Conversation 739-004

TapeTape 739StartWednesday, June 21, 1972 at 9:30 AMEndWednesday, June 21, 1972 at 10:38 AMTape start time00:26:05Tape end time01:33:06ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President);  Haldeman, H. R. ("Bob");  [Unknown person(s)];  Butterfield, Alexander P.;  White House operatorRecording deviceOval Office

On June 21, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon, H. R. ("Bob") Haldeman, unknown person(s), Alexander P. Butterfield, and the White House operator met in the Oval Office of the White House from 9:30 am to 10:38 am. The Oval Office taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 739-004 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 739-4

Date: June 21, 1972
Time: 9:30 - 10:38 am
Location: Oval Office

The President met with H. R. Haldeman.

     The President's schedule
          -Arthur F. Burns
               -John B. Connally, George P. Shultz
               -Schedule

     Economic indicators
         -Consumer Price Index [CPI]
         -Food prices
               -Price Commission meeting
                    -Donald H. Rumsfeld

     Debt ceiling bill
          -Frank F. Church
                -Social Security
          -Russell B. Long
          -Michael J. Mansfield
          -Timing of vote in Senate
          -William P. Rogers, Clark MacGregor
                -Robert W. Packwood, Charles McC. Mathias, Jr.
                       -Henry A. Kissinger
          -Timing of vote

     Watergate break-in
         -Staff meeting
         -Haldeman's conversation with John N. Mitchell
                -Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI]
                     -John D. Ehrlichman

                              (rev. Feb-02)

                 -L[ouis] Patrick Gray, III
            -G. Gordon Liddy
                 -Role in Committee to Reelect the President [CRP]
-Mitchell's knowledge
-Charles W. Colson
-White House consultant
      -John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson
-Colson's involvement
-Other involvement
      -Need for strategy
            -Ehrlichman
            -Civil suit
                 -Depositions
                 -Liddy
                 -Summary judgement
-White House involvement
      -E. Howard Hunt, Jr.
            -Colson
            -Bay of Pigs
            -Colson's projects
            -International Telephone and Telegraph [ITT]
                 -Dita D. Beard
            -Disappearance
-White House strategy
      -Ehrlichman
            -Admission of guilt
            -Implications by press
                 -Dan Rather
                        -Republicans
                        -George S. McGovern
                        -Hubert H. Humphrey
-White House staff reaction
-Colson's conversation with the President
      -Jack N. Anderson's commentary
            -Charles G. ("Bebe") Rebozo
-Republican convention arrangements
      -Miami, Florida
      -Cubans
            -Hunt
-James W. McCord, Jr.
      -Hiring
-Hunt
      -Cubans
-Plans to bug McGovern headquarters

                            (rev. Feb-02)

      -Doral Hotel
      -Republican National Committee
-Colson
-Washington Post story
      -Hunt, Colson
      -Five burglars
           -Lawyer
                -Liddy
-Colson
      -Defense by administration
      -Activities
-As an issue
      -Nationally
      -Washington
      -Liddy
           -White House strategy
                -Tom C. Huston
                -Nathan Hale
           -Admission of guilt
                -White House reaction
-Burglary
-Sentencing
-Mitchell
      -Involvement
      -Ehrlichman
      -Liddy
-Hunt
      -Disappearance
      -Cubans
      -FBI
      -Names in notebooks
      -Policemen and FBI agents
           -Joseph A. Califano, Jr.
-Lawsuit
      -Edward Bennett Williams
      -Depositions
-Ehrlichman
      -Gray
-Colson
      -Hunt
-Depositions
-Liddy
      -Mitchell
      -Democrats' reaction

                                         (rev. Feb-02)

                -Ehrlichman's strategy for White House

     The President's schedule
          -Press meeting
                -McGovern
                -Ronald L. Ziegler
                -Watergate break-in
          -Economic Quadriad meeting
          -Shultz
          -Nelson A. Rockefeller, James L. Buckley, Jacob K. Javits, John A. Volpe
                -Rapid Transit grant to New York City
                -Mitchell

     Watergate
         -Colson
         -Democrats
               -Operations against the President
         -Reaction
               -Colson, Hunt

     The President's schedule
          -Press meeting
                -The President’s view
                -Primary results
                      -McGovern
                      -Bella S. Abzug
                      -Emanuel Celler
                          -Allard K. Lowenstein
                          -Reasons for defeat in primary
                          -Republicans
                      -John J. Rhodes
                          -Press
                      -Charles W. Colson
                      -Abzug
                          -Impeachment efforts

     Common Cause
          -Suit
                -Impeachment efforts
                -Campaign efforts
     Colson

An unknown person entered at an unknown time after 9:30 am.

