Nixon, Griffin & Smith on Vietnam War and Economic policy

Transcript (AI-generated)

This transcript is incomplete. The transcription skipped stretches of speech — roughly 1 minute of this recording (about 1% of it) is represented by only a few words. Listen to the audio rather than relying on the text below; a corrected transcript is queued.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Names and numbers are often wrong; speakers are not identified. Do not cite it as authoritative — verify against the audio and the finding aid.

Download transcript (.txt) · JSON data

Click a timestamp to play from that point; the page address then links to that moment (e.g. #t=125).

We would like to get the update if we have more economic ideas from the courage of the global leaders today.

We're just providing us with the benefit of the leaders because the Admiral has been with us on the hill, and we want to see regions on this island.

Ja, ja, ja.

— 1 min 18 s with no transcribed speech —

Well, uh, we would like to get the, uh, the, uh, the update, if we have more, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh,

I like to just very quickly run over

A chart of Indochina.

They had indications that the 308th invasion moved down and positioned itself just close to the DMC.

Simultaneously, they brought in a large amount of long-range artillery, 130-kilometer artillery.

They also concentrated a great number of service-to-air missiles just close to the DMC.

At the same time, they brought the 304th division around here into the Schiphol area, where they could make a move to the eastwards, into the 235th, and the 324th QA went down here, so that it was focused on Hue, which is a big city in the military supply.

First of all, we noticed that 320th Division, which also came from the central part of North Beach now, come into this area, which we call the Highlands, and position itself here in the classroom area against the Dockville-Conjuring Plate 2.

At the same time, the North Vietnamese had three divisions in Cambodia, the 5th, 7th, and 9th, which were the ones that were involved in the cross-border operations about two years ago.

And they were the ones that focused into militaries and streaming against the mentality of the Tiananmen area.

So when they find out that they were, in fact, going to make an all-out effort, they had two divisions here in the Gwinnifer Jars area operating against the battleships.

And this meant that at that point they only had one division left in North Vietnam if they, in fact, committed all the divisions that I mentioned in New South Vietnam.

The fact is that they had not committed the three-pointed test division, which was their last,

At the same time, we noticed a rather significant increase in airfare activity.

We're equipped with some very modern equipment.

Equipped by soldiers who are going to show you some pictures of those units and some of the types of equipment they get.

When the North Vietnamese made this attack,

They did under cover of very, very bad weather, which is prevalent in that particular area that time of year.

And consequently, they had several days wherein they could operate freely, primarily against the 3rd Army Division, without any help being provided for the South East Base.

Now, the Southeast Indians, of course, had liked all this movement very carefully.

And they had had some contingency plans for reinforcements, which included their Marine Division from the Saigon area up to the Military Region 1.

They took certain elements of their Airborne Brigade,

and put this area in military region 2, and they had a plan for taking the 21st division from military region 4 and putting it up here in this general area in military region 3.

And subsequently, all of those plans have in fact been executed.

Now let me turn to region by region.

and tell you and thank you what has happened so far, and update the situation at his hands this morning.

First, this is the military region 1, and this is the DNC area.

And as I said before, the 3rd Division of the Army was disposed right behind the DNC, and the 1st Division was disposed around

which is a very valuable point to avoid if the South Sea Division is concerned, and the 2nd Division was down in the southern part of the Military Division 1.

I have indicated here the range of the service air missiles.

which were located north of the DNC, and which were used to get the aircraft, U.S. and South Asian aircraft, operating in this area.

You can see then that the aircraft that were operating in support of the 3rd Division were constantly subjected to firings across the DNC.

Since 30 March, and counting all of the air activity in South Vietnam and North Vietnam, the North Vietnamese have fired over 700 service air missiles.

125 of these missiles will fire north of the DMZ, down into this particular area, against air transport and in support of this invasion.

Initially, the 3rd Division fell back from these positions just south of the DMC and took a position here from Don Pa to along the Guadalajara River, which is a river that runs right in here.

And then the Spanish Alliance...

More or less down this way.

Subsequent to that tank, over the weekend as you know, the Don Hawk, which was the northwest strong point here, received 4,900 rounds of 122mm and 130mm artillery, which is perhaps one of the heaviest gunnings at any point they've received in this war.

As a result of that, the

A series of assaults and attacks on this particular point that was done at the regional level.

from the tracks that they then drew from Corn Creek, and now are in the process of setting up a line which has a strong point angle here on what we call Foxport Base Magic, which is in the west tip of this area.

Now, so, you find at this point, in this particular area, a situation wherein the Great Division is just over the round way,

Operating now for some time against efforts made by this 3.4D division to move in here.

This division has suffered very heavy losses, and there have been several engagements here wherein the 4.4D division loses two of the 300 personnel.

The general agent reports this morning that the first division is in good speed.

They do need some replacements, but they are holding this position facing to the westward and the southwestward.

The problem that is facing the south east region right now is to establish a north behind here so that the stop doesn't move down by the combination of the 308th division, the 304th division and some independent regiments that the north east region has in this area.

And so that must be done by using reinforcements and a marine position.

The marine position, I must say, has operated extremely well and has many, many past command and control throughout this operation.

We take extraordinary action to replace this equipment.

Now, so you have as I say this morning, a situation with a line running about like that, with the 1st Division holding the firm against this effort, and with activity now taking place to establish a line hanging on Fox 4 Nancy, right in this position.

Now, just south of Military Region 1, you have demand.

The Nang, of course, is used by the South East of East as a harbor, and also both the South East of East and the U.S. forces operate after it from the Nang.

We've had to inspect from time to time, and have had already attacks by fire with rockets and mortars in this area, and I expect that during the forthcoming week we'll get some more of that.

There's also been some activity down south here of Da Nang by one unit of northeastern forces, but so far apparently it has not developed as a significant threat.

It is an area that the 196th U.S.

Brigade is located for the best purpose of protecting this activity that's going on here in Da Nang.

For the first military region, this is where most of the activity is taking place.

This is where we have the most serious situation.

This is where the North Vietnamese have the most rare accidents from a logistics point of view as well as a replacement point of view.

I want to emphasize that this is not a one-sided affair.

We have intercepted, among other things, that the Northeastern East is taking 2,000 wounded back by this route.

The forward air control aircraft has observed many trucks going north with wounded in the trucks.

And since we have laid on such a heavy air in this particular area, it's obvious that they have sustained extreme numbers of casualties in some cases.

We haven't had any significant casualties in the case of the 3 or 4 divisions.

And they were trying to revitalize these units.

But nevertheless, their losses, both in equipment and personnel events, extremely heavy.

For instance, in addition to the tanks.

I might just mention that they had a regiment of tanks of about 160.

They reinforced these tanks.

They've been using tanks for the first time.

Most of our air effort is being conducted in enemy territory.

It's difficult for us to get immediate bomb damage assessment.

In other words, we've got to move in there in order to get precise data so they can relax to this design.

But nevertheless, the tanks have been destroyed.

For instance, right here, only this morning, when the North Vietnamese attacked the Marines, the South Vietnamese Marines, and lost 10 tanks.

The problem, as I said before, is to establish this line in some way that it can be held so that the energy markets will develop and we can work on that.

Now, so why is the military reason one?

