Nixon White House TapesTape 332 › Conversation 332-021

Nixon, Colson & Weinberger on Vietnam War and Democratic Caucus

Thursday, April 20, 1972 · 3:10 PM–4:10 PM ET · Old Executive Office Building

ParticipantsNixon, Richard M. (President);  Colson, Charles W.;  White House operator;  Weinberger, Caspar W. ("Cap");  [Unknown person(s)];  Rogers, William P.Conversation332-021 onTape 332 (tape position 00:32:59–01:34:16)StartThursday, April 20, 1972 at 3:10 PMEndThursday, April 20, 1972 at 4:10 PMRecording deviceOld Executive Office BuildingSourceNixon Library record for 332-021 ↗

President Nixon met with Charles Colson, William P. Rogers, and Caspar Weinberger to discuss strategies for managing the Vietnam War, congressional opposition, and the ITT investigation. A key focus was rallying public and congressional support for the President's military response to the North Vietnamese invasion by framing it as a necessary defense of U.S. troops and national integrity. The group also addressed the need to cut federal subsidies for higher education institutions as a budget austerity measure and considered tactics to discredit Democratic opponents who were viewed as defeatist. Additionally, the President received updates on economic figures and discussed the administration's defensive stance regarding ongoing congressional hearings.

Download MP3 (part 1) · 111.9 MB ·Download MP3 (part 2) · 111.7 MB ·Download MP3 (part 3) · 111.8 MB

This conversation has not yet been cut into its own clip, so the player above contains the full tape segment shared with neighbouring conversations. It begins about 00:32:59 into the tape and ends around 01:34:16.

This transcript was generated automatically by AI (WhisperX) and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Names and numbers are often wrong; speakers are not identified. Do not cite it as authoritative — verify against the audio and the finding aid.

Download transcript (.txt) ·JSON data · Timestamps are positions within the full tape recording.

