Nixon White House Tapes — Conversation 716-003 Date: Monday, May 1, 1972 at 5:31 PM Participants: Nixon, Richard M. (President); Kissinger, Henry A. Recording device: Oval Office Source: https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/716-003 This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite it as authoritative. [1:25:35] Okay. [1:25:36] If you want to put all this in, it's going to take a long time just going over that record and feeling active. [1:25:49] Don't, there's any other way to go over it with this. [1:25:51] Just hand it over and here's the record. [1:25:58] High five. [1:25:59] I think the stronger they get, the more quickly to the point. [1:26:02] Okay. [1:26:06] It's been a record of when you talk by his seat, et cetera, et cetera. [1:26:11] It's not going to go down. [1:26:35] On page seven is where you get to it. [1:26:37] Yes. [1:26:41] See, I have here, you said I have in my possession, I actually have a record. [1:26:47] It is a shocking record. [1:26:49] And then put in here. [1:26:50] It's a shocking record. [1:26:51] I said, since we don't have enough time. [1:26:53] It's not a waste of time, but you know it. [1:27:35] What I will do here, Mr. President, is where it says would be restored, I will put wherever it says would, must. [1:27:49] Oh, this is the announcement. [1:27:54] Now, this is still history. [1:28:12] The U.S. in 72 is about to fall from France in 54. [1:28:23] I said, I put there, I put the goal, and I say, the president is prepared to do what it's told me to do, whatever is necessary to stop this invasion. [1:28:33] He will stop at nothing, I warn you. [1:28:35] You say that, he will stop at nothing. [1:28:40] And I can assure [1:28:44] P.O. [1:29:12] What are the effects of what you're telling us is on our city? [1:29:17] They have to go back across the D.C. [1:29:19] They have to go back across the D.C. [1:29:21] They have to go back all over the city. [1:29:41] They must release prisoners. [1:29:46] We then will reduce some of the additional forces we brought into the area and stop bombing the north. [1:29:53] That's the first step that we would consider progress. [1:30:01] And the second is, we can say that we started covering our January 27th proposal. [1:30:10] And, frankly, what we have to stay away from now is the idea of a withdrawal for prisoners in the ceasefire. [1:30:19] That's what worries me, is that they're going to come up with our matrix. [1:30:22] Do they accept our matrix? [1:30:24] Yeah. [1:30:24] Due to the spigot leaks, you mean that, sir? [1:30:29] Yeah, and because it might be favorable to them. [1:30:33] Well, you can say it. [1:30:39] that's fine to go back to the lines. [1:30:45] That's good. [1:30:45] Provided they go back to the lines, yes. [1:30:47] Yes, you go back to the lines or we take you immediately, but we're not going to take you now. [1:30:53] You cannot be rewarded for your aggression. [1:30:57] What I will do, Mr. President, is first I'll make this stuff open and say that we shouldn't say anything, except show covenant. [1:31:04] Then I'll say now I want to hear what you have to say. [1:31:07] If he gives me a long recital, and this is where it's, you're right, if I'm not presenting the whole thing, if he's going to start a long recital, I've done, I've already heard that. [1:31:18] And I'll be brutal. [1:31:19] I know you will. [1:31:26] If I be as brief as possible, come to the talk, take a look on the final, and say, well, we can't go without a balance, but we're going [1:31:40] I just want you to know that the president will stop at nothing. [1:31:46] And I just leave that as damn clear. [1:31:49] Because it's absolutely true. [1:31:50] We're prepared to sink the whole ship of this thing. [1:31:54] These people are not going to get away with this. [1:31:58] I agree completely. [1:32:00] I'll say it. [1:32:03] Maybe it's not as pessimistic as it is. [1:32:07] Well, the truth is, Mr. President, we've taken our head over the NFC record. [1:32:15] You remember Laird sitting in there in February telling you you needed no reinforcements? [1:32:21] The Vietnamization is succeeding. [1:32:23] These guys can do it without American air power. [1:32:26] And the Vietnamization was always a gamble. [1:32:35] We knew it was a gamble, and if it holds, it will be because of the additional stuff you've got out there, because of the heavy tanks you've got out there. [1:32:44] We are sending new heavy tanks now to replace them out of Japan and Okinawa. [1:32:49] Are they using the present heavy tanks at all? [1:32:51] Well, they're using them, but they don't have enough people