monday.
not nearly as much as they should, but they're being quiet on some things, such as their preferential treatment of other countries.
But they will probably do something on citrus, less than they should.
They'll do something on tobacco.
They say on grain storage they will do something on wheat, but they claim that they sold all their other grains, barley and so forth, to Russia, which is all right if they have.
They're going to do nothing on grain pricing.
The French are adamant on that score.
We may get whipsawed.
The Italians are on our side on grain prices.
They say that they're not going to give on citrus tobacco unless France gives on grain.
So we may get whipsawed there Monday.
But in any event, we probably will get something out of them that will be of mediocre value.
The Japanese are going to get a long list of things out of the Japanese.
I don't intend to go into a lot of its verbiage.
Some of it's mean, some of it isn't.
They're going to go away with the tariffs on soybeans completely, but it's only 5%.
They said they had $329 million in sales last year.
By far the biggest...
agricultural items we had.
We'll get something on, we'll get something on beef, we'll get something on beef, we'll get something on citrus.
We'll have to open up three states to the mandarin orange issue.
Because a lot, a lot of things must be 2025 items that we'll get some relief on there.
We can, we can handle it any way we want to.
The Canadians, they'll do nothing.
Just to completely back up, we'll do nothing.
And they just claim that they've got a political problem in 1973, and they don't actually do anything.
We say to them, well, we've got a political problem in 72.
Truth of the matter is, they don't want to cooperate.
They're being implacable, completely, wholly unreasonable.
And I think we ought to start to...
I had their old meeting with them in 72, and I just told them that was a bad idea to do so.
Thank you very much.
Well, this kind of attitude won't let us have any further discussion.
We just have to continue to allow them to do whatever is in our best interest.
And what we ought to do, probably in a way, is to fairly soon give notice of termination of the order.
And we ought to reduce our
allowances for tourists to the same unit they allow, which is to give our tourists $100 a month for 30 days.
We restrict them to $25 duty-free every three months, which is what they've done.
Uh, and we'll just count them, just on the thing, and just the question of status under the interest, and the interest of the organization, I can automatically appeal that we sent them in for the goddamn tax, at their request.
And we, and we, frankly, we just gave them special leave over the years, and I'll cast them on a trip up there, and I'll go up there and tell them all these things.
They, uh, they, uh, they, uh, they would not have anything official, and he's back here talking to them.
And I just want to make a note.
John, if you'd follow up on this, you were mentioned to...
Didn't I hear you?
Who's doing this?
Well, it's... Hey, hey, it's me.
I'm going out there.
I'm supposed to go and see that.
So they follow up to you.
I promise to not do it.
And frankly, because he'd seen that in Russia, he has to counter it.
But I see no reason to go up there and see the damn Canadians.
If they're acting this way, I really can't do it.
Because I've got a damn thing to discuss with them.
I mean, Canada and the United States have got long and hard, hard border lines.
We don't have to fight them.
Damn, we just can't go up there and act as if when they're not cooperating.
I would like to reconsider the trip.
And then we can, you know, hang that out there for a little bit.
I really can't.
I have to do it.
I can't.
You see, we do these things.
I go up there.
They'll take the damn trip.
Why?
Why do I have to go out and do this?
But we don't have to do these things.
Oh, well, what the hell are we talking about?
I think he was on for a minute.
At some point, you see, we're perfectly figuring out.
France had already said that we were irresponsible, that the steps in this budget here just means that we're not paying attention to our business.
And, well, that's what all of us have done.
Thank you for your question.
That's right, and they're destroying Earth and they're spreading all over Europe.
So our problem is probably a long shot in terms of what these people are trying to do to us.
And I think we've got a year or two now to get back at us.
Well, that's right.
So long as we have this international launch everything open, and I had a long session yesterday, long this morning, and what the other countries are trying to do is push us back into a position of convertibility.
And I said, well, just say to them, we're not going to do that.
And I told Paul and Bill Dale, and I said, let's just, you just count it and say that, that let's have a moratorium on weekdays.
If under the rules, the property has soon gone over $60 million, and all she's got is dollars.
But you can't pay the fund in dollars because we're in deficit to the fund.
And under the Articles, you can't pay any currency of a country which is in deficit.
So God, in fact, can't pay $60 million in dollars.
They've got to pay the Dutch marks, or Dutch guilders,
So where do they get those?
Well, they normally come to us to give.
So we buy them and, in fact, take their dollars.
This is an infertility that we've always done.