Let me quickly go through the others, and then I'll talk about some of the U.S. efforts in terms of air and in terms of gunfire support.

First, you know, it's military reason two, which is, if you want to rearrange yourself, is this area right here, what we call the highlands or the track border area where Cambodia allows itself to be there for the gun.

As I said, the OIPC brought down the...

It has been also subject to a situation of attrition, you might say.

And I think that, I personally think that that first intent was to kick off down here.

But they said it could not get started.

The North Vietnamese will not move until they get everything in place just so.

But Lord, I don't think that's going to happen.

And so, due to some of their loss of basis, they did not make a move.

Now, they have moved out now, and occupied a place called Dactyl, and they're moving south to the point where the southeast communities are standing up their defense lines just north of a place called Quantum.

And the next place out there is 22.

Play 2 is a larger city, of course, and there's a highway which runs from Play 2 on a straight east over here to the ocean.

And the problem is to...

We will keep that highway open.

That's where the four ends have been participating during the past week.

That highway is open.

There have been several large civilian carboys going into place too, so there's no food problems so far as the physicians are concerned in that particular area.

One of the military reasons too, I should say that again so far, the enemy has not made that major move, but we do anticipate that the enemy is going to make a major move against the continent.

Also of some concern is the fact that over here in what is called Ben Den Province, which is on the water, on the ocean right here, where the North Vietnamese have maintained the units for a long, long time, and have had a UBC infrastructure, they have been...

They have had to withdraw from some of the district headquarters, and the North Vietnamese are pretty well infiltrated, but right in this little area, right here.

So, in these military reasons, it is like saying that we are expecting a kickoff against Khartoum any time.

We are looking for that.

That goes to military region 3, which is received so much publicity in terms of Antlok.

Antlok is a little town here that's due north of Sidon.

And the North Vietnamese moved out to Greece with their 5th division.

As I told you, they had 3 divisions in Cambodia and this area here.

They moved out first and laid siege, you might say, to Antlok.

And perhaps Antelope has received about as much artillery and mortar fire as any small town or city in this particular war also, overall.

Today, Antelope is still in the hands of the Southeast Division.

They have expanded their parameter.

They are still receiving a kind of...

Tanks by fire, particularly at night.

However, we have seen no tanks in the vicinity of Antelope, despite the fact that initially there were quite a few tanks in the area.

And so, obviously, the North Vietnamese have withdrawn those tanks that did survive, and this doesn't mean that they might not try to use them again, but the tank activity there has been rather light and non-existent in recent days.

In Military Division 3, the South-East Committees have the 18th, the 25th, and the 10th Divisions.

And they have 1.5th Division as a reserve, which more or less defends the site on itself.

When this operation commenced, they took a division from the 4th Floor area and moved it up along this road to reinforce the other action that's taking place here.

In addition to these three days, it's been seven nights.

The North Vietnamese also moved all the way from Hanoi.

An independent raiment called the 202nd Quest Raiment.

This raiment is operated by him, and in a series of fights over the weekend, they lost several hundred men.

And we know that they are unaffected for the moment.

Again, we would expect the North Vietnamese Senate to withdraw and try to fill them up and get them going again.

Turning to the Delta area, military in Kuala, which is the most heavily populated, you know, here the action has been simply a series of very sharp but small encounters between the

The action in military reason 3 is very light except for some shots and manlocks.

Actually, military reason 2 is relatively light except, as I said, the North Vietnamese forces are trying to present themselves with an attack on Khantoum.

In military reason 1, the problem, as I said, is to establish these lines in the north.

Now let me talk a little bit about some of our actions with our own forces.

As you gentlemen all know, this plane kicked off, the president directed that we augment both the air and the sea forces.

We did this by sending additional carriers and destroyers, and as well as the institution and the ports.

same as this red line marks the range, the area in which they can, in fact, come.

Some of the destroyers have been hit in the flying line despite the fact that they received large shore valley fire.

The damage to them has been very light.

We did have, for the first time in this war, one destroyer hit by a very small bomb, delivered by B-17.

But aside from that, they have simply been subject to attacks by P.D.

Boats, which they have defeated quite handily.

There have been no damage from P.D.

Boats, and they have been firing a very large number of rounds at primarily the statistics targets.

The air effort has also taken place in the north of the DMZ, as well as south of the DMZ, and we have been using air in military regions 234 and 1, as well as in the northeast end.

Mr. President, I think that that is about, that is the situation that stands today.

I'd be very happy to ask questions.

I just covered it very quickly.

Why don't you speak from a perspective, give an idea, and say the number of surgeries, and why, say like yesterday, or the day before.

Yes, well...

Combined with, if you combine the South Vietnamese effort with the U.S. effort, we've been applying something around 1,200 sorties total.

This counts attack sorties as well as support sorties that are necessary in order to manage the whole area.

We have...

Yes, sir.

The...

So far as the action in the northeast hand is concerned, we've had two carriers that have been operating continuously, and there's also an aircraft from the 7th Air Force.

This right here is a place called Don Hoyt, where they ship in a lot of material, and then they have a highway running down into the OCV trail.

We've had several attacks on large numbers of trucks, supplies, P.O.L.,

Yesterday, right at this point right here, we attacked, I think it was 128,000 50-gallon fuel drums, or something like that.

It was well over millions of gallons, and it all went up.

We had it smoked up to 10,000 feet.

They've been attacked against that wall, attacked against men.

We have been conducting attacks on point parties, such as bridges and so on, and on mobile parties.

In other words, the aircraft that's conducting on reconnaissance primarily aimed at stopping the flow of supplies and working on that final 325th division that's been trying to move out of that.

But...

Generally speaking, we've had about 200 sorties in this general area during the last three or four days.

And south, we've had something like anywhere from 340 down to 200 or so in military region 1, and then somewhere like 130 or 40 in military region 2 and 3, and about 40 of this sorties in military region 2.

At the same time, these institutes have concentrated their air force in military region 1 and 3, to a lesser degree, in 2.

But this distribution of strikes, of course, is controlled by the field commanders according to the typical operations of the moment.

And the airstrikes now are predominantly invasives.

That's where the air is needed the most, rather than... That's correct.

In other words, as far as this being used as a concern...

It was a point that I wish to make, that...

I have no illusions about why the Beacon 2s are not getting further north at the moment where they're being used, where they're needed most, because in the areas of battles, where they're being annihilated, it's that I understand.

Yes, sir, that's quite correct.

The resources are concentrated depending on the identification of the targets and the tempo of the land action.

as it existed at the time.

And so this is kind of a playback of Napoleon back and forth, where one day you'll see a major atmosphere, and the next day it may be at another point.

But that's just normal management of the resources.

The third division, as I understand it, that's the one thing that is having the greatest difficulty.

But in terms of the analysis of these divisions, the third, the first, the...

One April, and this action really started on 30 March, so it had just reached its readiness date when it became involved in this action.

As I said, when it was faced with this massive move, which had not been conducted before by the Norwegian Legion, essentially they used a very large number of tanks,

A very large number of motorized vehicles and motorized advance units that under the 1st Division fell back in the south of the Guadalquivir River and then fought there until this weekend.

But it wasn't one of the newer divisions.