trained. [1:32:56] Even the ones we got out there? [1:32:57] Well, not those they're using, but we've suffered enormous casualties of them. [1:33:00] We had 60 to start with, and they're down to 21 now. [1:33:02] They have lost 40 tanks? [1:33:03] Yeah. [1:33:07] mostly in military reasons. [1:33:13] Why have they lost the sanctions? [1:33:17] That artillery is just . [1:33:18] That Russian artillery is just . [1:33:20] Russians have always been good with artillery. [1:33:23] Russians have always been good with artillery, these guys. [1:33:25] I like these guys. [1:33:29] Not French artillery, but the Russians have had massive artillery. [1:33:42] Oh, it's another intelligence failure, too. [1:33:51] I mean, when they shoot 1,400, about 4,400 into Quantree, about 1,400 into Amlok day after day, that's 150 tons of ammunition, 100 tons of ammunition a day. [1:34:04] We had no idea. [1:34:05] And that's just ammunition. [1:34:07] You have to add food, and you have to add weapons. [1:34:12] No. [1:34:14] I thought of it last night. [1:34:16] I opened my mind, read this thing, got us into these difficulties. [1:34:22] Mistaken, for which I blame myself last year, we had sat on top of the Cambodians at Laotian Operation last year, the way they're sitting on top of this. [1:34:33] We would have won. [1:34:35] But basically, they wasted the Cambodian Operation tree set, nearly. [1:34:39] That was a disaster. [1:34:41] Yeah, because they just fooled around with that. [1:34:45] They just didn't pick up the stockpile, I'd say. [1:34:50] So that gave us this capability. [1:34:53] Oh, yes. [1:34:54] Oh, without a doubt. [1:34:55] Well, in 1972, we didn't have an offensive action. [1:34:58] And every year, we had an offensive action. [1:35:02] There was no offensive. [1:35:10] So, uh... [1:35:15] They're not good on the offensive. [1:35:21] They must be pretty good on the defensive. [1:35:26] But we've been full-fledged about their capabilities. [1:35:29] They're pretty good on the defense. [1:35:31] They're useless on the offense. [1:35:34] And do you remember when they were telling you the Vietnamese could have done Cambodia alone, how they wouldn't be five, they'd still be five miles from the border? [1:35:47] But the other side must be hurting very fast. [1:35:50] We can't berate ourselves too much. [1:35:52] We've done more than almost the human spirit can bear as it is. [1:35:59] But the point is, right now, if we're prepared enough, I want this goddamn military to come up with some ideas. [1:36:05] I mean, I'm only going to do everything. [1:36:16] No, I remember only too well that you came in and you pleaded with Abrams to come up with some new ideas. [1:36:31] No, we've done superhuman things in keeping this thing alive. [1:36:43] Right now, there would be a hell of a depression for the American people. [1:36:51] If after this offensive began so late, it is like losing earlier. [1:36:57] The South Vietnamese were defeated. [1:37:00] We got run out of there. [1:37:02] Now, by God, don't ever underestimate what's happening at any point. [1:37:06] There would be a hell of a depression if we got run out of business. [1:37:09] The American people don't want to lose. [1:37:11] The American people got confused there for a year or two because we were trying to win and the opponents were shouting from the rooftops. [1:37:20] That's what screwed them up. [1:37:23] It's – I don't think the American people – I had dinner last night with a number of people, but Roland Evans and Tom Braden were there. [1:37:35] Evans is hawkish as hell. [1:37:36] He said the president has the power in North Carolina. [1:37:38] He said we can't take this. [1:37:41] Braden is beating around, but – He would. [1:37:44] He would. [1:37:45] You'd expect that. [1:37:46] He's savage. [1:37:46] Yeah. [1:37:48] Not as much. [1:37:49] Evidence, evidence is... [1:38:22] I just want to be sure that pilots and stuff are well selected. [1:38:27] I mean, I don't want to select them, but I just want to be sure that it's worth doing. [1:38:33] I'll get myself a full briefing from Abrams. [1:38:35] I think on almost any conceivable... [1:38:37] I've got to say it through this time. [1:38:40] All right, we'll get you a briefing. [1:38:43] On almost any conceivable... [1:38:44] I've got to see some options, too. [1:38:49] Right. [1:38:53] I want to see about the Dykes, too. [1:38:55] The only point, I'll be careful about, Mr. President, is if you order them to use the B-52s and they'll do it, they're apt to get the Korov. [1:39:03] If one of these clusters of B-52s hits a populated area, you're going to have 5,000 dead. [1:39:09] My