Then they pay their 16 million.
And Dutch Markets and things, everybody's coming to your house.
I said, no.
Just so we have more time, more payments to the fund.
I said, every country's going to get some.
And so that's more for me anyway.
I just have no, no payments, no, no interest in that business.
Well, just sit there to preserve our negotiating position for years.
They're going back to convertibility.
I'm a little afraid of that.
Because we
This gets all of the central bankers and the private bankers and finance ministers worrying staringly.
They throw doubt on everything.
I proceed.
I think it's a pretty interesting industry to work in.
Well, we have some of the countries like Ceylon.
If Ceylon, they want to make a $74,000 payment, they come to us.
We make in some drawing rights to pay it.
Yes, Ceylon's been kind to us.
She's got comics.
Now it's the president.
Maybe we don't have that money.
You know, a lot of the things we, in a lot of countries, we'll have some of them, we won't have them.
But they don't want us getting back into a confrontation with anybody but the same children who want to try and go back to a system of convertibility that we can't live with.
Won't the German fellow vote in Congress?
Oh, sure.
Sure.
That's the thing, isn't it?
They'll get a good rate of exchange.
That's the thing, isn't it?
We're not the only source.
You're right.
I would handle this.
Let this be done.
I don't want these markets stirring and I don't want these central bankers and finance ministers casting doubt, doubt, doubt.
I want to come to Mr. Reese Franklin, Mr. Hughes.
There's only that right now.
You just said, and I just said, the public art budget, they're already cashed in now.
I know, therefore, therefore, we're dealing with that.
Look, there's the president's message to the Congress on the ceiling.
There's the action you decided to take now.
I think it was very creative, John, on lengthening the debt, putting out a long-term issue.
That will help the plan.
I think all along, we've got to ask ourselves the question,
But are we building confidence, adding to confidence, removing doubt, putting an end to hesitation and uncertainty?
I agree with you, Arthur, and the only point is that we could get into a long discussion between these two here.
But let me remind you, Mr. President, that notwithstanding the success that we had in these international negotiations, Great Britain wound up with a trade service with the largest in the history of the United Kingdom.
Japan, for all her problems, she wound up with $7.5 billion trade surplus in 1971.
And notwithstanding her devaluation or revaluation, she is now anticipating a trade surplus in 1972 of $7 billion.
This is enormous, just enormous.
This is equivalent to us having
It's probably a thirty-five, eighty dollar train, shouldn't you?
Uh...
Now, our trade problems are not over by a long shot, and our trade is not over by a long shot.
Believe me, we're not out of the woods.
We're still not competitive, and we're still going to have to deal on a hard-nosed basis with these countries with respect to barriers, administrative barriers, tariff barriers, and otherwise.
So we're going to need to start doing other things, and we're going to run probably another
trade deficit for a number of months this year to assure the world.
And this is what I heard.
This is one downside on this thing.
And again, I just want to point this out to you.
The common market is now ten, not six.
And they're saying they have preferential trade arrangements with 28 more countries.
You're going to see, in fact, you're going to see right now in Europe the strongest economic combine cartels in the world today.
The United States is not the biggest number of firemen.
Europe is right now.
They're going to be self-sufficient.
They've already made a special trade arrangement for 28 countries.
And they, in fact, say to hell with you.
This is why everybody's been talking.
We say we want to protest, but they say, no, you can't protest.
We don't care.
We're not going to give money to a little preferential trade arrangement.
So what they're doing, they're building them a trading line that's going to be far superior, far stronger than anything we've got.
No doubt in my mind about it.
It's just happening right now.
Now, this is all for different subjects, but I'll pursue it.
It's certainly of a sense of the importance of not getting back into any form of conversion.
There's no question that, you know, if you get in that, that leads to, uh, creative crisis, of course.
You can't get back into it, but we developed a different policy, a different trade policy ourselves, and moved aggressively until we could all send it, until we could live it.
That's correct.
Can't live it without being able to.
But we, at the same time, we ought to write, we ought to type, we ought to... Yeah, yeah, we don't want to... We don't want to shake the experience of the rest of the world and so forth.
So, no question.
Well, we'll, uh...
But anyway, that's...
I don't want anything else, sir.
We ought to have... Let's see.
The Japanese will let us know this week what they're going to do.
And finally, the Canadians let us know this afternoon...
Monday the minister's meeting on the community meeting, so we ought to go, that ought to all be settled by, I'll say, the middle of next week.
