Nixon White House Tapes › Tape 685 › Conversation 685-012

Nixon & Safire on Busing and Desegregation

Tuesday, March 14, 1972 · 2:55 PM–3:15 PM ET · Oval Office

ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President); Safire, William L.Conversation685-012 on Tape 685 (tape position 05:02:59–05:23:08)StartTuesday, March 14, 1972 at 2:55 PMEndTuesday, March 14, 1972 at 3:15 PMRecording deviceOval OfficeSourceNixon Library record for 685-012 ↗

President Nixon met with William Safire to provide strategic guidance on an upcoming speech regarding school busing and desegregation. Nixon emphasized the need for a simple, compelling narrative that positions his administration as decisive in curbing mandatory busing while maintaining a commitment to equal education. He directed Safire to cut technical legal jargon and focus on vivid, relatable examples of the hardship busing imposes on families to secure broader public support, particularly ahead of the Florida primary. The discussion prioritized immediate legislative action over long-term constitutional amendments to address public frustration with current court-ordered desegregation policies.

Download MP3 (part 1) · 167.9 MB ·Download MP3 (part 2) · 167.8 MB ·Download MP3 (part 3) · 161.3 MB ·Download MP3 (part 4) · 40.1 MB

This conversation has not yet been cut into its own clip, so the player above contains the full tape segment shared with neighbouring conversations. It begins about 05:02:59 into the tape and ends around 05:23:08.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Names and numbers are often wrong; speakers are not identified. Do not cite it as authoritative — verify against the audio and the finding aid.