33:08The Democratic caucus I see out there fund the day.
33:12Yeah, we got outmaneuvered is what happened.
33:16A lot of the Stratton Amendment would be attached to it.
33:19The original ploy, which we were successful with yesterday, was to get the Stratton Amendment sent as a substitute for a meal, which would have meant they had to go against it to get to a meal, and then give us.
33:34I picked right on the elbow.
33:38Well, if it isn't, I mean, in a way, it could be added to them, you know, and I'll just go, well, as far as the vote is concerned, but I don't worry about it.
33:49Well, the only part of it that doesn't trouble me at all, because the speaker going over now, I think, is going to give us a very kind of funny house in 30 minutes.
34:05But I'm just convinced they're on the wrong side of it, Mr. President.
34:11I think he's not going to find that out, especially when they get home.
34:16Well, the Speaker's doing this because of the election, and he's being fortunate.
34:23He's a weak man, basically.
34:28That's interesting that he's still got 66%
34:34I mean, it was a very low boat.
34:35I mean, what I mean, there were about 70 absentees around, 130 to 66.
34:38That would be the 70th, the 60th.
34:41Yeah.
34:41At least.
34:41But anyway, what I meant is that they didn't try to interpret whether it was not any different from the boats they had before.
34:58Yeah, in terms of the percentage.
34:58They actually only gained 10 votes on the dub side and lost 10 on the key issue this morning.
35:03Of course, in the subsequent votes, they picked up ground.
35:09The cadence was added on the final vote, which is understandable.
35:15But they really only got their total by 10 votes in a straight-up comparison with what they really won.
35:23So it isn't true.
35:24And in the election year, would you consider it?
35:27The pressure is on them to .
35:31But I think they're going to .
35:34Yesterday, the first time since November of 1969, Vietnam, the male in Vietnam is running in favor of the organization.
35:47And strongly so.
35:49That's because of the .
35:50That's right.
35:52Stir it up, but they're getting a surge in the oil running heavily in favor of what you're doing.
36:02That's the right to stir it up, some of that, and other people.
36:07So it's not bad.
36:08Stir it up, but it won't right unless they feel it.
36:11Go over here in his groups that are likely to stir it.
36:15Well, on this vote, I don't like to do it in terms of giving the enemy anything.
36:20That's what they're really doing, really, is they've come to the enemy.
36:24At this point, I mean, at this point, we're going to stop them.
36:32But, you know, you can't stop them.
36:40And then what is done to stop the invasion?
36:42What are they going to do to stop it with the resolution?
36:44Ron handled that very well.
36:45And I'm talking to him, and I know what I did.
36:50I tried to step it up.
36:52Because this is one where I think it pays us to get through this.
36:57But I do have a presence to help.
36:58Oh, yeah.
36:59That's right.
36:59I'm trying to get Schultz to resign.
37:01It's a little bit of leadership that I'm thinking of doing.
37:06And I want to take your heart, and I know that we're out.
37:10Yeah, you're the same as Nick.
37:11Nick really was proud of his mind story.
37:18I don't think much of it he said.
37:19Well, but my point is that we got another employee there.
37:26kill for a show, but the point is that's where we're going to get involved in a minor way.
37:36There's subsidies of their salary.
37:38If it's for the laser beam or something at MIT, it has to go forward.
37:41If everyone wants to do it, but we subsidize too goddamn many of these folks around the country.
37:49We subsidize them through the ROTC, and the ROTC
37:53Mr. Wagner, please.
37:54Good economic news tomorrow, Mr. President.
38:02We've asked BLS to run again because we think it's a mistake, but they come out with zero.
38:10There's no difference.
38:17Because the food thing was probably won.
38:20The food price was one tenth, or two tenths of a tenth.
38:25I mean, the reason we can't, Marina Whitman, I just don't do, she doesn't think it can be run.
38:32Well, it won't be.
38:33What are they going to do, run it again?
38:34No, they're going to check it again.
38:37Hello?
38:39Yeah, on that thing I'm going to do, you know we're going to do it now, two months from now.
38:44But I hope you realize how strongly I feel about that.
38:49And I hope you agree with it now.
38:50The point that I want to make out here is that I think your figure for MIT has got to be low.
38:55Let me explain.
38:58We're putting over $500 million a year into that then National Science Foundation.
39:03You know, isn't that true?
39:08Yeah, yeah.
39:09But that's all.
39:10All of that money goes to basic research.
39:13In other words, none of that's for laser beams or writing.
39:18Well, what I want to do is to take that and cut that to $100 million.
39:24I know it isn't, but I understand MIT gets a hell of a chunk of that.
39:32Why can't we cut that?
39:35Well, but all we got, he said there was only 31 million that could be cut.
39:40And my point is that if they get 40 million from the National Science Foundation, we'll just cut it out.
39:47You see my point?
39:48Because that's Paul's subsidy of teacher salaries, isn't it?
39:53Yeah.
39:54Yeah.
39:55All right.
39:55We'll just get that.
39:56We can't cut it totally off.
39:58But, you know, I'm thinking of a 50%, 60% cut, you know.
40:00After all, we've got to have an austerity budget next year.
40:04And this is an opportunity because higher education is way, way oversubsidized.
40:09They've gotten fat.
40:10And, frankly, I just think we ought to bust them hard.
40:17Yeah.
40:18Well, it's not a lot, but it's something, and it's an area.
40:21Well, education generally is an area that you've got to dig into.
40:25And so I just want you to look over, and I don't know what you do.
40:30I want to look.
40:30There's $14 billion in subsidy for education.
40:35How much of that is for higher education?
40:42I don't know.
40:43You can see what I mean.
40:44You can't knock down the University of California
40:48land for whatever the hell they go out and this and that.
40:50But what I mean is that when we're in the piddly-wing stuff, like, oh, you know, some of this transportation and environment stuff, but, you know, I want a ruthless examination of it, and we would just tighten them all up and not renew the contracts.
41:11Fair enough.
41:11Oh, no, cancellations cost us money, and also they'd say, what the hell are we cancelling for?
41:15Now, the point is, though, that the renewal of Congress makes a lot of sense because by that time we'll have our mid-year budget review.
41:22We'll have a lot of stories out that we have to cut the budget.
41:26Yeah, that's right.
41:27And we would just go right after these people and knock their brains out.
41:31Now, I've been trying to do this for years, you know, and I've been fought by the ATW and, frankly, some of our people that are close to universities and our own staff.
41:41But I'm not going to tolerate it anymore.
41:43I figured that I know we've got a couple other things.
41:46We're going to flush the course.
41:51And we don't have to.
41:53The Senate is going to do it for us.
41:56H.R.
41:561 is dead.
41:57And there is probably a very good sharing, I hope, of the other things.
42:03So in this kind of a field, let's just play our game and play it right.
42:06And you will do the most much you'll have to do.
42:10All right.
42:11Good luck.
42:15Well, anyway, on this vote, I hope that our people, it'll be hard.
42:23They've got bad thoughts.
42:26Networks, the press, the House have the biggest vote against war.
42:33That's the way they'll cover it.
42:37So what the hell?
42:38They still can't carry it, though.
42:40If we get 60 Democrats,
42:4360 Democrats.
42:44We will also find more solidity among Republicans.
42:47You see, the Republicans, you're not going to have 40 or 50 defections this time.
42:50As a matter of fact, you're not going to have 60 Democrats.
42:53You're going to have more than 60 Democrats.
42:56You'll get more than 60 because some things are going to happen.