                                       (rev. Feb-02)

     Request to meet with Colson

The unknown person left at a unknown time before 10:12 am.

     The President's schedule
          -Economic meeting
               -Quadriad
               -Council of Economic Advisors [CEA]
                      -Caspar W. Weinberger
                      -Shultz
                      -Ehrlichman
                          -Peter M. Flanigan
                          -Rumsfeld
               -National economy
                      -Herbert Stein
                      -Unemployment
                      -Food prices
                      -Employment
                          -Haldeman’s view

*****************************************************************

[Previous PRMPA Personal Returnable (G) withdrawal reviewed under deed of gift 10/24/2022.
Segment cleared for release.]
[Personal Returnable]
[739-004-w001]
[Duration: 5m 45s]

     1972 campaign
         -Pierre Rinfret
               -Potential usefulness
               -Connection with Leonard Garment
               -George S. McGovern
         -Stock market
               -George S. McGovern
                    -Potential impact on market
                    -“McGovern Market”
               -Marianne H. Means
         -George S. McGovern
               -White House strategy and approach
                    -Media
                    -Democratic voters
               -H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman’s opinion

                                         (rev. Feb-02)

Alexander P. Butterfield entered at 10:12 am.

     1972 campaign
         -George S. McGovern
              -Family
                    -James Rowen
                    -Daughter

Charles Colson entered at 10:13 am.

     1972 campaign
         -George S. McGovern
              -Family
                    -James Rowen
                        -Relation to Hobart Rowen
                        -Relation to Daniel Rowen
                               -Friend of H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman’s son

     The President’s schedule
          -Photo opportunity
               -Economic Quadriad
          -George P. Shultz

     George S. McGovern
         -Charles W. Colson’s opinion
         -Edward Hallett

     Emanuel Celler
         -Defeat by Elizabeth Holtzman
              -Votes
         -Votes
         -Brooklyn

     Unknown victorious Republican
         -Potential telephone call from Charles W. Colson

*****************************************************************

Butterfield left at unknown time after 10:13 am.

The President talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 10:13 and
10:22 am.

                                        (rev. Feb-02)

[Conversation No. 739-4A]

[See Conversation No. 25-98]

[End of telephone conversation]

     John J. Rooney

     Rockefeller

     Lowenstein

     Watergate break-in
         -Washington Post story
         -Anderson's commentary
               -Rebozo
                    -Libel
               -Jim Shertz (sp?)
         -White House strategy
               -Democrats
                    -Hunt
                    -Civil suit
                         -Mitchell
               -Lawyer for burglars
               -Mitchell
               -Williams
               -Ehrlichman
               -Liddy
               -Shertz (sp?)
               -Hunt's activities
                    -Media coverage
                         -Washington Post
                         -National Broadcasting Company [NBC]

The President talked with the White House operator at 10:22 am.

[Conversation No. 739-4B]

[See Conversation No. 25-99]

[End of telephone conversation]

                                       (rev. Feb-02)

*****************************************************************

[Previous PRMPA Personal Returnable (G) withdrawal reviewed under deed of gift 10/24/2022.
Segment cleared for release.]
[Personal Returnable]
[739-004-w002]
[Duration: 2m 58s]

     1972 campaign
         -George S. McGovern
              -Votes for Democratic presidential nomination
                    -Votes needed
              -Edward M. (“Ted”) Kennedy
                    -Potential Democratic presidential nominee
                    -[First name unknown] Saintangelo
              -Indiana
                    -Labor
                    -George S. McGovern supporters
                    -Edward M. (“Ted”) Kennedy
                         -Delegates
                         -[First name unknown] Saintangelo
              -Edward M. (“Ted”) Kennedy
                    -Charles W. Colson’s opinion
                    -The President’s opinion
                         -Franklin D. Roosevelt
                    -Charles W. Colson’s opinion
              -Television coverage
                    -Today
              -The President’s opinion

