Nixon, Flanigan & Raimondi on Catholic Church and Latin America

Transcript (AI-generated)

This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Names and numbers are often wrong; speakers are not identified. Do not cite it as authoritative — verify against the audio and the finding aid.

Download transcript (.txt) · JSON data

Click a timestamp to play from that point; the page address then links to that moment (e.g. #t=125).

Oh!

Thank you very much.

All right.

Thank you very much

It was such a pleasant and satisfactory experience for me.

First of all, to experience the understanding of the government and the efforts and the cooperation, it's something which, to my confidence,

Well, if you are ready to take something, all right.

Or you prefer tea, tea or coffee?

Tea.

We'll both have tea.

It's something which is ingrained in the American people, the sense of modern spiritual values, which they always bring, they may have now.

Christ, let's say, sometimes, like periods of youth, but I was telling Mr. Flanagan that youth nowadays is much better.

We find it in our colleges, in our seminaries, much more serious and mature than the time of youth.

that they are more dedicated, more aware and more serious, you know, that they don't see it light-heartedly, in the sense of that they really want to be sure.

They want to dedicate their life, they want to know what.

And once they enjoy it, they do it knowing that they are going to commit it.

So there is encouragement.

I am much more hopeful than when I came here.

What is the future remnants of the church's development?

We discussed that on occasion.

How do you see the future?

Yes, sir.

In a more positive, more constructive sense, I try to be in touch with the people going around visiting the diocese divisions.

Because to give them confidence that the institution is still there and is still meaning something, and their response is excellent, very faithful.

I think that there have been some disorientations, darkenings.

in the doctrinal level we had experienced, it was some sort of, let's say, philosophical shock or shock in the sense of conflict of mentality.

From the traditional to the very modern and almost

The mentality present is something which is inconceivable.

Life and thought are in constant motion without endings.

They are fixed.

This elimination of the metaphysical, the distinction between being and living, living and, you know, yes,

Everything is instant, it's living, it's moving, it's developing.

There is no more expression.

And then I had to come into it with those fixed notions and ideas and principles, which were a term of reference, of course.

Now they find themselves their own goods.

Their own goodness.

It's something living.

It's nature, you know.

I think this is leveling down to a more reasonable and more realistic way.

Well, I was going to suggest that you were wrong.

I'm glad after all these years we finally have the war over.

And now we need this to, to vote our enemies to these great problems we have in the world, which he's greatly concerned about.

I would raise only one caution that worries me.

Latin America and some other areas, for the church to be an advocate of social change, I think, is very constructive, because for too long, as he recognizes, as you obviously do, the church was seen as simply a bastard for reaction.

that those forces must be that the church and particularly the abled people in it must not be used by those elements that are so radical that they eventually would destroy the freedoms that we're so interested in that's what worries me and I understand that I don't take the it's kind of the shall we say

I mean, I have great admiration for Colonel McIntyre, who seems to be very reactionary, but he's really not.

He just gives us all.

And Spelman, I do well.

Koch is more in the center.

Kroll, perhaps, to the right.

Koch.

And that's good to have diversity.

But it's taking those four, those four, all alone.

I think all four, each in very degrees,

would see this problem of the bust of basically having the change occur, but not allow that change to be taken over by forces that destroy the churches that have lived so long.

I mean, I am a great admirer of the way

that has lived so long and has kept civilization together even in the dark ages has fallen over us as a force of stability.

And now, some of the radicals come in and use it for destructive purposes.

I'm not trying to suggest, and with recent presumptions, suggest what the world should do about these things.

And after all, they thought about it all.

But as I look at the world from my layman's point of view, it's potentially a very, very dangerous situation in some areas because these

Well, I appreciate very much your understanding.

We've talked before about this.

But I may, if you allow.

Sure.

If these churchmen, let's say, in the United States had been a real moderating influence, even in Latin America, things could have gone much more easily out of hand.

If they did not find that stability or influence in the hierarchy, you know,

And I know also because they came here, many, to find encouragement and help for their own purpose.

And they did not find it.

They did not find it, no.

So that's been a real motivating influence in the hierarchy of the United States in the southern hemisphere.

The hierarchy, yes, yes.

And I think that it will continue.

And I think that the U.S. President and the government can help you.

I know that you personally feel that self-confidence and trust.

But for general purposes, we have in the country, in Turkey, in Afghanistan,

look very much to the hierarchy, the attitude, and the disposition of the hierarchy of the United States.

Therefore, as an example, as a model almost for all the others, if we had this disorientation in this country, that would have been tragic for the country.

We would hope to maintain our very close contact with the bank.

And working over these next four years, which is as long as I will be here, I hope you know this will be your long end of that.

But we want to, it seems as a temporal, the spiritual forces must work together.

We have separation of church and state, but I know the enormous influence the Catholic Church has on the world.

It's an influence for good.

Our influence, we also want to be for good.

And by exchange of information, I think we contribute to this world in a great deal.

Should I say how much is appreciated your personal interest in the Catholic schools and the Catholic system?

We're going to put that in, incidentally, and it'll be in our tax bill in about three weeks.

We've got the leaders all lined up for it.

Yes, I got Mills, you know, Congress and Mills and Senator Long, and they both agreed to support it.

There'll be a little fight because some of the, you know, the people, but we have it in our budget, too.

Thank you.

I know that the Holy Father will appreciate very much because I have spoken to him and he is so pleased.

Well, it's good too that a Protestant can do it.

I can't have that relationship, but a Protestant can.

And so I made the promise and I'll keep the promise.

Keep the school alive.

I will tell you.

It was a great investment to assure a great

Well, I wish we could have seen each other more often, but...

Take your complex with you.

This is the seal off.

Because of your.

Thank you.

Nixon, Flanigan & Raimondi on Catholic Church and Latin America

AI Summary

Audio

NARA Description

Nixon Library Finding Aid

Transcript (AI-generated)

Also recorded on February 27, 1973

Cite this conversation

Nixon, Flanigan & Raimondi on Catholic Church and Latin America

AI Summary

Audio

NARA Description

Nixon Library Finding Aid

Transcript (AI-generated)

Also recorded on February 27, 1973

Related conversations

Cite this conversation