43:00And Albert said that he only voted for it because it could never be enough.
43:05As did a number of other members who came out of that caucus.
43:13And I just predict that 30 days, 45 days down the road, they were saying no.
43:18Well, I think you ought to start right out of the way.
43:21I think you ought to find the VFW commander.
43:25Write every member of the House of Boarders.
43:26You have to say, I'm going to fight you.
43:29I mean, I personally, I was distressed, shocked at your vote.
43:33Get some people, get some lousy mail in there if you can.
43:37Can we do that?
43:38Let's stir up some tough mail about the Doves.
43:41He won't defend our fighting men and the rest.
43:43And the heat came to these guys.
43:45They're going to be very susceptible to that shot.
43:47So they're going to hear from them.
43:49They're going to hear from the FWPs.
43:51And some of this thing is playing beautifully in the works.
43:55Yeah.
43:55And, you know, that's a signal to the hard-hands and the teams to do the same thing.
44:04Same thing this weekend.
44:04These fellas will win.
44:05And he's done well, and I'm proud of him.
44:07And so that way, would you be sure that notice prepared the result?
44:11I guess that I, or whatever, you know, he, I mean, now what is his first name?
44:15Frank.
44:15Dear Frank, you know, I have dear Frank at this time on our end, and I just want you to know that I am most grateful for the statement that you made.
44:27Thank you.
44:27Now I'm going to call him to his meeting, and I hope he's found some money for it.
44:36Good, that's it.
44:39I think he was considering it.
45:08It's a little tough for me, but it's pretty open.
45:10Well, I know, but let's face it.
45:12Does the Democratic Party want to go down as the defeatist party?
45:16There's some talk that's got to be made about the Democratic Party now.
45:20Always say, thank God for John Stennis and George Mahon, but the Democratic Party now has come down solidly on the side of defeat, on the side of surrender, on the side of the enemy.
45:32I've had...
45:33I've had Noel Cook just living up on the hill with us.
45:36Yeah.
45:37He's done a very professional job.
45:40Yeah, yeah.
45:41He got to produce that camp.
45:43He said certain elements of the Democratic Party show more concern for our enemies than our allies, and more with the condemnation of the President for the enemy.
45:52Because- Right.
45:53Or for the lives of our party.
45:56Whiskey went in and
45:58I think what you've got to do is that our guys have got to have the feeling that they may be on the right side of the issue to do.
46:11You know, because they'll sit here and read the Washington Post and the networks and all the rest, no wonder, and we're going
46:27You gotta look down the road, we've got a few cards to play.
46:31You know, don't you think they're smart enough to know that?
46:33Yes, sir.
46:34They figured that we're not just sitting here in a bond joint.
46:38Yes, sir.
46:38Why the hell would they think we'd hit these people unless we had something on?
46:44Well, I think they'd also be part of the two weeks that we've had very good news coming out.
46:51The news that played well for us, I think,
46:53Yes, that's of course a lot of people.
46:55We've had a lot of hawks.
46:57We've had a lot of hawkish people.
47:00And, you know, our folks are in better shape.
47:02Tell them to fight.
47:04And I'll tell you what to do.
47:05Tell them to break it.
47:06Tell them not to be afraid of the U.S. You say, President, I mean, this is not a damn thing.
47:11But the day that these businesses have confidence and pride in you, you're afraid of the U.S.
47:21I'll tell them anything's going to happen, because we can't, you know, we're still not going to be able to do this or not.
47:33What's the latest now on ITT?
47:34Will they vote today or vote next week?
47:36Well, we didn't want to vote today, because we haven't got to vote today.
47:41Well, no, we have to vote, but by the terms of the burden, it just happens by itself, in other words.
47:49Absent any action, it takes effect.
47:51The third amendment was not in his experience to terminate on the 20th and the reports to be filed on the 27th.
47:59So if there were no action taken, they would be- Well, planning is up today.
48:03How's it going?
48:05He's been doing well, except he's refused to answer a lot of questions that were outside the scope of the agreement, first testament request.
48:15Well, hell, I didn't answer the question.
48:17Then I told him, remember I told you, Chuck, be very free about it and say, well, he's just not very smart, is he?
48:26No, but I mean, when I mean smart, smart is by exactly, he said, no, I'm not smart.
48:32It's so easy, you know, to say.
48:36Well, of course, no one else saw it.
48:37And perhaps I shouldn't answer that question because it's beyond the agreement that I'm happy to, Senator.
48:43But instead of appearing for a company, he appeared a little reserved in what happened.
48:46The Democrats demanded executive session right after lunch, which is where they are now.
48:52He testified this morning for an hour and a half.
48:58And he refused a lot of questions as a result when he came back from lunch.
49:01The Democrats said let's leave the executive session.
49:04We've been led down primarily as fed.
49:05We know we're going to get flammable overhitting and denials who are questionable.
49:11Of course, I and Kennedy overplayed that and put it, you know, they probably built it for the maximum.
49:17In executive session, we were winning in those 9-5, which is pretty good.
49:23But what the hell?
49:25Can't you get a hold of Pete and say, Christ saves Odd Banner?
49:28That'd be more important.
49:29What did he say?
49:30Does he understand it?
49:31Yes, yes.
49:32You see what I mean?
49:33It's a public relations game.
49:35I don't give a shit about executive privilege.
49:38You're public relations.
49:39Well, it's a public relations lawyer.
49:42It's a good lawyer who knows when to act and when not to act.
49:46Well, anyway, does he have anybody sitting with him?
49:49McGregor's right behind him.
49:50Well, God damn it, McGregor should tell him to answer.
49:53We'd probably do.
49:54Yeah.
49:54He'll be more than coming, I guess.
49:57Because we haven't got anything to hide.
50:00The only time he should plead executive privilege is when he has something to hide.
50:03Then he'll have to do it.
50:06Then he's got a perfect case.
50:08But if he doesn't have anything to hide, I'd give it to him.
50:10Yeah, because the more you give them, the more you do hide it.
50:14You can say, well, look, I've got a nice little patch on it.
50:18If you're outside, just go put on this one.
50:21Now, you see, the main thing is, Chuck, that Pete never advised me
50:26That's right.
50:27So for Christ's sakes, he can answer the questions.
50:30You know, he isn't, he doesn't come in like Kissinger.
50:33Kissinger would have to say, I'm sorry, that's executive privilege.
50:35That's right.
50:36But Pete doesn't do that.
50:37Pete is running around with other people.
50:40We've carried the whole executive privilege thing so far.
50:43He's lost it.
50:45We don't have a good argument on what's going to happen.
50:49Well, what's going to happen?
50:51Look it up.
50:51I think my betting is unless our votes weaken, it shouldn't be.
50:57that we have a vote since the day after the last day of the year.
50:59We got through the police and just, we went with it.
51:04For once, I must say, his strategy failed.
51:05Incidentally, how could he answer that question?
51:08How about that?
51:08He didn't purchase that.
51:11Jesus Christ.
51:16Let's see how he could get out of it in case one of those people squeamish.
51:22Or was it basically from Janine?
51:24No, it was Janine, Jeremy, and a number of people gave him money.
51:26They gave him a bag of cash.
51:28Yeah.
51:28Well, so what is his answer in case of rape?
51:32He forgot.
51:32He hasn't looked at his records.
51:37We know his records in the safe.
51:39The account is okay.
51:41He corrected himself.
51:43Of course, he's out of the payroll.
51:46He's a nice person.
51:48He probably was...
51:51That was the one question that we knew we couldn't sustain.