*****************************************************************

     Watergate break-in
         -White House involvement
               -Ziegler
         -Credibility
               -Ehrlichman
               -Vietnam
               -Civil rights
         -As an issue
               -National reaction
                     -ITT
                     -Repression, bugging

                                         (rev. Feb-02)

                    -Espionage
                        -Industrial, international, political
          -White House involvement

*****************************************************************

[Previous PRMPA Personal Returnable (G) withdrawal reviewed under deed of gift 10/24/2022.
Segment cleared for release.]
[Personal Returnable]
[739-004-w003]
[Duration: 2m 8s]

     1972 campaign
         -George S. McGovern
              -Charles W. Colson’s opinion
                    -Democratic National Convention
              -Judge George L. Hart
                    -Appointment by Dwight D. Eisenhower
                    -District of Columbia Republican chairman [?]
                    -Succeeded by Carl L. Shipley
              -Hubert H. Humphrey and Edmund S. Muskie
                    -Move towards the center
                    -Compared to Nelson A. Rockefeller
                        -Approach towards Barry M. Goldwater
              -Democrats’ rhetoric
                    -Henry M. (“Scoop”) Jackson
                    -Hubert H. Humphrey
                        -June 19, 1972 comments

*****************************************************************

     Watergate break-in
         -White House strategy
               -Haldeman
               -Liddy
         -ITT
               -Ehrlichman
               -Haldeman
         -Colson's involvement
         -As an issue
               -Grand Jury
               -Hunt

                                         (rev. Feb-02)

                 -Democrats
                 -Convention
                 -The President's role
           -Robert J. Dole
           -Lawrence F. O'Brien, Jr.
           -Colson
           -Television coverage
           -Civil suit
           -Hunt
                 -Career
                 -Role
                 -Conversation with Colson
                 -Bay of Pigs
                 -Novels

Colson left at an unknown time after 10:22 am.

     The President's schedule
          -Quadriad
               -Schultz
               -Burns
          -Reports on trips
               -Burns
               -Connally
               -Flanigan
               -Burns
               -Cabinet meetings

