Nixon White House Tapes › Tape 946 › Conversation 946-013

Nixon & Kissinger on Leonid Brezhnev and Nuclear policy

Friday, June 22, 1973 · 11:31 AM–11:41 AM ET · Oval Office · 11 min

ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President); Kissinger, Henry A.; [Unknown person(s)]Conversation946-013 on Tape 946StartFriday, June 22, 1973 at 11:31 AMEndFriday, June 22, 1973 at 11:41 AMRecording deviceOval OfficeSourceNixon Library record for 946-013 ↗

President Nixon and Henry Kissinger met to review the public reception of the recently signed Agreement on the Prevention of Nuclear War, specifically focusing on Kissinger's press briefing and the challenges of explaining the accord's scope regarding nuclear first use, China, and regional military operations. They discussed how to frame the agreement as a significant symbolic commitment to peace while managing skepticism from the press and political critics. Additionally, the President briefly consulted with an unidentified staffer regarding legislative meetings and discussed a potential postponement of negotiations concerning a US-USSR air services protocol.

Download MP3 · 20.0 MB

This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Names and numbers are often wrong; speakers are not identified. Do not cite it as authoritative — verify against the audio and the finding aid.

Download transcript (.txt) · JSON data

· Click a timestamp to play from that point; the page address then links to that moment (e.g. #t=125).

Each line starts with a timestamp button; press it to play the audio from that point.

We had a 45-minute break, and my statement was very positive.
In the questions, things came up which I thought likely, but I couldn't avoid them.
They said, why didn't you ban the first use of nuclear weapons?
I said, because this is designed to prevent war, not a catalog for how to fight it.
and that we did not think we could make a distinction between various kinds of weapons once war starts, but we will make a major effort to prevent war.
I had to say, and somebody said, does that protect China?
I said, I don't want to say which country it protects, but I would certainly think an attack on China would serve an international peace and stability and would therefore, but we don't expect such an attack to take place.
And, uh,
You know, there was a usual question.
Somebody said, well, this is just reaffirming motherhood.
So I said, well, you had been with the president and president through all these sessions you've been in, so it was all that simple.
That was a military operation that was going on.
And it was
They fully understood it, and they fully understood what we were going to do.
Actually, it's covered by our legal sector.
But I took the position, and you might consider taking the position.
We just can't go into every situation which is really must be covered.
It is obviously the cause for restraint.
It's the agenda of the government.
It's the cause for restraint.
If the two, I said in answer to the question, if the two countries want to act like sharp lawyers pressing against the edges of the agreement, they'll find a way of doing it.
But this symbolizes a commitment to peace.
It strengthens it.
It strengthens it.
So that's what's the key.
We know the key, but don't be too worried about those cigars.
Mr. President, we've got to play our game.
As long as they're debating the substance of foreign policy, we are going to win.
They can't look up on the substance of foreign policy.
that we agree to refrain from force, use of force against each other, any force, or against our allies in either one of our countries.
No, that's a heck of a thing.
And it has a constitution to it.
But it's quite something.
Goddamn bull-brain propagation and bohemians.
Oh, yeah.
Absolutely.
I just hit it.
First of all, it's covered by Article 6.
It's an existing obligation.
Secondly, it was going on and was discussed with the Soviets.
It was a firework.
sure.
Yes.
We can get it if you give the word.
On the other hand, Stacey, in planning and change, we can do a little better if we hold out for six months.
It's a 5-10% decision.
That's what I think.
We have a 6% difference if we add one more.
Oh, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't be, don't
They can't lick up on the substance.
But it's a good thing.
It's a very important thing.
It's an important thing to agree to prevent a nuclear war in a way that we're going to prevent a nuclear war in a way to prevent a nuclear war.
And that means that we will restrain, that we agree to refrain from force, the use of force against each other, any force, or against our allies in either one of our targets or against our countries.
No, that's a government thing.
It has a constitutional thing.
And it's quite good, quite something.
Sure, if they break it, so will it.
It's a goddamn bull, right?
Oh, yeah.
I just hit it.
First of all, it's covered by Article 6.
It's an existing obligation.
that we agree to refrain from force, the use of force against each other, any force, or against our allies in either one of the parties, or against their countries.
No, that's a heck of a thing.
And it has a constitution, eh?
But it's quite something.
Senator Simonson is on his way along with Senator Vestorin.
We can get it.
If you give the word.
On the other hand, there's a plan in place.
There's a plan in place.
There's a plan in place.
I think it's just as well.
I think it's just as well.

On June 22, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon, Henry A. Kissinger, and unknown person(s) met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 11:31 am and 11:41 am. The Oval Office taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 946-013 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 946-13

Date: June 22, 1973
Time: Unknown between 11:31 am and 11:41 am
Location: Oval Office

The President met with Henry A. Kissinger.

       Leonid I. Brezhnev’s visit
              -Kissinger’s previous press briefing on Agreement on Prevention of Nuclear War
                      -Questions
                              -Nuclear weapons
                                      -First use
                                      -Prevention
                                      -People’s Republic of China [PRC], Cambodia, Middle
                                       East
                                      -Military operations regarding Cambodia
                                      -Calls for restraint
              -Press relations
                      -Peter Lisagor
                      -Max Frankel
                              -US foreign policy
              -Agreement on Prevention of Nuclear War
                      -Restraint
                      -Use of force
                              -Allies
                              -Third parties
                              -J. William Fulbright
                              -Article six of agreement

An unknown man entered at an unknown time after 11:31 am.

       President’s schedule
              -Gerald R. Ford, Leslie C. Arends
                                              -20-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                                            Conversation No. 946-13 (cont’d)

                     -Legislation
                     -W[illiam] Stuart Symington, John Pastore

The unknown man left at an unknown time before 11:41 am.

       Brezhnev’s visit
             -US-USSR Protocol on Expansion of Air Services
             -Peter M. Flanigan, State Department
             -Negotiations
                     -Postponement
             -President’s decision

Kissinger left at an unknown time before 11:41 am.
  • 041-036 10:50 AM · 5 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Carl B. Albert talked on the telephone from 10:50 am to 10:55 am.
  • 946-010 10:50 AM · 5 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Carl B. Albert met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 10:50 am and 10:55 am.
  • 946-011 10:55 AM · 18 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Stephen B. Bull met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 10:55 am and 11:31 am.
  • 946-012 10:55 AM · 56 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and unknown person(s) met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 10:55 am and 11:31 am.
  • 946-014 11:41 AM · 23 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and William E. Timmons met in the Oval Office of the White House from 11:41 am to 11:42 am.
  • 946-022 11:42 AM · 27 min — unknown person(s) met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 11:42 am and 12:29 pm.
  • 127-001 11:45 AM · 45 min — President Richard M. Nixon, Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, William P. Rogers, and bipartisan Congressional leaders, including Michael J. ("Mike") Mansfield, Hugh Scott, J. William Fulbright, Strom Thurmond, Craig Hosmer, Henry A. Kissinger, Melvid R. Laird, William E. Timmons, Peter M. Flanigan, Anne L. Armstrong, Roy L. Ash, Helmut ("Hal") Sonnenfeldt, and Thomas C. Korologos, met in the Cabinet Room of the White House from 11:45 am to 12:29 pm.
  • 127-003 12:29 PM · 43 sec — Henry A. Kissinger and a White House tour group met in the Cabinet Room of the White House on an unknown date, sometime between 12:29 pm on June 22, 1973 and 8:32 am on July 10, 1973.

Conversation 946-013, June 22, 1973. White House Tapes, Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, National Archives. Audio and AI transcript via Easy Nixon, https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/946-013 (accessed October 10, 2026).