51:56I know.
51:56I know.
51:57Well, anyway, it was the one question that scared me.
52:01Well, in other words, what could they do about it?
52:03He said that.
52:04They have a problem with that, too.
52:05Well, because who's going to, unless somebody gets terribly mad at the idea of even offering to donate, or I've heard all that, they don't want, knowing to donate, Mr. President, I would say the odds are bad that we're coming back very soon.
52:17Because it's a pretty tough approach.
52:21I think it's often that, at this time, it won't help you.
52:24I mean, we've been hurt, wouldn't we?
52:28A little bit, I think.
52:30I don't know what's happened to that company.
52:33It's been really ruined.
52:36Well, not ruined, but it's been years.
52:43We've never been hurt.
52:45I mean, our, the impact on us, I think, has been a survey on the Hill.
52:50He was about to say he is, he comes up to this room.
52:54Occasionally, one or two of them say this.
52:55Apparently, most of them say absolutely no to that.
52:56They get no questions.
52:57Well, I can say that the last election started with presidential races.
53:00So that is the key thing that sort of makes Republicans look bad.
53:05It's a little bit of an issue here.
53:08It could be something else, anyway.
53:11I have not been concerned about it.
53:13I just figured it was part of some of these black people's elections.
53:21I don't, and our people are hitting on it.
53:23I've asked my employer a hundred times if he wanted to name one person in this administration.
53:33I've never been charged with, never approved, personally.
53:37Has that been headed to you?
53:38Oh, yes.
53:38That's come through very well.
53:40In fact, most of the editorials that have turned on our paper have used that argument.
53:45First of all, it's nothing to show in this case that you're going to cast some
53:52Any doubts on the integrity findings for the officials in the Justice Department?
53:58And this administration is completely free from any of the scandal that has been going on with this game person.
54:05Most of them have said it's an unfair rap with a few exceptions.
54:08That's the way to be expected.
54:13We're getting, I like to say, we're getting excellent editorial support.
54:18And I'm surprised that we didn't see a star these times.
54:23You know, it's an attempt to do an element piece.
54:26But around the country, it's been as much as they said most people would love to see us repeat.
54:37And it's funny, this one.
54:41What I meant is, let's face it, if South Vietnam is cold, and they will, there are going to be some rough fights going on all over the world.
54:58They're all on the enemy, and the enemy's going to make big losses and will make some gains, but they will not win.
55:10And if they don't win, they've lost the war.
55:12See, that's the thing.
55:13They put all the chips in.
55:14That's why we put the chips in.
55:15So that's the thing.
55:16Now, when they've lost the war, then they've got to negotiate.
55:19Now, whether they negotiate for the election or not, they may.
55:26In any event, we're going to have the damn thing so cool this summer.
55:33You know what I mean?
55:34I don't think that is what they negotiate for.
55:36I think if they fail to win, they don't have to be defeated.
55:39Just fail to win.
55:41And South Vietnam told, well, when we continue our withdrawal in our cases, then we, but then you see we have the POW.
55:46So that's at a well and proper time where they just offered the POWs for withdrawal.
55:50And what the hell else can you say?
55:57And you can certainly argue that the organization has been successful.
56:01The Vietnamese are fighting.
56:03Quite well, very well in most places.
56:05Quite well in other places.
56:07There are no rocks or anything like that.
56:10They don't really get along.
56:13And they're just not going to understand.
56:15And our Air Force is just pounding the shit out of them.
56:19We've tripled it up for the power report in that place.
56:22That's what's pinched it.
56:22That's what's surprising about it.
56:24That's the North Vietnamese calculation.
56:27It's probably the Soviet calculation.
56:29They probably will really want this right now.
56:33before the referendum.
56:34They wanted it some time or another.
56:36But the main point, the main miscalculation they brought out of it was Johnson took it out and said, well, let this all be in the Senate, which is what we have been counting on to do.
56:46But you see that awesome power we've drawn up that made the aircraft carriers, that everything has been all without any suggestions, whatever.
56:57I said, how was it?
56:59Of course you're going to go.
57:02And that is what he said in their backs.
57:07And he said, is he free from the staff?
57:15No, sir.
57:15I told him, I want you to put down the staff.
57:25No, I'll tell you what, Judy just gave me a message.
57:42I'm just talking to Mr. Colson.
57:44Mr. Colson will be talking to me later, but I would like for him to work it out so that we can get a staff briefing on his trip and on this little seminar tomorrow.
57:57Okay.
57:57Okay.
57:58And there'll be a couple other reasons.
58:02I'm going to suggest that Mr. Colson have a go for it.
58:04And that's it.
58:04See, you might call Bill.
58:10Go right ahead.
58:13Roger, please.
58:16Uh... You know, that little lieutenant colonel, that little fucking big man, the little bull rat, the little lieutenant colonel, and some press bastards, I feel they've become a combination.
58:38That's all right.
58:39And the press raises the question about it.
58:41I didn't mean that they're bad news, but I'm commending them.
58:53What do you think?
58:54Unbelievable.
58:54I would go there and tell an 18-year-old boy you're being...
58:58I would say, no, Bill.
59:02I had a thoughtful idea that I'm going to, I had Hague, I got his briefing last night, I'm just going to give you a little of it, but if he has a 30-minute period, you know, he doesn't have very low key weight on all fronts, and he talks about the other news morale and our own fellows and what they're doing and how they're going to do so forth.
59:26I just set it up, I thought I set it up, and they had him do a briefing of the White House.
59:33If you think well of the idea, you might want to have him over to brief your top people so that they will know, you know, that everybody's got to have a little confidence in his policy, and particularly on the immunization thing.
59:45And Al, of course, is going to do it.
59:47He knows he's going to have to do battles and so forth.
59:54He has fought over most of this territory himself, and he's enormously impressed with it.
1:00:02Well, when I say enormously, very impressed, assuming that we can continue to give him our support.
1:00:07So I just want to tell you that I pass it to Hague to be available in case you want it.
1:00:11Don't lose it unless you want it.
1:00:13Yeah.
1:00:17Yes, he did.
1:00:18Oh, no, no, no.
1:00:19Come on, come on.
1:00:20He's in the barbershop now.
1:00:22Yeah, but he'd do it in the morning, and it wasn't any time he was safe at all.
1:00:30Fine.
1:00:30I know you had a State Department moment.
1:00:33Right.
1:00:33That was the one.
1:00:36Right, I had him.
1:00:37Yeah.
1:00:40Yeah.
1:00:42Well, the thing is, it then has the cooperation and all that.
1:00:51And I would just say that if you and I had heard his report, we felt that they ought to hear what's really going on out there.
1:01:00You see, he talked to the commander-in-chief, and he'll say that men, the commander-in-chief, when they purchase a disaster,
1:01:11But he says others were very good.
1:01:13He says our own people were particularly picked up by my mom.
1:01:20But anyway, I just thought, he'll be available if you want.
1:01:27Oh, yeah.
1:01:30Yeah.
1:01:31She called you after your testimony.
1:01:34Yeah.
1:01:35Oh.
1:01:36Isn't that great?
1:01:37Yeah.
1:01:38Of course, she was
1:01:45The vote in the House should not be surprising, considering the election here.
1:01:50It's about, we still have a vote to do well.
1:01:53Because the Republicans also are becoming more partisan now.
1:01:57And so if it comes up in the House, it'll get closer all the time.