Download transcript (.txt) · JSON data

· Timestamps are positions within the full tape recording.
5:06:27Drink your saffron, please.
5:07:03go.
5:07:05Bill, I wanted to give you a little guidance in regard to this thing you're working on now.
5:07:15As you know, we want 10 minutes, so we're talking about 1,500 words in 10-12 minutes.
5:07:22So with regard to TIL, the message, of course, will be given out the following day, and it naturally will be balanced, and if anything will be good toward the reasonable and so forth approach.
5:07:39The TILs on this one,
5:07:41Because there should be any guilt at all.
5:07:44There should be more toward those, toward the majority, basically.
5:07:50In other words, you don't have to put in all the qualifying things about how this is my job, trying to demonstrate that this is not great, and so forth and so forth.
5:08:05A little bit going on that, but just so that we will cover it.
5:08:09But the main point is that this must be one that in effect says, we've got this problem, bust in, and we're going to do something about it.
5:08:15And this is what we're going to do.
5:08:17And this is why I'm against it, and so forth.
5:08:19Now we're going to put in, of course, we're going to turn the clock back on education and so forth and so on, education and so forth.
5:08:34But as far as those concerns in that direction.
5:08:39As far as what is said in it, I, as much as possible, pick up, I mean, we just pick up on the rhetoric that we'll have in the message, because there's a lot of good rhetoric in there already.
5:08:53In other words, those lines are fine.
5:08:55I don't mind adding some.
5:08:57But in terms of what could be added, what should be added would be along these lines.
5:09:06to make it understandable for the television audience.
5:09:11I think if you're sitting out loud, you can put your mic to it.
5:09:21I've had a chance to speak to businessmen about it.
5:09:25But I would say, getting something in the building that doesn't, for example, we could say,
5:09:32under a, I don't have one, an eight-year-old child is picked up by a, there's been violence in the school, which she can walk to or she can march to.
5:09:52And where we go to the corridor or the bus,
5:09:55She has to get up a half hour, an hour early in the morning, and then ride with us for an hour, both ways, or something like that, to a faraway, in other words, another area, etc.
5:10:13You know, take that, this first, this is done in the name of basically attending segregation.
5:10:29And of course, if you carry it out wrong,
5:10:34It certainly is detrimental to education.
5:10:38And this has got to stop.
5:10:57I'm against this.
5:10:58This has got to stop.
5:11:00And, you know, using it, putting in a vivid example, one of the most horrible examples that we hear so much about, we'll say, for example, that this is what's happening now.
5:11:10This will drive it.
5:11:11I don't want to discuss this with anybody.
5:11:14Maybe it goes to Elliot.
5:11:16and we can land the rest above the wall because the point is, it's what I'm concerned about, it's what the country's concerned about, and also, they're right.
5:11:24Now, it's true that there are many examples where that isn't the case, but it is that we're trying to get about, and that is stirring up the country.
5:11:33Now, it's also true that a lot of questions parents are disturbed about.
5:11:40sending their kids to black neighborhoods, black teachers, kids with such late minds, that's true.
5:11:48I got it, too.
5:11:50You can tell this child is way over black from being here.
5:11:55I don't care if that child's white or black, it's a child who has to go past the neighborhood school.
5:12:00In other words, that is where we should go.
5:12:03But the fine on its way is in the neighborhood school where all of her friends go.
5:12:09Because, I'm sure you've heard it, because of the court order, you see, she has to go out and get out an hour or two, right at school once for an hour, clear across town, to another school, another neighborhood, another neighborhood.
5:12:24And then, in order to assert it from them, this is wrong.
5:12:27This is going to be stopped.
5:12:29We're not going to add to their respect.
5:12:30It's got to be a better way, or something like that.
5:12:34You see what I mean?
5:12:35It is on that.
5:12:36We must make that a positive example.
5:12:38We'll make this.
5:12:39We'll talk.
5:12:40All the other reference is, of course, important.
5:12:43But the message the following day, and all of those others on the editorial here, have to be received upon and largely by the legislation and the rest.
5:12:54So what I'm going to be saying is make this as simple as possible.
5:13:01Don't go into any detail in pointing out the exceptions and the fine points and the rest about what the moratorium does and does not cover.
5:13:14I mean, let that come the next day.
5:13:18It's just enough that it's honest.
5:13:20But so the country, the 80% of the people, including over 50% of the black, that are a bunch of their kids, they will say, oh, my God, he is saying what we believe.
5:13:33See, not clear enough of the record.
5:13:37And this has to be him to say that they don't know the idea of it.
5:13:46This is not a black and white issue.
5:13:48We don't want to turn the clock back on segregation, on desegregation.
5:13:54Let's all move forward together, et cetera, et cetera.
5:13:59I want to lie in so that, because I think it's necessary to enlighten the country a bit here too and not just make a waltz kind of speech.
5:14:09But what I'm concerned about is here,
5:14:12The Sympathetic answer, as you know, is a constitutional one, stopping, busting.
5:14:17Now, we're rejecting that, and we're even rejecting the Sympathetic Mortarium.
5:14:25We're back on as far as some of the more liberal people want.
5:14:31It's just made us a soft meat, I think, just leaving them harassed in courts.
5:14:36One of them that I think is certainly worth looking into is to get the hell out of the courts.
5:14:42I'm afraid if I had to, in regard to, well it isn't in there yet, but if you can think of a better one, I believe, that the court decisions in the interim are contradictory.
5:14:52Here's AI.
5:14:53It's harassed, amazed, it's a jumble, it's about what have you.
5:14:59I mean, and not because, of course, you can't do that.
5:15:02No, it's not your Congress's stuff, isn't it?
5:15:05and fill this vacuum and so forth and so on by pointing out some important decisions because it gets the money lost far back with what, with regard to what's already happened, you see.
5:15:17Well, I don't know what this is talking about, but it needs to give you a little bit of a feel of that.
5:15:23I mean, 20,000 workers is what I want to get out of 1,500.
5:15:31Yes, sir?
5:15:33Well, I think so, and I do feel different.
5:15:36I feel that I'm going to be speaking to the public because I think we've got to grab right into it.
5:15:43I'm not sure what way the way it starts in there isn't too bad, as you would say.
5:15:46But I ought to talk about an issue that is, you know, after all this will be two days out of the Florida primary, that an issue that is of concern to everybody.
5:16:01uh, all Americans, or something like that.
5:16:03You know what I mean?
5:16:05It's a, it's an issue that affects every American.
5:16:07The issue of busing divides some Americans.
5:16:10The issue of equality of mind isn't bad.
5:16:12It's education.
5:16:13A little of that in the monarchy is alright.
5:16:15But, that, and then I would say, my position on busing, well, I'm a cancer.
5:16:22I'm a cancer person.
5:16:22I've said it many, many times.
5:16:25The, uh, my, my position also with regard to segregation is,
5:16:30I, I, I oppose, as do the great majority, and the great majority of Americans, and on segregation, that I, I, I, I oppose such, uh, uh, uh, the, the legal, etc., the dual school system, or, well, I don't like that, but I, I oppose segregation.
5:16:50Of course, we've got to get a word there from people who understand what we're talking about.
5:16:58The question is how can we deal with segregation, desegregation, in a way that does not result in inferior education?
5:17:07Because the purpose of Brown, of course, was not primarily desegregation.
5:17:17The purpose of Brown was better education.
5:17:20I mean, that was what they thought.
5:17:22That case was not.
5:17:23We can't say that.
5:17:25quite in those words, but that's what Brown, Brown was about, was highly suggestive about education, I was there, and it was because segregated education was found to be as a result of Brown-Green inferior education that they said segregated education is unconstitutional, see?
5:17:43Now, so I said, now, read it.
5:17:48And they suggested, so what do you want to do?
5:17:51And maybe tie up what is the constitutional amendment, rather than the end.
5:17:58It's almost just constitutional.
5:18:00And then blasted out, I said, the constitutional amendment is the way to go.
5:18:04But the main trouble is that there's a doubt that if you get it together, it will be better than if you didn't.
5:18:11the majority amount, it would have to pass, of course, it would be a matter of years, and what is needed, it would take too long, and this is, of course, not the likelihood of, it is, what is needed is action now, and therefore, and what I have as a program to deal with now, and the way to get action now is by legislation as a program.
5:18:39Well, yeah, more than that, we had in there, if you read the message, we had actually, we're asking for other reasons, too, but basically, to be the same, that currently apart from some of the great questions that arise, whether constitutional amendments would work and so forth,
5:18:56For those that are interested in doing something, it does not speak to the problem now.
5:19:00We've got it now.
5:19:01It takes two years.
5:19:03And one year of a child's life is worth saving on one year of a period of education because the cost is too high to pay or something like that.
5:19:16And then you come to this last question for one, the moratorium.
5:19:20We're going to stop all of us at this time.
5:19:26We have a chance at two.
5:19:28We're for equality of opportunity, education, action, and work.
5:19:30And then a couple of third.
5:19:33to improve education where our kids live, and so forth and so on.
5:19:39Three, to be sure we get a little bit stronger in this one, I instructed the agencies of the government, in case I had an agency plan for education, all agencies of the government, and every government,
5:19:50to carry out the spirit of this message and their actions.
5:19:56You see, the radio devil is here.
5:19:58Bill reminds the people are the Justice Department lawyers and the HEW have been here for years.
5:20:03And I ought to be the one to say that.
5:20:06And I've also instructed the Justice Department to intervene in cases where this is not being carried out.
5:20:14And then it comes in with some more on something very, you know,
5:20:21I would not put in, I don't think you need to put in, that long defense, the fact that I really for Negro rights, I mean, that's just, I mean, my commitment, which is my language, is not our record, our record matters.
5:20:37That can be any other message.
5:20:38You can say it in a sentence, but you don't need to put all that.
5:20:43I'm just telling you these are things you can drop out at great length.
5:20:47You can drop out all that, bring them a roll about how the ones that worked in California, in any direction, I'll drop that out.
5:20:55Just say it in a sentence.
5:20:58But I'm mainly interested in getting across the fact that this is an issue for the Boston people.
5:21:06So I'm concerned about just the – there is no way, let me say, that we can get the support of the people that are –
5:21:16that are pro-us, they're going to get this, they're going to get anything.
5:21:20But what I am concerned about is that we will not get the support of those, I don't mean to get a waltz, but we will not get the support of the decent people like the Baylors and the Rocks and the rest, and the Ricketts who have constitutional amendments.
5:21:35We've got to get their support.
5:21:37And unless we speak to that issue,
5:21:40Very actually, you won't get that story.
5:21:41It's that life that we have to do primarily through this message, you see.
5:21:47and also through this message we want to put the president strong on the side the question is how to build it how to build the right way i don't have a reason i don't have the luxury of identifying about it i'm being simplistic about it it's very complicated we want to do the right thing we want to do this we want to have uh we want to deal with this problem without
5:22:12without stopping, you know, turning, without violating the constitutional rights of the people.
5:22:16You know.
5:22:24I have, but I have, I have something that is a blank thousand words to the Congress.
5:22:31I urge all of us to read it carefully.
5:22:35I've been working on it.
5:22:37I've been working on it for weeks.
5:22:42I'd like to thank the people from all over the country who have varied reasons to discuss and represent my best friend,
5:22:51a lesson in my life as to the, as to the most decent solution to a terribly difficult problem.
5:22:56It is the most difficult domestic problem that I have encountered since the present and perhaps the most difficult one that has confronted this nation in a hundred years.