The 1st Division is a division that's been in this area from the outset, and it is one of the best divisions, if not the best division, that the Southeast Indies have.

Who's the commander of the 1st?

The commander of the British mission is General Foose of the THU.

What was General Long?

General Long is a man who had died in the military.

See that?

There's a one.

That's General Long.

It's been rolled on and sued into minutes and in three, and probably in four, but there may be some that have taken place in this particular command truck.

Thank you.

The enemy is still conducting an all-out offensive, and we can just state that there will be continued attacks from various countries, certainly the vulnerable place Kuwait, perhaps subject to very severe attacks.

The critical thing to have in mind is that

Of course, the importance of the regions and areas, but more importantly, the ability to solve the enemies.

...remain as a viable force despite the offense... ...and having in mind the fact that the offense cannot continue indefinitely.

That's correct.

What we're really talking about is the will and determination of the South Vietnamese.

Now, we know that the North Vietnamese have indeed what they call a logistic offense...

In other words, they have taken extraordinary efforts to move supplies south in order to sustain this type of operation.

And it's doubtful that they can sustain this tempo very long.

As I mentioned, they've fired 4,900 rounds into Hong Kong.

But at the same time, I think as they move down here, they're going to find it more difficult to

...to be attacked.

John, could you give us some ideas of your reaction, the reaction General Abrams has to the conduct of the South Vietnamese so far?

Have they done about what you expect them to do, or are they better than you thought, or worse?

Well, I think you're saying that some of them have done better, and some have done worse, John.

I would say they've been spying, stinking everybody.

And that's about what one might expect.

For instance, in Headlock, where we...

Well, comparing about the ability to hold, they finally ran it, and despite very heavy cages and very heavy damage to the city itself, now as I said, they have managed to extend the perimeter.

So, I think that you have to say that this is one of the problems, again, getting back to will and determination.

I think they have tried it.

And they have the equipment in most cases.

Well, they've shown no great direct counterattack up there, and that's one of the failings of the South Vietnamese units through the years.

Is it likely to continue, or are they not counterattacking because they don't have the assets and...

One of the reasons is that the North Vietnamese, as I said, having committed total inventory of resources, had been keeping heavy pressure on them.

And there's no question about it in my mind that the North Vietnamese, this is a deliberate place themselves to live and do to die.

And I think the fact that they committed a three-way drug division, and now there's some indication that they, which we have been watching, that one of the divisions over here has come off as moving down this way.

They say they're choosing to wear suits.

And so they have kept to a very maximum pressure, at a very maximum power.

And the Soviets have provided in all these divisions with what one might call invasive-type equipment.

And if you're interested, I have some of that.

Let me see those photos there.

Could you say that the lack of leadership is a proof of yourself?

I think, unless you can always put your mind on the leadership.

By and large, that's where the problem is.

That's where we had to start from scratch in South East Ham to build up the leadership.

That's the most difficult part.

You can always say it's the leadership.

Is there any evidence

of a shortage of logistic capability from the north end of east as of yet, caused by the airstrikes on the supply lines.

We've had isolated cases where they, for instance, have exhausted their fuel or exhausted their ammo.

I think at the moment it's more of a problem of distribution rather than insurance, because they are facing this problem of having to carry the fuel and the ammo along with them.

And so that is actually a problem of distribution.

We've had reports of ammo shortage.

For instance, as I mentioned, the SA-2 missiles.

We've had the indication that some of the missile launchers up here are out of missiles and things of this kind.

But here again, this has been fighting.

Tom, what effect is the weather likely to have, both on air?

This is more about the change in the seasons here.

Yes, as I think everyone knows, the Anaheim Mountains run about so.

And during the northeast monsoon, which is just shifting to the southwest monsoon, the winds blow across the river parking and pick up the moisture and stack it up against these mountains.

And that's what was happening when they actually made the move across from the 30th, and why we had this cold, heavy overcast.

Now it's shifting around so the flow comes from the northwest.

It picks up the moisture in the Gulf Sound, backs it up on this side, and starts raining in Laos.

And so the rains are beginning.

We've had progress in the Porto Manila all night.

They've changed several trucks, bogged down in front.

It's just the beginning of the rains on the southwest side of these mountains.

For instance, down in this particular area, it gets unusually tricky and gummy.

And the weather has a different effect on different areas.

So far as the logistics are concerned, of course, the easiest problem that the North Vietnamese have is just the DNC because they have destroyed a lot.

And the weather now, fortunately, from a flying point of view, on this side of the mountain, is very good.

Admiral, what about the logistics problems for the South Vietnamese?

I think there's a real capacity for the North to cut through the second floor area from Can Thung to Vinh Tien.

That's a real possibility.

If they cut Vietnam into there, will it create logistics problems up around Hue?

Or do you rely primarily on the sea there?

No, I don't think it would cause a position problem anywhere around Hawaii.

I know it's dependent on the headline of two occasions they've got to cut.

It's not being added to all of Highway 19, but I don't think it has to.

The biggest difficulty is that I told you, the biggest difficulty is the civilians and so on in the Plate 2 area.

And not that it in effect cuts off the supplies from military forces up north of that area.

The contact problems is of concern from a long range point of view in the sense that the enemy, it hasn't had any soft spot with respect to the

I think what they're trying to do is to probably attack two or three provincial capitals.

And this is why they have focused on pontoon, and palm trees, and so on.

But I know that, just depending on where they are, I think they are ahead.

It's a couple of key buildings that have met that path.

And, well, there have been some reports of NBA divisions poised, and I think the Paralympic area of Cambodia, is there any possibility of a threat developing on the city of Saigon itself because of actions taking place there?

The possibility, they're not divisions so much, and I mentioned there, there were two regiments right here, 271st and the 24th.

And the 271st, though, has been very heavily mauled.

Now, I mentioned in fact that we haven't seen any tanks hit Anilok in quite a while.

You always have the possibility of them trying to do a...

...planking movement, you know, and come in in that direction.

On the other hand, they sound to me that they do have a forward evasion, doesn't this generator have?

So, I'll just press that A1 to gate right here.

So, it depends on, they already have the gate belt if they want to stand them off.

Also, they, for the sound you can look for, again, along with the logistics lights...

of the North Vietnamese Arts Center.

But this is being watched, but we don't see any indication of such a thing developing at the moment.

Now it is true that they have interdicted Highway 1, which runs from Saigon to Phnom Penh in Cambodia.

The North Vietnamese have interdicted that particular highway.

But that does not affect Saigon or the military's point of view, of course.

It does, to some degree, affect Afghanistan.

Admiral, in a briefing that we could do today after Kissinger pointed out, I believe that of the 43 provincial capitals we had lost, none of those landed in the territory would have fallen shortly.

Now, how does that compare with our situation today?

Well, we lost one.

Just one.

So they all came back to us.

And they created Dr. Christopher.

Unfortunately, too prophetic.

The theory that he's educated is in his reading about footfall, or Kwan-Kree, and Khantung.

Kwan-Kree has lost Khantung as a gesture, a lot at that time, of course.

But these towns that you read about that fall, and just keeping that perspective, they're running tight, and it isn't in capital, so that's what happens to the men and the divisions, and they build on both sides.

As far as the district capitals are concerned, there are 43.

One is falling.