1:02:17You say on the one hand we condemn the bombing, on the other hand we condemn aggression.
1:02:28How the hell are you going to stop the bombing with a resolution?
1:02:40Well, that's the point that I saw a comment this morning.
1:02:41Apparently, you already picked it up.
1:02:43You picked it up earlier.
1:02:47I was going to ask you a question.
1:02:56Christy would you like to ask?
1:03:01Yeah, well, they're on a bad wicket.
1:03:04If things should happen to work out, which they might, they're on a hell of a bad wicket.
1:03:08They'll have been on the side of the enemy.
1:03:11Now, we don't know whether it's going to work out or not, but they also have got to realize if they don't work out.
1:03:21A terrible responsibility falls on them for giving comfort to the enemy.
1:03:29Do you understand?
1:03:29And we're going to have to say it.
1:03:30I hope we don't have to, because I prefer to have it work out than if it may.
1:03:35Okay.
1:03:36All right.
1:03:36Now, I will have Colson get a hold of Haig.
1:03:38I can't get any of these at the barbecue room.
1:03:40I'll have Colson get a hold of Haig.
1:03:42Haig will call you and set the time that he'll see you in the White House.
1:03:45He'll get the White House back early in the morning and be ready for you.
1:03:50Bye.
1:03:53Oh, God, there might be a thousand of them.
1:03:56Well, I'll tell you, could I, if I could suggest, just looking at the Chicago group, Chicago sometimes, those are incredibly important.
1:04:09Uh, the, uh, anything in Ohio, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the, the, the, the President Wilson, I don't know if he'd be there in Cincinnati.
1:04:17Anything in Pennsylvania, and that's the Newhouse crowd, uh, that would be good.
1:04:23Uh, the, the, always the Los Angeles group, of course, and then California, and the Texas group, and, uh, that's about it.
1:04:30I don't know, I don't know whether he's here or not, because he is, he's not an editor, publisher.
1:04:38Yeah, but if you could stay with the, well, understand there are other, there are some that, if Mark Hayden's there today, especially him, because he was terribly hurt that we didn't come to the Creek Iron, but he's been a great friend, and, you know, he's supported us all the way before, and I'll see you a little time, and it might be useful.
1:04:59Oh, hold on, the wives are coming tonight.
1:05:03Oh, yes, oh, yes, this is why, wives are probably today.
1:05:06Oh, yes, my goodness, yes.
1:05:08Oh, if she could come, you see, what we want is to have the cabinet sort of sprinkle around.
1:05:13And it's another, we're going to use, we're going to let them do the upstairs, too.
1:05:16We're going to kind of move out of the upstairs so they can see both.
1:05:20Great.
1:05:20All right.
1:05:23Well, if she could come, you could.
1:05:26All right.
1:05:28Okay.
1:05:29He's still up.
1:05:32Oh, yes.
1:05:32I talked to him yesterday.
1:05:34He just was
1:05:37Well, Larry's done well.
1:05:40He did, you know, we played this one a little differently than our Democratic friends expected.
1:05:44We came out with some big guns.
1:05:47And they're frankly saving me for next week, which is about rioting.
1:05:51The pure pro-liberalists, the aspirants.
1:05:53See, if I had been out jarring about how it's going and so forth, next week I'll have to say how it's going.
1:06:01I'll have to give an address.
1:06:03And although I won't even do it then, it's bad news.
1:06:06I mean, no, I'm going to ride it through, ride it through tough, cold, you know, I think it's commonly thought, he said, he had said a very interesting thing this morning, he said, he thinks we're going to, you know, don't underestimate the kind of people, some way they sense a man in the presidency has courage.
1:06:26He said at this instance, he says, I think they're sensitive.
1:06:35I don't know.
1:06:37You hear it from a sophisticate, but I don't know whether that average guy out there feels it.
1:06:41Because, you see, we don't.
1:06:42Nobody says it on television.
1:06:44Nobody says it in the newspapers.
1:06:45Do they?
1:06:46They never use the word.
1:06:47You have to give, well, it's been a little bit of an exciting development for a book like this.
1:06:54You have to say, Mr. President, that somehow the American people understand that we don't give enough credit.
1:07:03I think Doug Kelly is absolutely right.
1:07:05And he and I, it's uncanny that I find, I get a political feeling that he has exactly the same political feeling.
1:07:14Right now, the American people, I think, understand it very clearly.
1:07:18Well, you see, the other line, old Chuck, the other line is that we have to understand that people are sick of the war.
1:07:26We've got the war back.
1:07:27And, you see, the argument of the evidence of no background that much would be to the attack.
1:07:32Well, the president, in a moment of rashness and anger, proceeded to bomb Haiphong and destroy the peace initiative.
1:07:41Now, if they get that, that's bad news.
1:07:44Now, actually, however, a sophisticated person would say, my God, here he goes.
1:07:50He had it all done.
1:07:51All he had to do was to flush Vietnam.
1:07:53Nobody would have cared.
1:07:54He'd gone to Moscow, hat in hand, and said, let's take any of you who can offer it.
1:07:59But you see, the point is, I think it's, if there's one thing I trust you to get across to different people, it's the liability of the office of politics to be there.
1:08:09That could be used by people.
1:08:12I don't know whether they are or not.
1:08:13Is that getting true?
1:08:14Yes, sir, I do.
1:08:15And also, I said it also to the leaders of the United States, what I'm going to do.
1:08:20We have to do it.
1:08:21We cannot have the next president, whoever he is, sit there with no viable foreign policy.
1:08:26We won't have a viable foreign policy if the United States is run out of Vietnam, particularly after we have gone the extra mile and attempted to
1:08:36offer a peaceful settlement and a withdrawal, and that we're not trying to defeat the enemy, we're not trying to humiliate them, but by and by we're saying they're not going to humiliate the US.
1:08:46So he had the phone as we had it on, and also that was picked up by him.
1:08:55It's hard for that kind of thing to get across.
1:09:05You see, you recall that at the time of the
1:09:10through the missile crisis, which, incidentally, first, should not have been a crisis.
1:09:14It should never have come out of it.
1:09:16Second, it was handled miserably, even though we all said it was good, due to the fact that we didn't get a goddamn thing out of the Russians, which we should have done.
1:09:25In other words, we were looking down their throat and then letting them get away with our Turkish faces.
1:09:30And that day, it was not enough, too.
1:09:31But nevertheless, the press went into orgasms about Kennedy's great courage and shenanigans.
1:09:40You know what I mean?
1:09:42When you've got a 10-to-1 advantage over an enemy and missiles, you can take any courage to blockade Cuba.
1:09:48The Russians had no choice but to back down.
1:09:51It couldn't have been easier.
1:09:52Now, at this point, we've got a lot of things.
1:09:56We've got the Chinese initiative.
1:09:58750 million are the biggest army in the world standing up there in North Pole, they might say.
1:10:03We've got the Russians with a summit coming up.
1:10:06They might decide, well, they're going to get some tough here.
1:10:09We may blockade Berlin.
1:10:11These are the things that we had to take into account.
1:10:14And we took them all into account because we knew there was no choice that would not otherwise lead us to a defeat.
1:10:20A defeat which would totally destroy the presidency.
1:10:22That's what drew me involved here.
1:10:25For whoever it is.
1:10:26Now, it would not totally destroy it.
1:10:28We had a very strong man as president.
1:10:29But I thought it was always a chance that I could die.
1:10:37There's certainly no one of us that will succeed me that will be as tough as I am.
1:10:41The other one, and that's not to say that it's just the way I am.
1:10:44I'm just a very tough man and willing to risk all.