Haldeman left at 10:38 am.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

So what's this morning?
Yeah, that's the Burns appointment he's been requesting for months as we've been putting on our weeks.
We've been putting off and so first time recommendation that shows us that both of them saying he had to meet with it.
Eventually he's going on a trip.
No, he's asked to see you alone.
No, we've said that he wants to be here.
Don't you think that's what he's doing?
Absolutely.
I think Arthur is.
And so does Jones.
Brogan's pick from Shaw, Shelton, and Conner.
Brogan's pick from St. Bill and Conner.
Just told him to show us a razor, but that's fine.
And what's the news today?
Well, the consumer pricing tax is three points.
Yeah, you got that.
And food is down.
Yeah, I know.
We're going to go light on it, crowing on it, because it's going to be monumentally up next month.
They were afraid it would be in this month, but in this it won't.
There's no way it's in next month.
Food apparently will get 3% next month.
The concern about the press commission's meeting today, there's been a lot of flurry about that on the basis that they may take action on food prices and all.
The concern is that they're not taking a lot of action out of concert with us.
that we have a problem dealing with, and Ronstadt feels that he's got it basically under control, and that they won't do anything apart from us, or that would embarrass us, or without our knowledge.
They're still working on that, this whole thing of what we do, and they've got a range of options, and they've got in through the final shot.
Church, as we know definitely, is going to put the 20% Social Security on the debt ceiling bill on the floor of the Senate.
And Long's position on that is that if he does, if they do, which he is going to do, he's going to force them to put a funding provision with it.
He's not going to let them just put the Social Security bill
That's a long strategy.
Oh, I see.
Only 15% of the budget.
I wonder, what's going to move the tribe?
All right, to create a problem.
Man's fuel.
So it looks like an even up, and now 40 or 41 on each side.
And I don't know, Men's Guild apparently wants to put it, doesn't want to vote until next Friday, just before they adjourn.
We apparently want to vote now.
And if we can't, they've still got to step back to the social, too.
They are doing a pretty good job.
Our guys are moving hard.
Rogers is working on Sun and so on.
McGregor's been grinding them one by one.
We've got one back with him.
They think Matthias will go with us.
Yeah, well, we've got to come in with that.
Nobody believes in God's discontent.
But I think he, they believe in God's discontent.
I suppose it's far-fetched.
There's no question it won't be this week, because we don't want it this weekend, they don't.
We don't want it until we get Henry back.
So Monday is when we would prefer, on Monday, and they still would prefer it on Friday, and that's the range now.
I was going to go with Monday, but...
on the um it's very interesting because i've been prepared to cold cockpit that comes up in the staff meeting and hasn't even come i don't want to hear it you know somebody did some crap about it or something but it didn't come up nobody wanted to discuss it the whole discussion was on you know all these congressional
and stuff that we've got up before us.
But we'll start with Mitchell afterwards.
And Mitchell's, yeah, good.
He sure does.
He probably has something to do.
Yes, does the same thing.
Well, he does once in a while, and he raises some good questions.
He does more asking than telling.
And so I was very useful to have Mitchell there.
There's something new.
The question now about Mitchell's concern is the FBI.
And there's the question of how far they're launching the process.
And he's very concerned that that would be turned off.
And then they're working on it again.
John.
I got to talk to you.
Well, we were told yesterday in the discussion on this that we should not go directly to the FBI.
Mitchell said today that we've got to, and he asked her over to talk to Craig.
It's great that John's doing that.
And the question that John and I raised, both of us have been trying to think of a step, one step away from it and look at a strategy.
and see whether there's something that we can do other than just sitting here and watching it drop on us bit by bit as it goes along.
And there is, it's pretty tough.
John laid out one scenario which would involve this guy Lee and the committee confessing.
taking, moving the thing up to that level.
Saying, yeah, I did it.
I did it.
I hired these guys, sent them over there because I thought it would be a good move.
It would build me up in the operation area.
Little guy.
Nobody basically mentioned him.
No.
Liddy is the general counsel for the re-election finance committee.
And he is the guy who did this.
And, uh,
He, uh...
I'm not really sure.
I'm not sure how much.
He obviously knew something.
I'm not sure how much.
He clearly didn't know any details.
I think that was the record.
It wasn't too effective.
The Colson thing and so forth.
I mean, he's getting a bad rap there.
And of course, he's taking the rap.
Basically, the White House is taking the rap.
The White House is insulting the business and so forth.
Hell yes, he worked for Kennedy.
He worked for Johnson.
Now he's working for the White House.
That's the whole story.
That we did.
I think that is the fact.
The problem is that there are all kinds of other
And if they start a fishing thing on this, they're going to start picking up treads.
And that's what appeals to me about trying to get one jump ahead of them.
And hopefully cut the whole thing off and sink all of them.
See, Erlin paints a rather attractive picture on that in that that gives you the opportunity to cut off the civil suit.
The civil suit is potentially the most damaging thing to us.
in terms of those depositions.
And you have lay, confess, and then say they're unauthorized.