Another country is in danger.

What will happen to the others?

That's what the situation is today.

I think far more important than the district capitals is the capability, as the analyst suggested, of both sides in terms of the exaltation means to

...through retaining their morale and spirit, and so forth, on the defense.

And the North Korean army needs to have the ability to adjust to it, otherwise they can't clean the offense.

Now, this battle has been going on for almost five weeks.

Having gone on that long, the North Korean army needs...

The south Vietnamese have their problems because, as they are a minority of Vietnamese, except for the 1st Division and 2 or 3 others, you don't have a lot of battle-starved veterans and leaders who have been tested to settle.

Anarchy of Vietnamese are led by, I don't want to say such enormous casualties, but they're led by pretty skilled, effective leaders.

They also, and we have to candidly realize, that they, and this is no discredit to our program, but we have to admit that the program was set up not for the purpose of office convenience, but our business is to have bigger tanks, bigger guns, and better supplies.

I love

The air power is not a total equalizer, but it is a considerable one.

Basically, our air power, the packed air, has to be given to, it's an equalizer for the North Vietnamese superiority in tanking guns.

I think if I could put it in perspective, it's very important for Junos, both in my speech a week ago, and speaking again in Dallas, to answer the question on the branch.

I think it's very important to maintain a strong position in what we're going to do.

As I said, this is an enormous event.

By mass, it's totally done to be quick.

Better equipment than the South Vietnamese have, due to the fact that the South Vietnamese are not equipped for the offensive.

It's actually not for this kind of offense that they are now having to defend against.

We are compensated for that to visit the equipment for the airstrikes.

Airstrikes in the battle area, airstrikes in the arms of the cops, have the supplies that we can, and of course there was more of that.

As far as how the battle is going, still there have been some losses on the South Vietnamese side.

There will be more, there's no question about it.

Because the United States does not yet run its course.

What is in support of their mind as far as the population of the United States, the population of the country, is still under the control.

It's also, you know, that none of the South, none of the rest of the East are moving North.

All of them are moving South.

And that means that our people are totally failed in their efforts to win the civilian population of the West Side, using these pictures and papers and their aspirations.

If they like the communists so well, and hate the South Vietnamese government so much, they'll be running into the arms of the Anacortes South.

It's probably if they take over they're going to get it.

It's also to note that the North Vietnamese certainly have better discipline.

At the south end, I mean, it's partly because they've been at it longer, but partly because they used president and chair, he's one of the stories, and the man came and attained the rest.

They used chair, they used all the brutality that perhaps used to be used in the armed forces in the United States, but he didn't change it one way or another, one way or another.

We try to get them to protect, you know, in India, because they want to, and so forth.

But also, there have been massive cases, and this is one of the reasons you saw yesterday, that the people of Kuwait were very, very, on an emotional basis, very, very dependent on themselves, but they are having to master Kuwait, and so you see that there are massive cases, and already there have been thousands of shellings there,

After they come in and cut the throats, murder, all those in the leader class will oppose them.

This is just, of course, a curtain race of what will come in the future.

There is no end.

I say it's better.

What could happen?

Turkey?

Turkey is absolutely right.

It's in the event, for example, that the United States and Saudi Arabia collapse.

What would they call it?

Saudi Arabia would collapse.

It would collapse in a matter of weeks.

If the event that would happen, what would happen to in South Vietnam, would be similar to what happened to the North Vietnam when the North Vietnamese took over in 1984.

The passing vision of Da Nang estimated to disturb Vietnam.

That 500,000, I have to make it, are being used to attack us.

In this case, we were included by some there who would oppose the communists, were murdered or starved to death.

And the massacre, in a way, is another situation.

It's quite different from my way.

To us, atrocities are wrong, and they should be, and they are prosecuted.

To them, they take a dose for it.

Because that is the way they're operating.

Now, having said all this, the Nazi Party is very sober, very analytical, and I'll answer this.

This is a tough battle.

It will continue to be a tough battle.

But our view of the main is still the same.

However, they are countries suffering from enormous tensions.

South Vietnamese are fighting very well in some places, not so well in others, as would be anticipated with a relatively new army against a more spurious army, but we are providing the equalizer to the extent that we can.

and massive air support, and massive fleet support, and let me say, those destroyers and carriers, I'm taking destroyers and cruisers and so on, we have out there doing a great job shelling those high and highway predictions with the stand.

Now, the question as to how the battle will come out is going to depend on which of the two sides can last.

For the North Vietnamese, the chance of seeing this, and as Rogers Morton has already implied, the general weather will become a factor in this area.

In the next two to three weeks, the weather becomes an increasingly difficult factor for the offensive.

It's also, of course, a factor against the air power, but it's a factor for the offensive, for a motorbike you couldn't stop getting on, because the weather becomes very difficult around the first of June, throughout the month of June.

So I think what we can say here now is that...

This battle is going about as we anticipated.

The South Vietnamese members perish in the forces.

Some of their units have not performed well.

Others have performed heroic.

The populace of South Vietnam, despite, of course, some pessimism that you might expect whenever they lose one provincial capital, the populace of South Vietnam has been getting it down the road.

They have not fought for the North Vietnamese side.

The North Vietnamese are in arms with us in Malacca.

As far as our here, they will continue to be concerned they're going to make this a job, and they will continue to.

As far as our here is concerned, it seems to me that our only choice is to contain, provide, match, prepare, and see who's going to do the solving of the needs, until the offensity runs its course.

Once it runs its course, then our case will be finished.

In Cambodia in 1970, they had trouble but they were disinvolved and they were badly mauled and that was the year.

In Laos in 1971, despite the fact that the end of the battle given any gain on the route and so forth, you will note that there was no further North Vietnamese action in 1971 lines, because they used up their assets in the battle.

Now it comes this year, this year is different from the end of the war in Laos in the sense that the North Vietnamese have everything now.

They know that this is their last possibility.

If everything except one division in 325th would be mentioned, it will now probably be many.

As yet, for example, Americans were still there, and we had put on an inch on landing, and it's been estimated that they had virtually walked into Hanoi.

However, we're not there.

And I come back to the basic point.

There are no American ground forces.

There will be none.

There are U.S. and American air power.

It will continue to be there.

And as far as the targets in North Vietnam are concerned, at the present time, in the last three weeks since our first strike on the Anaheim Islands, Canada has recommended that we attack the battle area.

We're doing that.

However, as far as the general attitude, the general policy is concerned,

As long as the North Vietnamese continue their mass defense in South Vietnam, all military targets in North Vietnam will be options for us to hit.

And they will be hit.

That's the way it's going to be.

So that's where she stands.

It's bad and good, and the main thing for us to do is to, I must say, I very much appreciate the regard you give everybody around this table for all of you.

I think one thing, the great weakness of the North Vietnamese is where they thought they would have the greatest strength, they would have the softest, but not no one.

How people without adequate arms can often be overtaken and overwhelmed by brutalized communist portions.

And it's here that our role is being played.

It's a close call.

It's a close contest, but as far as we're concerned, we have no other choice.

If I do, no other choice is to do with the harmless consequences of extolling and supporting communists and bidding of a small country to succeed.

If we can prevent that...

That's the summary, I think.

Yes, sir.

Very, very good.