1:10:48But the other point is, the other point, that if they have a threat, he's got to have all the strength in the world because those sons of bitches are weak.
1:10:58I mean, Humphrey, Ken, Peter, they came in a minute.
1:11:03And can you imagine if we had them over the United States?
1:11:05They just lost the war in Vietnam.
1:11:08what they do in the field of foreign policy.
1:11:10Well, suppose that after the U.S. war in Vietnam, you had one of those guys in the wild, and the Russians began to arm the UAR, not with irons, but with Soviet personnel on those sands.
1:11:22That changed the balance of power.
1:11:24What would happen?
1:11:26The United States would be driven out of the U.S. right that day.
1:11:37And these guys don't allow it because they'd be scared to death, petrified.
1:11:41I can't imagine any of them would have done this.
1:11:45You can't imagine any of them would have done this.
1:11:49No, I don't.
1:11:49The only man, frankly, let me say, in our administration, well, he might have, I mean, he would have had the right instincts, but he might not have chosen to fight men around him.
1:12:00That would be the problem.
1:12:02And he would have had to understand, basically, everything.
1:12:06But the only one real at all in the box you wrote is Connelly.
1:12:14And Connelly would have not been one of the questions without a damn good question.
1:12:21That's right.
1:12:21Rogers was the one.
1:12:22And needless to say, nobody else in the cabin was strong enough to do it.
1:12:31None of the people.
1:12:32Why should they be given an elsewhere standard?
1:12:34But nevertheless, the idea of
1:12:39I could win the presidency and have America lose the war.
1:12:51I'm not going to do it.
1:13:03It's too great a cost.
1:13:03So we're going to win a war, if necessary, and lose the presidency.
1:13:07Now, by winning a war, I don't mean militarily in the traditional sense.
1:13:10What I mean, we're going to abuse the energy in South Vietnam.
1:13:14In South Vietnam, not our people.
1:13:19These are very enormously potent arguments that are made by people in the U.S. You see, the China trip sprang from the image of a dignified, decent man trying to see
1:13:36It's still there among lots of people.
1:13:39This has the same outcome of the November 3rd in the Cambodia operation, you know, where, despite what everybody says, Cambodia didn't hurt us one damn bit, you know?
1:13:49Didn't hurt us.
1:13:50Do you remember Al Cap?
1:13:51Al Cap said that.
1:13:52He said also Al Cap was the only one that saw the December campaign.
1:13:59The only thing that hurt us was the aftermath.
1:14:02Yes, sir.
1:14:03200,000 building tradesmen in New York marched down those streets.
1:14:07That's the same group that gave Buckley over 50% of their support.
1:14:12That's the kind of person that you carry in New York State.
1:14:16That's why Nelson Raimondo has become a conservative.
1:14:19Everybody's kind of made him a conservative.
1:14:21According to Henry Nelson, of course, he was basically liberal because he's grown up in that environment.
1:14:27And he's advised him to do that.
1:14:32And Nelson was terribly disillusioned.
1:14:35I was the only one.
1:14:36I was the only one.
1:14:36I had no other governor, but I told him, I said, look, you're doing all right.
1:14:46And I said, it's a terrible thing.
1:14:47But anyway, what happened was, here was the press.
1:14:49You go through this branch, and everybody fought along.
1:14:52And those sons of bitches lied, distorted.
1:14:59And Reagan, of course, was at heart of the journey.
1:15:12Everybody's worried about Friday, the kids, all of the kids, bringing a little under some of the emphasis.
1:15:17I couldn't be happier.
1:15:18I'll see those kids.
1:15:19Well, I see these kids in Columbia.
1:15:21I know that there's a big drug, and we're going to, what, they're going to burn something today?
1:15:26Oh, they pissed on the wall, or one guy put glasses, and somebody, there was a protest, and a couple other kids.
1:15:33You know, another thing, we'll run something in Columbia.
1:15:34With a guy like Frank.
1:15:37I'm sure he'll do well.
1:15:42Yes, yes, yes.
1:15:43Oh!
1:16:08But the interesting thing is, I'm neither.
1:16:10I mean, I have a, I really am not, you know, I am.
1:16:12Here, I probably was good if I had more shoes than I ever had when I saw this.
1:16:20Or the blacks.
1:16:22I know what I mean.
1:29:16We're in a situation now where we just tell the boys to keep the guns blazing.
1:29:19We're not going to hit them.
1:29:20We're not going to hit them.
1:29:23We're not going to hit them.
1:29:24We're not going to hit them.
1:29:27We're not going to hit them.
1:29:33We're not going to hit them.
1:29:40We're not going to hit them.
1:29:47And tell our people not to be concerned.
1:29:49Also, on the ups and downs of the battles over there, you know, we're going to lose a town.
1:29:57We're going to gain one sometimes.
1:30:00But the main point is, I use the term, you know, that Abram just said, softly at the mean line, we bend but they will not break.
1:30:10It's a good football term anyway.
1:30:14What this is about is not winning or losing territory.
1:30:17This is winners losing the war.
1:30:19The North Vietnamese cannot win this war.
1:30:23The South Vietnamese hold it for this long.
1:30:25They've already held it two and a half weeks.
1:30:29They hold it.
1:30:31The 1st of May, they're already getting a little soggy in a couple places.
1:30:36It's going to get soggier, too.
1:30:38At the end of May, I pretty much had it in all those areas.
1:30:45I've had no trouble, Mr. President, with the Capitol or the Hill.
1:30:52I can't be seen.
1:30:54It was a very good deal.
1:30:58You've got to ask people who would be a different kind of issue.
1:31:03I think the public senses that you're handling a coup.
1:31:09They may feel it.
1:31:11I hope the way they may feel this time is that I was pursuing a path of peace I've been working for and traveled halfway around the damn world and spent all that miserable time in the UK and withdrew all these forces and these people attacked.
1:31:27I, in a sense, struck back.
1:31:29Now that's it.
1:31:30The United States is for peace, but we're not for surrender.
1:31:32Well, the other one, as we've mentioned earlier, was self-defense.
1:31:37We reacted in self-defense.
1:31:39We saw the defense in Isabel, the defense of those 70,000 Americans, because you want to remember, people say, well, let's just defend them.
1:31:46Look, if the South Vietnamese Army, they say, why help the South Vietnamese?
1:31:49All right.
1:31:50Do you want the Americans out there in those damn places, in those foxholes, or do you want the South Vietnamese there?
1:31:57Who's taking the casualties?
1:31:58Ours were 12 again this week.
1:32:00You know what the South Vietnamese casualties were killed in action?
1:32:05Six hundred.
1:32:06They're losing 600 a week.
1:32:09God damn, that's a hell of a lot of people.
1:32:10It's not like World War I, where you used to lose $100,000 a day.
1:32:21That was a different time.
1:32:23People didn't work.
1:32:24I find the self-defense to be something that I demonstrate in myself.
1:32:29It's everybody's right to defend themselves.
1:32:30I see you got a report.
1:32:31You said you had one of the members of the CPI?
1:32:35No, I don't know.
1:32:37Are they going to really put out such a figure?
1:32:40All the components show a two-tenths increase.
1:32:43But the total shows zero.
1:32:45Well, that will be a blockbuster.
1:32:48It has to be.
1:32:49You know, I read this morning, I read this morning, I read the Times, the Post, and I told all of them.
1:32:56I said, I don't know whether I was reading about the same, Jan, that Post story.
1:33:08I thought,
1:33:10And I remember what I had read in my file, what Christ is this.
1:33:15And I read Dale's story, and I realized the figure was okay.
1:33:19It wasn't that post-coverage, absolutely disgraceful, horrible, horrible.
1:33:24And what they did, they ran into the story, really, before Peterson brought it.
1:33:30Well, I'll go over and see, I'll go over.
1:33:35Sir, the CPI was supposed to be 1.5.
1:33:37Whatever it is.
1:34:01Minimum press.