man, that could be... [1:39:15] They'd have every camera crew in the world. [1:39:17] They'd have a new atrocity. [1:39:20] They'd beat your brain. [1:39:20] I'm aware of that. [1:39:22] That's why I asked the question. [1:39:26] I know there's a difference. [1:39:28] Yet that's the gamble we always trade. [1:39:29] Well, within rational limits, we should take the gamble. [1:39:32] But I think these... [1:39:35] I think... We had the intelligence report last week that Haiphong had still not recovered from our last strike. [1:39:42] I think this next weekend we have to lay a tremendous strike on them. [1:39:48] and get as close to the pier as we can and burn out the rest of the P.O.L. [1:39:54] This time we're going to lose some planes because there's some that did that. [1:39:58] Why would you lose B-52s? [1:40:06] Well, they found a loose one somewhere there. [1:40:09] Oh, so we lose. [1:40:09] Yeah. [1:40:10] It's war. [1:40:15] But we can't wait much longer. [1:40:16] We can't wait longer than that. [1:40:18] You know, the thing that concerns me about all this is Russians. [1:40:29] This raises a great question about all that good texture crap over there in England. [1:40:33] Doesn't it to you? [1:40:35] Don't you think so, Mr. President? [1:40:36] I think we get the shit kicked out of us in a conventional operation. [1:40:41] We have to redo our military establishment as soon as the election is over. [1:40:47] Because by 77, it won't be worth being president of this country anymore. [1:40:52] You know, really, that's the thing. [1:40:55] If he'd do it. [1:40:56] In defense. [1:40:57] If he would do it. [1:40:59] That's what he ought to do. [1:41:05] I don't know if he'd do it. [1:41:05] He'd be superb as Secretary of Defense. [1:41:07] He'd be outstanding. [1:41:29] Well, I've looked at some of those pictures, and we are, you know, with TANWA and so forth, we are getting to them, but of course it takes a while. [1:41:44] I mean, we've dropped the bridge, and now they're moving a lot of stuff through the Bunker Eye Pass, and they've been really shooting that up. [1:42:01] It takes a hell of a long time. [1:42:08] Do you remember when this offensive started in military region one, you and the AAC said we should wait until the weather clears. [1:42:13] It's not as clear. [1:42:16] Now the Carthaginians are not fighting, unfortunately. [1:42:19] That's really the problem. [1:42:20] They couldn't have fought much. [1:42:45] They've got to keep their spirits up. [1:42:53] The spirit is going to determine this thing in the final analysis. [1:42:58] Even lousy, lousy armies that are still defending can survive. [1:43:09] When you look at those boxes of B-52, if they were anywhere near the front lines, they just must inflict some enormous casualties on them. [1:43:27] Because then, after they hit, it's obvious the nation would advance. [1:43:34] That's war. [1:43:34] They don't advance. [1:43:35] After they stopped them, they should have moved up. [1:43:39] And they had this great scheme of an offensive. [1:43:43] And they showed us the plans. [1:43:45] And if they had actually done it, they wouldn't have lost our power, to speak of quantity. [1:44:25] I don't mind your telling the staff. [1:44:29] I think we've got to call our own. [1:44:46] We've lost now only one provincial capital. [1:44:47] I think that's what we've got to say. [1:44:48] And so forth and so on. [1:44:48] But we still have to bear in mind, I can honestly say that this is a hell of a message supported by the most sophisticated weapons. [1:44:51] And we're going to suffer some losses. [1:44:52] But in the end, the enemy will not be allowed to succeed. [1:44:53] Now, that's the line to take. [1:44:54] Don't you agree? [1:44:54] And tell them and say, sure, we're going to suffer losses. [1:45:15] As I say, the only problem with pressurizing an enemy is not... ...is the effect on us, but it's the effect of his general positive power becoming discouraged. [1:45:32] If night after night they get the impression that we're going to lose, see, on the other hand, we just keep going. [1:45:40] It is difficult to blouse. [1:45:42] We got that pounded in and pounded down, and we did lose, at least the polygon. [1:45:48] Yeah, but because when it was all over, it looked as if we had lost. [1:45:52] I don't think this was handled that way. [1:45:55] It was by the end of May. [1:45:59] We had lost only one more political capital, or two. [1:46:05] Uh, I just want to get to three times, see if I can handle that. [1:49:13] First of all, I don't even know what he had when he did it. [1:49:15] I'm excited to find out.