On March 14, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon and William L. Safire met in the Oval Office of the White House from 2:55 pm to 3:15 pm. The Oval Office taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 685-012 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 685-12

Date: March 14, 1972
Time: 2:55 pm - 3:15 pm
Location: Oval Office

The President talked with William L. Safire.

[See Conversation No. 21-66]
  • 021-066 2:55 PM · 20 min — President Richard M. Nixon and William L. Safire talked on the telephone from 2:55 pm to 3:15 pm.
  • 021-067 3:15 PM · 7 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 3:15 pm and 4:18 pm.
  • 685-013 3:16 PM · 8 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Ronald L. Ziegler met in the Oval Office of the White House from 3:16 pm to 3:24 pm.
  • 685-014 3:24 PM · 55 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Stephen B. Bull met in the Oval Office of the White House from 3:24 pm to 3:25 pm.
  • 685-015 3:25 PM · 6 min — President Richard M. Nixon, Debbie Wright, George H. Mahon, Raymond L. Schafer, Macon T. Edwards, James T. Hazelwood, John E. Nidecker, and White House photographer met in the Oval Office of the White House from 3:25 pm to 3:31 pm.
  • 685-016 3:31 PM · 2 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Stephen B. Bull met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 3:31 pm and 3:37 pm.
  • 685-017 3:31 PM · 2 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Stephen B. Bull met in the Oval Office of the White House at an unknown time between 3:31 pm and 3:37 pm.
  • 685-018 3:37 PM · 14 min — President Richard M. Nixon, Stephen B. Bull, Tricia Nixon Cox, Luci Johnson Nugent, Patrick L. Nugent, and White House photographer met in the Oval Office of the White House from 3:37 pm to 3:49 pm.

Conversation 685-012, March 14, 1972. White House Tapes, Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, National Archives. Audio and AI transcript via Easy Nixon, https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/685-012 (accessed October 3, 2026).