On April 20, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon, Charles W. Colson, White House operator, Caspar W. ("Cap") Weinberger, unknown person(s), and William P. Rogers met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 3:10 pm to 4:10 pm. The Old Executive Office Building taping system captured this recording, which is known as Conversation 332-021 of the White House Tapes.

Conversation No. 332-21

Date: April 20, 1972
Time: 3:10 pm - 4:10 pm
Location: Old Executive Office Building

The President met with Charles W. Colson.

     Democratic caucus
         -Meeting
               -Results
               -Resolution on Vietnam War
                     -Amendments
                          -Samuel S. Stratton
                          -Thomas P. (“Tip”) O'Neill, Jr.
                          -Sam M. Gibbons
                     -Results of vote
               -Carl B. Albert
                     -Motives for actions

                -Absentees
                -Substantive votes
                     -Results
                -Election year pressures

     Vietnam
          -Change in public opinion
               -Support for the President
                    -Mail
                          -Ronald W. Reagan
                          -Bary M. Goldwater
          -Democratic caucus
               -Administration counterattack
                    -North Vietnamese invasion
                    -Lack of condemnation by Democrats
                    -Brown University
                          -George P. Shultz
                          -Colson
                          -Nicholas Ruwe

     Brown University
         -Shultz
         -Subsidies
              -Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT]
                    -Laser beam
              -Curtailment
              -Reserve Officer Training Corps [ROTC]

The President talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 3:10 and 3:15
pm.

     [Conversation No. 332-21A]

     [See Conversation No. 23-55]

[End of telephone conversation]

     Economy
         -Latest news
              -Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS] report
              -Consumer Price Index [CPI]
                    -Food prices
              -Marina von N. Whitman

                     -Views

The President talked with Caspar W. Weinberger between 3:15 and 3:19 pm.

     [Conversation No. 332-21B]

     [See Conversation No. 23-56]

[End of telephone conversation]

     Education
         -Cuts
         -Weinberger

     Vietnam
          -Democratic caucus
               -Results of vote
                     -Press coverage
                     -Vote on floor
                           -Support for the President's opposition
                                 -Democrats
                                 -Republicans
               -Albert
                     -Support for vote
                     -Veterans of Foreign Wars [VFW]
                     -Mailings to Congress
                     -Mobilization
                     -Pressure on Congress
               -Labor
                     -Frank E. Fitzsimmons's statement
          -The President's policies
               -Frank L. Rizzo
                     -Support
                           -The President's appreciation
                                 -Note
                           -Statement
               -Richard J. Daley
                     -Call from David E. Bradshaw
                     -Possible call from the President
          -Democratic party
               -Charge of defeatism
                     -John C. Stennis
                     -George H. Mahon

               -Noel Cook [?]
               -Jack F. Kemp
                     -Statement in House
               -Elford A. Cederberg
     -Republican supporters
          -Mobilization
     -News reports
          -Washington Post
     -Hawks
          -Clark MacGregor

International Telephone and Telegraph [ITT] case hearings
      -Vote in Congress
            -Byrd Amendment
                  -Possible outcome
                        -Peter M. Flanigan testimony
      -Flanigan
            -Testimony
                  -Questions
                        -Refusal to answer
                              -Prior agreement
            -Public relations sense
            -Testimony
                  -Executive session
                  -Questions
                        -Birch E. Bayh, Jr.
                        -Edward M. Kennedy
                  -Executive privilege
                  -Public relations
                  -MacGregor
                        -Executive privilege
                              -Invocation
            -Flanigan
                  -Advisory role to the President
                  -Executive privilege
                        -Compared with Henry A. Kissinger's use of
                         executive privilege
                        -Problems
      -Jack Gleason
            -Questions
                  -Handling
                        -Perjury
                  -Harold S. Geneen