We are going to have difficult times, but the other side is going to have difficult times, too.

I have just one question.

What success are you having in introducing and, I think, weapons into the infantry here in Arden?

Arden, of course, has the LAW weapon, which is a short-range vehicle, which they use quite well.

As a matter of fact, on occasion, they actually knocked out several tanks with 109 artillery.

We've just been in front of that now, giving us a total of...

Well, also, I think I mentioned the fact that it's estimated that they've lost about 300 tanks by a combination of the ground taxing as well as the annex and ship taxing.

An indication of the North Vietnamese cash, which is that they've got approximately 130,000 North Vietnamese records in South Vietnam.

And it's quite a chunk.

These are first line ground troops.

Going up, back up to Laos, already 22,000 of them already in that area.

The question is, who lasts the longest?

Well, what about the Vietcong?

I was on the program with the experts.

They said they were going to unleash an attack.

Does the Vietcong have the potential anymore to do more?

The Vietcong, if I can answer it, because I think I don't have much time.

The Vietcong, Bob.

Vietcong have always been, as the province has done, 200,000 people.

They've always been strong.

And there is, since the United States, there's been a number of Vietcong mayors.

And down in the Delta, there's still pockets of Vietcong.

But I think the Admiral would agree that our concern is not the Vietcong.

That's our concern, as the regulators, they haven't...

So, this is minimal factors.

That's correct.

I think that's one of the main differences between this activity and that of the city.

The city is not generating uprisings in the city, and in addition to that, there are a lot of standards that are good.

Many portions of the North Beach are actually manned by South Beach committees.

This time, as the president says, it's almost exclusively North Vietnamese, so when they lose a man, they lose a North Vietnamese, not a South Vietnamese, that's there.

Is there any disintegration politically in Saigon or otherwise?

Were there any major dissident groups who organized to disrupt the government?

I'm not asking the military operations.

We can take the president and some of the followers of the man they met, you know, it was...

I'm there as much as there was in our civil war.

Yes.

Thank you.

Mr. President, you have a problem about negotiations, I'm sure, with the probability that they can't sustain this over a long period of time.

They're probably being safe to get too much involved in substantive negotiations.

Negotiations, while their offensive was at its peak, they're really looking for a strong position.

What I'm saying, I'm just saying, Barbara, is the general rule of warfare, which all of you are aware of, and only negotiating the conference table, which is a different battle than that.

Consequently, while we have an American Armed Services and Urban Diversity Act, I think we should assume that as far as hopes for negotiating are concerned, on any basis that would be fair to both sides, particularly to our side, those hopes do not become significant until the battle subsides.

Because if the enemy figures that it's going to, say, take away, or something like that, they'll wait until they get back before talking.

If, on the other hand, they figure that they're running out of gas, then they'll talk.

But at the present time, at the height of a battle, there's never negotiation that succeeds.

You recall World War I, World War II, and all of these, the negotiating trend always must be kept open.

either privately or publicly, but it never really produces anything until the battle is resolved in such a way, so that one side or the other recognizes that they are better off negotiating the fight, this fight.

I believe that, I would say.

I mean, we are negotiating.

When I say that, it's disgusting.

As far as reaching a deal is concerned.

As long as a battle is at its height, nobody makes a deal.

And that's what we've done now.

The battle's still very, very hot.

I'd like to have a look at some of those institutes just before they think that we're out.

I'm certainly out there watching for that, but I wouldn't anticipate so much.

You're doing it here with a fanatical group of people.

They've walked for 25 years.

And they'll always, and they're always fighting in the hope that the South Vietnamese stuff may collapse, that there may be a South Vietnamese people's uprising, and actually in the hope that they'll get great support from what they thought were their friends in the United States.

And I'm sorely disappointed with that today, because there hasn't been, of course, the support for their efforts in this country that there have been in previous states.

They find, militarily, they're going to take too much punishment to make a good point.

There again, this is one of the reasons why we have to continue hitting them in their heartland.

They can't be a great exception.

I think yes, we're going to have this pain.

That's the end of it.

Any guess on time?

Well, as the President mentioned, we have a weather factor that will be coming in.

It isn't just the weather, but as the Admiral also has said to us, it's a question of how long the defenses will go.

Because there are great defenses in World War I and World War II.

Four weeks is about a few weeks to be called.

Thank you very much.

perhaps just to stay three or four weeks.

Yes, through May.

Through May.

First of June, then weather, plus just running out of gas, supplies, and the enormous treatment that brings it in.

So, the South Vietnamese have a problem holding on to the gas.

The North Vietnamese have a problem winning the border.

They don't win, they lose.

All the South Vietnamese don't have to lose.

They just have to prevent the North Vietnamese from winning.

That, of course, is another thing to play at.

Well, we must get on with some domestic strategy.

I don't know.

Yes, sir.

The Soviet has 11 new types of weapons that they have never used in South Vietnam before.

It's pretty formidable.

Mr. President, before the Admiral leaves, can I ask one more question?

What does the shipping look like in Haiphong and Vien?

Are the Soviets rushing in new equipment?

It's really at one of its highest levels.

You know, I made a 33-step, I believe, at high far ground.

The solids have been taking in about 200,000 tons a month.

A large part of that during the last three months has been P.O.L., fuel.

And this is one of the reasons that we have been attacking the fuel supply, because obviously, due to the fact that using more motorized food has happened,

They had to lay down a backlog of fuel, but that's actually quite accurate, it is quite heavy.

Thank you.

We would like to go on before we go to the Senate House of Deports to see if we can get matters in genre prepared again.

This case 3, I think, is very effective for what I call one case of these stories of ours.

I'm going to get ahold of Reverend's office.

I'm going to do it.

I think that's amazing.

You're the one in favor of your position.

I think that's a very strong case of support.

I feel like the whole 70% actually supports that.

It's right-footed.

The military probably is in a hard situation.

So we pay college patients to stop and get their health.

The press doesn't report that either.

So...

After Edison, you know, that was a problem.

Much depression.

What do you have?

What do you think?

It isn't like the closest one.

The closest one.

The holes, the facilities.

Did he get up there?

There's a guy I heard about when I was in Texas.

Okay.

This person has cut his, and the holes are so important.

We all know it's just an incredible battle.

And battles are lost.

Battles are lost.

— 1 min 1 s with no transcribed speech —

These are the kind of problems that you get when people say, well, we don't know what the president's domestic accomplishments have been.

So we're going to deal here mostly with hard facts, mostly with accomplishments.

And you'll see that they're not only presidential accomplishments, but also congressional accomplishments.

So there's something for everybody.

I'd like to talk very quickly about the three in this order.

Exploiting, crime, and not employment.

I can draw your attention to the one-armed employee who has had a few facts on the economy, because there have been several aspects of the economy growth.

I'm sure you're fully aware of all the facts that have been verified that you can use.

And of course, this business of the inflation change is where I have some more numbers out on Friday.

When those come out, we'll update this.

And then you'll receive an updated version of some of these facts.

And now, you can confidently say the rate of inflation has been stopped cold.

It has zero increase.

New prices have leveled off.

Fruit and vegetable prices have declined.

Cost of consumer services has risen only by 0.2% for the second consecutive month.