The only real disappointment where I think we can, have to do something about this candidate, would you, uh, pick the other one?
Well, I'll tell you two of them.
Two of them are going to have to talk, and I'll get Rogers to see what I mean.
Because I can see the problem there with the Canadians.
I think Art has got a good point.
Maybe the best thing to do is to cool it for a while.
But we might play a little other game, too, you know.
We can get messages through other than some of the state channels.
The difficulty is the State Department has a real obligation to get along with all these countries.
So they are going to play a hard line with these folks.
And we can't talk out of two corners of our mouth, but I have to.
I have to not.
Truth of the matter to me,
and he's all love and kisses at the moment, says nice things, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, but we must remember that he's doing it for a very selfish reason, which I totally understand.
He's in deep trouble because
He's played up to Kosicka, and now he's got to play up to me.
Played up to you, I swear to God.
We're delighted in the walkway, but Jesus said, they just say, you know, up your tail.
You can't do it.
You can't let them do that.
We'll see.
That's probably a nice chapter.
Yeah, a nice chapter.
I can't imagine how much you can say a word about the international.
Banking for tearing abroad can blow up things for us in a way that would be most uncomfortable.
Now, whatever we're going to do about convertibility, we've got to talk the language now of working out a new plan for convertibility.
We have no choice, Mr. President.
These exchange markets can get boiling.
They have been a little insecure.
People are now saying this is an assembly in agreement.
It is not firm.
Now, I think we've got to talk about it.
In any case, I'm doing it, Mr. President, once you know it.
Next, I think, on this gold thing.
I think we ought to go with that legislation promptly.
We ought to state that he has betrayed me.
No, no.
Let me just say a word.
We've said that before.
I know that.
What I would do, I would go with that legislation promptly.
I would say that these trade conversations have been successful.
We have gotten all that we wanted, but we've made progress.
I would say that, next I would say that we have created a foundation for conversations looking to the longer term on trade adjustments.
And then I say if our expectations are not fulfilled, then we have strong weapons that we can use, but we do not, we're quite confident we won't have to use them.
Now, Mr. President, I think if you proceed in that way, you strengthen confidence abroad, you minimize difficulties for Congress, I think, let me put it a little more generally, a lot of people are talking, people in this government are talking about fiscal and monetary policy.
I don't think that's our problem.
I'll let you take the money, sir.
The banks...
You know, we talk about M1 and M2 and reserves and so on.
The banks are loaded up with money.
They're hunting for customers.
They're going abroad, searching for customers, begging for them.
Your, uh, your best sales are flooded with money.
They can't place the money to have.
We don't have money problems, Heather.
We don't have the banks to be able to keep our customers.
Yeah, I know.
And to lower their price, to try to get a customer.
Yeah, I know that, George.
But what I'm trying to say is, it's not...
The lack of liquidity that is holding back this economy.
What is holding back this economy is... You know, we've had it hard since 1965.
We've had an accumulation of troubles in this country, and confidence has deteriorated at this lousy war we have now.
Riots in the streets, on the campuses, well, sure, it's quieted down, that's good, but once you have confidence in the British, it takes time before it's rebuilt.
Now, the argument, it is that President's business confidence is a good deal higher today than it was six months ago or even three months ago, but it's not high enough.
And I think we, you know, I don't know what to say.
I don't know what to say.
I don't know what to say.
I don't know what to say.
But we've got a debt ceiling first.
We've got a red loose shirt now.
I've seen you go two walkers up there.
George and I have to go up on the debt ceiling Monday.
We'll have the gold bill up there.
You're going to get the gold bill up here right away, aren't you?
We can get it up and fix it.
We know on the gold bill.
That's why I brought in John and Graham.
We know on the gold bill it's going to take time to get it done anyway.
But we'll get it up and make a statement for weeks.
We expect the trade association to be completed by the time the bill gets to my desk.
Is that what we'll do?
Right, John?
Basically, that's what we'll say.
Okay, well, let's get it ourselves.
When we get out there, we're going to be asked.
We're going to have to.
We're going to be asked.
That's why you have to put it up with that, with that kid.
And all I'm saying to you is that we've got to know that you're difficult.
maneuvering with respect to trade matters and international monetary matters.
What I want is an atmosphere such that the doubts and the hesitations of the financial people are created, they are created, Mr. President.
You ought to see the cables of the correspondents I hear.
The bankers are panicky people, and they communicate this disease to other people in there.
That's all I'm getting at.
John, the next speech you make, you're in the bankers.