                      -Edward J. Gerrity, Jr.
                      -Cash
                      -Answers
                      -Perjury
          -Geneen
               -Testimony
          -Impact on ITT Company
          -Republican counterattacks
               -Editorials
               -Defense of administration's integrity
                     -Richard G. Kleindienst
               -Editorial support

     Vietnam
          -Editorial support for the President
               -Extent
                      -Washington Star

          -South Vietnam
               -Success against North Vietnam
          -North Vietnam
               -Losses
               -Negotiations
                    -Timing of election
                    -Advantages with administration
                    -Prisoners of War [POWs]
          -North Vietnamese invasion
               -US counterattacks
                    -Intensity
               -North Vietnamese miscalculation
                    -Lyndon B. Johnson
                    -Air attacks
                          -Thomas H. Moorer
                          -Creighton W. Abrams
          -Alexander M. Haig, Jr.'s briefing
               -White House staff

The President talked with an unknown person at an unknown time between 3:19 and 3:36 pm.

     [Conversation No. 332-21C]

     Message to Haig
         -Forthcoming meeting with Colson

          -Staff briefing on trip to South Vietnam
                -Arrangements

[End of telephone conversation]

     Vietnam
          -Colson's call to William P. Rogers

The President talked with the White House operator at an unknown time between 3:19 and 3:36
pm.

     [Conversation No. 332-21D]

     [See Conversation No. 23-57]

[End of telephone conversation]

     Vietnam
          -Unknown Lieutenant Colonel's remarks
              -Press coverage
              -Haig's comments

The President talked with Rogers between 3:36 and 3:43 pm.

     [Conversation No. 332-21E]

     [See Conversation No. 23-58]

[End of telephone conversation]

     Vietnam
          -Rogers
               -Support
          -Administration's efforts
               -Melvin R. Laird
               -Appraisal
                     -Timing
                     -The President's posture
                          -Courage
                                 -Public recognition
                                 -John B. Connally's assessment
          -Public opinion
               -Hugh S. Sidey editorial

           -Kleindienst
      -The President's posture
           -Rowland Evans and Robert D. Novak appraisal
           -Trip to Moscow
           -Disregard for politics
                 -Publicity
                 -Impact on US foreign policy
                 -Sidey
                 -Press recognition
-Compared with Cuban missile crisis
      -John F. Kennedy's handling
           -Soviets
           -Press coverage
                 -Praise for courage
      -Soviets
           -Position
-North Vietnamese invasion
      -Considerations for US
           -People's Republic of China [PRC] Army
           -Soviet Summit
           -Berlin
      -Results
           -Destruction of Presidency
                 -The President's successors
                        -Democrats
                              -Weaknesses
                              -Hubert H. Humphrey and Edward M. Kennedy
-Soviets
      -Actions in Middle East
           -Democratic weaknesses
-Presidency
      -Vice-President Spiro T. Agnew
           -Degree of understanding
      -Connally
      -Command decision
           -Political risks
           -Determination
                 -Protection for South Vietnam
                        -Priority over election
      -PRC trip
           -Benefits
      -Cambodia operations
           -Benefits

                    -Al Capp
                          -Aftermath
         -Hardhat demonstration
              -Number
              -James L. Buckley
              -Nelson A. Rockefeller
                    -Conservatism
                    -Kissinger
         -Rockefeller
              -Attica Prison riot
                    -The President's call
                          -Impact on morale
                    -Press coverage
         -Reagan
              -Conservatism
         -Campus unrest
              -Columbia University
                    -Peter J. Brennan
                    -Protests
                    -Jewish students
                          -Percentage
              -Black students

    Rizzo
         -Attitudes toward Jews and blacks

    Minorities
        -Jews and blacks

*****************************************************************

BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 4
[Personal returnable]
[Duration: 12m 49s ]

END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 4

*****************************************************************

    Vietnam
         -Current campaign

                -Administration's strategy
                      -Air strikes
                            -Hanoi
                            -Haiphong
                      -Flow of battle
                      -South Vietnamese performance
                            -Abrams's views
                            -Losses
                            -North Vietnam
                                  -Ultimate failure
           -North Vietnamese invasion
           -Cabinet
           -Capitol Hill
                -Mood
                -Support for the President
           -Public opinion
                -Support for the President
                -Appreciation of the President's efforts
                      -PRC Trip
                -Defense of US Troops
                      -Dependence on South Vietnam
                -South Vietnamese casualties
                      -Rate
                -Issue of self-defense

     Economy
         -Consumer Price Index [CPI] reading
              -Latest figures
                    -Impact
              -New York Times and Washington Post reports
                    -The President's conversation with H. R. Haldeman
                    -Distortions
                    -[William B.?] Dale's story
              -Post story

     The President's meeting with Leslie T. (“Bob”) Hope

     Economy
         -Latest CPI figures

The President and Colson left at 4:10 pm.
  • 023-053 2:48 PM · 6 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 2:48 pm and 3:08 pm.
  • 332-017 2:48 PM · 5 min — President Richard M. Nixon met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building at an unknown time between 2:48 pm and 3:08 pm.
  • 023-054 3:08 PM · 10 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Charles W. Colson talked on the telephone from 3:08 pm to 3:09 pm.
  • 332-019 3:08 PM · 9 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Charles W. Colson met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building from 3:08 pm to 3:09 pm.
  • 332-020 3:09 PM · 52 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and Manolo Sanchez met in the President's office in the Old Executive Office Building at an unknown time between 3:09 pm and 3:10 pm.
  • 023-055 3:10 PM · 7 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 3:10 pm and 3:15 pm.
  • 023-056 3:15 PM · 3 min — President Richard M. Nixon and Caspar W. ("Cap") Weinberger talked on the telephone from 3:15 pm to 3:19 pm.
  • 023-057 3:19 PM · 7 sec — President Richard M. Nixon and the White House operator talked on the telephone at an unknown time between 3:19 pm and 3:36 pm.

Conversation 332-021, April 20, 1972. White House Tapes, Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, National Archives. Audio and AI transcript via Easy Nixon, https://www.easynixon.org/tapes/332-021 (accessed September 18, 2026).