The inflation rate since the freeze, 2.8%, as you see in the graph at the bottom.

But the really important number in this whole thing is under the heading wages, and it's the second line.

Real earnings for workers from 1970 to the present has been 6%.

Those are real in-pocket gains after inflation has taken half of it, so that the worker now gets that dollar to have for the first time since 1966.

That's the other list for five years.

Workers thought they were getting wage increases.

They didn't.

Their wage increases were totally eaten up by price increases.

Now, by raising up our program to find a degree, million American workers have begun to get off the treadmill and make some progress.

Now, of course, we'll have various people, so many workers, that say, we did better than that, and that this is an act, but this shows that when it shows a 6% increase, it deters real, suspendable earnings.

It's quite a good thing to use if you're talking to an audience that can take advantage of it.

Now, just to give you an example, the graph at the bottom of the page is lifted right out of the budget documents.

Do you remember when the budget came out of this anywhere?

It was a book of charts called Budget Highlights.

I encourage you all to use this book.

Obviously it spoke as of January.

We'll try and update a lot of the numbers that are in here.

But the graph you see at the bottom is this graph out of the budget highlights, updated to today.

And you see the trend in the consumer price index, which is a very favorable trend.

It's something that we encourage you to use to talk about.

Let's turn quickly to the vaccine on crime.

The top of the number one paragraph deals with the crime rate globally in cities across the country, the national crime rate and the D.C. crime rate.

The reason the D.C. crime rate is important is because this city is the only one in which the administration has direct linkage.

In all the other cities across the country, we send the money out, but it's a question of global administration, global control, local application of the money.

Here in D.C., this administration, with the help of Congress and various reforms that have been passed, has direct linkage and has proved on a model city basis that you can achieve a net reduction in the crime rate.

In fact, in the district, of course, the crime rate has been cut in half since this administration came into office.

But over a third of our major cities in the United States have expressed net decreases in their local crime rates, and the national crime rate is the lowest since six years.

So when you hear this business about this law and order administration not getting themselves, here are the facts to put that falling line up.

The dollars that Congress has appropriated, I think, speak as loud as any other single factor.

With the President's leadership, the amount of federal dollars applied to the crime problem in the United States has gone from $22 million in three years under the previous administration to $1.5 billion in three years under this administration.

In other words, $22 million against $1,500 million under the previous administration.

You make that point, it's altogether valid, but you invite your opponent to point out that there were only a few months remaining in the fiscal year just before the end of the Johnson administration in which the 22 million dollars could have been spent.

That's a dangerous fact.

Well, I think the important point here, Congressman Powell, is that there was no leadership in the Johnson administration

That there wasn't any reason why this kind of a program couldn't have been applied to meet the problem three years before.

But they fiddled around until the very end of that administration, before they got this program, with very strong Republican support, I might say, in the Congress.

And that this administration and this Congress have very vigorously attacked this problem during the first three years of this administration.

Now, I agree with your point, but you can take appropriations outside of the LEA as a specific program, and ask them, well, did you get the same kind of regulations?

I agree, John.

In a similar context,

I think it suggests that you have to be careful with the phrase you often use to speak of the crime rate.

You just made a classic mistake.

You said that the crime rate was lowest for six years.

That is not correct.

I think that's what I said, but if I didn't, I'd stand corrected.

What we're talking about here always is increase and decrease.

We have expressed net increase in the district of Colonia and in a third of the cities around the country nationally.

We're still dealing with a net increase rate.

And that increased rate is below what you can see here.

It's basically like a budget.

So I completely press that as the best example because for the first month, six years, we had no increase in the adjustment basis of the CDI.

So the price has changed.

We're always talking about the rate of increase, whether inflation has gone up or down, and as population increases, it's inevitable that crime has gone up, but it's the rate of increase of crime that we're always talking about.

If we can slow that down, we're gaining on the problem.

This district, let me say, is a flat, cut in half of crime area, whereas the major crimes are running at 200.

It wasn't 200, it was 22.

It's now less than 100.

It's not that bad.

Summarize that the bottom of that vaccine are three important pieces of legislation that this Congress has enacted as the President's request.

The third vaccine are unemployment.

I might say generically that as a group I promise you that there will be two ways of it.

Talking about unemployment.

One is to say, well, unemployment is as bad a problem as the opposition says it is, and you can break it down demographically.

And there is some material on this back sheet that could take that approach.

Do you feel that the best approach to take in talking about unemployment is to say, unemployment remains a problem?

If it is the way that we are, yes, that's right.

With the results that we have,

We're doing everything we know how to do to solve the problem.

We're optimistic that we're going to make even greater gains.

The gains that we have made are extraordinary considering the great turnaround that we've had in this country from a defense and war economy to a peacetime economy.

Many, many, many civilian jobs have been created in the fact that you get to those numbers.

And you can talk either about employment, where the numbers are very, very good, or unemployment, where the numbers still aren't good enough.

And you can run against unemployment so speedy by saying, we're not satisfied, it's so intense for this country, we're doing everything we know how to do, we're panning ourselves, we're going to get better results in the future, and so you're not put in the position of apologizing for such and such a ring of unemployment in particular.

...moment of time.

This summarizes, in fact, it summarizes the employment side, it summarizes the success that are being figured out on the unemployment side, and it's intended to be a foundation for whatever statistic of that is going to earn a few times.

Well, you'll be seeing more of these fact sheets in the very short run.

If you have suggestions for topics, or if you have suggestions for improvements, we think we have.

Our criteria are that we give you only provable facts, and that we keep it on one page.

But beyond that, we're wide open.

These are very excellent, Mr. President, and there'll be more.

We'll get some better rhetoric and so on.

But they're very beneficial if you're going out to the mountains.

You can have them available and use them.

But I suggest a honey plant.

John Connolly, by the street, is on the page.

I mean, I wouldn't get a call from you.

First, I think you can talk about the possibility that since the new economic policy and all this, that a million, whatever it is, a million men have jobs.

Second, with regard to what I'm finding among breadwinners and so forth, I think it's as low as it has been in the last five years.

I mean, the problem is that we come from a labor market where people have to come out of the armed services and out of defense lines, which should always be made available.

et cetera.

And obviously, at least in the United States of America.

Then I would, I also would, I'm sorry if I leave you.

There's those of you who can't do this in some areas, and I think you should.

It's John Collins saying that they know.

Every in a large city, you might just pick up your newspaper and take along the help wanted ads.

Whether it's Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Nebraska, you'll find pages and pages of help wanted ads from the same unemployment.

And I think you should make the point that part of the unemployment problem, not all part of the unemployment problem, is that there's this attitude of our people.

They will not take a job if they consider their job to be meaningful.

And this should not be the case.

Their job doesn't make any sense.

They have help wanted at a very, very high level, and on a fundamentally high level.

Perhaps some of it starts with demagoguery, but it's their point of view.

And that also gets you into the welfare thing.

Mr. President, you may be interested that we're putting these fact sheets into a loose-loop binder with indexed divisions of our stakeholders, and having them available at our Kennedy's Congress.

Well, let's see.

We have a brief report from the Senate House today.

Well, in the House of Representatives, we have another rather slow week this week.

