Conversation 023-039

TapeTape 23StartWednesday, April 19, 1972 at 3:27 PMEndWednesday, April 19, 1972 at 4:41 PMParticipantsKissinger, Henry A.;  Buchanan, Patrick J.;  Nixon, Richard M. (President)Recording deviceWhite House Telephone

On April 19, 1972, Henry A. Kissinger, Patrick J. Buchanan, and President Richard M. Nixon talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 3:27 pm and 4:41 pm. The White House Telephone taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 023-039 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 23-39

Date: April 19, 1972
Time: Unknown between 3:27 and 4:11 pm
Location: White House Telephone

Henry A. Kissinger talked with Patrick J. Buchanan.

[See also Conversation No. 713-1B]

     Vietnam
          -The Vice President’s speech
               -Objections of Ivy League presidents
                    -Bombing
                          -General themes

Kissinger conferred with the President at an unknown time.

[See Conversation No. 713-1B]

[End of conferral]

     Vietnam
          -Military divisions
                -Massive invasion
                     -Breaking of agreements
                           -North Vietnamese aggression
                           -Draft
                                -The President's additions

The President talked with Buchanan at an unknown time.

          -The Vice President
               -Speech
                    -Example for students
                    -Role models of university presidents

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

Hello?
Henry?
Yeah.
I was talking to the president about this Agnew speech.
Right.
And we think you ought to touch up the Ivy League presidents who are coming out against the bombing of the North a bit.
Hit them?
Yeah.
Okay.
And one of the general themes you should hit is what sort of thinking is it?
that condemns a bombing of military targets of the aggressor, that condemns America when a country has 13 of its 14 divisions in the territories of its neighbors, engages in a massive invasion, breaks every understanding and agreement they have had with us and towards the international community.
And then when we bomb the military targets, they condemn us and not the aggressor.
Okay.
Fine.
That's in there generally, or a lot of it specifically, but I think we can get a paragraph that makes that point, okay?
Can you do it?
Sure.
It'll be right on up there.
I've sent the V for the third draft of the thing.
Good.
I'll send this one up and say the president wants this, okay?
Right.
The president wants to talk to you for a minute.
Okay.
This, of course, will, I mean, his attack on the Democratic candidates will get him, but this, of course, will get him some headlines, too, which, in other words, because they think they're hurting him.
Right.
But on the other hand, he's on the right side of it this time, you know.
Okay.
In my view, you know, he may not want to use it.
But the point is that I think that he ought to say, when, pray God,
are these great leaders, the presidents of the great universities, just once going to speak up for America rather than speaking up for the enemies of the United States.
Lay it right to them.
And what an example they're setting for their students.
We can't blame, and he should say, we can't blame the students.
the few students who, for, you know, their activities here, when they are led by spineless, spineless, soft, woolly-headed faculty and university people with no courage, no guts, and no patriotism.
Put it to them like that.
Okay?
Okay, sir.
All right.
Right, sir.
I don't know whether you can write it mean enough or not.
I think so.
Okay.
Yes, sir.
Bye.