Conversation 038-159

TapeTape 38StartWednesday, April 25, 1973 at 8:20 PMEndWednesday, April 25, 1973 at 8:23 PMParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President);  Kleindienst, Richard G.Recording deviceWhite House Telephone

On April 25, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon and Richard G. Kleindienst talked on the telephone from 8:20 pm to 8:23 pm. The White House Telephone taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 038-159 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 38-159

Date: April 25, 1973
Time: 8:20 pm - 8:23 pm
Location: White House Telephone

The President talked with Richard G. Kleindienst.

[See also Conversation No. 430-39]

     Watergate
          -Kleindienst’s call to prosecutor David R. Nissen in Daniel Ellsberg case
                -Strategy for handling Judge William R. Byrne, Jr.
                      -National security
                      -Post-trial hearing
                -National security investigation
                                               -88-

                   NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

                                      (rev. January-2011)

                                                            Conversation No. 38-159 (cont’d)

           -Impeachment
                -Spiro T. Agnew

This transcript was generated automatically by AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Do not cite this transcript as authoritative. Consult the Finding Aid above for verified information.

Hello?
Yes, sir.
Nick.
Yes, sir.
Did you get your call to go to Nason?
Yes, I did.
What did you point out to him?
Well, I pointed out to them, you know, the essential nature of it.
What their strategy is right now is to try to persuade the judge that we ought to have this as a trial hearing.
No one can tell the case is over until we have a hearing on this.
making the basic representation that no evidence came into our possession.
Let me say one other thing.
I don't know how you can get this to the judge, but I think it's very important for him to know that this is a national security investigation of the highest importance it really is.
You know that, and I know it.
And that's what we would intend to do.
But our primary objective is to
You'll downplay it.
You'll file over, have a post-trial hearing.
A post-trial for the purpose of what?
Well, to determine whether there was any tainted evidence.
Well, that's the time to do it.
Or do you agree?
I don't know.
Well, we need the disclosure of the judge now.
What we want to do is to say, judge, here it is.
No information came to the department under the law.
We can't make that determination.
We mean this to your attention.
We would like the trial to go ahead and continue.
If there's a leak of acquittal, that ends it.
If there's a writing guilty, then we'll have a free trial hearing to determine whether there was any taking evidence.
Now, on that point, though, and the acquittal and the arrest doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference, but the main point, Dick, is I just want Neeson to know that this is
Very important national security investigation, which it was.
He has been informed of that.
You get the point, do you?
Good deal.
How it's played for this first go-around of the judge, I think we have to just use our tactics here.
You mean Neeson will tell the judge, right?
Yes, he will.
You've got it across very strong to him that this is terribly important.
Yes, I do.
Okay.
Sleep well, boy.
Same to you.
All right.
See you there, Mr. President.
What the hell?
You know, people say they're peach depression.
Well, then they get agnew.
What the hell?
Is that all right?
There's not going to be anything like that, old boy.
All right, boy.
All right.
Good night, sir.