It's anticipated, however, that revenue sharing will get a rule probably next week sometime, and it'll be on the floor of the House either in the week of the 15th, which is a week from Monday, or the 27th, which is the following week.

I think it will pass the House with a very substantial margin.

We also have for the Rules Committee now, and the rule probably will be granted, the minimum wage legislation.

The committee reported out, typically in that committee, very bad legislation.

It not only goes to two dollars immediately, but it includes about five extra provisions for extended coverage, all of which are bad.

There's one that is a very definite protectionist provision,

It's our strategy to come up with a substitute.

John Irwin Board will offer the substitute.

It calls for a straight $2 package from Greece, and it knocks out all of the extended coverage, including the protectionist provision.

It does, however, add a provision which we think is very desirable for youth differential.

The argument always is minimum wage increases knock out the job opportunities for younger people.

We allegedly have in the law now a use differential, but it is rather meaningless.

The Erlenborn substitute will have a really beneficial use differential.

Now, we've been trying to get John Erlenborn to reduce his $2 figure, but John's stuck with it.

John Anderson's going to offer an amendment to the substitute to take the increase from $1.60 to $1.80,

And then 12 months later, we've always done before, whenever we've had increases in weight, we've fixed it in rather than going to the top figure meeting.

Now we've taken a whip check to see whether our members would support John Anderson's substitute, or the amendments to the Ireland Board's substitute.

The WIP check is encouraging, but certainly it means we've got some work to do if we're going to get the amendment to prevail.

We are negotiating with some friends on the other side, trying to convince them that the Anderson amendment is desirable.

It'll be a very close vote on that.

I would strongly urge you to just be sure you have time for a veto.

I think there are many of us, including myself, if we are unsuccessful in our substitute or hand as an amendment, many of us will vote against the committee bill.

It's really bad legislation.

I guess the sound of the money has gone to my forehead.

I just wanted to say it before you did.

But those two are the major proposals that will come before the House prior to Memorial Day weekend recess.

After that, we hope to have the first, probably the only, reorganization proposal, the one that Chef Hollowfield has been working quite conscientiously on.

If we can get the community development

The rest of them are so controversial, I don't think they're going to be done in 1972.

Health insurance...

John Burns reported to me yesterday that he thinks it's helpful for humanity action in 1972.

John was optimistic about some action in private pension field in 1972.

On the House side at least, I can't speak for the Senate, but John Burns thinks there is a chance on the House side for such action.

Other than

I would say that...

The Committee on Appropriations is about ready to move on a number of those appropriation bills, and I told on the Senate side that we're in pretty good shape once we get them over there.

So this may move more rapidly than is apparent at this time.

We have the authorization bill for...

So, that will come to the floor of the House publicly after Memorial Day.

After those rules committees

The time is getting short.

Perhaps the military situation will be clarified.

I don't think this will come to the floor of the House before the 1st of June.

I think that will either be way ahead or we'll be in trouble.

So I think they're putting in a hurry on our part to expedite the districts that are killed.

Could I suggest one thing to the leaders and so forth that have these problems with regard to the war and the resolution and so forth and so on?

At this critical point, at this critical point, with, as you know,

The negotiating craft as well as a time of decision for South Vietnam and for the Congress to undercut the President would in my view completely destroy our negotiating position and would lead to

It would destroy the president's negotiating position, and the Congress would have to take responsibility for the destruction of the negotiating position at this point in time.

The enemy is just looking for that.

And we've taken a strong hand.

Actually, they followed the ORC poll, but they held it in Congress.

The Congress takes the position.

It will undercut the negotiations.

It will give the enemy enormous courage.

It could be the critical factor in destroying...

And we did the South Vietnamese will to recession.

So, I think we can put it right on the line.

We had fun last week.

Our fellow asked us about the...

I think we'll be in as good shape as the House in the future if we get something like that.

That's about where we are legislatively in the House.

But I also suggest that both the House and Senate, despite the fact that they do not expect to get results, keep hammering for the bus and monitoring, keep hammering for it, because that will be a critical issue as time goes on.

I might make a comment on that, but...

We are continuing to try and get people to sign the discharge petition, and I know four or five who are about to do it, and will sometime this week, once you get over that 170 mark in the whole class, so it starts to go on its own.

We're also opening negotiations with Bill Comer to see if we can't get the full committee to...

take away from the House Committee on Education under that legislation, which they are obviously not going to act on.

I can't really report on it, except that there's nothing to report anyway, about what happened yesterday in that stupid session.

I mentioned a lot in the room here, we're sorry to hear about Senator Fulbright's setback earlier in the week when he only got 15 votes, and then Secretary of State, he had all the Republicans except one voting with us on that.

That was the Canadian courts of the fight on the State of Portland USA authorization bill, which is now on the floor.

And the painting business is the amendment by John Stennis to strike out what's referred to as the church's language in the bill, reported by the committee, which would end all U.S. function for all military operations in Indochina by this year.

With the support of George Aiken, John Cooper and others, right now, frankly, we think we've got the votes to win the Senate.

Unfortunately, I expect the vote to be a little closer than I would like to see, but I think we've got the votes.

We're going to try to get us to a vote this week.

If we could get back to a boat, I think we're then going to be faced, however, with the ministry of America over here, which will be offered by Byrd this week, if we get that far, or by the ministry next week.

Once we get by the end-of-war boats, I think we'll quickly wind up at the State Department-USI opposition bill, and then the next thing on the calendar

We're going to start with John on that today, but I think that's a good change, and it's good for both.

Well, there's one thing that I should have mentioned.

You know the Democrats had a caucus about ten days ago, and after a very bloody two-day fast, they came up with a directive to Dr. Martin, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, to report out legislation that would conform to their...

Well, I've been in California for about four days.

I didn't talk to Doc.

I did talk to him just before I left.

He was then trying to get us around in some way or other.

But it didn't sort of affect me how he was going to do it.

You're fine with that?

Wayne Hayes, who's not often our ally, and we can say when he is, he's fine.

...told me that he was going to do everything he could to thwart any action here at any time.

He's a pretty agile, imaginative fellow when he feels that way.

So maybe we've got an ally that can help us, even though most of us don't like what he does often. ...

Well, I have nothing to add to that.

I think that in this case,

I understand they will offer the backfield amendment, whether that fixes the date.

I'm not taking pictures a day, but as far as I'm concerned, it's like some of the other days that I used to go to New York office.

It's like, I always ask them to fix a date.

So I don't understand the conditions that might be approved.

I'm not sure about that.

But certainly we have to thank Russia for the one-sided vote the other day on the 27th of 15th.

And that's all.

And incidentally, Russia's stock is not going up very high, as I see it, either in the economy store or within public.

And unless you bring back some pretty good proposals from Moscow, or...

I think they can send it to Kenya.

I hope they realize that.

The supplement was in that state authorization bill, which took them out.

But I didn't find too many of that bill, and I was torn.

I had to constantly take care of them, and...

When they get into concerts, and that was probably the easiest way to get them out, they might come out with a pretty good bail time.

A couple days in front of the bowl.

Thank you.

Yesterday, you sent me a message of default action.

I wound up recommending the absentees, but... You're doing such a good job in comparison to those who are not absentees.

I'd ask you to check it out if you want.

Thank you.