And then on the civil suit, we plead whatever it is, and you get a, what is it, a summary judgment or something.
I forget what the legal thing is, but...
He saw that as a way to cut it off, too, and then let it go to trial on the question of the damages, and that would eliminate the need for the depositions.
In other words, you'd have the... Any other... What do you think they have to do with the auto then?
So, as far as White House involvement, you're sure?
Well, there.
We're getting done.
That...
shot to a degree because they're, they're, it's, you know, a hundred percent by Innuendo.
They're, they're, the only time they got to the White House is that this guy's name was in their books, Howard Hunt.
And that Hunt used to be a consultant at the White House.
And he worked in CIA.
He worked in the Bay of Pigs.
I mean, he's done a lot of things.
What I'm getting at is that, and I can be honest with you,
We've got to be careful pushing that very hard.
Because he was working on a lot of stuff.
What do you mean?
Well, he didn't have education.
No.
That's what we said.
What did he work on?
IDG, I think, too.
You know, they tried that.
He didn't.
He didn't accomplish anything.
But he's the guy that went out and took them.
Talked to Dieter here.
Deadly.
That's what I see.
That's what I see.
That's what's all that.
This is the new beard contract.
Well, that is.
They've used it for all this stuff apparently.
That's, it's like all these other things, it's all a fringe, bits and pieces that you don't want to, that's why they have, and there's a very strong, I would challenge this question of hunt disappearing.
They say there's no question it's better for hunt to disappear than for hunt to be available.
There's no question that hunt would be caught in this.
of the early scenario or something like it is that you establish a reason and you establish an admission of guilt rather than just a presumption and you cut out the thing before you establish the admission of guilt at the low level and get rid of it rather than letting it apply guilt up to the highest level which is of course what they're trying very hard to do by letting the press and the
Although it's incredible, Dan Rather comes on the news and says, well, it's been a tough week for the presidential candidates.
We have the Republicans tired of the complicity and bugging the Democrats, and we have McGovern in trouble with his radical views, and we have Hubert in trouble because he's lost his support.
You know, he kind of ran, he stacked everybody up, which made him.
I think our people have deluded themselves, and I have to agree, thinking this was a Washington story that would not be of much interest.
The networks aren't going to let it be that.
They didn't have much of any interest on it.
There's no new news.
investigating those humans.
They found them on one of some of these shrines.
Colson just told me something about, uh, some chart that Provozo was following.
I haven't seen that.
I'm sure.
Oh, really?
I'm sure they'll, I'm sure they'll find a time to go to the Cuban sometimes.
Oh, Christ.
I mean, but I want this, that if he, if they take this kind of a charge against
If we could get the exact chart, you know, and so forth, he ought to sue.
You know what I mean?
But he knows not that well, he's not involved with it.
If they, see what I'm getting at is, what they would do is go out and tie him under a tie, tie him under a tie.
Well, I guess, obviously, he has nothing, whatever, has no knowledge at all of certain things he may be told.
And, why don't you just call him and ask him if he knows these people?
Unfortunately, they're intermeshing threats.
One of these guys was
over at the University of Miami trying to work out housing for the next move with the convention.
And they're all supportive.
Two of them have been principals in the Nixon stuff.
That's why, in a way, you can't push a lot of it to the Miami thing, can you?
I mean, to the Cuban thing, that's a problem.
Yeah, you can't, that's, you lose that, it's a pretty, you lose that if you bring Liddy into it.
That's one argument against him, because you could work to blame that, to Howard Hunt, all the other guys tied to Cuban.
Except, well, no, you could implicitly tie him, I should say, except this security guy, what was his name?
But he was a CIA agent for 19 years, he was hired for that.
because of his technical equipment, the rest of the Cubans served.
You see what I mean?
Hunt was the TIE of the Cubans.
He's the one that recruited the Cubans.
You know, what a great deal of...
Apparently, they said they were down there.
And why they had some plans to revoke the floor of the governor's headquarters
Well, I don't know.
They found a plan.
That's a pretty shitty bit of journalism, incidentally, which they haven't pointed out, and we shouldn't, but the committee can.
They had a plan that showed the layout of the ballroom area at the Doral Hotel, which is going to be the McGovern's headquarters.
What the press didn't point out is that the Doral Hotel is also going to be the Nixon headquarters.
We have a lot of things that are out of hotel all over here because it happens to be where we're running out of room arrangements.
And that's true.
I don't know who can take it on, but who's over there in the committee that can do a little slam bang on that sort of thing?
I mean, I think you ought to chip away at things on that sort of thing as well.
Yeah, we should.
And we would like to make another happen.
You know what?
That's just a little...
Sure, I know, but it's eyes off, and they've been showing you all these things that have gone wrong.
And they've taken a very bad shot, but we've got to be careful not to jump on a bad shot of Colson, which is going to bother him today.
And the Post runs a thing on the principles in the Democratic bugging and running incident.
And it's a little biography.
It's a three-paragraph biography on each of the principles.
The first one is Howard Hunt.
They talk about him.
The second one is Charles Colson.