Ha, ha, ha, ha.
Make one of your soothing speeches out of it.
Ha, ha, ha, ha.
Ha, ha, ha.
Well, you've got to go test by and so forth and so on.
For purposes of our own meeting, but I actually guess that Kurt and me and Mr. John, we've all got busy schedules and so forth, but I was thinking that about every two weeks would be useful.
Does that sound about right to you?
About every two weeks.
So we'll be here in about two, George, you follow up with Mike and stuff.
And incidentally, on this, the time of day for me is, you're off.
In other words, I put this ahead of other things.
So if somebody's got to testify on that day, or somebody's got to do something, I think 5 o'clock at night, I don't mind.
In other words, another thing that's good for me, a breakfast meeting is fine at some time, if you want to do that.
But work it out so that in a couple of weeks, maybe it's actually not going to be a bad idea to get up in a lousy frame of mind and go raise hell with each other.
Let's go over here.
Let's go over here.
Let's go over here.
Let's go over here.
You know, it's quite a nice day out.
If you look out, I don't know, how's it feel?
Is it warm or cold?
It's very cold.
It's very cold.
Oh, I try to walk the Dutch Prime Minister out.
Yeah, she's a big man.
You know, it's a funny thing, John.
This Dutch Prime Minister has never been to Asia.
Curious thing on all the relations.
Now, the Queen did go, but she didn't go to her mother's reception.
So in the Dutch, I'll never forget when I was driving through the countryside in Asia, I took a tree, of course, from Chicago, and I went up just way up in the mountains.
I remember seeing, you know, here's an Indonesian with, you know, all these brown faces on his mouth, and here's a group of people having a picnic over here.
There's a bunch of tourists and hikers and the rest.
And they were Dutch.
There are a lot of Dutch people there, you know, who stayed.
And they've done a hell of a lot for that country and still do, and the Indonesians don't want them.
So it's very interesting how some of these countries who had this colonial background, after an initial reaction of hatred, finally determined, well, you know, they can do things for us because they're tied to the school systems, the health systems, some language, and all this, and they're sort of cultured.
Interestingly enough, that's the way it works in this area.
What do you mean?
It's not to our end.
It's to our end.
It's to our end.
It's to our end.
It's to our end.
It's to our end.
I have to write down there.
You know, Brazil is the United States plus a Texas.
That's what they always say.
That's before we got Alaska.
And it's a huge place.
But beyond that, we forget that we always think of Brazil being ham and ponds, lakes and jungles.
And it has a very temperate climate.
It's got millions of acres.
It's like the American Midwest, right?
There's millions of acres.
And I tell you, there's a country that in 15 years, 20 years, got $100 million, $100 million at the end of the century.
And boy, there's going to be some most Portuguese work.
Well, they have the best government at the moment.
and the Americans.
They have, at the moment.
Now, if I had a good government, a very good government is a lot different from what our people here want.
As I told the next prime minister, I said, well, then you've got to understand that the Latins, the Latin countries need, as I saw it, the French style, the French constitution rather than the American constitution.
I said, basically, they need a strong,
head of state, and so forth.
The Italians desperately need that.
When the Spanish move from after the period of Franco, they can't go to an idea like ours where the dam would blow up.
And the difficulty in all of Latin America is that they have never found the delicate balance.
In Latin America, you either have a dictatorship, total dictatorship, or you have just a wild anarchy.
And what you need, I mean,
The detainees of De Gaulle was their mind on the practice, which is also a Latin country.
Remember, they had 13 or 14 parties.
The detainees of De Gaulle.
It was not as foreign policy and all the rest.
But the genius that he called, in addition to restoring the spirit of France, was to insist on a constitution that made the president of France, in more power than the president of the United States, the strong, central figure, and not put aside by these goddamn parties.
And that's what made the country go.
And frankly, it takes time.
They're going to have to go that way eventually.
But in Brazil,
as it moves along in these other countries in Latin America, could learn from that, rather than listening to what our good people from the State Department say, look, what you need is our kind of democracy.
Look, we have a hell of a time running our kind of democracy.
What can people do who have no idea about the other background?
Well, that's my speech for today.
OK. Good luck.
See you all.
Oh, John?
Yes, sir?
I called Walter Nelson, which, well, good.
Walter, my doctor told him that he was a little crazy.
Did he still need to come back?
He's still very busy.
But is it decent for a mother to phone his 3-year-old grandpa?
Thank you for watching.
Thank you.