Mr. President, I hope you will encourage, keep encouraging the Vice President to take off and do nothing in Congress.

I think I was very encouraged by the things the report is telling me.

This is a good way to attack on this weapon.

How is that?

I don't think he needs to be encouraged.

Mr President, along the lines of Senator Aiken's statement, it seems to me to be a good thing if the people of the country knew that Russia is still supplying the North Vietnamese people during this offensive.

With the figures which the Admiral gave us as the number of ships that are in those harbors,

I have the feeling that for some reason other people in the country think that because we bombed Taichung once, then maybe once, that the Russians have backed away from serving us.

Are you suggesting, George, that I should not go to Russia?

No.

I'm asking you just as an opinion.

I don't know why this is happening.

I think your point is that you go, but of course the plan is still off.

You're sure that you'll go.

The air talk, depending on the contractor, is not as benign as it might be.

Maybe it's not as much as it ought to be.

Why don't you say something about that?

Not enough.

It's in the front of me right now, and there is a change, I think, in the public sentiment towards voting.

Yes, that's me.

But here's one other suggestion.

Two weeks ago, some of the New York Times had a story, you know, on page 16 or 18 or somewhere, showing how the homeowners in South Vietnam were fighting back.

And even among that, we're joining them.

And I think you know that, but the Catholics just don't want that sort of contact.

And it seems to me that, I don't know how much progress has been made, but I'm glad to be a good sign for Moritz.

It's one of the reasons that this house being banned would only speed up some of those things, and get some publicity out of it.

I think they have set it up, George.

Yes, but your search is right, it doesn't get out of it.

You have all the publicity coming out of Saigon.

Correct.

Well, we don't have to do this.

I wanted to say one thing, that you will have to keep in confidence until 11 o'clock, because the announcement will not be made until then.

But I think I should share with the leaders my thoughts on the FBI.

And you know I'm doing something somewhat unprecedented.

Senator Pearson.

which I don't believe in the exceptions.

I'm excited that I will deliver the village to the ruler tomorrow morning.

It'll be a break in ten minutes, but I've got them.

So, I'm sure there's 380 presidents, but the president ought to be able to do it rather than having to take on this in the office.

And Dr.

Latch, it's a very simple subject.

As a ceremony, Dr.

Latch will give the invitation, and Dr. Elson will give the invitation.

She probably noted that by his parents' endowment, what is now a jury in Section 1, Latin America, was born.

With regard to the successor, I've been doing a great deal of giving a great deal of thought to it, and what Bob said certainly bears out the wisdom of the decision I made in regard to it.

When we consider the fact that the director of the FBI, Hoover, one director, served under eight presidents, two republicans and six democrats, three republicans and five democrats,

We're all with equal loyalty and with non-partisanship.

It seems to me that it's enormously important to keep that position.

And the confirmation and the direction it is confirmed by this time, however, is not partisan.

Political debate in an election year.

I have found that by checking the law, that in the event of the incapacity of the directors to operate, the Attorney General has the right to appoint active directors.

...for a period of time, which was not limited.

And consequently, I have authorized claims to make an appointment of an acting director and interim director, and it will be announced today that the president will, having, I will set forth these facts about what we need, and that the director of the FBI, who is the president of the department,

That he'd be appointed after the election.

By, of course, whoever is president at that point.

The elected president.

He'd be appointed after the election, and his name would be submitted to the Senate for confirmation of that.

Otherwise, you see what could happen.

What could happen is he'd be appointed directly to now.

Not to the point...

Shall we say, the land beyond repute is the greatest law enforcement officer in the world, and it would get better partisan debate down there in the Senate, and the Bureau would be in turmoil after November, when his name would happen to be incidentally.

It's like an appointment to the Supreme Court.

He has to submit his resignation the minute the election occurs.

And a new president, if he did not happen to be meeting with somebody else, we cannot have it that way.

So the decision that I made is that we will have an acting director, which will not be submitted because he does not need to be.

He will be a good man, I'm sure.

He will serve through the record.

And that act of the record, on a political level, is ruled out in the great tradition in which Hooger was appointed.

But that's not my job.

That's a decision I've made, and I trust that you will all support it.

But I think they have to steer their animations that way.

Well, I had thought all the time, if you're making a point to tell, I can't have such a wonderful... No, I had thought that that might be a problem.

I know you and your experience will see that.

Mr. President, I...

I haven't seen some problems in that.

But I didn't have a...

I don't think you're in the position that Lyndon Johnson was when he was going around again.

It is a Supreme Court nomination.

You see, if it were a Supreme Court nomination, there would be no question.

Send it right now.

And of course, you're not going to have the cabinet.

Send it right now.

You see, this is a very...

It's a very special appointment.

The director of the FBI should serve through administration after administration.

It should have continuity.

It shouldn't be subject to a political change.

That's why, for example, when Hoover came in after my election, he submitted his resignation.

I reappointed him.

Of course, I would have because of my personal respect and affection for him.

But I didn't consider that there was any choice, because I just felt that under the circumstances, it shouldn't be treated as one of those political problems like the others.

No, I realize that, but I think we have to distinguish this position from the others.

Mr. President, I'm worried it has to be casual here.

Chairman Seller is planning to introduce legislation to establish a good enough commission to investigate the FBI this week.

Was that an option?

Was that a plan before you directed that?

No.

We were waiting for an opportune moment to make this decision.

Well, it's been investigated before.

We'll see what happens.

It's a little late.

I must say that I got my clothes as clean as I could.

What I'm saying is that I was in Texas the other day.

I went to a lot of places in Florida.

It's great.

I know it's a hard time for you.

I mean, you pick up his mind, you look at the television, and you say, my God, this is what he did.

And when he comes to say, you end up with a picture of a shark tail swiping around with the antelopes.

My view is that we're doing the right thing.

It's impressive.

And there's stories from...

I greatly appreciate it, as, of course, it's the support of some of those sterling fellows in the Democratic side, like Sam Smithers, who stood up strongly against George May on any event.

So as long as we've got your support, I believe we're okay.

Mr. President, you may have one more problem.

You have a bill coming out of our committee which will encompass about 3.9 billion dollars in child development camps, daycare camps.

Oh, that's nice.

But you know, you should know, it's coming out probably today, maybe tomorrow.

I've tried to do some things with it, but I've been beaten with it.

Two votes or three votes on my side.

You remember I put up.

I said we'll have to carry it before.

I hope that the House will sit down and do nothing.

May I ask, is that tied to the OEO authorization?

No, it's the second bill.

It's the second bill.

Well, Peter, we do appreciate it.

I know you have those.

You have such a tough debate.

I just wowed on that.

Anyway, I'm sorry.

Those fights are appreciated.

All I can say here is I think we should be greater players than the people that fell there against us.

Just get out of here like that.

Don't pay it up too much.

Nixon, Griffin & Smith on Vietnam War and Economic policy

AI Summary

Audio

NARA Description

Nixon Library Finding Aid

Transcript (AI-generated)

Also recorded on May 3, 1972

Cite this conversation

Nixon, Griffin & Smith on Vietnam War and Economic policy

AI Summary

Audio

NARA Description

Nixon Library Finding Aid

Transcript (AI-generated)

Also recorded on May 3, 1972

Related conversations

Cite this conversation